Most anthropologists recognize that there are four major race classifications in the world, which include caucasian, mongoloid or asian, negroid or black and australoid. The race classification was created by Carleston S. Coon in 1962. The four major races can then be further subdivided into 30 subgroups.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-human-races-are-in-the-world
Most anthropologists recognize that there are four major race classifications in the world, which include caucasian, mongoloid or asian, negroid or black and australoid. The race classification was created by Carleston S. Coon in 1962. The four major races can then be further subdivided into 30 subgroups.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-human-races-are-in-the-world
THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY
The purpose of philosophy exists in the need for and identification of increasingly precise and therefore increasingly parsimonious means of decidability. A means of decidability remains imprecise, and we call that means of decidability a theory. The most parsimonious theory exists in correspondence with existential reality. We name that means of decidability we call a theory constructed in correspondence with reality, “Truth”. Over time, our search for parsimonious decidability causes the falsification of non-correspondent theories and replaces them with correspondent theories. As such, while the purpose of philosophy is to identify theories with which we obtain decidability, the consequence of the practice of philosophy is increasing correspondence with reality, and somewhat like zeno’s tortioise, we approach the truth perpetually but never knowingly reach it because to do so is to state tautology: identity, the most perfect description that humans can possibly utter.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-05 08:00:00 UTC
DEFINITIONS
HEURISTIC – proceeding to a solution by trial and error or by rules that are only loosely defined
ALGORITHMIC – the systematic transformation of inputs into outputs by a sequence of repeatable operations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-03 23:07:00 UTC
The difference between Legal argument and Propertarian (Natural Law) argument, is that we don’t have to make excuses for ‘rule’ (commands), legislation(commands), and regulation(commands), just whether a disagreement is true and moral – meaning perfectly reciprocal.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 13:30:00 UTC
SOVEREIGNTY = perfect (exceptionless) reciprocity by perfect (exceptionless) reciprocal insurance, in numbers sufficient to deny violations of reciprocity to all possible (exeptionless) extant numbers.
PERFECT RECIPROCITY = limiting one’s actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of property – in – toto, limited to productive externalities.
PROPERTY IN TOTO = That in which one has expended any resource with intent to obtain an interest, without imposing a cost on that which another has expended a resource with the intent to obtain an interest. Synonym: ‘demonstrated property’
INTEREST: = ergo, leaving only homesteading, transformation, and exchange, as means of obtaining an interest. Synonym: monopoly share (a possession), proportional share (citizenship in a commons), proportional share (private in a common contract), demonstrated share ( a denial of opportunity( such as norms and traditions)
RESOURCE : life, body, effort, time, attention, kin, material possession, material interest (share), organizational interest, normative interest, institutional interest, informational interest. Synonym: “capital”.
YIELDS:
Possession(insured by self defense) > consensual property (insured by reciprocity) > normative property(insured by normative enforcement) > property right (insured by third party enforcement) > natural right(ideal between government and citizens) or human right(ideal between governments). Technically speaking,under rule of law, under natural judge-discovered common law, under perfect reciprocity (sovereignty), natural rights can be brought into existence.
Under these conditions it is possible to create sovereignty in fact, liberty by permission, freedom by utility, and subsidy by preference.
(Good luck getting that degree of precision out of parasitic libertines) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 11:27:00 UTC
BETWEEN HONESTY TRUTHFULNESS AND TRUTH.
i can knowingly speak deceitfully without honesty.
i can knowingly speak honestly, without due diligence.
i can knowingly speak truthfully, with due diligence.
i cannot knowingly speak the Truth, only strive to.
i can knowingly speak a tautology,
I can knowingly construct a proof of existential possibility.
The Truth exists in the most parsimonious description man can utter. That description is a thing’s true name. It’s name consists of the operations of its construction – its causes. And only those causes – nothing more.
Therefore to speak ‘The Truth’ consists of speaking a thing’s true name.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 00:27:00 UTC
stoicism: agency-in-toto.
(true. love it.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-30 22:44:00 UTC
Telos=Decidability
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-29 20:29:00 UTC
TERMINOLOGY (DEFINITIONS)
Fungible = identically (functionally) substitutable.
Substitutable = functionally substitutable.
Non-substitutable = functionally non-substitutable.
EXAMPLE (humor)
all Victoria’s Secret models are fungible.
all hot brunettes are substitutable.
all blondes are not substitutable.
lolz
(Response via PM from my mother: “all men are substitutable”.) 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-29 07:32:00 UTC