Form: Definition

  • Fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to externali

    Fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to externality of the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-13 16:12:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764494963480690688

    Reply addressees: @ontologicalepi @SanguineEmpiric

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764493929509027840


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764493929509027840

  • DEATH There are three stages of death that we can probably agree upon. 1) that w

    DEATH

    There are three stages of death that we can probably agree upon.

    1) that which cellular cooperation ceases to sustain the brain and the individual cannot recover naturally.

    2) that which the technology of the time ceases to restore the individual to life.

    3) that which the condition of the person would doom him to suffering were we to use technology to return him to life.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-09 04:25:00 UTC

  • I used libertarian in the classical liberal sense not in the Rothbardian.Use Rot

    I used libertarian in the classical liberal sense not in the Rothbardian.Use Rothbardianism instead for clarity.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 16:35:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761239032600879104

    Reply addressees: @AltRightJoseph @kyramarat1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761238433557807104


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761238433557807104

  • Living as a servant or slave is one’s obligation? Men seek to stand as peers, wi

    Living as a servant or slave is one’s obligation? Men seek to stand as peers, with none above is. This is what ‘Nobility’means.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 11:36:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761163943729594368

    Reply addressees: @SydneyTrads

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761163185193820161


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761163185193820161

  • I don’t use aristocracy and nobility as synonyms. Noble families are members of

    I don’t use aristocracy and nobility as synonyms.

    Noble families are members of the natural aristocracy. Nobility is a designation for families who have demonstrated excellence in contribution to the commons.

    You cannot affect nobility.

    One can however join the natural aristocracy meaning meritocratic ruling class by military achievement and affectation of character.

    And at least in practice as long as you can manage to be an officer and a gentleman then you can do so as long as your genetic class permits.

    Because as a soldier in the service if aristocracy you are due equal deference and respect.

    This is one of western mans perks for service. The ability to exercise violence in the construction of private and commons in exchange for respect and status regardless of his parenthood.

    A man who pays his way through service may demand respect due aristocracy even if affectation, under pain of violence – he need not ask for it.

    I have a tepid reaction to commercial pretense of nobility unless it is matched by at least administrative service. But we should never discount the value of nobility to all of us whether martial, intellectual, or commercial. It is extremely difficult to manage good breeding and to cast off your failure over the generations.

    It is through this combination of martial, judicial, civic, and familial virtue that we keep lesser peoples at bay, domesticate them, and raise our generations to transcendence.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 11:31:00 UTC

  • DECIDABILITY: CUNNING, MORAL, SMART, GENIUS I think there is a pretty big differ

    DECIDABILITY: CUNNING, MORAL, SMART, GENIUS

    I think there is a pretty big difference between smartness and genius. I consider quite a few people smarter than I am in this dimension or that – and I think it’s related to their ability to master things like chess, chemistry, and mathematics, using axiomatic systems to permute applications of rules within the limits of the game. In other words, those people that live in a world of proofs I consider smart.

    I suppose I COULD work in that field, but axiomatic thought is a very different way of thinking from theoretic. In my world there are no rules, there is only information and order. To some degree I see all rules as errors, or contrivances, the same way I see legislation and norms.

    The theoretical mind does not work with boundaries at all, but with creating new orders in order to break through the boundaries that limit us.

    This I think, is the difference between deviant and cunning, moral and wise, axiomatic and smart, theoretical and genius. Some of us cunningly circumvent rules, some morally work within them, some us axiomatically think of new ways to apply them, and some of us theoretically think of new organization of rules. All using slightly different methods of decidability.

    Intelligence can be applied using cunning(immoral), moral(wise), axiomatic (smart), and theoretical(genius) methods. I think this is the correct framing of a problem we generally confuse ourselves through conflation.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 06:15:00 UTC

  • THEORY

    https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2016/07/27/has-the-evolution-of-consciousness-been-explained/CONSCIOUSNESS THEORY


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-01 14:01:00 UTC

  • “NOMOCRATIC MARKETISM” WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? I’m a ‘Marketist’, which is reducibl

    “NOMOCRATIC MARKETISM” WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

    I’m a ‘Marketist’, which is reducible to nomocracy(rule of law) with formally institutionalized markets for (a) production of commons, (b)production of goods and services, and (c) production of reproduction (families).

