Form: Critique

  • Truth is there isn’t anyone to debate worth debating in libertarianism other tha

    Truth is there isn’t anyone to debate worth debating in libertarianism other than Hoppe, and that in itself is telling.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 17:12:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716674816787550208

    Reply addressees: @RealBausReturns

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716673827351183360


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RealBausReturns

    @curtdoolittle Have you discussed Propertarianism vs Anarcho Capitalism with Chris Cantwell? He doesn’t tend to shy away from arguments!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716673827351183360

  • A marxist avoids arguments. Rothbardian Libertines avoid arguments. They are jus

    A marxist avoids arguments. Rothbardian Libertines avoid arguments. They are just frauds and parasites. Liberty requires violence. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 16:35:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716665414512746496

  • There is a reason all books on libertarianism are beginners introductions.There

    There is a reason all books on libertarianism are beginners introductions.There aren’t any advanced books for the same reason. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 16:25:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716663023310618625

  • Hijack Libertarianism? Hell no. Kill that free-riding effeminate vampire in pseu

    Hijack Libertarianism? Hell no. Kill that free-riding effeminate vampire in pseudo intellectual drag.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 10:49:00 UTC

  • Germans are possessed by verbal mysticism. Their philosophy and literature is no

    Germans are possessed by verbal mysticism. Their philosophy and literature is nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 11:51:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716231522827825153

    Reply addressees: @Lupus_Singular

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716230523128061953


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716230523128061953

  • EXAMPLE OF WALTER BLOCK’S LIBERTINE IMMORALITY Here in Ukraine, speculators buy

    EXAMPLE OF WALTER BLOCK’S LIBERTINE IMMORALITY

    Here in Ukraine, speculators buy up appointments to apply for visas, and then sell them for 1000UAH (about $50, in a country where people make $200 a month and raise children on it.)

    Now, according to libertarianism this is moral, ethical, and non-aggression.

    According to propertarianism (and human nature) this is not a productive, fully informed voluntary exchange free of negative externality.

    But so called ‘parasitic’ libertine rothbardianism claims this is moral. Yet that which is moral is that which incentivizes us to cooperate rather than incentivizes us to prey upon one another.

    Why doesn’t the government require that all appointments scheduled are for the individual applying for the visa? Well, because they’re in on the parasitism (corruption).

    Now, I want to know why I don’t kill you and take your stuff. The only reason not to is if we engage in fully informed, productive, voluntary transfer free of negative externality.

    Libertinism is just an excuse to continue usurious parasitism of the ghetto. It’s not moral. It’s immoral.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 10:26:00 UTC

  • THE MIDDLE CLASS NEGOTIATES. ARISTOCRACY PROSECUTES. WOMEN, PRIESTS, AND STATE A

    THE MIDDLE CLASS NEGOTIATES. ARISTOCRACY PROSECUTES. WOMEN, PRIESTS, AND STATE APOLOGIZE.

    I prosecute falsehoods. I’m agnostic in prosecuting falsehoods. I prosecute libertarian and conservative falsehoods as hard or harder than I prosecute progressive falsehoods. Why? Because libertarian and conservative literature, philosophy, and rhetoric has been a demonstrated failure in competition against socialist, feminist, and postmodern matriarchal literature, philosophy, and arguments. Why? Because women vote more consistently against THE GREAT GENDER COMPROMISES, of the west, and because women are the dominant consumers, and because women are the most pliable customers of the profiteers in the academy media, and state.

    No matriarchal civilizations survive. Why? It’s suicidal. We give women and those who profit from their impulses uncommon liberty, yet not adequate restraints. We prosecute profiting from the sale of all other forms of harm. Why don’t we prosecute those who profit from this kind of harm: genocide.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 01:42:00 UTC

  • THERE IS A REASON WOMEN WERE CONSIDERED EVIL, AND WHY VICTORIANS INVENTED THE MY

    THERE IS A REASON WOMEN WERE CONSIDERED EVIL, AND WHY VICTORIANS INVENTED THE MYTH OF ANGELS.

    (criticism of psychology today)

    While men domesticated alphas in order to more evenly distribute reproduction, and while women learned to rally and shame to rally men to defend against alphas, Man had a very hard time domesticating women.

    Men treated women affectionately but much more like we treat our pets. Like chimps, brothers and cousins conducted war to obtain women and to protection their own from taking.

    Women evolved to care not about the tribe but about other women and her children, and their children.

    Men evolved to herd, and control the tribe.

    The problem was that women bear children at will and place the cost on the tribe. And women trade sexual favors and affection to obtain resource and in doing so create conflict. Then they create conflict intentionally as an extension of rallying and shaming.

    Man evolved property (ownership) in tandem with the sophistication of his means of production.

    Ownership of women limited conflict, controlled female reproduction, and limited the difficulty that women could create by the trading of sexual favors and affection.

    Romantic love is a relatively recent invention.

    With the end of the division of labor, and the advent of redistribution, the lower classes have increasingly abandoned marriage, and women have returned to owning their own children, bearing them at will and forcing the cost upon the tribe, forcing reproduction downward in the classes, and using sexual favors, affection, and even just attention, to obtain what they want from many different men.

    This has broken the limitations on women’s dysgenic reproduction and hyper-consumption, and disregard for the male members of the tribe.

    THat’s how it is.

    You need a superior solution to the obvious evolutionary origins rather than to beg pseudoscience to justify a prior. 🙂

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 08:41:00 UTC

  • Simple people who have not been converted by the academy into the cult of pseudo

    Simple people who have not been converted by the academy into the cult of pseudoscientific state humanism think and say very few stupid things. Whereas the average idiot that’s been to university seems to say stupid things with pride, conviction, and frequency.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:26:00 UTC

  • Most philosophers specialize in wishful thinking, loading, framing, overloading,

    Most philosophers specialize in wishful thinking, loading, framing, overloading, obscuring, suggestion and justification


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 11:25:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711151691354218500

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711150124861362176


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @sapinker Sadly, the distribution of philosophers is worse than that of psychologists prior to Operationism. For the same reason.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/711150124861362176


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @sapinker Sadly, the distribution of philosophers is worse than that of psychologists prior to Operationism. For the same reason.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/711150124861362176