Nov 11, 2016 11:06pm In person i am a gentleman. but i learned a lot from Hayek’s pristine, gentlemanly, german failure with Keynes: never give the enemy an inch out of grace. we aren’t Victorians. this is a street fight. a brawl. and i use broken bottles, brass knuckles, clubs, knives, guns, and every other weapon I can get my hands on. And so do all of us in the various New Right groups. When the left, via Alinsky, took the battle to the streets, they broke with our ancient european tradition and adopted the techniques of the peasantry. that’s’ all well and good for them – until they realized in this election that we gave up on our Victorianism and stooped to their level. And the alt right beat them to a bloody pulp at their own game. Now I am in the process of eviscerating every bit of leftist pseudoscience written in the past 150 years. It will take me a while to build the 100 or so people that can construct propertarian arguments but at that point we are the equivalent of the anti-frankfurt school. And so forgive me if I frequently digress from stoic analytic purity and go slumming, seeking street fights with the left’s kleptocracy of deceit. But I’m looking for skulls to drink from. You, the left, thought you were winning rather than that we were just biding our time, hoping you would learn. Sorry. You didn’t learn. We are failed parents and you’re the family black sheep. You’re the alcoholic, the drug user, the impulsive criminal, and the sociopath. and the social-climbing daughter. That’s all. A cult of kleptocracy. So, We don’t want your consent, your agreement, your approval, or your opinion. We want your silence, submission, punishment, eviction, or death. Which of those we levy against you dependent upon your choice of silence, departure, or death. You cannot meet us on the field of truth. You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda. You cannot meet us on the field of war. You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you. So we have a message for you: productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange between the classes or it is easier, and cheaper to return you to servitude, serfdom or slavery. You are weaker. You will always be weaker. And we know this. And so do you. You’re done. There won’t be another election for you to win. Because you taught us that you are not ready for adulthood, nor liberty, nor peerage.
Form: Critique
-
The ‘Talk’: Why Are We Stooping To The Left’s Level
Nov 11, 2016 11:06pm In person i am a gentleman. but i learned a lot from Hayek’s pristine, gentlemanly, german failure with Keynes: never give the enemy an inch out of grace. we aren’t Victorians. this is a street fight. a brawl. and i use broken bottles, brass knuckles, clubs, knives, guns, and every other weapon I can get my hands on. And so do all of us in the various New Right groups. When the left, via Alinsky, took the battle to the streets, they broke with our ancient european tradition and adopted the techniques of the peasantry. that’s’ all well and good for them – until they realized in this election that we gave up on our Victorianism and stooped to their level. And the alt right beat them to a bloody pulp at their own game. Now I am in the process of eviscerating every bit of leftist pseudoscience written in the past 150 years. It will take me a while to build the 100 or so people that can construct propertarian arguments but at that point we are the equivalent of the anti-frankfurt school. And so forgive me if I frequently digress from stoic analytic purity and go slumming, seeking street fights with the left’s kleptocracy of deceit. But I’m looking for skulls to drink from. You, the left, thought you were winning rather than that we were just biding our time, hoping you would learn. Sorry. You didn’t learn. We are failed parents and you’re the family black sheep. You’re the alcoholic, the drug user, the impulsive criminal, and the sociopath. and the social-climbing daughter. That’s all. A cult of kleptocracy. So, We don’t want your consent, your agreement, your approval, or your opinion. We want your silence, submission, punishment, eviction, or death. Which of those we levy against you dependent upon your choice of silence, departure, or death. You cannot meet us on the field of truth. You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda. You cannot meet us on the field of war. You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you. So we have a message for you: productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange between the classes or it is easier, and cheaper to return you to servitude, serfdom or slavery. You are weaker. You will always be weaker. And we know this. And so do you. You’re done. There won’t be another election for you to win. Because you taught us that you are not ready for adulthood, nor liberty, nor peerage.
-
Impossibility Isn’t A Problem for Libertarians.
impossibility is not a problem for libertarians. it’s all a fantasy of wishful thinking – a prayer that a margin will someday be a norm.
-
Impossibility Isn’t A Problem for Libertarians.
impossibility is not a problem for libertarians. it’s all a fantasy of wishful thinking – a prayer that a margin will someday be a norm.
-
There Is Nothing To Find In The Lies of the Conflationary Prophets
THERE IS NOTHING TO FIND IN THE LIES OF THE CONFLATIONARY PROPHETS BUT INFANTILISM. —“It seems that, in Genesis, God has legs, and doesn’t know the answers to the questions he asks. It confirms my inclination to the Marcionite Heresy.”— There is nothing there to find. We have our fairy tales, and myths. We have our origin story: the Iliad and the odyssey We have books of great literature. Books of great ideas (moral literature). Books of great history. Books of great science. Books of great law. Books of great war.
