Form: Definition

  • WRONGS EXIST. RIGHT IS THAT WHICH IS NOT WRONG. —“If might makes right, does r

    WRONGS EXIST. RIGHT IS THAT WHICH IS NOT WRONG.

    —“If might makes right, does right really exist?”–

    As far as I know, reciprocity (productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality) cannot be undesirable, wrong, unethical, or immoral. That which is not wrong, is right. (via-negativa logic).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-23 20:00:00 UTC

  • Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.

    —“If might makes right, does right really exist?”– As far as I know, reciprocity (productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality) cannot be undesirable, wrong, unethical, or immoral. That which is not wrong, is right. (via-negativa logic).
  • THE MEANING OF CONSERVATIVE Conservative means empirical, markets, hierarchical

    THE MEANING OF CONSERVATIVE

    Conservative means empirical, markets, hierarchical via meritocracy, rule of law of reciprocity vs discretion, and the intergenerational nuclear family as the object of policy.

    Conservatives accumulate capital – particularly genetic and normative. Progressives the opposite – the consume all available capital.

    That these differences reflect male and female reproductive strategies is obvious.

    That conservative aristocratic, meritocratic, tripartite, high trust paternalism dragged us out of ignorance poverty, starvation, disease, and the deceit of abrahamic religion is simply a truism.

    That all countries that experimented with socialism are disasters, and that all nations under american protection that experiment with its social democratic version are experiencing demographic and normative collapse -and in europe only the german export of vehicles holds europe together are evidence enough for the informed.

    The fact that conservatives are concerned about the loss of intergenerationally transferred capital and others aren’t – is again genetic but also scientific.

    Marx, Boaz, Freud, were pseudoscientists.

    People are gullible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-21 03:25:00 UTC

  • The Meaning Of Conservative

    Conservative means empirical, markets, hierarchical via meritocracy, rule of law of reciprocity vs discretion, and the intergenerational nuclear family as the object of policy. Conservatives accumulate capital – particularly genetic and normative. Progressives the opposite – the consume all available capital. That these differences reflect male and female reproductive strategies is obvious. That conservative aristocratic, meritocratic, tripartite, high trust paternalism dragged us out of ignorance poverty, starvation, disease, and the deceit of abrahamic religion is simply a truism. That all countries that experimented with socialism are disasters, and that all nations under american protection that experiment with its social democratic version are experiencing demographic and normative collapse -and in europe only the german export of vehicles holds europe together are evidence enough for the informed. The fact that conservatives are concerned about the loss of intergenerationally transferred capital and others aren’t – is again genetic but also scientific. Marx, Boaz, Freud, were pseudoscientists. People are gullible.
  • The Meaning Of Conservative

    Conservative means empirical, markets, hierarchical via meritocracy, rule of law of reciprocity vs discretion, and the intergenerational nuclear family as the object of policy. Conservatives accumulate capital – particularly genetic and normative. Progressives the opposite – the consume all available capital. That these differences reflect male and female reproductive strategies is obvious. That conservative aristocratic, meritocratic, tripartite, high trust paternalism dragged us out of ignorance poverty, starvation, disease, and the deceit of abrahamic religion is simply a truism. That all countries that experimented with socialism are disasters, and that all nations under american protection that experiment with its social democratic version are experiencing demographic and normative collapse -and in europe only the german export of vehicles holds europe together are evidence enough for the informed. The fact that conservatives are concerned about the loss of intergenerationally transferred capital and others aren’t – is again genetic but also scientific. Marx, Boaz, Freud, were pseudoscientists. People are gullible.
  • Are Kurds From Iraq White (or What Race Are They)?

    No. They are West Asians.

    WEST ASIAN RACE

    West Asian ( Armenian(R1b/J2) – Jewish(E1/J) – Greek(I2) — Southern Italians(I2) — Turk – Kurd – Iranian – Jordanian – Iraqi – Assyrian – Druze – Lebanese – Georgian – Caspian – Palestinian)

    Tajik Race (Tajik – Bukhara Arab – Shugnan – Kallar – Sourashtran – Yadhava)

    https://www.quora.com/Are-Kurds-from-Iraq-White-or-what-race-are-they

  • Why Are You A Neoconservative?

    Because conservatism = empiricism, reciprocity, sovereignty, requiring reciprocity, rule of law because of reciprocity, markets because of rule of law of reciprocity, and markets create meritocracy, and eugenic reproduction, and that is the very simple reason for western excellence.

    Everything else is lying so that someone or other can steal, free ride, or otherwise engage in corruption.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-you-a-neoconservative

  • What Does Truth Mean?

