Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • Magical Thinking

    –“Magical thinking is the attribution of causal or synchronistic relationships between actions and events which seemingly cannot be justified by reason and observation. In religion, folk religion, and superstitious beliefs, the posited correlation is often between religious ritual, prayer, sacrifice, or the observance of a taboo, and an expected benefit or recompense.”– As you move east and south this seems to increases rapidly

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39441540_279742982622599_90479525157

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39441540_279742982622599_90479525157

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39441540_279742982622599_9047952515785555968_o_279742979289266.jpg FACT VS OBJECTIVE TRUTH?

    —-”What is the difference between a fact and an objective truth?”—-

    A FACT consists of a promise of a theory of an observation.

    A TRUTH Proposition consists of a promise of a theory of an observable.

    **|Universal Epistemology| : Free Association**(survived minimum relations for cognizance) -> **Hypothesis** (survived rational falsification) -> **Theory** (survived empirical falsification) -> **Law** (survived applied falsification).

    |**Truth**| : A promise that the correspondence between the experience invoked in the audience by the statement and something observable: open to senses(physical), emotions(Intuitionistic), or mind(intellectual) – satisfies the demand for decidability (correspondence), given the consequences and demand for restitution upon ignorance, error, bias, or deceit.

    In practice we use Fact for measurements or records of existentially observable reality, and objective truth is a ‘fuzzier term’ that attempts to include statements about language (verbalisms) and attribute to them the freedom of error, bias, and deceit of facts.

    In other words, these terms are specific (fact) and loose (Objective) assertions of the absence of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. We use the via positiva assertion “True”, meaning rather than the via negativa assertion “free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit” for brevity and habit, despite the fact that the term true can and only can mean ‘free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit given the scope of externalities of the question (harm)”. Because that is all it is possible to know.

    As far as I know that is the best definition of truth that exists – or can exist.FACT VS OBJECTIVE TRUTH?

    —-”What is the difference between a fact and an objective truth?”—-

    A FACT consists of a promise of a theory of an observation.

    A TRUTH Proposition consists of a promise of a theory of an observable.

    **|Universal Epistemology| : Free Association**(survived minimum relations for cognizance) -> **Hypothesis** (survived rational falsification) -> **Theory** (survived empirical falsification) -> **Law** (survived applied falsification).

    |**Truth**| : A promise that the correspondence between the experience invoked in the audience by the statement and something observable: open to senses(physical), emotions(Intuitionistic), or mind(intellectual) – satisfies the demand for decidability (correspondence), given the consequences and demand for restitution upon ignorance, error, bias, or deceit.

    In practice we use Fact for measurements or records of existentially observable reality, and objective truth is a ‘fuzzier term’ that attempts to include statements about language (verbalisms) and attribute to them the freedom of error, bias, and deceit of facts.

    In other words, these terms are specific (fact) and loose (Objective) assertions of the absence of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. We use the via positiva assertion “True”, meaning rather than the via negativa assertion “free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit” for brevity and habit, despite the fact that the term true can and only can mean ‘free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit given the scope of externalities of the question (harm)”. Because that is all it is possible to know.

    As far as I know that is the best definition of truth that exists – or can exist.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 12:48:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_152793348650897/39441540_279742982622599_904795

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_152793348650897/39441540_279742982622599_904795

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_152793348650897/39441540_279742982622599_9047952515785555968_o_279742979289266.jpg FACT VS OBJECTIVE TRUTH?

    —-”What is the difference between a fact and an objective truth?”—-

    A FACT consists of a promise of a theory of an observation.

    A TRUTH Proposition consists of a promise of a theory of an observable.

    **|Universal Epistemology| : Free Association**(survived minimum relations for cognizance) -> **Hypothesis** (survived rational falsification) -> **Theory** (survived empirical falsification) -> **Law** (survived applied falsification).

    |**Truth**| : A promise that the correspondence between the experience invoked in the audience by the statement and something observable: open to senses(physical), emotions(Intuitionistic), or mind(intellectual) – satisfies the demand for decidability (correspondence), given the consequences and demand for restitution upon ignorance, error, bias, or deceit.

    In practice we use Fact for measurements or records of existentially observable reality, and objective truth is a ‘fuzzier term’ that attempts to include statements about language (verbalisms) and attribute to them the freedom of error, bias, and deceit of facts.

    In other words, these terms are specific (fact) and loose (Objective) assertions of the absence of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. We use the via positiva assertion “True”, meaning rather than the via negativa assertion “free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit” for brevity and habit, despite the fact that the term true can and only can mean ‘free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit given the scope of externalities of the question (harm)”. Because that is all it is possible to know.

    As far as I know that is the best definition of truth that exists – or can exist.FACT VS OBJECTIVE TRUTH?

