Form: Critique

  • Both the former and the latter claimed they were making scientific statements. T

    Both the former and the latter claimed they were making scientific statements. The most humorous is the neoMarxist frankfurt school what literally, knowingly, ‘made it all up’.

    A student of group strategies and thier frameworks of logic will become rapidly aware of the semitic use of mythicism vs the european use of historicism. Why? Social cosntruction of falsehoods vs social construction of truths.

    Why is it that the feminine mind or the feminine group strategy requires social construction of falsehoods?

    That’s a fascinating question but we already know the answer.

    Responsibility.

    Reply addressees: @ratfacedmouse @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:31:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720539303090982912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720537444771062144

  • Yuval Harrari is wrong about almost everything because he is advancing an agenda

    Yuval Harrari is wrong about almost everything because he is advancing an agenda (just as did Diamond, Zinn, Gould, Lewontin, Boaz, Freud) and just as did the entirety of the frankfurt school, neomarxists and postmodernists. It’s largely a denial of Darwin as a general rule of all existence not just biology. We know why (Feminine cognition), and we know why most of this pseudoscience is produced by the Ashkenazim (feminine bias in cognition). The oddity is only in why are we tolerant of this pseudoscience? (it’s cultural)

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:18:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720535878118821888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720526925901320453

  • “It is not intuition if it is wrong.”– Um…. No. Intuition is a cognitive proc

    –“It is not intuition if it is wrong.”–
    Um…. No.

    Intuition is a cognitive process or an understanding that arises without conscious reasoning.

    The fact that we intuit (predict by auto association) has nothing to do with whether the prediction is true or false.

    The outcomes of intuition—meaning the decisions made or beliefs held as a result of intuition—can be evaluated for truthfulness or falsity based on whether they align with facts, correspondnce, or logical consistency.

    For instance, a person may have an intuitive feeling that a certain path through the woods is the correct one to reach a destination. Whether this intuitive decision is true (the path does lead to the destination) or false (the path does not lead to the destination) can be determined by following the path and seeing where it leads.

    Reply addressees: @BigSisterCynthi @Josh_Ebner @taylorburrowes @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 12:02:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720048821512663040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719942452843557291

  • SAPOLSKY’S BOOK ISN”T ABOUT FREE WILL BUT WORLD VIEW. RE: @Robot_Sapolsky #Deter

    SAPOLSKY’S BOOK ISN”T ABOUT FREE WILL BUT WORLD VIEW.
    RE: @Robot_Sapolsky #Determined

    The better reviews are correctly uncharitable so far. But it’s because it’s the book is not in fact about the philosophical question of ‘free will’ which asks only whether we have the capacity to choose between moral and immoral actions. That’s all the ‘free will’ debate asks. And yes we do have it. Which is why we hold one another accountable for our actions throughout mankind and throughout history. The book instead is about our World View (model) within which we exercise the free will to make moral decisions.

    If I find a day to read this book through, I”ll write a solid review. But I can tell from the interviews already that he’s spewing nonsense about FREE WILL, even if he is trying to demonstrate how heavily our WORLD VIEW and therefore thoughts, words, and deeds within it, are affected by our body form, its limitations, our brain and its limitations, and the universe that we live in.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @badoer77


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 02:04:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716636765480423424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716621679529455866

  • I want to note that I do not like this book or anything else that tries to confl

    I want to note that I do not like this book or anything else that tries to conflate two things that are different.

    In my work we explain the origins of religion and that like natural selection it does assist in the organization of groups.

    But that’s true of philosophy, sciencde, accounting, or literacy. It’ also true of group evolutionary strategies. Which is what I tend to work on.

    Reply addressees: @f_quiver


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 21:41:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716208166545805312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716200409105350960

  • ^This is nonsense. The flynn effect resulted from minor changes at the bottom of

    ^This is nonsense. The flynn effect resulted from minor changes at the bottom of the curve, and from the gradual adoption of scientific thought (synthetic, general rules), replacing pre-scientific thought (discreet, specific rules).

