https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_SnowflakeGENERATION SNOWFLAKE
Generation Snowflake, or Snowflake Generation, is a term used to characterize people who became adults in the 2000s and 2010s as being more prone to taking offence and less resilient than previous generations, or as being too emotionally vulnerable to cope with views that challenge their own.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-09 13:30:00 UTC
DEFINITIONS, OPERATIONAL, IN SERIES, AND IN EQUILIBRIUM
Definitions are very powerful, operational definitions much more so, and operational definitions in series are even more so, and the comparison of series in equilibrium even more so.
With definitions in series alone, comprehension increases dramatically. It is equivalent to the difference between the descriptive power of arithmetic and the descriptive power of geometry.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-09 10:43:00 UTC
DEFINITION: LAW (‘inescapable’).
1 – Law: a statement of perpetual continuity (determinism), insured by the forces (organizations) of nature or man(polity, or government).
2 – Law (physical): a statement of perpetual continuity (determinism), discovered by a process of testing(prosecuting) an hypothesis against reality,
3 – Law (Natural): a statement of perpetual continuity (reciprocity) insured by the forces of nature (natural law)
4 – Law (Common): a discovery (finding) of a violation of reciprocity, argued by a plaintiff, defendant, or prosecutor (hypothesis) of the findings of an inquiry by a judge (theory), that survives refutation from other judges (law), insured by a third party insurer of last resort (polity, government).
5 – “Law” (Command) A command issued by the insurer of last resort, insured (enforced) by that insurer of last resort.
6 – “Law” (Legislation): A contract on terms between members of ruling organization, issued by that organization, in its capacity of an insurer of last resort (self insurance).
7 – “Law” (Treaty): An agreement between insurers of last resort, under reciprocal promise of adherence and insurance.
Of these seven, command and legislation are not laws, but enforced as if they were laws. Treaties are uninsurable, because compliance is voluntary, unenforcible, and such agreements are, and always have been regularly violated – unless insured by an empire: a larger insurer of last resort.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-08 21:08:00 UTC
DEFINITIONS OF THE WORD “LAW”
(and lesser things)
So, you want to hold to the definition of ‘involved’ as including the consequences of some action, rather than ongoing action, then I’m going to be forced to ask now someone is no longer involved?
I leave psychologizing, conflation, loading, framing, and overloading (acts of suggestion) to people engaged in deceit.
LETS UNDERSTAND THE ARGUMENTATIVE METHOD OF MARXISM
I (correctly) call acts of ridicule, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, conflation, loading, framing, overloading, fictionalism (supernaturalism, pseudo-rationalism, and pseudo-science), straw-manning, straw-manning to avoid exposition, heaping of undue praise on unworthy heroes, slighting of worthy competitors – what they are: the techniques of Marxists and Feminists. What is this technique? There are only three means of coercion: force, cooperation (reciprocity, truthfulness, in argument in this case), and Gossip (attempts to create or eliminate opportunities). Ergo: Marxist/Feminist/postmodern substitution of argument is in fact, nothing more than *gossip*.
NOW FOR THE MEANING OF LAW (‘inescapable’).
1 – Law: a statement of perpetual continuity (determinism), insured by the forces (organizations) of nature or man(polity, or government).
2 – Law (physical): a statement of perpetual continuity (determinism), discovered by a process of testing(prosecuting) an hypothesis against reality,
3 – Law (Natural): a statement of perpetual continuity (reciprocity) insured by the forces of nature (natural law)
4 – Law (Common): a discovery (finding) of a violation of reciprocity, argued by a plaintiff, defendant, or prosecutor (hypothesis) of the findings of an inquiry by a judge (theory), that survives refutation from other judges (law), insured by a third party insurer of last resort (polity, government).
5 – “Law” (Command) A command issued by the insurer of last resort, insured (enforced) by that insurer of last resort.
6 – “Law” (Legislation): A contract on terms between members of ruling organization, issued by that organization, in its capacity of an insurer of last resort (self insurance).
