REVIEW OF NWF HANDBOOK’S CONSTITUTION
(by request)
Net: it’s well done. Best I’ve seen. It’s a POLITICAL constitution not a LEGAL constitution. My work creates a universal LEGAL constitution and leaves the political organization up to each ‘state’.
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/09/04/review-of-the-northwest-front-constitution-of-2006/
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-04 14:47:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1434166210393001984
I try to avoid the Fundamentalist, WN, NS movements as much as possible – despite agreeing that I’d prefer to live in a homogenous polity of my own relations, if for no other reason than the reduction of competition for status and because of status for opportunity, and because of opportunity for political power. Like most libertarians and conservatives I view government as a means of limiting us to voluntary market cooperation, and like most conservatives, I view the role of religion, education, and Law as training naturally barbaric, naturally amoral, male and female superpredators to limit themselves to such voluntary market cooperation. This means we can only survive and reproduce by limiting ourselves to voluntary markets cooperation.. And this means that people unfit for the resulting hierarchy that results from voluntary markets for cooperation are selected out of the gene pool by suppression of their reproduction in exchange for their caretaking. This is a kind way of saying that the natural order always and everywhere either results in indentured and serf classes whose needs are provided for by exiting them from the market for cooperation in exchange for exiting them from reproduction – thereby constantly reducing the burden of unfit people on fit people. So despite the context of avoiding WN, NS, and Fundamentalists, that doesn’t mean I eschew discourse with their thought leaders – any more than eschewing discourse with libertarian and leftist thought leaders. Why? Because they’re all unsatisfied with the status quo, they’ve all just chosen the extreme means of solving the problem of altering the status quo and therefore limiting themselves to political fringes. The status quo is just as problematic for leftists, libertarians, and rightists. The only people it’s good for are the predatory elites who pit everyone against one another, the top organizing the bottom against the middle. And the left as always serves as the useful idiot soldiery for the top that organizes them against the middle. Yesterday I had a two-hour conversation with someone from the Northwest Front. This is a well-organized, well-thought-out movement with written canon, strategy, tactics, and constitution. As in all cases, conservatives are superior educators, and leftists are superior agitators. And the conservatives are happy to state their desired end state, while the left evades any statement of their desired end state. So after our conversation, I agreed to look at their constitution. And after reading it, I can’t find fault with it. It’s free of the usual optimism, sophistry, and pretense. A study of world constitutions is a study of fantasy political literature -which is why constitutions other than the American are so subject to irrelevance. And the constitution they sent me to review is a document consisting of clearly stated empirical realism. However, that constitution is one of escape from the enemy, without correcting for the means of total war by the enemy. The enemy of western civilization uses the female method of undermining from within by sowing discord, demonizing the leadership, demonizing the norms traditions values and institutions of cultural production, and then promising a big lie that if they were in charge ‘things would be better’. This is the fantasy of every mother and most women. Because they desire the world be suited for the reduction of their effort of the neuroticism (worrying, anxiety, fear, impulse) of the female mind, as suits their children – or worse, that suits their status pursuit, whether by virtue-signaling non-aggression under the pretense of care, or hypergamy under the pretense of equality, or hyperconsumption under the pretense of both, if they don’t have children. All of these ‘benevolent facades’ are just selfish demands from males to satisfy their impulses over which – without religion or ritual of some kind, or kinship-female group suppression, or the empiricism that results from having four or more children – they cannot control. Likewise, male motivation for heroism and desire for status, and access to kindness, affection, sex, reproduction, is obtained by satisfying the selfishness of women that they project as benevolence but are just demands for discounts on consumption because of her necessity of raising fragile offspring while maintaining her maximum market value to women and to men – but primarily to women. So my work takes a very different approach. And that is to increase the suppression of female anti-social behavior, that scales to female warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Jews, Christians and Muslims, to the same degree that we have suppressed the male anti-social behavior that scale to male warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Indo Europeans from whom Europeans descend. So where the Northwest Front constitution states isolation and political organization, my work on the law creates a market (court) for the suppression of the female means of anti-social behavior, just as thoroughly as it creates a market (court) for the suppression of male anti-social behavior. The difference is that I don’t leave out the problem of the ‘unfit’ – and solve that problem too. The pre-war soft-eugenicists were right. The war hard-eugenicists were … wrong. Sorry. So where most if not all constitutions evade law in favor of the law-making process, my constitution turns law into a formal logic that is as rock-solid as mathematics and writing like software programming, to ensure that the female method of civilizational destruction cannot only be suppressed internally but that war is justified in suppression of it externally. So when I say that my work on constitutions is inflexible in law, but that the means of construction of policy (legislation, regulation) is a Chinese menu of choices within that law, though I do recommend a recipe for ‘perfect government’ for people capable of it, you can set up any government you want that suppresses both male and female means of internal anti-social behavior, and anti-societal warfare. Ergo my work os compatible with the NW constitution. It would be compatible for all conservative and libertarian people and for certain most centrist people. But if you want a free-rider upper cast that parasitically lives off , and obtains power by the redistribution underclass, at the expense of the productive middle classes then you’re going to have to find some other constitution and body of law.
