This is correct. It combines a) deception, b) by projection, c) by assertion of opinion as truth, d) by the pretense of knowledge (lying).
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-29 18:29:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1740802231413162327
Reply addressees: @datepsych
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1740800160861401398
Approximately, yes. That’s right However, we standardize on the terms empathizing in time evading responsibilty for production, defense, and preservation of capital vs systematizing over time seeking responsibilty for production, defense and preservation of capital.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 20:13:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738654050910867795
Reply addressees: @Zamicol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738652688009572821
advice:
techical term is systematizing – meaning the interaction of processes by prediction over time
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 01:11:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738366771034268045
Reply addressees: @Damo68351777 @Psyche_OS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738364744439152729
Q: CURT: “WHAT DOES TOXIC FEMININITY CONSISTS OF?”
Toxic Femininity consists of the natural expression of female instinct and intuition in the absence of offspring and the absence of regulation on her behavior – certainly by women in the main, but as importantly, by women in establishing limits that impose costs on the capital of the commons. In general women do not mature until they have at least one but usually at least three to four children – which is rather obvious in voting patterns and linguistic analysis.
Toxic femininity consists of:
(a) hyperconsumption of everything from attention to goods and services to accumulated capital
(b) responsibility evasion particularly for common capital
(d) various forms of manipulation and deceit too long to list to obtain consumption, assets, or avoid responsibility.
(c) various forms of seduction into hazards to obtain assets or evade responsibility
(e) social constsruction of and by magical thinking to advance all the the above. (confusing wants with
(f) Hiding behind false claims of oppression and victimhood by claiming demands for responsibility, accountability, and self regulation of impulses are offenses rather than domestication of animal impulse – thus again, evading responsibility for the commons.
Correction (Cures)
Can you regulate human nature? Of course. We can prohibit some of it and direct most of it. (for example, heroism instead of selfishness).
As for policies, well, outlawing the spectrum of female social crimes is pretty easy and by doing that we create the only means of regulating women – social pressure. Women are incapable of self regulation without external social constraint. They have to feel it and to feel it it has to be empathizable. The law is the most effective vehicle for outlawing antisocial behavior and causing adaptation to the prohibition of that behavior, by social pressure – largely from other women.
Most of my work, from female brain organization, to feminine behavior, to the abrahamic sequence, to the marxist sequence consist of simply restoring the equilibrium of suppression of criminal (antisocial) between the sexes because of sex differences in antisociality and criminality, and the kinds of crimes made possible by industry technology mass media, and democracy.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 00:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738352710485700608
Q: CURT: “What does Toxic Femininity Consists of?”
Toxic Femininity consists of the natural expression of female instinct and intuition in the absence of offspring and the absence of regulation on her behavior – certainly by women in the main, but as importantly, by women in…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 00:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738352631565693368
Q: CURT: “What does Toxic Femininity Consists of?”
Toxic Femininity consists of the natural expression of female instinct and intuition in the absence of offspring and the absence of regulation on her behavior – certainly by women in the main, but as importantly, by women in establishing limits that impose costs on the capital of the commons. In general women do not mature until they have at least one but usually at least three to four children – which is rather obvious in voting patterns and linguistic analysis.
Toxic femininity consists of:
(a) hyperconsumption of everything from attention to goods and services to accumulated capital
(b) responsibility evasion particularly for common capital
(d) various forms of manipulation and deceit too long to list to obtain consumption, assets, or avoid responsibility.
(c) various forms of seduction into hazards to obtain assets or evade responsibility
(e) social constsruction of and by magical thinking to advance all the the above. (confusing wants with
(f) Hiding behind false claims of oppression and victimhood by claiming demands for responsibility, accountability, and self regulation of impulses are offenses rather than domestication of animal impulse – thus again, evading responsibility for the commons.
Correction (Cures)
Can you regulate human nature? Of course. We can prohibit some of it and direct most of it. (for example, heroism instead of selfishness).
As for policies, well, outlawing the spectrum of female social crimes is pretty easy and by doing that we create the only means of regulating women – social pressure. Women are incapable of self regulation without external social constraint. They have to feel it and to feel it it has to be empathizable. The law is the most effective vehicle for outlawing antisocial behavior and causing adaptation to the prohibition of that behavior, by social pressure – largely from other women.
Most of my work, from female brain organization, to feminine behavior, to the abrahamic sequence, to the marxist sequence consist of simply restoring the equilibrium of suppression of criminal (antisocial) between the sexes because of sex differences in antisociality and criminality, and the kinds of crimes made possible by industry technology mass media, and democracy.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 00:15:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738352631343435776
Q: CURT: “What does Toxic Femininity Consists of?”