    —-”What is the difference between a fact and an objective truth?”—-

    A FACT consists of a promise of a theory of an observation.

    A TRUTH Proposition consists of a promise of a theory of an observable.

    **|Universal Epistemology| : Free Association**(survived minimum relations for cognizance) -> **Hypothesis** (survived rational falsification) -> **Theory** (survived empirical falsification) -> **Law** (survived applied falsification).

    |**Truth**| : A promise that the correspondence between the experience invoked in the audience by the statement and something observable: open to senses(physical), emotions(Intuitionistic), or mind(intellectual) – satisfies the demand for decidability (correspondence), given the consequences and demand for restitution upon ignorance, error, bias, or deceit.

    In practice we use Fact for measurements or records of existentially observable reality, and objective truth is a ‘fuzzier term’ that attempts to include statements about language (verbalisms) and attribute to them the freedom of error, bias, and deceit of facts.

    In other words, these terms are specific (fact) and loose (Objective) assertions of the absence of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. We use the via positiva assertion “True”, meaning rather than the via negativa assertion “free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit” for brevity and habit, despite the fact that the term true can and only can mean ‘free of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit given the scope of externalities of the question (harm)”. Because that is all it is possible to know.

    As far as I know that is the best definition of truth that exists – or can exist.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 12:48:00 UTC

  • “White Law”, or “The White Law”

    “White Law”, or “The White Law”.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-16 21:01:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030197762367868929

  • “White Law”, or “The White Law”

    “White Law”, or “The White Law”.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-16 17:00:00 UTC

  • “I am unwilling to oppress another individual’s engagement in reciprocally volun

    “I am unwilling to oppress another individual’s engagement in reciprocally voluntary trade, just as I am unwilling to tolerate another’s oppression of my reciprocal and voluntary trade.. But like all trade I am willing to suppress any externalities that emerge from others trade just as I assume they are willing to do to me. Public promiscuity is an externality that I am willing to suppress whether others are wiling to or not. Because public promiscuity encourages a hazard in the commons. And creating hazards in the commons is an imposition of risk cost upon others. And imposition of costs upon others is the only definition of ‘wrong’ in the context of ‘right/good, wrong/bad’ that I know of. Because imposition of costs upon others causes them to retaliate for one having done so. And both the export of risk into the commons, and the cycle of retaliation are harmful to the commons, and harmful to me, and is therefore something I will retaliate against by prior constraint. For this reason one does not determine what is inoffensive to others. Others determine what is offensive to them, and demonstrate it by retaliation. I understand that homosexuality is revolting offensive to many people, and so are many birth defects. The only solution to this problem that I know of is voluntary disassociation. And the my understanding of the problem is that people are prohibited by the monopoly state from voluntary disassociation.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-16 08:53:00 UTC

  • —“Can You Define the Terms Radical Right and Radical Left?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)Left (Socialist), …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit. …. Consumption Preference, …. Demand Discretionary rule. …. Values: Exclusively Care, and Proportionality. …. Result: Dysgenic. -> The Radical Left is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Community > Polity > World (Herds) Libertarian (Classical Liberal), …. Ascendent Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Generation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Almost Exclusively Liberty. …. Result: Eugenic Tilt. -> The Radical Libertarians are Activist and NOT willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Markets. (Solitary Hunters.) Right (Aristocratic), …. Established Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Accumulation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Complete Spectrum of Care, Proportionality, Loyalty, Hierarchy, Purity. …. Result: Eugenic. -> The Radical Right is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Nationalism (Packs) Voting Patterns Underclasses, Minorities, and Single White Women vote Left (self), while White males and MarriedWhite females vote right (family). (See Pew research). White women are the only defectors from their tribe. In Simple Terms: Political choices are intuitionistic because they are too general due to representatives and parties to vote with greater discretion. So we see voting patterns and political affiliation reflect Cognitive biases to advance the feminine dysgenic (herd) reproductive strategy or advance the male eugenic (pack) strategy. This is rather obvious given the difference (vast) in male and female reproductive and survival strategies. Really, That’s the answer. And that’s what all the data tells us. And it’s also why representative democracy is a catastrophe waiting to happen.