We have imitation of kin for infants. We have heroic imitation for children. We have virtue ethics for the adolescent. We have rule ethics for the adult. We have outcome ethics for the mature. CONFLATIONARY SIMPLICITY vs DEFLATIONARY COMPLEXITY The attractiveness of religious parable is that it’s conflated (all the disciplines are conflated into a single narrative). And the simple beast in each of us prefers to call upon one ‘unit of measure’ (method of deciding). But what separates man from animal is reason, and human from man, is deflation: the ability to compare multiple dimensions. So while we harbor in us a romantic childish animal that wants to save the burden of learning and cognition by relying on the reductive, conflation of simple ideal types, virtues, and parables, rather than identities, measurements, spectra, equilibria, and models, we merely infantilize ourselves by returning to infantile means of conflationary measurement. THERE ARE NO ANSWERS IN THE LIES OF THE CONFLATIONISTS. End the lies. -
There Is Nothing To Find In The Lies of the Conflationary Prophets
THERE IS NOTHING TO FIND IN THE LIES OF THE CONFLATIONARY PROPHETS BUT INFANTILISM. —“It seems that, in Genesis, God has legs, and doesn’t know the answers to the questions he asks. It confirms my inclination to the Marcionite Heresy.”— There is nothing there to find. We have our fairy tales, and myths. We have our origin story: the Iliad and the odyssey We have books of great literature. Books of great ideas (moral literature). Books of great history. Books of great science. Books of great law. Books of great war.
We have imitation of kin for infants. We have heroic imitation for children. We have virtue ethics for the adolescent. We have rule ethics for the adult. We have outcome ethics for the mature. CONFLATIONARY SIMPLICITY vs DEFLATIONARY COMPLEXITY The attractiveness of religious parable is that it’s conflated (all the disciplines are conflated into a single narrative). And the simple beast in each of us prefers to call upon one ‘unit of measure’ (method of deciding). But what separates man from animal is reason, and human from man, is deflation: the ability to compare multiple dimensions. So while we harbor in us a romantic childish animal that wants to save the burden of learning and cognition by relying on the reductive, conflation of simple ideal types, virtues, and parables, rather than identities, measurements, spectra, equilibria, and models, we merely infantilize ourselves by returning to infantile means of conflationary measurement. THERE ARE NO ANSWERS IN THE LIES OF THE CONFLATIONISTS. End the lies. -
I consider ‘modern art’ as a failure to solve the problem of high art, and devol
I consider ‘modern art’ as a failure to solve the problem of high art, and devolution into mere ‘design’ for decoration.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 22:44:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801194684966207488
Reply addressees: @Graf_von_Dienen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801147178345435137
IN REPLY TO:
@von_dienstmann
@curtdoolittle What is your opinion as an art scholar on contemporary and modernist art movements? (Pollock, Mondrian, impressionists, etc)
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801147178345435137
-
HEIRARCHY OF MYTHOLOGICAL INFANTILISMS —“Serious post time: who is worse, adul
HEIRARCHY OF MYTHOLOGICAL INFANTILISMS
—“Serious post time: who is worse, adult Harry Potter fans, or adult Doctor Who fans?”—-
Harry potter is an adolescent chick cross dressing as a boy reveling in the luxury of attention that all chicks want, but almost never get, while pretending that she doesn’t want it.
Doctor Who is a traumatized beta cuck that’s seeking salvation by reaching for every life raft of every kind that he can find.
Manga (Japanese animation) is probably the worst of them.
Superheroes less so.
The ancient myths less so.
The great adventure novels less so.
The lives of the great men less so.
I’d have to say that while I love the series, HP is far worse, but that if you cannot incrementally graduate from each then you are simply infantilized by the mythos that you intuitionistically appeal to. So I would focus on explaining to children that damsels in distress get killed – they aren’t saved by friends, relatives, teachers, and magic.
A real harry potter would be dead in the first book.
HIERARCHY:
– Infant Stories.
– Children’s Stories
– Manga (asiatic myths are infantile)
– Harry potter / Dr Who (late childhood)
– Fantasy (moral responsibility)
– European Mythology (resistance to the lies of the east)
– Science Fiction (restated mythology)
– The great adventure novels
– The lives of the greats
– The story of history
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-20 10:27:00 UTC
-
A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE FRAUDS (this ought to get me in trouble) (impor
A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE FRAUDS
(this ought to get me in trouble) (important piece)
Don’t dis on black or other impulsive peoples, we have white trash too. Blacks just haven’t organized to cull their herd as much as we have. They didn’t have winters. The entire warm zone of the planet consists not of failed states but of people who failed to cull the herd.
