Form: Critique

  • terms = premises. libertarianism is a set of lies that take advantage of impreci

    terms = premises. libertarianism is a set of lies that take advantage of imprecise terms, people who are fooled by them.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:49:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797919362711592960

    Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThisMachin

    @curtdoolittle I am very familiar with Libertarian ideas about this . We can start conversation at a hight level. Or we can read Webster.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320

  • So far you can’t define terms or construct an argument. Do both and then rationa

    So far you can’t define terms or construct an argument. Do both and then rational discourse is possible. Otherwise, bullsh–.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:24:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797913098153668608

    Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797910555281399808


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThisMachin

    @curtdoolittle I think you had a traditional, fact-free, economics education. It’s not your fault really.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797910555281399808

  • PAUL KRUGMAN – HE’S WISHING WHITE PEOPLE DEAD EVEN SOONER (profound) (read) (sha

    PAUL KRUGMAN – HE’S WISHING WHITE PEOPLE DEAD EVEN SOONER

    (profound) (read) (share)

    —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why

    middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman

    Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor?

    Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it?

    Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to?

    Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition?

    Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital?

    Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms?

    You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold?

    What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)?

    We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents?

    If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech.

    If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then.

    Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction?

    With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right?

    We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman.

    There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law.

    Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science.

    Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience.

    And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit.

    And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital.

    And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries.

    I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold.

    WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 12:27:00 UTC

  • MOLYNEUX IS AN EDUCATOR AND I AM A PROSECUTOR – BUT OTHERWISE ITS THE SAME MESSA

    MOLYNEUX IS AN EDUCATOR AND I AM A PROSECUTOR – BUT OTHERWISE ITS THE SAME MESSAGE

    Stephan won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant.

    SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight.

    Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg.

    It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS.

    Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines.

    Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg

    We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits.

    This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor.

    And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST.

    Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 11:08:00 UTC

  • DEAR SNOWFLAKES Dear Snowflakes. Why on earth should adults with assets, experie

    DEAR SNOWFLAKES

    Dear Snowflakes.

    Why on earth should adults with assets, experience, and responsibilities not simply discipline your infantilized, undisciplined, barbaric, ignorant, irresponsible, uselessness, for what it is: a waste of oxygen, water, food, and space?

    The market for survival, the market for reproduction, the market for production of goods, services, and information, the market for commons, the market for polities, the market for dispute resolution.

    You don’t have any rights that others won’t exchange with you.

    We don’t need to exchange rights with you.

    Because you have NOTHING TO EXCHANGE.

    So why don’t we just beat or enslave your useless, whining, undisciplined, barbaric, ignorant, irresponsible meat-sacks?

    You aren’t entering the world you were promised by the lies and propaganda. You’re entering a world in which the advantages that your European predecessors and ancestors have made has been squandered by the generations that infantilized you.

    Welcome to the world of the ordinary.

    Becuase of you, and the generations that squandered your inheritance on third world undomesticated animals, you’re going to live in relative poverty like all the rest of the world.

    And you won’t change that because everything you have been taught and value is a lie designed to make you nothing more than a useful slave to be farmed like animals by a political elite.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 08:57:00 UTC

  • ALL THIS GRAPH SHOWS IS THAT WOMEN TAKE IDIOT DEGREES IN SOCiAL SCIENCE IN LARGE

    ALL THIS GRAPH SHOWS IS THAT WOMEN TAKE IDIOT DEGREES IN SOCiAL SCIENCE IN LARGE NUMBERS.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:02:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796458058708897799

    Reply addressees: @KendallRaeOnYT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796397958275145728


    IN REPLY TO:

    @KendallRaeOnYT

    The majority of Trump voters were uneducated older white men. Numbers don’t lie. #NotMyPresident https://t.co/qIqZPgObPY

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796397958275145728

  • A nice man with a profoundly tragic understanding of economics that would appeal

    A nice man with a profoundly tragic understanding of economics that would appeal only to the profoundly ignorant …oh wait.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 10:37:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796300674698973184

    Reply addressees: @CommonWhiteGal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796287733798871040


    IN REPLY TO:

    @CommonWhiteGal

    america u had the chance to make this wonderful human run for president and y’all lost it https://t.co/A5RJ3uTWc6

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796287733798871040

  • Psychology is a pseudoscience and all psychologism a use of it to commit a fraud

    Psychology is a pseudoscience and all psychologism a use of it to commit a fraud. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 04:42:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795124225187184640

    Reply addressees: @ogiesoro @LilDocCollins @Bgiant1Bob @nsa @CIA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795094788659933184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795094788659933184