    There was no iq deficit in nordic populations. Just the opposite. The only change we know of in nordic populations from antiquity is increase in neoteny because women had a more masculine face and it’s been gradually europeanizing over time to a more feminine (gracile) face.

    The way we judge the intelligence of a population is through their arts and crafts. In the case of the nordic shipwork and their arts, esp the anglo saxons for that matter, compared to say, the Scythians who paid the greeks to do their arts for them. Compared to the non-representationals. Compared to the primitivists. Hard to judge egypt for example because of the distribution of work. That said, there had to be some very smart people in ancient egypt *(they had a lot of time, and food, which allowed a division of ablor and production of artistic elites).

    Ovrer 98% of invention is european. And european IQ at present is lower than it was pre-industrial revolution due to reversal of manorialism’s impact on asymmetric reproduction. We’ve lost something like 14/15 points already. This is getting worse through immigration that is forcing us into a second world economy, as the lower IQ population replaces the higher IQ european population.

    Interesting is the absolute dearth of ashkenazi contribution until integrating into western civ, and even then they continued their tradition of mythicism (historical fabrication) in their massive and still harmful production of the pseudosicences. The “Einstein Industry” is an attempt by social construction to suggest the opposite, but it’s simple fact that the Jews contributed nothing to civilization despite being the most literate group of people in europe until they were allowed to integrate.

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @alba_superbus_ @NWEurasian @NatLawInstitute @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 17:15:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715778834815983616

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715776489189208467

  • (Fake News) –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts

    (Fake News)
    –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts to remove contentious social media posts”–

    Instead, the supreme court wants (a) to handle this matter itself and urgently, (b) because the lower court ruling is ‘overbroad’ (c) and because it has extraordinary impact (d) and because if it is of present import to the people.

    Alito was interesting in that he dissented, and wanted the ruling to stand. He gets it right once in a while. 😉

    The conservative block didn’t for one reason, which is the reason they always fall back on: they are trying to end legislation from the bench, bypassing the people and the legislature, thereby depriving the people of sovereignty:

    “This is a matter for the the people, via the legislature, and only after the legislature the court.”

    The court’s job is to clarify law, produce settled law, not make law, and the public perception that the court is making law is only due to the court prohibiting laws that interfere with the bill of rights (natural rights albeit poorly stated and incomplete).

    #SupremeCourt

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 14:45:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715741157236285440

  • (Fake News) –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts

    (Fake News)
    –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts to remove contentious social media posts”–

    Instead, the supreme court wants (a) to handle this matter itself and urgently, (b) because the lower court ruling is ‘overbroad’ (c) and because it has extraordinary impact (d) and because if it is of present import to the people.

    Alito was interesting in that he dissented, and wanted the ruling to stand. He gets it right once in a while. 😉

    The conservative block didn’t for one reason, which is the reason they always fall back on: they are trying to end legislation from the bench, bypassing the people and the legislature, thereby depriving the people of sovereignty:

    “This is a matter for the the people, via the legislature, and only after the legislature the court.”

    The court’s job is to clarify law, produce settled law, not make law, and the public perception that the court is making law is only due to the court prohibiting laws that interfere with the bill of rights (natural rights albeit poorly stated and incomplete).

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 14:45:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715740040288956416

  • NWE… He is profoundly ignorant of genetics, archaeology, history, and the move

    NWE… He is profoundly ignorant of genetics, archaeology, history, and the movement of peoples – and I’m fairly sure he’s no concept of the foundational differences in civilizations. I’m kind of impressed you invested that much time before discovering the futility. Because the cognitively feminine mind can’t reform, and can’t admit its wrong, because it is so dependent upon intuition instead of knoweldge and reason (which you demonstrated by you (correct) statement that you admit when you”re wrong.) Well done though. 😉

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @cerflerg @NatLawInstitute @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-19 16:36:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715044230177935364

