Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors. Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes). Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes). Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive). Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial). Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor). Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor). Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor). Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons. Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population. Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).
Form: Definition
-
CONFLICT VS FIGHTING For sake of argument, let’s say Conflict is something that
CONFLICT VS FIGHTING
For sake of argument, let’s say Conflict is something that occurs with people who you share interests, or care about. But Fighting and Warfare on the other hand are what you do when you do not share interests or care about them.
I hate conflict. I love a fight.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-07 19:20:00 UTC
-
SOVEREIGNTY VS LIBERTY VS FREEDOM Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enou
SOVEREIGNTY VS LIBERTY VS FREEDOM
Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors.
Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes).
Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes).
Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive).
Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial).
Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor).
Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor).
Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor).
Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons.
Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population.
Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-07 09:10:00 UTC
-
UNDERSTANDING CITIES Cities = Markets = Decreased Opportunity Cost. It’s the abi
UNDERSTANDING CITIES
Cities = Markets = Decreased Opportunity Cost.
It’s the ability to communicate that decreases opportunity cost.
Opportunity cost = increasing choices.
The question is whether increasing choices produces increasing outcomes.
For business it does. For genes it does not.
This is the fundamental problem. Cities Destroy Genes in exchange for lower opportunity costs of consumption.
So we have a choice: (a) continue to bring people to capital at the cost of genes (genetic capital), or (b) bring capital to people to preserve genetic capital.
In other words, redistribute the opportunity costs.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 09:07:00 UTC
-
Any description of any political system must include a population model, an econ
Any description of any political system must include a population model, an economic model, a commons producing model. If you can’t state all three of those, then you aren’t stating anything that makes any sense at all.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 13:38:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1003632024068984832
-
Statistical correlations like theories must be stated (a) in a series of subject
Statistical correlations like theories must be stated (a) in a series of subjectively testable operations, and (b) using the most parsimonious sequence, (c) with the most rational incentives.
Most of the time, a statistic is being used to lie or counter a lie. Like truth and falsehood there is no reason to state the truth other than to counter a falsehood. Nor any reason to state a falsehood other than to counter a truth.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 13:05:00 UTC
-
A Narration (horse), Description A Fiction (unicorn), Fairy Tale A Fictionalism
A Narration (horse), Description
A Fiction (unicorn), Fairy Tale
A Fictionalism (Mohammed rode a flying horse). Lie.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 12:04:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1003608376222371840
-
A Narration (horse), Description A Fiction (unicorn), Fairy Tale A Fictionalism
A Narration (horse), Description
A Fiction (unicorn), Fairy Tale
A Fictionalism (Moses saw a burning bush, Jesus arose from the dead, Mohammed rode a flying horse). Lie.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 08:04:00 UTC
-
Abrahamism
ABRAHAMISM: 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”) 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance. 5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance. 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods. 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods. 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge. 9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood.
-
Abrahamism
ABRAHAMISM: 1) Restatement of Myth as History 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”) 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance. 5) False Promise of Impossible(supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance. 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods. 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods. 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge. 9) Oath to a falsehood. Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood.