Form: Definition

  • EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY The only Anarchy that can exist is a condition of

    EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY

    The only Anarchy that can exist is a condition of Sovereignty. Under Sovereignty one can have possessions, but not property. One can have possession but not ownership. But Sovereignty requires relative invulnerability. So to create sovereignty we form alliances with others who desire sovereignty by the exchange of reciprocal insurance. To resolve conflicts between us without violating sovereignty, we can only appeal to the universal decidability of natural law. We accumulate decisions under natural law in the common law. Under reciprocal insurance, natural law, and common law’s norms, we leave behind possessions and create ownership and property. By the combination of sovereignty, exchange of insurance, common law, and the accumulation of decisions, and openness of the contract for reciprocal defense of sovereignty, we create that order we call sovereignty for ourselves. But slaves are more profitable than Enemies. Serfs are more profitable than slaves. citizens are more profitable than serfs. So to increase our defenses, increase our dominion, and increase our wealth, we extend sovereignty, to the citizenry, thus creating a condition of liberty. one possesses sovereignty by ability. one possesses liberty by permission. One possesses freedom out of utility. One possesses subsidy (redistribution) out of charity. There is only one source of sovereignty: the organized application of violence to prevent all alternatives. There is only one source of liberty: the permission of those who fight for sovereignty. There is only one reason that the sovereign grant liberty: profitability. There are only one means of demanding liberty from the sovereign: enfranchisement through reciprocal insurance by violence, or by raising the cost of the absence of liberty through the organized application of violence. Wishful thinking is just lying to yourself and others. That’s the domain of religion. In the domain of truth, there is only one source of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy: the organized application of violence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 21:01:00 UTC

  • When we say that something is deterministic all we are saying is that it produce

    When we say that something is deterministic all we are saying is that it produces a pattern of regularity – like velocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 16:26:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789140628831604736

    Reply addressees: @brettmaverick_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789139578506457088


    IN REPLY TO:

    @t1Maverick

    @curtdoolittle love the distillation only qualm is physical law is probabilistic not deterministic; even second law of thermodynamics

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789139578506457088

  • Cool, um, probabilism is an issue of measurement precision, determinism means on

    Cool, um, probabilism is an issue of measurement precision, determinism means only ‘regular pattern’ not precision.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 16:24:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789140363332190208

    Reply addressees: @brettmaverick_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789139578506457088


    IN REPLY TO:

    @t1Maverick

    @curtdoolittle love the distillation only qualm is physical law is probabilistic not deterministic; even second law of thermodynamics

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/789139578506457088

  • Q&A: “You make a distinction between natural and common law?” NATURAL LAW: coope

    Q&A: “You make a distinction between natural and common law?”

    NATURAL LAW: cooperation via non imposition: the requirement for all actions that affect others, to consist of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to externalities of the same criteria.

    (update)

    NATURAL LAW: cooperation via non imposition: the requirement for all actions that affect others, to consist of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to externalities that are also productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntarily transferred.

    Now technically speaking (and I like to speak technically 😉 ) individuals affected by externalities cannot always be fully informed, and as such cannot consent to voluntary transfer. So we have to count on productive and warrantied, for those that are. In other words, if you make people’s property values increase, they are not going to be unhappy about it. If you make them decrease they are going to be unhappy about it.

    In other words, impose no cost upon others, directly or indirectly that they have not consented to. But by all means distribute gains to others directly or indirectly whether they have consented to it or not. 🙂

    (end update)

    COMMON LAW: those instances in which judges discover a new means of violating natural law, which must then be codified for future reference as a means of deciding against the violator.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 14:04:00 UTC

  • DEFINITIONS: DETERMINISM VS PROBABILITY Probabilism is an issue of measurement p

    DEFINITIONS: DETERMINISM VS PROBABILITY

    Probabilism is an issue of measurement precision, determinism means only ‘regular pattern’ not precision.

    When we say that something is deterministic all we are saying is that it produces a pattern of regularity – like velocity.

    So something demonstrates velocity, but we must say how much. Something demonstrates determinism but we must say how much.

    All physical phenomenon can be described deterministically. The problem is whether or not they can be probabilistically.

    A lot of phenomenon are deterministic – but not probabilistic (the neutrality of money for example)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 12:29:00 UTC

  • Natural Law Means A Simple Law.

    When arguing under natural law it is not so important that you master all the contracts (legislations) and processes (regulations). The reason being that legislations and regulations are always open to revision or refutation if they violate the One Law. So while many layers of contract and regulation may result in conformity to the One Law, it is also possible that they may result in violation of the One Law. And the only way we know that is through FULL ACCOUNTING.

  • Natural Law Means A Simple Law.

    When arguing under natural law it is not so important that you master all the contracts (legislations) and processes (regulations). The reason being that legislations and regulations are always open to revision or refutation if they violate the One Law. So while many layers of contract and regulation may result in conformity to the One Law, it is also possible that they may result in violation of the One Law. And the only way we know that is through FULL ACCOUNTING.

  • MORAL POWER VS IMMORAL POWER Power: the ability to coerce others in order to alt

    MORAL POWER VS IMMORAL POWER

    Power: the ability to coerce others in order to alter the probability of outcomes.

    There are three forms of coercion available to man:

    1 – advocacy-information / shaming-deception

    2 – payment for productivity / payment for corruption/parasitism

    3 – violence for property rights / violence for parasitism

    And two directions:

    1 – privatization of commons

    — vs —

    2 – contribution to commons(socialization)

    All three forms of coercion can be put to constructive or destructive ends. And one can target privatization or socialization.

    I prefer operational names. not quite sure how to square this with De Jouvenel, but I assume one can use the ability to coerce (power) to contribute to commons (‘power’) or to siphon (parasitism) from them.

    I’ll also stay on message, and repeat that Aristocracy = Sovereignty. And that Sovereignty is only possible under rule of law, under natural law, with universal standing and application. And so we can say that Rule of Law will naturally produce a natural aristocracy just as natural aristocracy must naturally produce rule of law. Two sides of the same coin.

    IN SUMMARY

    1) Sovereignty (property)

    …. –(Requires)–

    2) Rule of Law under Natural Law

    …. –(that results in)–

    3) Natural Aristocracy (production of commons by the most able)

    Power, in the forms of Gossip, Remuneration, and Violence is in and of itself neutral. We can put power to moral or immoral ends.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 11:47:00 UTC

  • NEW SLANG omfg “OVEN MIDDLE CLASS” Middle-class liberals whose primary method of

    NEW SLANG omfg

    “OVEN MIDDLE CLASS”

    Middle-class liberals whose primary method of signaling is advocating for policies that ruin the areas they don’t live in and the lives of people they don’t socialize with. Not-In-My-Back-Yard multiculturalists.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-12 15:05:00 UTC

  • DAP: Default Aggression Principle: Either productively trade, or be conquered an

    DAP: Default Aggression Principle: Either productively trade, or be conquered and domesticated.

    NPP: Non Parasitism Principle: Non-Aggression against Property In Toto: Classical Liberalism

    NAP: Non Aggression Principle. Non-Aggression against physical property.: Jewish Separatism

    PAP: Parasitic Aggression Against Proceeds. Democratic Socialism: Parasitic Aggression Principle. All Proceeds are Public.

    NPrivP: Non Privitization Principle: Communism. All resources and proceeds are public.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-12 14:53:00 UTC