    The last may sound odd, but it means only that the family is the central object of certain policies, and as formal an institution as law.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-01 01:03:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY: A RECIPE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENT WITH REAL

    TESTIMONY: A RECIPE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF EXPERIENCE CORRESPONDENT WITH REALITY

    “Testimony: A Recipe for the Reconstruction of Experience, provided with warranty of due diligence against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, overloading, pseudoscience, and deceit.”

    “Truth: A perfectly parsimonious recipe for the construction of experience given perfect information such that error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, overloading, pseudoscience and deceit are impossible.

    For the simple reason that language consists of general terms (distributions so to speak), Man cannot know the truth even if he speaks it, but he can speak truthfully, and we can test whether his testimony reconstructs an experience we find equally correspondent to the subject.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-31 04:24:00 UTC

  • THE CORRECT ANSWER TO “WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS” *(Answers to this question show th

    THE CORRECT ANSWER TO “WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS”

    *(Answers to this question show the tragedy of a late 20th century education.)*

    **Necessary (Correct) Definitions:**

    * **Right**: a contractual obligation by another party to perform some actions, and refrain from other actions

    * **Negative Right**: a contractual obligation by another party to refrain from actions: to forgo opportunities for gains.

    * **Positive Right**: a contractual obligation by another party to perform actions: to bear costs, and to forgo opportunity for ‘defection’ (cheating).

    * **Existential Rights**: Rights exist only when (a) obtained in contractual exchange, and (b) are enforceable in matters of dispute by a third party ‘insurer’. (throughout most of history the ‘government’ is the insurer of last resort. Rights do not exist then, they must be existentially created by the construction of an insurer (usually government).

    * **Desired Right:** A right that you wish to possess if you can find (a) a party to exchange it with you and (b) an enforcer (insurer) of those rights once you negotiated them.

    **Hierarchy of Rights:**

    1. – **Normative** (norms, manners, ethics, morals),

    2. – **Contractual: **(from promise to formal document)

    3. – **Political Right **(political):

    …..1. Law proper (discovered),

    …..2. Legislation (negotiated),

    …..3. Regulation (commanded)

    4. – **Human Rights **(inter-state): Human rights were an attempt by western nations in the post-colonial and post-war era to set the terms by which governments would respect the sovereignty(esp. borders) of other governments. In other words, it was an attempt to prevent horrors of primitive and developing countries, contain the horrors of communism, constrain expansionist governments, and set the purpose of government to the improvement of the condition of its citizens.

    5. – **Natural Rights **(~scientifically necessary): Those rights necessary for the evolution of voluntary organization of production of goods and services (capitalism) in the absence of parasitism and predation by organizations whether public or private. All natural rights are negative rights, since we can only equally refrain from action, because we are unequally able to act, and unequally can control resources necessary for action.

    Human rights are necessary rights – those necessary for human freedom from predation – that any government must seek to produce for its citizens (act as a guarantor) if that government wishes to preserve it’s sovereignty from actions against it by those signatories of the contract for human rights: the insurers of last resort.

    ALL NATURAL (POSSIBLE AND NECESSARY) RIGHTS ARE EXPRESSIBLE AS **“RECIPROCATED PROPERTY RIGHTS”**

    * **All Natural Rights are expressible as property rights that we reciprocally grant one another**: rights to non imposition of costs against life, liberty, and property. (Which was the original wording of the US Constitution.) All moral codes are also expressible as property rights, for those actions unknown to affected parties. All ethical codes are expressible as property rights for those actions between parties where knowledge is asymmetrically distributed.

    * **The difference between human rights (political) and natural rights** **(scientific)** is that to mollify the communists and obtain their signatures the articles in the 20’s were added that mandated positive rights. These rights cannot be brought into existence without violating all other rights. This is why they do not and cannot exist.

    * the only rights we can grant each other are **negative**, because

    we can only equally possess the ability to refrain from action.

    * We create (organize) governments in order to create property rights. To create an insurer of our life(existence), liberty(action), and property(inventory)

    Everything else we say about it is some form of colorful deception.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-31 03:31:00 UTC