  • YOU’RE CLOSE: BUT YOU’RE FIGHTING THE LAST WAR AGAIN: WE AREN’T AN INSURGENCY. W

    YOU’RE CLOSE: BUT YOU’RE FIGHTING THE LAST WAR AGAIN: WE AREN’T AN INSURGENCY. WE’RE A REVOLUTION. AND WE WILL WIN

    —“I think what we’re seeing now is, what I would describe as a proto-insurgency situation … the ingredients are out there, if somebody knew what they were doing, [they could] pull together an effective movement.” —- David Kilcullen, former Chief Strategist in the State Department’s Office of the Coordinator of Counterterrorism

    “Knowing What You’re Doing” when creating an INSURGENCY movement. And knowing what you’re doing when creating a REVOLUTIONARY movement, are two different things.

    It may not be readily apparent, but insurgency is merely a tactic. And in the era after 1) end of the Peace of Westphalia, 2) the Postwar Consensus on state responsibility for groups in their borders; when combined with 3) the expansion of man-portable weaponry from the rifle to the RPG; 4) the frailty of the just-in-time network of production distribution and trade, 5) the frailty of the financial system do to overextension, 6) the frailty of the infrastructure dependent upon electricity, gas and gasoline, 7) the nearly perfect yet frail communications of the internet, 8) the climax of 80 years of immigration warfare against ethnic europeans; it has become possible for a revolutionary movement to both put forth a formal institutional solution to the genocide against the west, and to conduct that revolution on three levels:

    I. Formal, Legal, Scientific, Institutional Argument.

    II. Distributed and unsilencable promotion and propagandism.

    III. Organized Acts Of Protest and Rebellion.

    IIII. Disorganized Acts of Infrastructural and Political Destruction.

    And to do so over a vast, distributed indefensible territory, with a very small number of people, who can retreat and disappear into familiar neighborhoods.

    So that, after as little as four months, the only solution left to the military is the seizure of the government as an end to hostilities, and the negotiation and implementation of the demands of the revolution.

    ANGLO CIVILIZATION IS VERY GOOD AT LOW LEVEL REVOLUTIONS: LAW, COURT, AND CONSTITUTION.

    Anglo civilization only APPEARS to be the oldest continuously governed in the world, for the simple reason that we have these revolutions every few generations, each of which is required to restore our ‘rights as Americans, Englishmen, Anglo-Saxons, Germans(Brothers), and Indo-Europeans: that we are sovereign men, who agree to put aside our weapons only so long as the current order both protects our sovereignty, protects our lineage, and improves the conditions under which we perpetuate both.

    KNOWING WHAT ONE IS DOING.

    I know exactly what I’m doing. Although, I am certainly not doing it as fast as or well as I’d like. But we are methodical. We are not creating an insurgency….

    We are creating a Revolution: The Restoration of Western Civilization by the organized application of violence, to restore the demand for speaking the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth, for all speech within in the commons, and thereby reversing the century and a half of pseudoscience and deceit that has been propagated against western civilization by the the combination of Jewish Cosmopolitanism French moralism, and Anglo Puritanism.

    The first defeat of the west was not military but by deception and propaganda using the first great lie of monotheism’s promise of utopia after death. The second near defeat of the west has been conducted under the second attempted promise of utopia on earth, written in a similar sequence of books by Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises,Adorno, Rand, Rothbard, and Strauss – and their offshoots in postmodern and feminist philosophy.

    And this new pseudoscience was easily sold for profit in exchange for a diploma, that is the modern equivalent of the medieval Indulgence – and of equal value – distributed willingly as a replacement for theology by the academy seeking to extract revenue from a population newly liberated from the marginal productivity of manual labor by the capture and direction of energy from hydrocarbons.

    These Cosmopolitan authors were threatened by the restoration of empirical Western Aristocracy – the Organized Domesticators of Man – by Darwin’s Innovation, Spencer’s admittedly imperfect Exposition, Menger’s Explanations, Maxwell and Poincare’s Discoveries, Nietzche’s Restoration of western ethics, and the Victorian Restoration of our Germanic Myths and Legends; and the Romanticists’ restoration of perfect beauty.

    All of which threatened the industry of liars: Priest, Politicians, Academics, Pseudoscientists, moneychangers, and frauds. All of which once again were sold to the folly of women, and the ignorance of the underclasses as a utopian means of escape of their domestication the aristocracy that had made Europe a garden – an open air museum – like no other since the peaks of Athens and Rome.

