Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • The Theoretical, Empirical, and Communicative classes will always be smaller tha

    The Theoretical, Empirical, and Communicative classes will always be smaller than the Critical and Working.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 08:06:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/770895496546230272

    Reply addressees: @SamuelStringman @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/770201041740500993

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/770201041740500993

  • ***We can perform operations which we call virtuous (attribute a value) but ther

    ***We can perform operations which we call virtuous (attribute a value) but there is no action ‘virtue’. There are only virtuous actions.***

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 04:09:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENT EQUILIBRIA Ghengis Khan equilibrium(power to command regardless of

    THE DIFFERENT EQUILIBRIA

    Ghengis Khan equilibrium(power to command regardless of knowledge)

    vs

    Pareto Equilibrium (assumption of pervasive knowledge)

    vs

    Nash Equilibrium (assumption of local knowledge)

    vs

    Market equilibrium (assumption of self and price knowledge)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-30 06:15:00 UTC

  • HOMESTEADING(CREATION) -> POSSESSION(DEFENSE) -> PROPERTY(NORM) -> PROPERTY RIGH

    HOMESTEADING(CREATION) -> POSSESSION(DEFENSE) -> PROPERTY(NORM) -> PROPERTY RIGHTS(LAW)

    It’s probably clearer to label possession as my opinion and property as insured by third parties. I can possess material things, but I can have an interest in far more things.

    I’m going to try to correct this in my own usage.

    I may hold possessions, but property is a normative construction, and property rights are a legal construction. And I think that is pretty much what the common law says.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 06:55:00 UTC

  • THE OWNERSHIP SPECTRUM This might help everyone demarcate the different terms. u

    THE OWNERSHIP SPECTRUM

    This might help everyone demarcate the different terms.

    unaffilliated(individual) -> citizen(insured) -> stakeholder(in unenumerated commons) -> shareholder(enumerated commons) -> partner(inter personal decidability) -> “executive”(leadership decidability) -> (sole)owner(limited decidability) -> unaffilliated uninsured individual (total decidabilty)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 04:01:00 UTC

  • I AM A CONTRACTUALIST: A CLASSICAL LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE LIBERTARIAN. If you want

    I AM A CONTRACTUALIST: A CLASSICAL LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE LIBERTARIAN.

    If you want to classify me, I am a contractualist. This means a classical liberal, libertarian. I am conservative because I’m an empiricist. And I am a Nationalist because I’m from a germanic, martial class by intuition, and because as an empiricist I understand the superior ability to govern contractually under homogeneity.

    So I know how my work on truthfulness sounds to contemporary people, just as I am aware how Darwin, Hume, Machiavelli, and Socrates were considered immoral people, and how western contractualism in its current degraded form, sounds immoral to less advanced peoples.

    If I **DIDN”T** make you feel a moral twinge, then I wouldn’t be advancing human understanding by reordering values. The difference is that I’m trying to improve human conditions for prosperity not dominate others, harm others, or even exclude others. The problem is that exclusion of differences in strategies is necessary for the development of the prosperity and peace that contractualism provides for us.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-25 03:52:00 UTC

  • Truth refers to correspondence between a statement and its object. It’s called ‘

    Truth refers to correspondence between a statement and its object. It’s called ‘correspondence’, all other are subsets.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 19:18:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768165452178661376

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768165148221513729

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768165148221513729

  • no because a truth statement must be informationally incomplete. Truth != Proof

    no because a truth statement must be informationally incomplete.
    Truth != Proof !=Tautology. What is the difference in info?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 19:05:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768162308401004544

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768161584522768384

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768161584522768384

  • THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS. We’ve been discussing this in my corne

    THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS.

    We’ve been discussing this in my corner of the universe, and I tend to work with the following terminological sequence:

    Faith = recognition that you’re position is indefensible, but you report that you hold some position.

    Belief = a ‘signal’ in the report that you might decide in favor of the position were it of no cost to you, but that you aren’t accountable for the truth or falsehood of it.

    Know = that you are not signaling, but with present knowledge, will defend your claim that you will decide in favor of the position, even if it costs you minor reputation for defending it.

    Promise = that you are willing to commit status and reputation to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Warranty = that you are willing to commit materially to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Demonstrate = that you have chosen in favor of the position.

    We have a lot of evidence that says this hierarchy of costs reflects the ‘put’ that an individual is making on the proposition at hand.

    TYING TO EARLIER POST ON THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY as reducible to word games that attempt to escape accountability.

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154464857972264

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:26:00 UTC

  • Positional numbers are operationaly constructed names

    Positional numbers are operationaly constructed names.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:21:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768060688178769920

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059858650173441

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059858650173441