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715040532999643224

  • THE GOODS AND BADS OF JEWISH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SCIENCES AND PSEUDOSCIENCES Wh

    THE GOODS AND BADS OF JEWISH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SCIENCES AND PSEUDOSCIENCES
    While Pinker was instrumental it’s not true that Jews were in particular. The Jews also put forward blank slate-ism though indirectly. It’s central to the marxist sequence as it was to the abrahamic sequence before. Worse, because of it, Jews dominate the pseudosciences including boaz in anthropology, freud in psychology, marx in everything including econ, gould in evolutionary biology, lewontin in genetics, cantor, bohr, (even some of einstein) in math, the entire postmodern and frankfurt movements, libertarianism, anti-male feminism, zinn and harari, in history, rez, kelsen, dworkin, hart are especially frustrating in destroying western legal traditions. And today, we’re stuck with the NYT giving moutpieces to DeLong, Stigler, and Krugman (who is the most anti-white person in academia).

    So Jewish contribution to ‘science’ has been ok in physics and chemistry and medicine, but jewish intellectuals have done extraordinary damage to the behavioral, sociological, political, economic, and evolutionary sciences.

    This is a habit by the way. Jews act like tehir history didn’t exist from 100AD thu 1500AD. And a cursory analysis of why they ‘forget it’ is because their persecutions were earned every single time.

    I’ve had to work on the feminine > semitic > jewish > abrahamic > marxist sequence of expressions of feminine antisocial and parasitic behavior, and I don’t really like what I”ve found. But there is plenty of blame on the feminine side just as on the masculine of violence and war.

    And it’s time to update our law, as we did with our commonlaw, to equally suppress the feminine means of antisocial, anti-economic, anti-political behavior as thorougly as we have the male. The difference is that the feminine mind is less self regulatory and consious and far more implusive in these matters, so it’s going to be harder than outlawing the incremental discovery of male means of irreciprocity (crime).

    HISTORY
    The Blank Slate theory, also known as “tabula rasa,” has a rich history rooted in philosophy, psychology, and more recently, neuroscience and genetics.

    Ancient and Classical Periods:
    Aristotle: While not fully endorsing a blank slate theory, Aristotle’s work laid some early groundwork by suggesting that the mind is unscribed at birth.
    (CD this is not the same as tabula rasa, he was saying only that we learned, not that we were equal. If you read his writings he was anything but an equalitarian.)

    It’s an Abrahamic Mythos

    Medieval and Renaissance:
    Avicenna (Ibn Sina): An Islamic philosopher who maintained that the human intellect at birth is a tabula rasa, allowing humans to obtain knowledge through empirical means.

    Thomas Aquinas: Merged Aristotle’s ideas with Christian doctrine but still maintained aspects that alluded to a blank slate.

    Enlightenment:
    John Locke: Widely considered the key figure who popularized the term “tabula rasa.” Argued that humans are born without innate ideas and that knowledge comes solely from experience and perception.

    19th Century:
    John Stuart Mill: Extended Locke’s ideas and strongly advocated for empiricism, stating that human character is entirely a product of upbringing.

    Early 20th Century:
    Behaviorists (John B. Watson, B.F. Skinner): In psychology, behaviorists argued that all behavior is a result of conditioning and that the human mind starts as a blank slate.

    Mid to Late 20th Century:
    Noam Chomsky: Criticized behaviorism, suggesting that the capacity for language is innate, a direct challenge to the blank slate theory.

    Sociobiology (E.O. Wilson): Introduced ideas that both genetic and environmental factors play a role in human behavior, challenging the idea of a blank slate.

    Human Genome Project: The mapping of the human genome raised questions about the role of genetics in human behavior, intelligence, and disposition.

    21st Century:
    Steven Pinker: Published “The Blank Slate,” arguing strongly against the concept and suggesting that it is contrary to findings in genetics and neuroscience.

    Evolving Neuroscience: Continued research into the brain and genetics adds complexity to the idea, suggesting an interaction between innate traits and environmental conditions.

    Sources:

    “The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature” by Steven Pinker
    “Tabula Rasa and Human Nature” by Robert Hanna
    “Behaviorism” by John B. Watson
    “Syntactic Structures” by Noam Chomsky
    “Sociobiology: The New Synthesis” by E.O. Wilson

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @NWEurasian @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 15:49:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714670016354820096

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714649994135998973