    We gave the experiment a century. It has been a failure. Worse, the crime of the germans against the jews has been met with yet a second great crime of the jews against the entire west. If we are – as ordinary men – required to constrain our powerful from the exercise of immoral violence, then why are not the jews required to constrain their powerful from the exercise of deception and fraud?

    Just as we ended mysticism with Empirical Law and literacy, we can end pseudoscience and propagandism with Testimonial Law and New Literacy – which are both simply extensions of science and law into the public sphere to counter the weaponization of pseudoscience using the academy, the media, and twentieth-century means of mass communication.

    Why is Truth so important that we required an innovation in science over pseudoscience, as great as the innovation of empiricism over justificationary mysticism ? Why is the end to monopoly representative government, and the implementation of direct market democracy so important?

    Because people forced to tolerate winner-take-all, under mass propaganda distribution of pseudoscience and deceit, have no choice but to revolt as the accumulation of injustices mount against them. Whereas under a direct democracy of market government, equal shareholders in the economy can exchange what will amount to good public behavior, and investments in the commons in exchange for material redistributions that compensate for their lack of productivity. This in turn will incentivize them to limit the numbers of underclasses and maximize the number of producers, so that their distributions and therefore their consumptions are greater.

    Trade makes peaceful neighbors. Dictatorship of an immigrant minority when combined with a majority’s unmarried women, merely guarantees that the high trust society with high economic velocity because of high innovation, will slowly collapse into match world averages if each new group of immigrants merely imposes genetic, cultural, institutional, commons, and material costs on the previous.

    If we are to have war, let us have an honest war of violence.

    Not this deceitful dishonest pseudoscientific war against western man by the second promise of utopianism in this world, achieved by the use of fiat credit to spend down the accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital of millennia.

    SO WE DID NOT START THIS WAR – BUT HAVING TAKEN SO MANY LOSSES IN THE WAR AGAINST US, WE WILL END IT.

    We will end the empire, devolve all but the military, the treasury of last resort and insurer of last resort, to the regions and the states, and forever eliminate the federal cancer that we created in the Civil War as a means of controlling whether Southern Celtic Agrarian exporting culture or northern Scandinavia Domestic industrial culture would end up ruling the newly acquired western continent.

    The European civil war and the seizure of the UK Empires Bases was a great boon for us, but a curse for European civilization. If we have ended world communism, we can certainly end world Islamism’s violence and ignorance, world cosmopolitanism’s rule by extractionary credit, and anglo utopianism’s feminist suicide of the west by immigration of numbers rather than immigration of quality.

    YOU STARTED IT. WE WILL END IT.

    The WW2 Debt Is Paid. Two genocides are done.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 18:44:00 UTC

  • I KILLED ANARCHO CAPITALISM. BUT IT WILL TAKE TIME TO BLEED OUT. —“We are Anar

    I KILLED ANARCHO CAPITALISM. BUT IT WILL TAKE TIME TO BLEED OUT.

    —“We are Anarchists because….

    If human beings are fundamentally good, no government is necessary.

    If human beings are fundamentally bad, any government, being composed of human beings, would be bad also.

    No government can exist without the perpetration of theft and robbery, called taxation.

    No government can exist that does not force its decrees on the people, and command obedience under threat of punishment.

    The principal outrages of human history have been committed by governments.”—

    —Dan Eff

    False dichotomy.

    All human beings are rational within the limits of their knowledge and ability. Therefore they act morally when it’s to their advantage, and immorally when it is to their advantage.

    History consists of the incremental suppression of immorality through the incremental expansion of rule of law (natural law).

    Ergo, discretionary rule is impossible as is stated in the OP, and Anarchy is impossible because of the discount on immorality imposes high transaction costs – something that is not stated in the OP.

    The only possible means of moral rule is via the perfect decidability provided by Natural, Judge-Discovered, Common Law, and the resulting markets for association, reproduction(marriage), consumption(production distribution and trade), commons(territorial, physical, institutional, and normative capital), rule(of small states), and conflict (martial war, immigration war, economic war, religious war(conversion), and information war (propaganda and deceit).

    We must end the fallacy of anarcho capitalism: it is nothing more than an attempt to circumvent the high cost of commons while taking advantage of the markets created thereby.

    Anarcho capitalism is just as parasitic upon the commons as Communism is parasitic upon private property.

    Boaz, Marx, Freud, Canto, Mises, Strauss, Rand, Rothbard.

    Left, Right and Center parasitism as a group evolutionary strategy.

    Anarcho capitalism is dead. I killed it. It’s just going to take a lot of time to bleed out.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 20:58:00 UTC