I try to avoid the Fundamentalist, WN, NS movements as much as possible – despite agreeing that I’d prefer to live in a homogenous polity of my own relations, if for no other reason than the reduction of competition for status and because of status for opportunity, and because of opportunity for political power. Like most libertarians and conservatives I view government as a means of limiting us to voluntary market cooperation, and like most conservatives, I view the role of religion, education, and Law as training naturally barbaric, naturally amoral, male and female superpredators to limit themselves to such voluntary market cooperation. This means we can only survive and reproduce by limiting ourselves to voluntary markets cooperation.. And this means that people unfit for the resulting hierarchy that results from voluntary markets for cooperation are selected out of the gene pool by suppression of their reproduction in exchange for their caretaking. This is a kind way of saying that the natural order always and everywhere either results in indentured and serf classes whose needs are provided for by exiting them from the market for cooperation in exchange for exiting them from reproduction – thereby constantly reducing the burden of unfit people on fit people. So despite the context of avoiding WN, NS, and Fundamentalists, that doesn’t mean I eschew discourse with their thought leaders – any more than eschewing discourse with libertarian and leftist thought leaders. Why? Because they’re all unsatisfied with the status quo, they’ve all just chosen the extreme means of solving the problem of altering the status quo and therefore limiting themselves to political fringes. The status quo is just as problematic for leftists, libertarians, and rightists. The only people it’s good for are the predatory elites who pit everyone against one another, the top organizing the bottom against the middle. And the left as always serves as the useful idiot soldiery for the top that organizes them against the middle. Yesterday I had a two-hour conversation with someone from the Northwest Front. This is a well-organized, well-thought-out movement with written canon, strategy, tactics, and constitution. As in all cases, conservatives are superior educators, and leftists are superior agitators. And the conservatives are happy to state their desired end state, while the left evades any statement of their desired end state. So after our conversation, I agreed to look at their constitution. And after reading it, I can’t find fault with it. It’s free of the usual optimism, sophistry, and pretense. A study of world constitutions is a study of fantasy political literature -which is why constitutions other than the American are so subject to irrelevance. And the constitution they sent me to review is a document consisting of clearly stated empirical realism. However, that constitution is one of escape from the enemy, without correcting for the means of total war by the enemy. The enemy of western civilization uses the female method of undermining from within by sowing discord, demonizing the leadership, demonizing the norms traditions values and institutions of cultural production, and then promising a big lie that if they were in charge ‘things would be better’. This is the fantasy of every mother and most women. Because they desire the world be suited for the reduction of their effort of the neuroticism (worrying, anxiety, fear, impulse) of the female mind, as suits their children – or worse, that suits their status pursuit, whether by virtue-signaling non-aggression under the pretense of care, or hypergamy under the pretense of equality, or hyperconsumption under the pretense of both, if they don’t have children. All of these ‘benevolent facades’ are just selfish demands from males to satisfy their impulses over which – without religion or ritual of some kind, or kinship-female group suppression, or the empiricism that results from having four or more children – they cannot control. Likewise, male motivation for heroism and desire for status, and access to kindness, affection, sex, reproduction, is obtained by satisfying the selfishness of women that they project as benevolence but are just demands for discounts on consumption because of her necessity of raising fragile offspring while maintaining her maximum market value to women and to men – but primarily to women. So my work takes a very different approach. And that is to increase the suppression of female anti-social behavior, that scales to female warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Jews, Christians and Muslims, to the same degree that we have suppressed the male anti-social behavior that scale to male warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Indo Europeans from whom Europeans descend. So where the Northwest Front constitution states isolation and political organization, my work on the law creates a market (court) for the suppression of the female means of anti-social behavior, just as thoroughly as it creates a market (court) for the suppression of male anti-social behavior. The difference is that I don’t leave out the problem of the ‘unfit’ – and solve that problem too. The pre-war soft-eugenicists were right. The war hard-eugenicists were … wrong. Sorry. So where most if not all constitutions evade law in favor of the law-making process, my constitution turns law into a formal logic that is as rock-solid as mathematics and writing like software programming, to ensure that the female method of civilizational destruction cannot only be suppressed internally but that war is justified in suppression of it externally. So when I say that my work on constitutions is inflexible in law, but that the means of construction of policy (legislation, regulation) is a Chinese menu of choices within that law, though I do recommend a recipe for ‘perfect government’ for people capable of it, you can set up any government you want that suppresses both male and female means of internal anti-social behavior, and anti-societal warfare. Ergo my work os compatible with the NW constitution. It would be compatible for all conservative and libertarian people and for certain most centrist people. But if you want a free-rider upper cast that parasitically lives off , and obtains power by the redistribution underclass, at the expense of the productive middle classes then you’re going to have to find some other constitution and body of law.
