Immorality can be boiled down, yes to non-imposition of costs on demonstrated in

Immorality can be boiled down, yes to non-imposition of costs on demonstrated intersets, where interests include a very broad spectrum. What is moral then, is whatever is not immoral. And what’s positively moral is that which contributes to those interests rather than imposes costs upon them. In other words, law and morality are identical, and wherever they are not, one or the other is false.

—“Love this disambiguation in terms of costs and demonstrated interests. If law and morality are identical then so many things will be simplified. No outrage industry because of perceived immorality. No virtue signaling (you either within the law, or outside the law). No legal sophistry. No hordes of lawyers who interpret the law as it suits the highest bidder.”—James Dmitro Makienko