Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • The Ineffable

    October 18th, 2018 12:22 PM

    [T]he ineffable is that which one is simply too ignorant to explain. There is nothing that is not explicable with the knowledge to do so. People use such terms to retain self image and status despite their ignorance.

  • STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM There is no difference between NSDAP germa

    STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM

    There is no difference between NSDAP germany and CENTRAL PARTY china other than the scale of the bureaucracy necessary to administer a more rapid modernization (in china) and a rapid resistance to communism (in germany).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 16:50:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052965032206761992

  • The Definition of Proletariat in Roman Law

    October 17th, 2018 10:53 PM THE DEFINITION OF PROLETARIAT IN ROMAN LAW by Igor Rogov

    [P]eople not belonging to any particular family, and having no name nor any stakes in upholding the ancestral honor: Which is literally “proletariat”, as defined by the Roman law and culture. The difference between Rome and the Present, is that the current proletarian crop has all the voting power to be manipulated, so the collapse of the empire does not even need any external barbarian invasion anymore. (Let’s repeat that. The “Invasion from within”.)

  • Definitions: Tolerance vs Forbearance (core)

    October 17th, 2018 4:30 PM DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE by Luke Weinhagen The distinction between tolerance and forbearance.

    TOLERANCE: allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. – It is a passive state. – No agency. FORBEARANCE: intentionally taking responsibility for a cost to allow someone else not to. (example: my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). – It is an active state. – Allows agency.

  • The Definition of Proletariat in Roman Law

    October 17th, 2018 10:53 PM THE DEFINITION OF PROLETARIAT IN ROMAN LAW by Igor Rogov

    [P]eople not belonging to any particular family, and having no name nor any stakes in upholding the ancestral honor: Which is literally “proletariat”, as defined by the Roman law and culture. The difference between Rome and the Present, is that the current proletarian crop has all the voting power to be manipulated, so the collapse of the empire does not even need any external barbarian invasion anymore. (Let’s repeat that. The “Invasion from within”.)

  • Economic Pseudoscience = Cherry Picking

    October 17th, 2018 5:30 PM ECONOMIC PSEUDOSCIENCE = CHERRY PICKING [W]hat separates economic science from economic pseudoscience, is selective measurement of changes in capital. Labor mobility turns out to be one of the WORST POSSIBLE means of altering poverty. Bring capital and rule of law to people, not people to capital and rule of law: One either brings rule of law and capital to people (colonialism) or one brings people to rule of law and capital (reverse-colonialism). The only choice is whether you colonize and INCREASE world institutional capital, or are colonized and CONSUME world institutional capital – while claiming you’ve made an increase in productivity rather than consumption.

  • Definitions: Tolerance vs Forbearance (core)

    October 17th, 2018 4:30 PM DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE by Luke Weinhagen The distinction between tolerance and forbearance.

    TOLERANCE: allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. – It is a passive state. – No agency. FORBEARANCE: intentionally taking responsibility for a cost to allow someone else not to. (example: my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). – It is an active state. – Allows agency.

  • DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE by Luke Weinhagen The distinction between

    DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE

    by Luke Weinhagen

    The distinction between tolerance and forbearance.

    TOLERANCE: allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs.

    – It is a passive state.

    – No agency.

    FORBEARANCE: intentionally taking responsibility for a cost to allow someone else not to. (example: my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet).

    – It is an active state.

    – Allows agency.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 16:30:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism Isn’t an Ideology.

    October 16th, 2018 4:22 PM PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertarianism) AND THE SCIENCE OF TESTIMONY, COMBINED INTO A FORMAL RATIO-EMPIRICAL SYSTEM OF LAW (Decidability) FOR ETHICS, AND POLITICS. In other words, it’s the solution to social science.

    —“This is crucial for people that want to claim they don’t adhere to the propertarian ideology. It is not an ideology. It is a methodology and much like science it focuses on empirical evidence and the falsification of proposed truth claims. Most people that say they don’t agree with propertarian ideology have an ideology of their own that has been found to be based on lies via propertarian methods – and that’s the real objection.”– Curtus Maximus (A Sock/Alias of Someone Else)

    [Y]ou cannot defeat it. Sorry. You can however, state that despite your ideology being parasitic, predatory(immoral) and dishonest (fraudulent) that you cannot compete by meritocratic (market, evolutionary, eugenic) means, (meaning you’re inferior) and therefore must resort to parasitism, predation, and deceit (fraud), to survive by parasitism, predation, and fraud. It’s ok to do that. It’s just the truth. But you can’t make any kind of moral argument to support it.

  • Propertarianism Isn’t an Ideology.

    October 16th, 2018 4:22 PM PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertarianism) AND THE SCIENCE OF TESTIMONY, COMBINED INTO A FORMAL RATIO-EMPIRICAL SYSTEM OF LAW (Decidability) FOR ETHICS, AND POLITICS. In other words, it’s the solution to social science.

    —“This is crucial for people that want to claim they don’t adhere to the propertarian ideology. It is not an ideology. It is a methodology and much like science it focuses on empirical evidence and the falsification of proposed truth claims. Most people that say they don’t agree with propertarian ideology have an ideology of their own that has been found to be based on lies via propertarian methods – and that’s the real objection.”– Curtus Maximus (A Sock/Alias of Someone Else)

    [Y]ou cannot defeat it. Sorry. You can however, state that despite your ideology being parasitic, predatory(immoral) and dishonest (fraudulent) that you cannot compete by meritocratic (market, evolutionary, eugenic) means, (meaning you’re inferior) and therefore must resort to parasitism, predation, and deceit (fraud), to survive by parasitism, predation, and fraud. It’s ok to do that. It’s just the truth. But you can’t make any kind of moral argument to support it.