Form: Definition

  • STUFF I DIDN’T KNOW Red pill = unpleasant truth. Blue pill = comforting lie. Bla

    STUFF I DIDN’T KNOW

    Red pill = unpleasant truth.

    Blue pill = comforting lie.

    Black pill = demoralizing defeatism.

    White pill = hopeful encouragement.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:06:00 UTC

  • axiomatic, theoretic, and analogistic

    axiomatic, theoretic, and analogistic.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 09:39:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005746176388403201

  • THE PROCESS OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT by Bill Joslin So the process of cognitive

    THE PROCESS OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT

    by Bill Joslin

    So the process of cognitive development and concept creation would follow this spectrum.

    1) Analogistic : abductive, fictional, imaginary, free association, imaginable – hypothesis creation.

    2) Theoretical – inductive, narrative, possible, hypothesis development

    3) Axiomatic – deductive, descriptive, deterministic, testable, probable, provable law proposal

    4) Operational – descriptive, directive, decidable, actionable, warrant able, testable, falsifiable – creation(discovery) of law

    A (spectrum) process of constant disambiguation leading to more effective action (increases in agency) – which is why some may get stuck at one position and then assert each as separate discrete entities which are opposed to each other (a type of cherry picking) versus steps toward disambiguation

    (I think you did it Bill Joslin …. damn!) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 09:27:00 UTC

  • National Socialism vs Classical Liberalism

    National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Autarkic, Commons-biased, Mixed economy” Classical liberalism for example is actually a “Rule of Law, Nationalist, Private Property-biased, Free Trade, Mixed Economy, with houses for the classes to negotiate commons.” (repost)

  • National Socialism vs Classical Liberalism

    National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Autarkic, Commons-biased, Mixed economy” Classical liberalism for example is actually a “Rule of Law, Nationalist, Private Property-biased, Free Trade, Mixed Economy, with houses for the classes to negotiate commons.” (repost)

  • PASTORLAISM = COSMOPOLITANISM = UNIVERSALISM = ABRAHAMISM

    PASTORLAISM = COSMOPOLITANISM = UNIVERSALISM = ABRAHAMISM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 12:26:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005425879336538112

  • Attention Economy (f) Opportunistic, Intuitionistic, Position Economy (m) Strate

    Attention Economy (f) Opportunistic, Intuitionistic,

    Position Economy (m) Strategic, Empirical.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 11:23:00 UTC

  • PASTORLAISM = COSMOPOLITANISM = UNIVERSALISM = ABRAHAMISM

    PASTORLAISM = COSMOPOLITANISM = UNIVERSALISM = ABRAHAMISM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 08:26:00 UTC

  • National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Aut

    National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Autarkic, Commons-biased, Mixed economy”

    Classical liberalism for example is actually a “Rule of Law, Nationalist, Private Property-biased, Free Trade, Mixed Economy, with houses for the classes to negotiate commons.”

    (repost)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-08 12:30:00 UTC

  • Sovereignty vs Liberty vs Freedom

    Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors. Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes). Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes). Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive). Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial). Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor). Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor). Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor). Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons. Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population. Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).