    (edited for clarity) Truth can only mean ‘descriptive testimony free of error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit’. In other words, speech, the semantic content of which corresponds with existentially possible reality. One speaks TRUTHFULLY, or UNTRUTHFULLY, or HONESTLY or DISHONESTLY. To be precise, one speaks HONESTLY not having done due diligence, nor warrantying one’s speech. One speaks TRUTHFULLY having done due diligence, and warrantying one’s speech. Truthful speech evolved from and refers to testimony for which you are accountable (have skin in the game). So you might speak honestly – not having done due diligence on your speech. But that is not the same as speaking truthfully – having done due diligence on your speech. So you might give your honest opinion, but that differs from doing diligence that such an opinion survives criticism – meaning tests of correspondence with reality. Both the physical sciences and law specialize in the art of due diligence. (Although much law has adopted the art of lying, testimony in court tends not to.) As an extension of law, anglo analytic philosophy attempts to specialize in the art of due diligence. Strangely, continental philosophy does the opposite. But if speaking truthfully requires that we perform due diligence, and warranty our speech, then how does one perform such due diligence? How do we test correspondence? In the most simple of terms, a truth statement must be: 1. CATEGORICALLY consistent (non conflationary) 2. INTERNALLY consistent (logical), 3. EXTERNALLY correspondent (empirical), 4. OPERATIONALLY possible (existentially possible), 5. COHERENT categorically, internally, externally, and operationally (consistent across all tests) 6. FULLY ACCOUNTED (you haven’t cherry picked cause and/or consequence) And if you want to claim it’s ethical and moral (and objectively legal): 1. RATIONAL: consisting of nothing but a series of fully rational choices 2. RECIPROCAL: consisting of nothing other than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges free of imposition upon others by externality. HONESTY AND TRUTHFULNESS IN THE USE OF THE WORD “TRUTH” We use the word ‘Truth’ in many, many contexts. Most of them somewhere between a convenience and a dishonesty. True, honest, logical, and good are independent concepts frequently conflated to attribute authority where it is absent.
  • What Does Truth Mean?

    (edited for clarity) Truth can only mean ‘descriptive testimony free of error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit’. In other words, speech, the semantic content of which corresponds with existentially possible reality. One speaks TRUTHFULLY, or UNTRUTHFULLY, or HONESTLY or DISHONESTLY. To be precise, one speaks HONESTLY not having done due diligence, nor warrantying one’s speech. One speaks TRUTHFULLY having done due diligence, and warrantying one’s speech. Truthful speech evolved from and refers to testimony for which you are accountable (have skin in the game). So you might speak honestly – not having done due diligence on your speech. But that is not the same as speaking truthfully – having done due diligence on your speech. So you might give your honest opinion, but that differs from doing diligence that such an opinion survives criticism – meaning tests of correspondence with reality. Both the physical sciences and law specialize in the art of due diligence. (Although much law has adopted the art of lying, testimony in court tends not to.) As an extension of law, anglo analytic philosophy attempts to specialize in the art of due diligence. Strangely, continental philosophy does the opposite. But if speaking truthfully requires that we perform due diligence, and warranty our speech, then how does one perform such due diligence? How do we test correspondence? In the most simple of terms, a truth statement must be: 1. CATEGORICALLY consistent (non conflationary) 2. INTERNALLY consistent (logical), 3. EXTERNALLY correspondent (empirical), 4. OPERATIONALLY possible (existentially possible), 5. COHERENT categorically, internally, externally, and operationally (consistent across all tests) 6. FULLY ACCOUNTED (you haven’t cherry picked cause and/or consequence) And if you want to claim it’s ethical and moral (and objectively legal): 1. RATIONAL: consisting of nothing but a series of fully rational choices 2. RECIPROCAL: consisting of nothing other than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges free of imposition upon others by externality. HONESTY AND TRUTHFULNESS IN THE USE OF THE WORD “TRUTH” We use the word ‘Truth’ in many, many contexts. Most of them somewhere between a convenience and a dishonesty. True, honest, logical, and good are independent concepts frequently conflated to attribute authority where it is absent.
  • WHAT DOES TRUTH MEAN? (edited for clarity) Truth can only mean ‘descriptive test

    WHAT DOES TRUTH MEAN?

    (edited for clarity)

    Truth can only mean ‘descriptive testimony free of error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit’. In other words, speech, the semantic content of which corresponds with existentially possible reality.

    One speaks TRUTHFULLY, or UNTRUTHFULLY, or HONESTLY or DISHONESTLY.

    To be precise, one speaks HONESTLY not having done due diligence, nor warrantying one’s speech. One speaks TRUTHFULLY having done due diligence, and warrantying one’s speech. Truthful speech evolved from and refers to testimony for which you are accountable (have skin in the game).

    So you might speak honestly – not having done due diligence on your speech. But that is not the same as speaking truthfully – having done due diligence on your speech. So you might give your honest opinion, but that differs from doing diligence that such an opinion survives criticism – meaning tests of correspondence with reality.

    Both the physical sciences and law specialize in the art of due diligence. (Although much law has adopted the art of lying, testimony in court tends not to.) As an extension of law, anglo analytic philosophy attempts to specialize in the art of due diligence. Strangely, continental philosophy does the opposite.

    But if speaking truthfully requires that we perform due diligence, and warranty our speech, then how does one perform such due diligence? How do we test correspondence?

    In the most simple of terms, a truth statement must be:

    1. CATEGORICALLY consistent (non conflationary)

    2. INTERNALLY consistent (logical),

    3. EXTERNALLY correspondent (empirical),

    4. OPERATIONALLY possible (existentially possible),

    5. COHERENT categorically, internally, externally, and operationally (consistent across all tests)

    6. FULLY ACCOUNTED (you haven’t cherry picked cause and/or consequence)

    And if you want to claim it’s ethical and moral (and objectively legal):

    1. RATIONAL: consisting of nothing but a series of fully rational choices

    2. RECIPROCAL: consisting of nothing other than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges free of imposition upon others by externality.

    HONESTY AND TRUTHFULNESS IN THE USE OF THE WORD “TRUTH”

    We use the word ‘Truth’ in many, many contexts. Most of them somewhere between a convenience and a dishonesty. True, honest, logical, and good are independent concepts frequently conflated to attribute authority where it is absent.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-15 08:27:00 UTC