Toxic Femininity consists of the natural expression of female instinct and intuition in the absence of offspring and the absence of regulation on her behavior – certainly by women in the main, but as importantly, by women in establishing limits that impose costs on the capital of the commons. In general women do not mature until they have at least one but usually at least three to four children – which is rather obvious in voting patterns and linguistic analysis.
Toxic femininity consists of:
(a) hyperconsumption of everything from attention to goods and services to accumulated capital
(b) responsibility evasion particularly for common capital
(c) various forms of seduction into hazards to obtain assets or evade responsibility
(d) various forms of manipulation and deceit too long to list to obtain consumption, assets, or avoid responsibility.
Correction (Cures)
Can you regulate human nature? Of course. We can prohibit some of it and direct most of it. (for example, heroism instead of selfishness).
As for policies, well, outlawing the spectrum of female social crimes is pretty easy and by doing that we create the only means of regulating women – social pressure. Women are incapable of self regulation without external social constraint. They have to feel it and to feel it it has to be empathizable. The law is the most effective vehicle for outlawing antisocial behavior and causing adaptation to the prohibition of that behavior, by social pressure – largely from other women.
Most of my work, from female brain organization, to feminine behavior, to the abrahamic sequence, to the marxist sequence consist of simply restoring the equilibrium of suppression of criminal (antisocial) between the sexes because of sex differences in antisociality and criminality, and the kinds of crimes made possible by industry technology mass media, and democracy.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 00:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738341050459000832
Q: WhATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMPLETED AND FINISHED?
It’s a common mistake to conflate them.
“All completed efforts are finished, but not all finished efforts are completed.
Also, culturally: “It’s completed” vs “I’m finished”
Also, culturally: “I’m finished for the day but the task isn’t completed”
Also, culturally: “Complete is more complete than finished.”
The Cause of Undecidability in Definitions
The Necessity of “Adversarialism by Disambiguation by Enumeration, Operationalization, and Serialization” (What we call ‘The Method’ or “P-Method”)
In general English usage, the words “completed” and “finished” are often used interchangeably, but there can be subtle differences in their connotations and contexts where they are most appropriately used.
Completed
Implication of Fulfilling Requirements: “Completed” often implies that something has been done in accordance with certain standards or requirements. It suggests that all parts of a task or project have been accomplished to a set level of expectation or satisfaction.
Focus on Objectives: The use of “completed” is common in professional or formal contexts, especially when referring to tasks, projects, objectives, or processes that have specific goals or criteria.
Example: “She completed her degree,” implies that all requirements for the degree were met.
Finished
General Completion: “Finished” can imply the general completion of an activity or task, without necessarily the connotation of meeting specific standards or criteria.
Broader Usage: It can be used in a broader range of contexts, from casual to formal. “Finished” can simply mean that one has stopped working on something, regardless of the outcome.
Example: “I finished reading the book,” which implies reaching the end of the book, but not necessarily that there was a specific objective or standard involved in reading it.
Special Contexts and Nuances
Artistic and Personal Projects: In creative or personal projects, “finished” can imply a degree of finality or the end of engagement. For example, an artist might say a painting is finished, which can also carry a subjective judgment about its completeness.
Negative Connotations: Sometimes “finished” can have a negative connotation, implying an end or termination, often used in phrases like “You are finished,” which can imply the end of one’s opportunities or possibilities in a certain context.
Colloquial Interchangeable Usage
In many cases, “completed” and “finished” can be used interchangeably without significant loss of meaning, especially in everyday conversation.
In conclusion, while “completed” often carries a connotation of fulfilling specific criteria or standards, “finished” is more general and can refer to the end of any activity, regardless of how or why it ended. The choice between them can depend on the context and the particular nuance the speaker wishes to convey.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @SantiagoAuFund
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-22 18:47:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738270002128576512
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738264753875677361
DISAMBIGUATING GLOBALISM
Common Misunderstanding of “Globalism”. Globalism = ~Free Trade (world system of law, finance, and trade.)
Informational Globalism was made possible by transport trade and communication systems. To some degree it has always existed.
Economic Globalism was made possible by the USA’s capture of the British Empire and the Postwar strategy to prevent further world wars by creating economic interdependence. To some degree the USA succeeded which raised mankind out of ignorance and poverty.
Political Globalism is a misguided effort by two factions in the west to ride on the USA’s capacity to produce economic globalism. To no degree is this ever possible – or in mankind’s interest. Since all monopolies are devolutionary.
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @Areez22 @lacaille8760 @ezra_tezra @DanielF70060768
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-22 14:39:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738207699257438208
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738203369481580638
Method of argument.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-22 05:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738063287080964161
Reply addressees: @BustinHb86352 @kriegslied8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738001421071765817