DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING
I use understanding for reason, sympathy for motives and intentions, and empathy for feelings.
|COMMUNICATION| Empathy(Feel/Value/reaction) > Sympathy (Intuition/Incentives/cause) > Understand (Reason/Words/Argument-Negotiation)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 14:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054382018765750277
DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING
I use understanding for reason, sympathy for motives and intentions, and empathy for feelings.
|COMMUNICATION| Empathy(Feel/Value/reaction) > Sympathy (Intuition/Incentives/cause) > Understand (Reason/Words/Argument-Negotiation)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 10:40:00 UTC
October 20th, 2018 9:49 AM
PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT —“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott
PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT
—“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 09:49:00 UTC
October 19th, 2018 10:23 AM
—“CURT: WHAT IS ‘GENETIC LOAD’ IN CONTEXT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY?”— —“Can I get a quick rundown on genetic load?”—Stephen Murray
In the context of POLITICAL ECONOMY (What I do) IT’S AN ARGUMENT FOR A ONE CHILD POLICY. 1) Long version: “… ratio of the employable (productive) to the unemployable (un productive).. sufficient to produce a pareto distribution (power law) at a given level of development (institutions, technology, economy) in competition with (context of) a given world economy (exterior condition). …” 2) Short version: since you must produce a pareto distribution in order to organize an economy the ratio of the 120+ class to the rest of the population must be sufficient to do so. 3) Or, Shortest version: a small group of people with a median distribution of 100-112 cannot organize a productive competitive polity out of a large population with a median of 75-85. 4) Or Colloquial (“Over Beers”) version: – You cannot make a china out of an india. – You cannot make a europe out of the middle east. – You cannot make a europe out of a south america. … without decreasing the genetic load ( by the most civilized means: one child policy.) HOWEVER…. You can however devolve a north america, a europe, a russia into a south america, india, middle east, by increasing genetic load through immigration or asymmetric reproduction.
October 19th, 2018 10:23 AM
—“CURT: WHAT IS ‘GENETIC LOAD’ IN CONTEXT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY?”— —“Can I get a quick rundown on genetic load?”—Stephen Murray
In the context of POLITICAL ECONOMY (What I do) IT’S AN ARGUMENT FOR A ONE CHILD POLICY. 1) Long version: “… ratio of the employable (productive) to the unemployable (un productive).. sufficient to produce a pareto distribution (power law) at a given level of development (institutions, technology, economy) in competition with (context of) a given world economy (exterior condition). …” 2) Short version: since you must produce a pareto distribution in order to organize an economy the ratio of the 120+ class to the rest of the population must be sufficient to do so. 3) Or, Shortest version: a small group of people with a median distribution of 100-112 cannot organize a productive competitive polity out of a large population with a median of 75-85. 4) Or Colloquial (“Over Beers”) version: – You cannot make a china out of an india. – You cannot make a europe out of the middle east. – You cannot make a europe out of a south america. … without decreasing the genetic load ( by the most civilized means: one child policy.) HOWEVER…. You can however devolve a north america, a europe, a russia into a south america, india, middle east, by increasing genetic load through immigration or asymmetric reproduction.
October 19th, 2018 3:29 PM TESTIMONIALISM IS THE CORE INSIGHT OF PROPERTARIANISM [M]ost of the work is dependent upon the completion of the scientific method, and its restatement as due diligence in the production of testimony such that one can (and by law) must, provide a warrant of due diligence for one’s speech. This allows us to extend the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence from goods and services to information (speech) ending the industrialization of lying that we know as marxism-feminism-postmodernism of the academy-state-media complex. The this ‘checklist’ and the ‘grammars’ are a substantial innovation, and they are unfortunately a bit harder to grasp and internalize than acquisitionism (psychology restated as desire to acquire property in toto), and propertarianism (ethics restated as voluntary transfer of property). The rest, (operational law, rule of law, and perfect government) are not that complicated.
TESTIMONIALISM IS THE CORE INSIGHT OF PROPERTARIANISM
Most of the work is dependent upon the completion of the scientific method, and its restatement as due diligence in the production of testimony such that one can (and by law) must, provide a warrant of due diligence for one’s speech. This allows us to extend the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence from goods and services to information (speech) ending the industrialization of lying that we know as marxism-feminism-postmodernism of the academy-state-media complex. The this ‘checklist’ and the ‘grammars’ are a substantial innovation, and they are unfortunately a bit harder to grasp and internalize than acquisitionism (psychology restated as desire to acquire property in toto), and propertarianism (ethics restated as voluntary transfer of property). The rest, (operational law, rule of law, and perfect government) are not that complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 15:29:00 UTC
—“CURT: WHAT IS ‘GENETIC LOAD’ IN CONTEXT OF POLITICAL ECONOMY?”—
—“Can I get a quick rundown on genetic load?”—Stephen Murray
In the context of POLITICAL ECONOMY (What I do) IT’S AN ARGUMENT FOR A ONE CHILD POLICY.
1) Long version: “… ratio of the employable (productive) to the unemployable (un productive).. sufficient to produce a pareto distribution (power law) at a given level of development (institutions, technology, economy) in competition with (context of) a given world economy (exterior condition). …”
2) Short version: since you must produce a pareto distribution in order to organize an economy the ratio of the 120+ class to the rest of the population must be sufficient to do so.
3) Or, shortest version: a small group of people with a median distribution of 100-112 cannot organize a productive competitive polity out of a large population with a median of 75-85.
4) Or colloquial (“Over Beers”) version:
– You cannot make a china out of an india.
– You cannot make a europe out of the middle east.
– You cannot make a europe out of a south america.
… without decreasing the genetic load ( by the most civilized means: one child policy.)
HOWEVER….
You can however devolve a north america, a europe, a russia into a south america, india, middle east, by increasing genetic load through immigration or asymmetric reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 10:23:00 UTC
October 18th, 2018 12:22 PM
[T]he ineffable is that which one is simply too ignorant to explain. There is nothing that is not explicable with the knowledge to do so. People use such terms to retain self image and status despite their ignorance.