This is the dumbest shallowest least competent review I’ve ever seen. lol. I won’t even bother to write up a response.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-03 19:05:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1433868671512977430
Reply addressees: @NNpcson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1433848919583252481
RE 0 – This video is a half-truth by the means half-truths are conveyed. It’s Exasperating. And it attempts to circumvent the problem. And the prsentation getting worse and more false as we move through it. This is a screed against western civilization not against the use of the term.
RE 0 – This video is a half-truth by the means half-truths are conveyed. It’s Exasperating. And it attempts to circumvent the problem. And the prsentation getting worse and more false as we move through it. This is a screed against western civilization not against the use of the term.
@The Propertarian Institute “You would have to define the means of causality of parallel processing.”Considering the means of “force across empty space” has never been addressed by scientists, yu0r request for a causality laundry-list from a random internet commenter seems just a bit overambitious to say the least.
To: @xxxYYZxxx I use the internet to run tests (king of the hill games), because my specialty, quite accidentally, is the logic of human ignorance, error, bias, fictionalism and deceit. Which is why I”m running the test against you folks. In your case (as I have said in the past) I’m testing your malinvestment. Because it’s similar to the Christian malinvestment: “If it turns out you’re half right, will you modify the half you’re wrong about?” The answer is almost always no in a gradient from those whose status depends upon it to those whose status is not. (Yours is and you’re reacting to my ‘sciencing’ of your cult as a threat to your status and self-image. This is the same effect as the addiction response. Or rather the addiction response is an artificially induced version of this informational induced threat to your status.) As for force across empty space, (a) there is no such thing as empty space since space is produced by the continuous emergence and collapse of the quantum field. The energy of the quantum field is tens of orders of magnitude above any other energy density. (b) we have the math and evidence of how information is transmitted across that field (c) we have a full description of the hierarchy that can emerge from the quantum field and as others have said somewhat elegantly, ‘there is no room for any other information to exist or pass – so all ‘woo woo’ claims of magical information transmission have been permanently falsified. You might want to interject that we don’t know the origin of the quantum field, but that is not true – the dipole effects are the only method of release (creating space time) of an organization of information under pressure. We just do not know if it’s possible to have existence be a meaningful term in the absence of that field. That said, a few lost generations of physicists due to mathematical pseudoscience aside (string theorists), we were ‘done’ with the overall story of the structure of the universe in 1991. Like I said. If you can’t explain it operationally you don’t understand it. If contronted with operational explanations you evade it and do not reform, we are left only with that you have a motive to lie even if you lack the means. And for unaccomplished young men cheap status by fictional claims of the pretense of knowledge has a long history back into shamanism. Or as we prefer: hucksterism. Or more simply ‘bulshitters’.
@The Propertarian Institute “You would have to define the means of causality of parallel processing.”Considering the means of “force across empty space” has never been addressed by scientists, yu0r request for a causality laundry-list from a random internet commenter seems just a bit overambitious to say the least.
