Form: Definition

  • ” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”— Let’s pu

    —” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”—

    Let’s put fascism in series so that we can disambiguate it.

    Market Meritocracy: the anglo and dutch method of civil organization (made possible by extensive trade in the absence of a strong state, and presence of talented economic classes, and endless opportunity for all.)

    Communism: state seizure of the means of production by the underclasses and equidistribution of production by ‘need’. (Jewish – Envious, destructive )

    National Socialism: state intervention in internal production, and direction of returns to the commons for kin: via positiva care. (french – pragmatic)

    Fascism: Defense of the commons from non-kin – via-negativa defense. (Italian – ideological )

    Combination of both national socialism and fascism (Germany – Secular Theological )

    Technological advancement had made possible the direction of new wealth from the industrial revolution to the advancement of groups.

    The debate was over:
    … empires (successfully transformed nations (britain, america)
    -vs-
    … the old backward nations (continental europe)
    -vs-
    ….classes (the failed nations (jewish – universalist)).

    Which we can see as not terribly complicated in retrospect: the rational choice of peoples to respond to change in material circumstances dependent upon their extant condition.

    Fascism consists in the pursuit of Autarky (economic and resource independence) under a corporation called the state, which represents an extended tribe of people (nation) by direct intervention with industry and trade to give preference to autarkic exchanges and prevention of externalization of gains of resources and production despite pricing signals that would normally instruct members of any given industry to operate efficiently by buying by price alone.

    Fascism provides a merger of the state and industry such that industry adopts autarkic pricing, buying within the country, rather than market pricing.

    National Socialism was a response to Market Meritocracy, where the same opportunities were not available to all, in an historically authoritarian state with vast bureaucratic organs both secular and theological.

    Fascism was and is EXPLICITLY racial national tribal because it arose in RESPONSE to communism. Germany was exceptionally talented in all aspects but needed to defend herself, and direct new wealth to the expansion of commons.

    Communism(Socialism) was a response to both given the backwardness of the classes and states, and gave jews, ‘intellectuals’ and underclasses a means of using the bottom to gain power against the middle which they envied.

    in particular communism was a means by which jewish minority could replace the nobility, seize power in the russian empire, which was the most backward, with the largest poor population, and was in turmoil because of the war, and the need to use ‘bodies’ in that war to compensate for the backwardness of industry and state.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:28:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068

  • WE DON’T USE THE TERM “FREE WILL” We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, beca

    WE DON’T USE THE TERM “FREE WILL”

    We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, because it is an ideal, and so tainted that it’s meaningless.

    Instead, we use the terms…
    1. Agency (via positiva) and;
    2. Sovereignty (via negativa) and;
    3. Reciprocity (via voluntary, productive);
    …and we state operationally what those mean.

    If you cant disambiguate it and operationalize it then you don’t understand it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424678176895590

  • “CURT, WHICH DNA SERVICE SHOULD I USE?”— —“Curt; Which DNA service?”— Depe

    —“CURT, WHICH DNA SERVICE SHOULD I USE?”—

    —“Curt; Which DNA service?”—

    Depends upon what you want from the service.

    FIND LIVING RELATIVES (General)
    Ancestry is cheapest largest, easiest to understand with 10M people, testing 700k markers, and 500 regions, producing lots of information – but we detect anti-european ‘bias’ in the results. Definitely for the ‘mixed race’ demographic

    HEALTH, AND MORE PRECISE ETHNICITY (More)
    23andMe is expensive, but if you opt in it includes your health information. 7M people, 1000 regions. Definitely for better ancestral ethnicity and health. Some anti-european bias to appeal to the “what am I?” market.

    PATERNITY, ORGAN DONOR TESTING (really) (lots more)
    Family Tree DNA … Paternity Testing and other specific tests (really, these guys test everything) every additional test costs but then .. when you wanna know… you can know.

    Notes:
    a) Ancestry and 23andMe both require ‘interpretation’ of results by ‘human judgement’
    b) You are best served by getting both tests and comparing them.
    c) Anything below double digit percentage is ‘noise’ that means nothing more than ‘at one point shared a common ancestor’.
    d) You are largely the product of last six generations … after that it’s very difficult to tell much of anything meaningful because whatever remains is ‘artifact’. that artifact might be from eight generations ago… or hundreds of generations ago.
    e) for example, southeast asian most often means native south american with god knows who, and finally the fragment ended up in you.
    f) so if you don’t know human migration patterns you can incorrectly interpret the ‘artifacts’.
    g) or that you have no such artifact, only share earlier markers in common with people from a region due to even earlier migrations.
    (Ancestry.com tries to muddy the waters on purpose)

    In other words, view any origin below 20% with extreme skepticism. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Good 2019 review here:
    exploringlifesmysteries.com/best-dna-test/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:12:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424639582302125

  • PUBLIC SPEECH IS TO THE PUBLIC NOT IN PUBLIC –“Is it a correct summation that p

    PUBLIC SPEECH IS TO THE PUBLIC NOT IN PUBLIC

    –“Is it a correct summation that public speech is not a speech in public but a speech to the public? Because that’s what I’ve been telling people.”—Martin ล tฤ›pรกn


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-08 21:14:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148339524721885184

  • DEFINE “POWER” The ability to alter the probability of outcomes by force, remune

    DEFINE “POWER”
    The ability to alter the probability of outcomes by force, remuneration, promise of inclusion-exclusion, or combination thereof, in competition with others able to do the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-07 12:19:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147842608888274945

  • it’s called “recursion”. brainstem > thalamus > neocortex > hippocampus > thalam

    it’s called “recursion”. brainstem > thalamus > neocortex > hippocampus > thalamus > (repeat )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-17 13:38:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140614683126390786

    Reply addressees: @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140610514403418113


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable โ€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140610514403418113

  • I don’t necessarily know what ‘materialism’ means. I use the terms Realism, Scie

    I don’t necessarily know what ‘materialism’ means. I use the terms Realism, Scientific Realism, Naturalism,Operationalism,Testimonialism. I deny dualism. But because I have the knowledge to do so. That does not mean the ACT of experience (change) is the same as material (state).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-17 13:10:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140607713237512193

    Reply addressees: @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140596519936122881


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable โ€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140596519936122881

  • Rationality (reasoning) and rational actor (following incentives) are two differ

    Rationality (reasoning) and rational actor (following incentives) are two different things. People are rational actors. They follow incentives. We cannot force people to stay married, only assist one another in re-sorting into new families.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:09:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048780441600001

    Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @BagleyDevon Women leave because they want more out of a relationship than is possible.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @BagleyDevon Women leave because they want more out of a relationship than is possible.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733

  • (PS: I love it when people use words they don’t understand. Incoherent(i can’t u

    (PS: I love it when people use words they don’t understand. Incoherent(i can’t understand) and illogical(that doesn’t follow) are two different things.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 12:58:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139517542022688768

  • “However, unjustified theories do not seem to supply a basis for rational action

    —“However, unjustified theories do not seem to supply a basis for rational action.”—-

    Reasonable vs Rational.

    Reasonable=Pragmatic. Rational=Justified.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-10 23:37:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1138228845570666496