STUFF I DIDN’T KNOW
Red pill = unpleasant truth.
Blue pill = comforting lie.
Black pill = demoralizing defeatism.
White pill = hopeful encouragement.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:06:00 UTC
STUFF I DIDN’T KNOW
Red pill = unpleasant truth.
Blue pill = comforting lie.
Black pill = demoralizing defeatism.
White pill = hopeful encouragement.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:06:00 UTC
axiomatic, theoretic, and analogistic.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 09:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005746176388403201
THE PROCESS OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
by Bill Joslin
So the process of cognitive development and concept creation would follow this spectrum.
1) Analogistic : abductive, fictional, imaginary, free association, imaginable – hypothesis creation.
2) Theoretical – inductive, narrative, possible, hypothesis development
3) Axiomatic – deductive, descriptive, deterministic, testable, probable, provable law proposal
4) Operational – descriptive, directive, decidable, actionable, warrant able, testable, falsifiable – creation(discovery) of law
A (spectrum) process of constant disambiguation leading to more effective action (increases in agency) – which is why some may get stuck at one position and then assert each as separate discrete entities which are opposed to each other (a type of cherry picking) versus steps toward disambiguation
(I think you did it Bill Joslin …. damn!) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 09:27:00 UTC
National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Autarkic, Commons-biased, Mixed economy” Classical liberalism for example is actually a “Rule of Law, Nationalist, Private Property-biased, Free Trade, Mixed Economy, with houses for the classes to negotiate commons.” (repost)
National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Autarkic, Commons-biased, Mixed economy” Classical liberalism for example is actually a “Rule of Law, Nationalist, Private Property-biased, Free Trade, Mixed Economy, with houses for the classes to negotiate commons.” (repost)
PASTORLAISM = COSMOPOLITANISM = UNIVERSALISM = ABRAHAMISM
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 12:26:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005425879336538112
Attention Economy (f) Opportunistic, Intuitionistic,
Position Economy (m) Strategic, Empirical.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 11:23:00 UTC
PASTORLAISM = COSMOPOLITANISM = UNIVERSALISM = ABRAHAMISM
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 08:26:00 UTC
National socialism for example, is actually and “Authoritarian, Nationalist, Autarkic, Commons-biased, Mixed economy”
Classical liberalism for example is actually a “Rule of Law, Nationalist, Private Property-biased, Free Trade, Mixed Economy, with houses for the classes to negotiate commons.”
(repost)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-08 12:30:00 UTC
Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors. Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes). Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes). Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive). Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial). Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor). Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor). Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor). Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons. Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population. Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).