Form: Definition

  • Q: “CURT; ARE YOU A [Insert Epistemic Method Here]?” No. As an epistemologist, I

    Q: “CURT; ARE YOU A [Insert Epistemic Method Here]?”

    No. As an epistemologist, I’m a falsificationist(all logic is falsificationary, and justification like induction doesn’t exist), a computationalist (only operationalism is causal), moral realist (reciprocity is fully decidable), and a testimonialist (performative truth, what can one testify to).

    Realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice, complete by fully accounted within stated limites.

    Think of it as a merger between Falsification, Computation, Intuitionism, and Performative Truth.

    AFAIK. That’s what it means to do science. Everything else isn’t science, because science evolved from european law, and the criteria for testimony.

    Hence why I place decidability then law above all other discplines in the hierarchy of disciplines.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 13:05:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656646610271588352

  • No. I’m a falsificationaist( all logic is falsificationary, so only truth candid

    No. I’m a falsificationaist( all logic is falsificationary, so only truth candidates survive), and a testimonialist (performative truth), and a computationalist (operationaism).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 12:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656642781635330049

    Reply addressees: @janevoe1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656641614826094595

  • I understand gods (all of them, including the 500 or so dead ones we know of so

    I understand gods (all of them, including the 500 or so dead ones we know of so far) as systems of measurement for organizing people by providing commensurability in thought, value, and behavior, reducing friction, especially as populations increase in anonymity, that persists a group evolutionary strategy across generations. In other words a set of anthropomorphic and therefore easily accessible by humans, headman, ruler, or natural influence without education or knowledge.
    The primary psychological purpose of gods is to limit the influencde approval, diasapproval, and judgement of others by creating a standard and by adherence to that standard suppression of neuroticism and conflict.

    Reply addressees: @ScienceMonthly


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 00:53:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656462516627677185

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656455152285655042

  • The term connect refers to a physical contact between two different referents. L

    The term connect refers to a physical contact between two different referents.
    Like the verb to-be, which most use to pretend knowledge we don’t have, or pretend mode of existence or identity by conflation or inflation, you’re using “connect” in the same sense.
    What you mean is “do our brains identify a pattern of relations from which we might inform or modify our behavior”. Things aren’t connected. We observe true or false, relationships between them.

    Things aren’t connected. We identify relationshps between them.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-10 23:41:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656444284839575552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656431504837210120

  • Embodiment includes: Proprioception: Where your limbs and head and eyes are, and

    Embodiment includes:
    Proprioception: Where your limbs and head and eyes are, and in what position relative to your torso (upper chest).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 04:39:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655432298307760128

  • Embodiment includes: Proprioception: Where your limbs and head and eyes are, and

    Embodiment includes:
    Proprioception: Where your limbs and head and eyes are, and in what position relative to your torso (upper chest).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 04:39:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655432298257342464

  • THE ORB? The orb is presented to British monarchs during their coronation. Datin

    THE ORB?
    The orb is presented to British monarchs during their coronation. Dating back to Charles II’s coronation in 1661, this piece of regalia is golden and has a cross perched on top to symbolize heavenly power over the world. It is mounted with emeralds, rubies, sapphires, diamonds, pearls and one amethyst.

    TRANSLATION
    The British invented the modern rule of law state, that completed the 2000-year project of governing by Natural Law (science of cooperation) being the application of ‘God’s Law’ with the monarchy as judge of last resort (highest court), parliament (political court), King’s Courts of the common law ( for serious matters ), shire courts (for commercial matters), and church courts (for moral matters), creating a hierarchy of courts and appeals or what is more correctly understood as a hierarchy of markets for justice by the law of man, nature, and nature’s god. 😉

    Silly (ignorant really) people who don’t understand the problems of evidence, testimony, reciprocity, tort (natural law), the problems of decidability, the fallibility of humans, in both criticism and fashion, and the need for a hierarchy of courts culminating in the monarchy as the judge of last resort, and the monarchy being above the law in the restoration of the law, nor the genius of the innovation the english people brought by their invention of the modern rule of law state, fail to grasp the value and importance of the british monarchy – or any european monarchy – and underestimate the importance of rule of law by the natural, common, and concurrent law, and underestimate the harm that comes from sovereignty of parliament (opinion) instead of sovereignty of natural law (science of cooperation), and underestimate the defense the Americans have from such follies of parliament by our constitution and sovereignty of natural law, nor the follies of the americans by use of a president instead of prime minister and monarchy.

    We always take for granted what we are ignorant of. The monarchy is our last line of defense of european civilization, and we made a drastic mistake of listening to the folly of Rousseau and the French fantasies, versus the thousands of years of our natural, common, concurrent, law as the most empirical system of government every designed by man, with the greatest possibility for continuous innovation, adaptation, evolution the prosperity that results.

    Cheers
    Much Love
    God Save the King.

    #Coronation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 17:46:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654905511240777728

  • RESPONSIBILITY I would say that this year it has become far clearer that Respons

    RESPONSIBILITY
    I would say that this year it has become far clearer that Responsibilty (Insurance, defense), is as foundational a concept in behavioral science as are Acquisition, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, and Testimony, and is the divergent factor causing all behavioral differences because of sex differences in the responsibility vs consumption vs capitalization equilibrium.

    Why is it that the left has worked to undermine the concept of responsibility along with reciprocity, meritocracy, proportionality, and hierarchy necessary to form a complex survivable polity able to continuously adapt to continuous change?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:56:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654122879276171276

  • Causality: Predicting external systems over time vs predicting internal response

    Causality: Predicting external systems over time vs predicting internal responses in time. Evolution for rather obvious reasons evolved the sexes to divide the labor of sensation, perception, disambiguation, auto-association, prediction, and valuation by TIME and POPULATION.
    Feminine empathizing in time vs masculine systematizing over time. Thus the mansplaining vs womansplaning phenomenon and the tendency of the feminine to see NAXALT/AXALT, equality, exceptions vs the masculine to see distributions, inequality, and generalizations.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:35:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652667880490557443

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652010058975178752

  • Causality: Predicting external systems over time vs predicting internal response

    Causality: Predicting external systems over time vs predicting internal responses in time. Evolution for rather obvious reasons evolved the sexes to divide the labor of sensation, perception, disambiguation, auto-association, prediction, and valuation by TIME and POPULATION.
    Feminine empathizing in time vs masculine systematizing over time. Thus the mansplaining vs womansplaning phenomenon and the tendency of the feminine to see NAXALT/AXALT, equality, exceptions vs the masculine to see distributions, inequality, and generalizations.

    Reply addressees: @IHateStapler @DegenRolf


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:35:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652667880389898242

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652010058975178752