  • —“Can You Define the Terms Radical Right and Radical Left?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)Left (Socialist), …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit. …. Consumption Preference, …. Demand Discretionary rule. …. Values: Exclusively Care, and Proportionality. …. Result: Dysgenic. -> The Radical Left is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Community > Polity > World (Herds) Libertarian (Classical Liberal), …. Ascendent Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Generation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Almost Exclusively Liberty. …. Result: Eugenic Tilt. -> The Radical Libertarians are Activist and NOT willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Markets. (Solitary Hunters.) Right (Aristocratic), …. Established Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Accumulation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Complete Spectrum of Care, Proportionality, Loyalty, Hierarchy, Purity. …. Result: Eugenic. -> The Radical Right is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Nationalism (Packs) Voting Patterns Underclasses, Minorities, and Single White Women vote Left (self), while White males and MarriedWhite females vote right (family). (See Pew research). White women are the only defectors from their tribe. In Simple Terms: Political choices are intuitionistic because they are too general due to representatives and parties to vote with greater discretion. So we see voting patterns and political affiliation reflect Cognitive biases to advance the feminine dysgenic (herd) reproductive strategy or advance the male eugenic (pack) strategy. This is rather obvious given the difference (vast) in male and female reproductive and survival strategies. Really, That’s the answer. And that’s what all the data tells us. And it’s also why representative democracy is a catastrophe waiting to happen.

  • “CAN YOU DEFINE THE TERMS RADICAL RIGHT AND RADICAL LEFT?”— THE CORRECT ANSWER

    —“CAN YOU DEFINE THE TERMS RADICAL RIGHT AND RADICAL LEFT?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)

    Left (Socialist),
    …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=277148002882097&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 19:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029454177376845826

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39208380_277148672882030_41532874359

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39208380_277148672882030_41532874359

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39208380_277148672882030_4153287435985354752_o_277148656215365.jpg —“CAN YOU DEFINE THE TERMS RADICAL RIGHT AND RADICAL LEFT?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)

    Left (Socialist),

    …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit.

    …. Consumption Preference,

    …. Demand Discretionary rule.

    …. Values: Exclusively Care, and Proportionality.

    …. Result: Dysgenic.

    -> The Radical Left is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Community > Polity > World (Herds)

    Libertarian (Classical Liberal),

    …. Ascendent Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy,

    …. Capital Generation Preference,

    …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity.

    …. Values: Almost Exclusively Liberty.

    …. Result: Eugenic Tilt.

    -> The Radical Libertarians are Activist and NOT willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Markets. (Solitary Hunters.)

    Right (Aristocratic),

    …. Established Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy,

    …. Capital Accumulation Preference,

    …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity.

    …. Values: Complete Spectrum of Care, Proportionality, Loyalty, Hierarchy, Purity.

    …. Result: Eugenic.

    -> The Radical Right is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Nationalism (Packs)

    Voting Patterns

    Underclasses, Minorities, and Single White Women vote Left (self), while White males and MarriedWhite females vote right (family). (See Pew research). White women are the only defectors from their tribe.

    In Simple Terms:

    Political choices are intuitionistic because they are too general due to representatives and parties to vote with greater discretion.

    So we see voting patterns and political affiliation reflect Cognitive biases to advance the feminine dysgenic (herd) reproductive strategy or advance the male eugenic (pack) strategy. This is rather obvious given the difference (vast) in male and female reproductive and survival strategies.

    Really, That’s the answer. And that’s what all the data tells us. And it’s also why representative democracy is a catastrophe waiting to happen.—“CAN YOU DEFINE THE TERMS RADICAL RIGHT AND RADICAL LEFT?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)

    Left (Socialist),

    …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit.

    …. Consumption Preference,

    …. Demand Discretionary rule.

    …. Values: Exclusively Care, and Proportionality.

    …. Result: Dysgenic.

    -> The Radical Left is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Community > Polity > World (Herds)

    Libertarian (Classical Liberal),

    …. Ascendent Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy,

    …. Capital Generation Preference,

    …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity.

    …. Values: Almost Exclusively Liberty.

    …. Result: Eugenic Tilt.

    -> The Radical Libertarians are Activist and NOT willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Markets. (Solitary Hunters.)

    Right (Aristocratic),

    …. Established Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy,

    …. Capital Accumulation Preference,

    …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity.

    …. Values: Complete Spectrum of Care, Proportionality, Loyalty, Hierarchy, Purity.

    …. Result: Eugenic.

    -> The Radical Right is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Nationalism (Packs)

    Voting Patterns

    Underclasses, Minorities, and Single White Women vote Left (self), while White males and MarriedWhite females vote right (family). (See Pew research). White women are the only defectors from their tribe.

    In Simple Terms:

    Political choices are intuitionistic because they are too general due to representatives and parties to vote with greater discretion.

    So we see voting patterns and political affiliation reflect Cognitive biases to advance the feminine dysgenic (herd) reproductive strategy or advance the male eugenic (pack) strategy. This is rather obvious given the difference (vast) in male and female reproductive and survival strategies.

    Really, That’s the answer. And that’s what all the data tells us. And it’s also why representative democracy is a catastrophe waiting to happen.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 15:46:00 UTC