TERMS: FULL ACCOUNTING VS FULL VS PERFECT RECIPROCITY —“Describe what you mean by “FULL reciprocity” if you would.”— “Without having to make an excuse for an involuntary imposition of costs in either direction.” I sometimes use the term ‘perfect reciprocity‘ which is technically impossible, but is less confusing. The possible term is full accounting (what is possible), not ideal accounting(what is perfect).
Form: Definition
-
Definitions: Full Accounting vs Perfect Reciprocity
TERMS: FULL ACCOUNTING VS FULL VS PERFECT RECIPROCITY —“Describe what you mean by “FULL reciprocity” if you would.”— “Without having to make an excuse for an involuntary imposition of costs in either direction.” I sometimes use the term ‘perfect reciprocity‘ which is technically impossible, but is less confusing. The possible term is full accounting (what is possible), not ideal accounting(what is perfect).
-
Definition: Commons, with Links To the Core
A Short Course in Propertarian Morality propertarianism.com —“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE “COMMONS”— COMMONS – Originally, meaning Land or resources belonging to or affecting the whole of a community. More articulately: any form of property to which members of a group share an interests, because of bearing a cost to obtain that interest, but where that interest is obtained by an unspecified membership in the group rather than by explicit possession of title. I use this term to refer to both physical commons, normative commons, institutional commons, and informational commons. The problem we face with commons is that without explicitly issued shares, even un-tradable shares, the ownership of the commons cannot be protected from confiscation by various means including immigration, or political confiscation. See Also DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/ A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/ A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/ (Honestly people, the accusation that this isn’t accessible is simply untrue. It isn’t in COURSE form, but all the insights are there to consume as fairly simple series (lists). The ‘book’ is up there. The courses are not. )
-
Definition: Commons, with Links To the Core
A Short Course in Propertarian Morality propertarianism.com —“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE “COMMONS”— COMMONS – Originally, meaning Land or resources belonging to or affecting the whole of a community. More articulately: any form of property to which members of a group share an interests, because of bearing a cost to obtain that interest, but where that interest is obtained by an unspecified membership in the group rather than by explicit possession of title. I use this term to refer to both physical commons, normative commons, institutional commons, and informational commons. The problem we face with commons is that without explicitly issued shares, even un-tradable shares, the ownership of the commons cannot be protected from confiscation by various means including immigration, or political confiscation. See Also DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/ A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/ A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/ (Honestly people, the accusation that this isn’t accessible is simply untrue. It isn’t in COURSE form, but all the insights are there to consume as fairly simple series (lists). The ‘book’ is up there. The courses are not. )
-
Propertarianism: Datatypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax
PROPERTARIANISM: DataTypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax Think of Propertarianism as a programming language consisting of data types, operations, grammar, and syntax. if you can ‘write a program’ that ‘computes’ (is operationally constructable’) with those data types, operations, grammar, and syntax, then you can write a formal description of any phenomenon open to human experience in the language of natural law. You cannot do math without understanding it, and you can’t write software without understanding it, and you can’t write natural law without understanding it. I mean… you’d honestly have to be a simpleton to think that you’re going to learn this FAST. you’ll learn it as fast as you could learn to program. If you can program you can simply do it faster because you’ve learned VERY SIMPLE VERSIONS of the form of operational logic of transformations that exist in propertarianism: Natural Law
-
Propertarianism: Datatypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax
PROPERTARIANISM: DataTypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax Think of Propertarianism as a programming language consisting of data types, operations, grammar, and syntax. if you can ‘write a program’ that ‘computes’ (is operationally constructable’) with those data types, operations, grammar, and syntax, then you can write a formal description of any phenomenon open to human experience in the language of natural law. You cannot do math without understanding it, and you can’t write software without understanding it, and you can’t write natural law without understanding it. I mean… you’d honestly have to be a simpleton to think that you’re going to learn this FAST. you’ll learn it as fast as you could learn to program. If you can program you can simply do it faster because you’ve learned VERY SIMPLE VERSIONS of the form of operational logic of transformations that exist in propertarianism: Natural Law
-
Terror, Progress, and Islam
Terror requires the deliberate targeting of non-combatants as a means of altering policy. Sovereignty requires one’s government control non-state actors. Democracy requires one’s people control one’s government such that it controls non-state actors, such that it does not break the westphalian peace, nor the postwar peace. Justice visited upon the muslims to contain them just as the west tried to contain the communists in the twentieth century and the Islamic empires, for it’s thousand years of warfare against the west. And so apparently we must unify china, india, russia, and america to contain islam until it respects the peaces of westphalia (containing non state actors), and of the postwar consensus (maintian borders, develop human rights, and develop consumer economies). No people yet has transformed from the medieval to the modern without a reformation, and some sort of civil war. Islam is the only backward civilization remaining. The problem it faces, and south america faces, is that the demographics throughout the muslim world make a rational secular state nearly impossible without the promise of ever-expanding growth under fiat money capitalism.
-
Terror, Progress, and Islam
Terror requires the deliberate targeting of non-combatants as a means of altering policy. Sovereignty requires one’s government control non-state actors. Democracy requires one’s people control one’s government such that it controls non-state actors, such that it does not break the westphalian peace, nor the postwar peace. Justice visited upon the muslims to contain them just as the west tried to contain the communists in the twentieth century and the Islamic empires, for it’s thousand years of warfare against the west. And so apparently we must unify china, india, russia, and america to contain islam until it respects the peaces of westphalia (containing non state actors), and of the postwar consensus (maintian borders, develop human rights, and develop consumer economies). No people yet has transformed from the medieval to the modern without a reformation, and some sort of civil war. Islam is the only backward civilization remaining. The problem it faces, and south america faces, is that the demographics throughout the muslim world make a rational secular state nearly impossible without the promise of ever-expanding growth under fiat money capitalism.
-
Definitions: Philosophy, Truth, Methods of Argument (Worth Repeating)
PHILOSOPHY The search for internally consistent means of decidability within a domain or context. TRUTH (PROPER) The most parsimonious most universal method of decidability regardless of context. SOME FORMS OF ARGUMENT
- Analogy – a justification by shared constant relations.
- Reason – a criticized and justified argument from experience.
- Rational – an internally consistent, non contradictory argument from experience
- Empirical – a correlative externally correspondent argument for the purpose of limiting human error bias and deceit.
- Logical – an internally consistent, non contradictory, argument from set membership.
- Analytic (Logical+Empirical) – an internally consistent, non contradictory, verbally parsimonious, argument from set membership incorporating the methods of the physical sciences.
- Operational (Current Scientific) – an internally consistent, existentially possible, subjectively testable, causal, argument from possibility.
-
Definitions: Philosophy, Truth, Methods of Argument (Worth Repeating)
PHILOSOPHY The search for internally consistent means of decidability within a domain or context. TRUTH (PROPER) The most parsimonious most universal method of decidability regardless of context. SOME FORMS OF ARGUMENT
- Analogy – a justification by shared constant relations.
- Reason – a criticized and justified argument from experience.
- Rational – an internally consistent, non contradictory argument from experience
- Empirical – a correlative externally correspondent argument for the purpose of limiting human error bias and deceit.
- Logical – an internally consistent, non contradictory, argument from set membership.
- Analytic (Logical+Empirical) – an internally consistent, non contradictory, verbally parsimonious, argument from set membership incorporating the methods of the physical sciences.
- Operational (Current Scientific) – an internally consistent, existentially possible, subjectively testable, causal, argument from possibility.