Form: Critique

Jan 19, 2020, 2:54 PM Please don’t waste my time. Find the data. Human behavior is 80% inherited and 20% idiosyncratic development of behavior. Races differ in degree of neoteny, and rate of maturity. Genders differ in the distribution of traits and biases because of structural differences in the brain and distributions in the endocrine system, with the stereotypes being true in all walks of life. Neoteny and symmetry are most reproductively desirable always and everywhere. Intelligence is a personality trait. Between trait intelligence and trait conscientiousness and trait agreeableness( female)-disagreeableness(male) we measure and predict all lifetime outcomes, and adding family tradition class outcomes are determined. We can even tell your behavior by the type of crop farmed by your ancestors. The difference between races and class is in genetic load, not increase in ability. I other words lower classes carry more defects and mutations. Upper classes maintain position only through selective mating but are otherwise genetically middle class. Nature nurture was solved pre-2000, gender differences by 2012, genetic and racial differences last year (2019), and we are just about to cross the line into the cognitive differences between races, subraces, classes, and genders. There is almost no rotation between genetic and social classes. There is only rotation between economic classes, because markets make it possible for underclasses, lower classes, working classes, and middle classes to achieve “lottery wins”, specifically in business, arts, sports, and entertainment. The problem facing each of the races is statistical and genetic: the size of their underclasses was not eliminated through eugenic reproduction like it was in Europe and east Asia. Instead, neoteny was prevented, and underclass populations expanded because the only defense against warm-weather disease gradients is early maturity and large numbers of offspring. While european winter farming and east Asian cold weather rice farming are brutal for those that carry genetic load. By the late middle ages, most of Europe was genetically middle class. Brit intelligence is largely captured in the middle class (or what we call in the states the upper middle class) and this has not traditionally been a problem in either agrarian or industrial ages – but has become and remains a problem in the post-industrial era. Which is why white brits underperform immigrants. So whereas the average IQ of anglos (myself included) was around 115 in the 1860s, we have lost 15 points, or one standard deviation, in just a hundred and sixty years. Every single one of these underclasses you let in and we let in is crushing both our economies, our cultures, and our future generations. Let me put it another way: try to estimate the value of one national point of intelligence. It’s pretty easy. Look what happens under 100, then under 97, then under 93, then under 90. It’s a cliff. The average intelligence of your people is more important than yur intelligence in determining your quality of life and that of your offspring and the generations that follow. Period. End of story. I know this because I know in painful detail the structure of the brain, how it operates down to the molecular level, how genetic information is transferred between generations, how we grow brains in utero and postpartum, and the changes brought about by structural differences in transmission of information. I know the research. And I know you don’t. You were sold a lot of lies. Your principal challenge in life is unlearning all the lies you were told, to make you an ignorant, useful, domesticated animal for the political classes.

Jan 19, 2020, 2:54 PM Please don’t waste my time. Find the data. Human behavior is 80% inherited and 20% idiosyncratic development of behavior. Races differ in degree of neoteny, and rate of maturity. Genders differ in the distribution of traits and biases because of structural differences in the brain and distributions in the endocrine system, with the stereotypes being true in all walks of life. Neoteny and symmetry are most reproductively desirable always and everywhere. Intelligence is a personality trait. Between trait intelligence and trait conscientiousness and trait agreeableness( female)-disagreeableness(male) we measure and predict all lifetime outcomes, and adding family tradition class outcomes are determined. We can even tell your behavior by the type of crop farmed by your ancestors. The difference between races and class is in genetic load, not increase in ability. I other words lower classes carry more defects and mutations. Upper classes maintain position only through selective mating but are otherwise genetically middle class. Nature nurture was solved pre-2000, gender differences by 2012, genetic and racial differences last year (2019), and we are just about to cross the line into the cognitive differences between races, subraces, classes, and genders. There is almost no rotation between genetic and social classes. There is only rotation between economic classes, because markets make it possible for underclasses, lower classes, working classes, and middle classes to achieve “lottery wins”, specifically in business, arts, sports, and entertainment. The problem facing each of the races is statistical and genetic: the size of their underclasses was not eliminated through eugenic reproduction like it was in Europe and east Asia. Instead, neoteny was prevented, and underclass populations expanded because the only defense against warm-weather disease gradients is early maturity and large numbers of offspring. While european winter farming and east Asian cold weather rice farming are brutal for those that carry genetic load. By the late middle ages, most of Europe was genetically middle class. Brit intelligence is largely captured in the middle class (or what we call in the states the upper middle class) and this has not traditionally been a problem in either agrarian or industrial ages – but has become and remains a problem in the post-industrial era. Which is why white brits underperform immigrants. So whereas the average IQ of anglos (myself included) was around 115 in the 1860s, we have lost 15 points, or one standard deviation, in just a hundred and sixty years. Every single one of these underclasses you let in and we let in is crushing both our economies, our cultures, and our future generations. Let me put it another way: try to estimate the value of one national point of intelligence. It’s pretty easy. Look what happens under 100, then under 97, then under 93, then under 90. It’s a cliff. The average intelligence of your people is more important than yur intelligence in determining your quality of life and that of your offspring and the generations that follow. Period. End of story. I know this because I know in painful detail the structure of the brain, how it operates down to the molecular level, how genetic information is transferred between generations, how we grow brains in utero and postpartum, and the changes brought about by structural differences in transmission of information. I know the research. And I know you don’t. You were sold a lot of lies. Your principal challenge in life is unlearning all the lies you were told, to make you an ignorant, useful, domesticated animal for the political classes.