To: @xxxYYZxxx I use the internet to run tests (king of the hill games), because my specialty, quite accidentally, is the logic of human ignorance, error, bias, fictionalism and deceit. Which is why I”m running the test against you folks. In your case (as I have said in the past) I’m testing your malinvestment. Because it’s similar to the Christian malinvestment: “If it turns out you’re half right, will you modify the half you’re wrong about?” The answer is almost always no in a gradient from those whose status depends upon it to those whose status is not. (Yours is and you’re reacting to my ‘sciencing’ of your cult as a threat to your status and self-image. This is the same effect as the addiction response. Or rather the addiction response is an artificially induced version of this informational induced threat to your status.) As for force across empty space, (a) there is no such thing as empty space since space is produced by the continuous emergence and collapse of the quantum field. The energy of the quantum field is tens of orders of magnitude above any other energy density. (b) we have the math and evidence of how information is transmitted across that field (c) we have a full description of the hierarchy that can emerge from the quantum field and as others have said somewhat elegantly, ‘there is no room for any other information to exist or pass – so all ‘woo woo’ claims of magical information transmission have been permanently falsified. You might want to interject that we don’t know the origin of the quantum field, but that is not true – the dipole effects are the only method of release (creating space time) of an organization of information under pressure. We just do not know if it’s possible to have existence be a meaningful term in the absence of that field. That said, a few lost generations of physicists due to mathematical pseudoscience aside (string theorists), we were ‘done’ with the overall story of the structure of the universe in 1991. Like I said. If you can’t explain it operationally you don’t understand it. If contronted with operational explanations you evade it and do not reform, we are left only with that you have a motive to lie even if you lack the means. And for unaccomplished young men cheap status by fictional claims of the pretense of knowledge has a long history back into shamanism. Or as we prefer: hucksterism. Or more simply ‘bulshitters’.
Dr Wolff from Democracy Now on Capitalism vs Fascism (but not vs communism) As always, Wolff is intentionally evading the reason for the development of Fascism – as a NATIONAL defense against INTERNATIONAL Communism, given that RULE OF LAW (capitalism) opened the door to international communism (like it has here in the west again in pomo-pc-woke form), and that it is international communism that was responsible for the terrors of the debate between the three poles of political preference. Wolf is a subtle underminer (sedition) of rule of law because he and his tradition holds the false belief that a group of human professional executives could do better. The point of rule of law is that all humans are the same, and equally corruptible, and deterministically abusive of power. The frailty in western civilization is nothing to do with capitalism – which like communism or anarchism cannot exist – is that we didn’t complete the rule of law program by prohibiting the set of crimes possible using ‘words and money’: free riding, rent-seeking, privatization of common gains and socialization of losses, and false promises that bait into a hazard. What would happen if we did? It would be very clear who undermined western civ, who created the present crisis, and how easily it was to fix it, and how rapidly the working and middle classes would be rescued from their current re-imposition of serfdom by ‘experts’. Dr. Wolff at democracy now shows how storytelling (overloading), pilpul (sophistry), and critique (undermining) and suggestion (deception), and false promise (baiting into a hazard) of alternatives to rule of law – constraining both commoners and professional ‘elites’ can be used to deceive the public with ease, and under the guise of ‘democracy’ advance the interests of globalists, who are nothing more than predators on western civilization’s accumulated capital and the means by which we accumulated that capital – and no other civilization did: the reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of self-determination, by self-determined means, using sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in display, word, and deed, thereby limiting us to productive, voluntary cooperation adversarial markets in all walks of life whether associative, cooperative, productive, reproductive, commons, polities, or wars. The dirty secret of western civilization is that this formula – the group strategy of western civilization – is the most consistent, correspondent and coherent with the laws of the universe (including the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary), and as such is the most rapidly innovative and adaptive of all civilization. This explains the bronze age expansion of the Indo-Europeans, the iron age of the Mediterranean, and the steel age of the north sea peoples. And that across these ages, the Europeans have dragged primitive mankind, whether African, South Eurasian, Indian, and now East Asian, out of their failure by 800ad, to discover and adapt to those laws. Why? Because the cost of adapting to those laws is the continuation of natural selection by the suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for the constant stress of constant adaptation: the underclasses. The development of Every civilization was halted by the expansion of the underclass – and justified by the elites that parasitically depended upon them. The entire sequence of the marxist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, pc-woke, anti-west&anti-white movement is simply a revolt against darwin’s explanation for the disproportionate rate of evolution of Europeans compared to all other civilizations. And in particular a revolt against the abuse of this strategy by the germans during the second world war. Ergo this is the reason for the vast expansion of pseudoscience begun by Marx, Boas, Freud, Bohr, and Cantor, exacerbated by the Frankfurt School, Gould, Lewontin, only refuted in the past decade by economics, genetics, neuroscience, and what passes for artificial intelligence. In and of itself, Democracy is the slow path to communist tyranny, decline, and death. The maximum value of democracy is the middle class (people who produce) voting to veto the members of the government for their policy failure under rule of law. There is no wisdom of crowds. There is wisdom only in a tradition held by those crowds. And even so, there is no durable wisdom in any tradition other than the scientific rule – rule of law by the European traditional natural law – and all other traditions failed by 800ad. No man is a hero to his debtors. No civilization is a hero to its debtors.