7 – “Law” (Treaty): An agreement between insurers of last resort, under reciprocal promise of adherence and insurance.
Of these seven, command and legislation are not laws, but enforced as if they were laws. Treaties are uninsurable, because compliance is voluntary, unenforcible, and such agreements are, and always have been regularly violated – unless insured by an empire: a larger insurer of last resort.
SUMMARY
I don’t rely on fuzzy terminology to construct a pretense of argument in order to invoke moral indignation because I cannot make my argument by substantive means – in fact, my reputation, justly deserved, is for the exact opposite, usually including the ironic criticism ‘autistic’, because I specialize in the prosecution of deceptions carried out by those who practice elaborate gossip as a pretense for argument.
—“I don’t call that ‘involved’. It means we had an interaction. But to be ‘involved’ requires ‘persistence’. So you’re either ignorant of the terminology, not very bright, or engaging in rhetorical fallacy, or rallying and shaming in the usual neocon (marxist), libertarian(marxist), or socialist(marxist) tradition of conflation, heaping of undue praise, straw manning, and propagandizing.”—
Q.E.D. Criticism stands.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
https://www.facebook.com/MisesUK/photos/a.283608325389931.1073741828.251337711950326/309122929505137/?type=3
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-08 20:57:00 UTC
—“Doolittle’s Chainsaw: What is the particular decision problem this concept solves, and what are the particular actions and transformations we use to achieve decidability?”— @Propertarian Frank
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-07 22:11:00 UTC
FYI: In my lexicon impulsivity is the opposite of agency. It is as psychotic is to autistic. Solipsistic to Aspie.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-05 20:15:00 UTC
“BEING” IN THE SPECTRUM OF EXISTENCE
Grammar.
1 – Existence: Persistence. Existence independent of experience,
2 – Observing: observation of phenomenon in existence.
3 – Acting: taking actions limited by existence.
4 – Imagining: the full set of pre-rational experiences
5 – Feeling: the full set of pre-cognitive experiences.
6 – Being(Experiencing): the full set of human experiences of existence. (including dreaming, daydreaming, fantasizing, free association, reasoning, calculating.)
7 – Reporting: narrating experiences.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-03 17:19:00 UTC
UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR FOR ARISTOCRATIC NEGOTIATIONS
“I cooperate with you on behalf of myself, my family and my kin for profit. I cooperate reciprocally to preserve the opportunity for profit, and lower the total cost of making profits through cooperation. But I cooperate with you, your family, and your kin, if and only if it is more rewarding than not cooperating with you, your family and your kin. And my investment in our cooperation, and my contribution to the common good, is in not preying upon you, killing you and your sons, taking your territory, your property, your things, raping and enslaving your wives and daughters, and that of all of your kin. So let us not imagine ourselves as equals. We merely carry on the pretense of equality in order to obtain cooperation at the lowest cost. And let us not suggest that we possess any debt to one another. We do not. For as long as I have the ability to take from you against your will, it is simply a calculation of profit and loss. And if you should attempt to suggest there is a false debt, then you are no longer cooperating but engaging in fraud, and I will, and mine will, prefer not to cooperate, but to prey upon you. If for no other reason than to ensure by example, that no others attempt to create such a fraud, and increase my costs and therefore reduce my returns on cooperation.”
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-03 15:38:00 UTC
STUFF I WISH I COULD HAVE SAID:
—“Propertarianism is ridiculously easy to summarize: a system [of terms and grammar] that makes what subtle social investments are linguistically possible to make commensurable, commensurable.
The further simplification of even that: a system of cooperation through mutual understanding.
The further simplification of even that: “How we can get what we both want.”
The further simplification of even that: “How we can help each other.”—Josh Jeppson
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-02 16:35:00 UTC
That which is discretionary – command
That which is historical record – common law record
That which is descriptive of that record – general rules of common law
That which is utopian or ideal in creating that record – legal philosophy
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-29 23:55:00 UTC