Don’t dis on Jewish people. We have vociferous gossiping parasitic white people too – most of our women. Jews organized to specialize in verbal creation of the opportunity for parasitism through the use of gossip and suggestion. To maintain Jewish separatism, escape payment for the commons, and to survive and profit by privatizing commons, they have allied with the state against the people in every society and been outcast or decimated for it. But that is the same strategy our women have always practiced since their invention of gossip, and the strategy our women have adopted since their enfranchisement in politics: alliance with the state in order to extract parasitically. Hence the treatment of jews and women by every society in history: as a useful danger to be carefully managed.
The problem that the transcendence of mankind faces is not the races but the classes and the genders. The bottom is more harmful than the top is beneficial. And because people act as racial kinship groups in all areas of life, we try to solve the wrong problem that generates the conflict: parasitism. We solve by war, religion (deceit), and propaganda (lies), that which we failed to solve by truth: the natural common, judge discovered law, of voluntary transfer prohibiting parasitism. We force them into productive voluntary exchanges in order to survive. We force them into productive work in order to survive. We force them into careful mate selection. And we force them back to the status of undomesticated animals if they do not, and sterilize them.
We don’t need to conduct wars of extermination, to put people in ovens, or hang them from ropes, or spit them on pikes – unless they rally in numbers. We need only limit their breeding to one child, and pay them to have no children. And to extend the legal prohibition on false and immoral speech products – protect information just as we protect land, air, water, commons, and institutions from harm.
We need to return to our long, successful, and widely profitable history of domesticating the universe, nature, plant, animal, and those animals sufficiently sentient that we have the potential to cooperate with via productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, limited to productive externalities: at present, that is limited to homo sapiens-sapiens and his sub-species we call the ‘races’, and ‘sub-races’.
Because Western Aristocracy is not a religion, or a philosophy, or a government – it is a technology and an INDUSTRY. And it is by use of this industry we have profited by dragging the beast man out of his parasitic past on the margins of nature into the transcendent mastery of himself, and nature.
Man is an animal. Human is a domesticated man. Aristocracy is a transcendent human: “one who domesticates the beast man”.
You can dis on Muslims in particular, and all religious fundamentalists in general, and all pseudo-academics, and all pseudo-intellectuals, and all pseudoscientists, and all frauds of any kind that spread error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience, and deceit. Because there is no place for fraud in the marketplace of information and ideas any more than there is for fraud in the marketplace of goods and services. All these people merely profit from undomesticating the animal man.
Because it is only the burden of the underclasses that cannot verbalize abstract ideas, and learn by self-instruction that prevents us from the universal human future we all desire.
And it is those who profit from the un-domestication of the animals, more so than the animals themselves that are our, and mankind’s enemy.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 09:23:00 UTC
-
END THE LIES: OBJECTIVISM INCLUDED “The frame creates the falsehood. It’s bait f
END THE LIES: OBJECTIVISM INCLUDED
“The frame creates the falsehood. It’s bait for the well-meaning fool.”
Humans retaliate for impositions of cost upon that in which they have born costs to obtain an interest.
The benefits of in-group cooperation are disproportionate to non-cooperation. as much as 10,000 times more productive. such that humans – we are expensive – cannot afford not to cooperate when competing with others who cooperate. And the rate of cooperation determines the rate of production, so we must always advance or rates to maintain advantage.
Humans are neither moral nor immoral, but rational, and act morally to avoid the imposition of costs and preserve the incentive to cooperate, and act immorally to impose costs and diminishing the incentive to cooperate, as they determine is their interest.
The more resources available for the mitigation of vicissitudes or the expansion of pleasures, the less rational the impulse to act immorally in the present. The fewer resources available for the mitigation of vicissitudes or the expansion of pleasures, the more rational is the impulse to act immorally in the present. Yet at all times we possess the impulse and opportunity to act immorally should circumstances change.
THE FAILURE OF OBJECTIVIST ETHICS
Objectivist polities cannot either form, or survive competition for members, nor competition from markets, nor competition from predators. They are impossible. Becuase all polities depend upon the production of commons and objectivism is (as is the jewish separatism that it was designed to reflect) a model under which members seek the gains of a market without paying the high cost of its construction and maintenance. This is the islamic (overloading), the gypsy(physical parasitism), and the jewish economic strategy(economic parasitism): impose costs and contribute no gains to the commons.
In other words, if you’re an objectivist you’re a parasite. A parasite on the commons just as a communist is a parasite on private property. But both communism against private property and objectivsm-libertarianism against the commons are simply out-group separatist strategies to engage in parasitism upoN others via one extreme or the other.
END THE LIES
You’re welcome to join the non-parasitic liberty movement. We call it ‘Sovereignty’. And it requires that you fight to pay for the liberty you currently beggar for.
But then, it is a possible liberty not an impossible one.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 07:47:00 UTC