Dr Wolff from Democracy Now on Capitalism vs Fascism (but not vs communism) As always, Wolff is intentionally evading the reason for the development of Fascism – as a NATIONAL defense against INTERNATIONAL Communism, given that RULE OF LAW (capitalism) opened the door to international communism (like it has here in the west again in pomo-pc-woke form), and that it is international communism that was responsible for the terrors of the debate between the three poles of political preference. Wolf is a subtle underminer (sedition) of rule of law because he and his tradition holds the false belief that a group of human professional executives could do better. The point of rule of law is that all humans are the same, and equally corruptible, and deterministically abusive of power. The frailty in western civilization is nothing to do with capitalism – which like communism or anarchism cannot exist – is that we didn’t complete the rule of law program by prohibiting the set of crimes possible using ‘words and money’: free riding, rent-seeking, privatization of common gains and socialization of losses, and false promises that bait into a hazard. What would happen if we did? It would be very clear who undermined western civ, who created the present crisis, and how easily it was to fix it, and how rapidly the working and middle classes would be rescued from their current re-imposition of serfdom by ‘experts’. Dr. Wolff at democracy now shows how storytelling (overloading), pilpul (sophistry), and critique (undermining) and suggestion (deception), and false promise (baiting into a hazard) of alternatives to rule of law – constraining both commoners and professional ‘elites’ can be used to deceive the public with ease, and under the guise of ‘democracy’ advance the interests of globalists, who are nothing more than predators on western civilization’s accumulated capital and the means by which we accumulated that capital – and no other civilization did: the reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of self-determination, by self-determined means, using sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in display, word, and deed, thereby limiting us to productive, voluntary cooperation adversarial markets in all walks of life whether associative, cooperative, productive, reproductive, commons, polities, or wars. The dirty secret of western civilization is that this formula – the group strategy of western civilization – is the most consistent, correspondent and coherent with the laws of the universe (including the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary), and as such is the most rapidly innovative and adaptive of all civilization. This explains the bronze age expansion of the Indo-Europeans, the iron age of the Mediterranean, and the steel age of the north sea peoples. And that across these ages, the Europeans have dragged primitive mankind, whether African, South Eurasian, Indian, and now East Asian, out of their failure by 800ad, to discover and adapt to those laws. Why? Because the cost of adapting to those laws is the continuation of natural selection by the suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for the constant stress of constant adaptation: the underclasses. The development of Every civilization was halted by the expansion of the underclass – and justified by the elites that parasitically depended upon them. The entire sequence of the marxist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, pc-woke, anti-west&anti-white movement is simply a revolt against darwin’s explanation for the disproportionate rate of evolution of Europeans compared to all other civilizations. And in particular a revolt against the abuse of this strategy by the germans during the second world war. Ergo this is the reason for the vast expansion of pseudoscience begun by Marx, Boas, Freud, Bohr, and Cantor, exacerbated by the Frankfurt School, Gould, Lewontin, only refuted in the past decade by economics, genetics, neuroscience, and what passes for artificial intelligence. In and of itself, Democracy is the slow path to communist tyranny, decline, and death. The maximum value of democracy is the middle class (people who produce) voting to veto the members of the government for their policy failure under rule of law. There is no wisdom of crowds. There is wisdom only in a tradition held by those crowds. And even so, there is no durable wisdom in any tradition other than the scientific rule – rule of law by the European traditional natural law – and all other traditions failed by 800ad. No man is a hero to his debtors. No civilization is a hero to its debtors.