Form: Definition

  • the relations Different from, superior to, inferior to; and reciprocal, parasiti

    the relations Different from, superior to, inferior to; and reciprocal, parasitic, and predatory are empirically, logically, and operationally testable – whether we like it or not.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 00:37:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026990862922903552

  • IS ALL KNOWLEDGE IDEOLOGICAL? There is knowledge that is correspondent, actionab

    IS ALL KNOWLEDGE IDEOLOGICAL?

    There is knowledge that is correspondent, actionable, and predictive within reality and knowledge that is non-corresponded, actionable, and non predictive, and knowledge that is non-correspondent, inactionable, and non-predictive. And all combinations thereof.

    KNOWLEDGE

    – Correspondent vs ….non correspondent (with reality)

    – Actionable …….vs …. in-actionable (by man)

    – Predictive ……..vs …..non predictive (outcomes)

    If one means all knowledge consists of paradigms that assist us in producing collective cooperation on the pursuit of ends, then that makes sense to me.

    If one means that there is more agency in non-correspondence than correspondence that is only true in the pursuit of power – which is just pursuits of rents.

    It’s not true if one has to hold power by it without perpetuating rents.

    Rulers are tediously empirical in action, even if ideological in rhetoric.

    They don’t have a choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 18:06:00 UTC

  • (term of the day) “The fallacy of vividness” “The fallacy of misleading vividnes

    (term of the day)

    “The fallacy of vividness”
    “The fallacy of misleading vividness”

    Meaning that the experience is a constituent part of the narration.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 21:43:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025134923219460098

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (term of the day) “The fallacy of vividness”

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (term of the day)

    “The fallacy of vividness”
    “The fallacy of misleading vividness”

    Meaning that the experience is a constituent part of the narration.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 21:42:57 UTC

  • (term of the day) “The fallacy of vividness” “The fallacy of misleading vividnes

    (term of the day)

    “The fallacy of vividness”

    “The fallacy of misleading vividness”

    Meaning that the experience is a constituent part of the narration.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 17:42:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    https://www.wax-science.fr/wp-content/uploads/Sex-diff-connectome.pdfhttps://www.wax-science.fr/wp-content/uploads/Sex-diff-connectome.pdfSEX DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:12:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    https://www.wax-science.fr/wp-content/uploads/Sex-diff-connectome.pdfSEX DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN STRUCTURE


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 10:12:00 UTC

  • Defining Postmodernism

    Postmodernism evolved in response to the failure of marxism socialism – a dogma which was pseudoscientific, and evidentially failed. Having to abandon pseudoscience, Postmodernism attacks reason directly stating that there is no truth and argument – only power. So in effect all debate is meaningless and the only objective is power by any possible means. Postmodernism = Relativism = Anti-science, Anti-reason, Anti-truth. Since truth, reason, science, and evidence falsify the marxist-socialist-feminist theology, then postmodernists abandoned all evidence, science, reason, and truth, and pursue power by any means, which includes their obsession with promoting falsehoods in pursuit of power, with which to impose monopoly authority and economic tyranny (forcible redistribution), thereby repeating the jewish > christian > islamic destruction of the ancient world (reason), with jewish > christian > muslim destruction of the modern world (science). DEFINITION —“A general and wide-ranging term which is applied to literature, art, philosophy, architecture, fiction, and cultural and literary criticism, political criticism, propaganda, among others. Postmodernism is largely a reaction to the assumed certainty of scientific, or objective, efforts to explain reality. In essence, it stems from a recognition that reality is not simply mirrored in human understanding of it, but rather, is constructed as the mind tries to understand its own particular and personal reality. For this reason, postmodernism is highly skeptical of explanations which claim to be valid for all groups, cultures, traditions, or races, and instead focuses on the relative truths of each person. In the postmodern understanding, interpretation is everything; reality only comes into being through our interpretations of what the world means to us individually. Postmodernism relies on concrete experience over abstract principles, knowing always that the outcome of one’s own experience will necessarily be fallible and relative, rather than certain and universal. Postmodernism is “post” because it is denies the existence of any ultimate principles, and it lacks the optimism of there being a scientific, philosophical, or religious truth which will explain everything for everybody – a characteristic of the so-called “modern” mind. The paradox of the postmodern position is that, in placing all principles under the scrutiny of its skepticism, it must realize that even its own principles are not beyond questioning. “—

  • Defining Postmodernism

    Postmodernism evolved in response to the failure of marxism socialism – a dogma which was pseudoscientific, and evidentially failed. Having to abandon pseudoscience, Postmodernism attacks reason directly stating that there is no truth and argument – only power. So in effect all debate is meaningless and the only objective is power by any possible means. Postmodernism = Relativism = Anti-science, Anti-reason, Anti-truth. Since truth, reason, science, and evidence falsify the marxist-socialist-feminist theology, then postmodernists abandoned all evidence, science, reason, and truth, and pursue power by any means, which includes their obsession with promoting falsehoods in pursuit of power, with which to impose monopoly authority and economic tyranny (forcible redistribution), thereby repeating the jewish > christian > islamic destruction of the ancient world (reason), with jewish > christian > muslim destruction of the modern world (science). DEFINITION —“A general and wide-ranging term which is applied to literature, art, philosophy, architecture, fiction, and cultural and literary criticism, political criticism, propaganda, among others. Postmodernism is largely a reaction to the assumed certainty of scientific, or objective, efforts to explain reality. In essence, it stems from a recognition that reality is not simply mirrored in human understanding of it, but rather, is constructed as the mind tries to understand its own particular and personal reality. For this reason, postmodernism is highly skeptical of explanations which claim to be valid for all groups, cultures, traditions, or races, and instead focuses on the relative truths of each person. In the postmodern understanding, interpretation is everything; reality only comes into being through our interpretations of what the world means to us individually. Postmodernism relies on concrete experience over abstract principles, knowing always that the outcome of one’s own experience will necessarily be fallible and relative, rather than certain and universal. Postmodernism is “post” because it is denies the existence of any ultimate principles, and it lacks the optimism of there being a scientific, philosophical, or religious truth which will explain everything for everybody – a characteristic of the so-called “modern” mind. The paradox of the postmodern position is that, in placing all principles under the scrutiny of its skepticism, it must realize that even its own principles are not beyond questioning. “—

  • Definition of “abrahamism” in Natural Law

    (repost) In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards. All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Pilpul vs Critique. ( If you cast this term as ‘racist’ or ‘hate speech’ you’re just either ignorant or a liar or both: a bad person. ) Most of Propertarianism (the Natural Law of Reciprocity) consists of attempts to prevent Abrahamic arguments and replace them with Testimonial (Ratio-Scientific-and-Operational) arguments so that Law (Constitutions) can be constructed strictly and logically and is not open to accidental, intentional, misinterpretation. Thus requiring legislatures reform a law rather than allow legislation from the Jurist’s bench – which is the means by which the US Constitution was undermined. My work consists of the suppression of deception (parasitism) by rhetorical means. Only liars and thieves would seek to suppress it.