Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • The founding principle is simple: self-determination by a universal militia gran

    The founding principle is simple: self-determination by a universal militia granting one another sovereignty and reciprocity in display word and deed in exchange for reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty and reciprocity, limiting us to voluntary cooperation in markets in all.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 15:20:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273999202742341633

    Reply addressees: @SpartanCowboy2 @party_blanket @John67415445 @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273990872862879744

  • The founding principle is simple: self-determination by a universal militia gran

    The founding principle is simple: self-determination by a universal militia granting one another sovereignty and reciprocity in display word and deed in exchange for reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty and reciprocity, limiting us to voluntary cooperation in markets in all.

    Reply addressees: @SpartanCowboy2 @party_blanket @John67415445 @StefanMolyneux

  • PROPERTARIANISM? The Completion of the scientific method; Producing a formal met

    PROPERTARIANISM?

    The Completion of the scientific method; Producing a formal methodology, vocabulary, grammar of both truthful and moral (reciprocal) speech; restating all disciplines in that truthful and reciprocal speech. including producing a law of truthful and reciprocal speech.

    Producing a formal methodology, vocabulary, grammar of both truthful and moral (reciprocal) speech; restating all disciplines in that truthful and reciprocal speech. including producing a law of truthful and reciprocal speech.

    Testimony (Propertarianism) consists of:

    … the use of procedural falsification;

    … in all dimensions of human perception;

    … resulting in the completion of the Scientific Method ;

    … its application to the totality of human knowledge;

    … resulting in a universally commensurable language of all thought;

    … its embodiment in the common law of tort;

    … its use in the construction of a template for constitutions;

    … and as a consequence creating a market for the prosecution of;

    … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit

    … and the eradication of:

    … … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit

    … from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons;

    … reversing the second Semitic attempt at the destruction of Western Civilization as it has destroyed every other by systematic undermining from within;

    … and restoring the quality of life we have expected from Western Civilization;

    … for those that live today, and those that will yet live in the future;”

    But what does that mean?

    It means a body of inviolable law, a constitution built from it, a law that encourages the prosecution of enemies rather than protecting them, and a system of government that restores and preserves that constitution and our way of life, and the uniqueness of Western Civilization for eternity.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 07:33:00 UTC

  • DISAMBIGUATION: “P VS APPLIED P” I see lot of confusion by not separating “P” (t

    DISAMBIGUATION: “P VS APPLIED P”

    I see lot of confusion by not separating “P” (the method) from various applications of the P-method. The method is close to using object oriented analysis and design to produce a programming language for law. So P-Method isn’t like libertarianism, or socialism, or some other political model. It’s a methodology. By applying P-Method we are trying to reform and restore our civilization. Method vs Application. Science vs Technology, Baking vs Cookies.

    THE METHODOLOGY

    1 – P-Metaphysics (realism, naturalism, operationalism, ….)

    2 – P-Epistemology (brain, mind, consciousness, learning, epistemology, acquisition)

    3 – P-Method (a method, the completion of the scientific method in a formal operational logic) of testing reciprocity in display word and deed.

    … a) Disambiguation, serialization, competition (supply demand equilibration, evolution)

    … b) The Grammars and Table of Grammars

    … c) The Operational Grammar and Universal Commensurability

    … … c’) The Specification for Man

    … d) Reciprocity in Display word and Deed

    … … d’) The set of definitions in series that result from disambiguating terms of reciprocity.

    … e) Compatibilism (division of perception, cognition, knowledge and labor)

    … f) Ternaryism, Tri-Coeercion – Tri-Functionalism

    … g) Beckerian explanation of social phenomenon using economic analysis

    APPLIED GENERALLY

    4 – P-Method applied to History and Group Strategies

    5 – P-Method as an explanation for the strategy and success of western civilization.

    6 – P-Law, and Government (applied P to creating governments) and

    APPLIED SPECIFICALLY

    7 – P-New-Constitution for restoration of western civilization.

    8 – P-Constitutions for various other civilizations.

    Which thing are you talking about?

    If it’s political it’s 7 or 8.

    Newbies talk about 7-8 all the time.

    That’s not P. That’s APPLIED-P.

    P method is the formal logic of psychological and social science, if not all science.

    P method combines all the philosophical and scientific categories.

    So when you confuse confuse P-method(explanation) with political preferences (application) it’s the same as confusing science(explanation) with technology(application)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 07:23:00 UTC

  • What is pseudo-mathematics? — Mathematics is just an instance of (Paradigm of) h

    What is pseudo-mathematics? — Mathematics is just an instance of (Paradigm of) human language, with a very limited set of references (positional names), tests of consistency (equal, greater, less), and operations (addition, subtraction, and sets thereof… https://lap78.ask.fm/igoto/45DKECPW7B667HQMHN2IG6NM56NTFPI7SDTOLGVZD7SKZ7FI2MV5MIYLPJE4WRBQJDSKEVKGCYXXSTSRQR23CKHZHOY7NRDG45FABFKQHVYTSM7CBGMGOOPVV22PLWTESSLYGBAY43MGBUUWIWLBSSKB5GIGRY4S2HOUR63FT6V3AYGHAZZHRW7M6FB3LNNB3F77ME24UF54ZBDSDEWV4CXSECGBOFRC2FI5ANDEUXHH4XAEOYBSPKCAJFZC7DQ=

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-17 16:17:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273288626797977602

  • What is pseudo-mathematics? — Mathematics is just an instance of (Paradigm of) h

    What is pseudo-mathematics? — Mathematics is just an instance of (Paradigm of) human language, with a very limited set of references (positional names), tests of consistency (equal, greater, less), and operations (addition, subtraction, and sets thereof… https://t.co/fu9JcNq5Xr

  • UNDERSTAND: Under our ancient tradition of European Trifunctionalism there are t

    UNDERSTAND:
    Under our ancient tradition of European Trifunctionalism there are three ‘priesthoods’:
    1 – Military (kings)
    2 – Judicial (judges)
    3 – Religious (priests)

    I do the judicial thing. I know my job.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 20:28:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272989328122224640

  • UNDERSTAND: Under our ancient tradition of European Trifunctionalism there are t

    UNDERSTAND:
    Under our ancient tradition of European Trifunctionalism there are three ‘priesthoods’:
    1 – Military (kings)
    2 – Judicial (judges)
    3 – Religious (priests)

    I do the judicial thing. I know my job.

  • Immorality can be boiled down, yes to non-imposition of costs on demonstrated in

    Immorality can be boiled down, yes to non-imposition of costs on demonstrated intersets, where interests include a very broad spectrum. What is moral then, is whatever is not immoral. And what’s positively moral is that which contributes to those interests rather than imposes costs upon them. In other words, law and morality are identical, and wherever they are not, one or the other is false.

    —“Love this disambiguation in terms of costs and demonstrated interests. If law and morality are identical then so many things will be simplified. No outrage industry because of perceived immorality. No virtue signaling (you either within the law, or outside the law). No legal sophistry. No hordes of lawyers who interpret the law as it suits the highest bidder.”—James Dmitro Makienko

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 15:31:00 UTC

  • Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity in Demonstrated Int

    Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity in Demonstrated Interests.

    Common law, constitution, enumerated rights, in strictly constructed (un-interpretable) form.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 12:09:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272501541228994560

    Reply addressees: @mutazsoliman @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272495925651537920