Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • WE ALL KNEW. (a) seth rich was the wikileaks source. (b) he was murdered for it.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.smh.com.au/world/us-election/dnchack-did-kim-dotcom-warn-the-world-about-the-democratic-party-hacking-20160622-gpp15a.htmlYEAH, WE ALL KNEW.

    (a) seth rich was the wikileaks source.

    (b) he was murdered for it. (by whom?)

    (c) there was no meddling.

    KIM DOT COM

    Kim Dotcom has once again chimed in on the DNC hack, following a Sunday morning tweet from President Trump clarifying his previous comments on Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

    In response, Dotcom tweeted “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why,” adding “Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. 360 pounds!” alluding of course to Trump’s “400 pound genius” comment.

    “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why. Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. “

    Dotcom’s assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick.

    The local transfer theory of course blows the Russian hacking narrative out of the water, lending credibility to the theory that the DNC “hack” was in fact an inside job, potentially implicating late DNC IT staffer, Seth Rich.

    John Podesta’s email was allegedly successfully “hacked” (he fell victim to a phishing scam) in March 2016, while the DNC reported suspicious activity (the suspected Seth Rich file transfer) in late April, 2016 according to the Washington Post.

    On May 18, 2017, Dotcom proposed that if Congress includes the Seth Rich investigation in their Russia probe, he would provide written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was WikiLeaks’ source.

    “If Congress includes #SethRich case into their Russia probe I’ll give written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was @Wikileaks source.”

    “I knew Seth Rich. I know he was the @Wikileaks source. I was involved.”

    “I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

    “If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.”

    Kim Dotcom knew.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-19 19:12:00 UTC

  • Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales becau

    Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales because western fairy tales teach honor, skepticism, and to be on the lookout for treachery. They do not celebrate infantilism. They warn us against it. Go to a children’s bookstore in Russia and Ukraine and you’ll find the books children used to read in germanic speaking countries. Kings, Princes, Princesses, Heroes, and Maids.

  • Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales becau

    Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales because western fairy tales teach honor, skepticism, and to be on the lookout for treachery. They do not celebrate infantilism. They warn us against it. Go to a children’s bookstore in Russia and Ukraine and you’ll find the books children used to read in germanic speaking countries. Kings, Princes, Princesses, Heroes, and Maids.

  • Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales becau

    Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales because western fairy tales teach honor, skepticism, and to be on the lookout for treachery. They do not celebrate infantilism. They warn us against it.

    Go to a children’s bookstore in Russia and Ukraine and you’ll find the books children used to read in germanic speaking countries.

    Kings, Princes, Princesses, Heroes, and Maids.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 09:58:00 UTC

  • Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Le

    Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Leftists: “Kill fascists! Punch Nazis!” *Assaults people on the streets* Right-Wingers: “It’s OK to be White.” *Hosts a rally. Gives a speech* Media: “Right-Wing extremism is our greatest threat.” -Blair Cottrell (Aus.)

  • Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Le

    Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Leftists: “Kill fascists! Punch Nazis!” *Assaults people on the streets* Right-Wingers: “It’s OK to be White.” *Hosts a rally. Gives a speech* Media: “Right-Wing extremism is our greatest threat.” -Blair Cottrell (Aus.)

  • Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Le

    Muslims:

    “Behead those who insult us!”

    *Kills innocent people on the streets*

    Leftists:

    “Kill fascists! Punch Nazis!”

    *Assaults people on the streets*

    Right-Wingers:

    “It’s OK to be White.”

    *Hosts a rally. Gives a speech*

    Media:

    “Right-Wing extremism is our greatest threat.”

    -Blair Cottrell (Aus.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-04 17:57:00 UTC

  • Postmodern Criticism From The Losers On The Hard Right

    –“Existential aesthetics provide us with a means of orientation from which we may construct a system of values.”– A Young Male Can you explain that? Because “existential aesthetics” sounds like a pretense. You can say that producing high arts the combine craftsmanship, design(aesthetic representation of ‘bounty’), and reference (history or myth), can assist in the constant reinforcement of the means of decision making contained in the mythos. You can say that creating myths and fictions allow the immature mind to fantasize rather than achieve. And the fool to participate in the throng. Sure. But ‘existential aesthetics’ needs to refer to SOMETHING existential in order to exist as ‘existential’. Because “means of orientation” sounds like a pretense. I think you mean, “means of preferring, choosing, deciding” in a kaleidic universe beyond your perception cognition and reason. Because “construct a system of values” can only mean a repetition of ‘means of orientation’. So I can only translate the phrase as “I need a mythology that bypasses reason, so that I can find a means of preferences, choices, goods, and decidability, so that I can have a means of preferences, choices, goods, and decidability.” I don’t begrudge the female for her lack of agency, because of her inability to exit the influence of her hormones. I don’t begrudge the young male for his lack of agency, because of his inability to exit the influence of his hormones. I don’t begrudge the poor for their lack of agency due to genetic, familial, class and class inferiorities – I seek to create institutions that assist them. I don’t begrudge the inferior because of their cultural, economic, and political limitations – I seek to help them form institutions that assist them. I don’t begrudge the socially inadequate because they are undesirable friends, undesirable mates, undesirable employees, and unprofitable members of the polity – I seek to prevent them from doing harm – and pursue satisfaction despite their inadequacies. However, I begrudge the genetically, personally, socially, economically, and politically inadequate from any pretense of superiority in false criticism of me, my achievements, or my work in progress as a means of generating pretense of criticism, pretense of superiority – when the very argument they use to do so is because they are by definition demonstrating inferiority by their demands. It is not a criticism to claim that Transcendence is insufficient for the inadequate. Itis an aristocratic value system, precisely because it needs no comforting lies. Weak, unaccomplished, undesirable males are not interesting if they, like women and children need fairy stories. Men act to transform the world by their will, for no other reason than reward for themselves, for their kin, and for their allies in doing so. And storytelling is the organizational model for liars, frauds, and priests. Business is organized by knowledge and wealth. Man is organized by law and power. Everyone else, is just sheep. (Or in this case LARPERS). (The right is full of losers.)

  • Postmodern Criticism From The Losers On The Hard Right

    –“Existential aesthetics provide us with a means of orientation from which we may construct a system of values.”– A Young Male Can you explain that? Because “existential aesthetics” sounds like a pretense. You can say that producing high arts the combine craftsmanship, design(aesthetic representation of ‘bounty’), and reference (history or myth), can assist in the constant reinforcement of the means of decision making contained in the mythos. You can say that creating myths and fictions allow the immature mind to fantasize rather than achieve. And the fool to participate in the throng. Sure. But ‘existential aesthetics’ needs to refer to SOMETHING existential in order to exist as ‘existential’. Because “means of orientation” sounds like a pretense. I think you mean, “means of preferring, choosing, deciding” in a kaleidic universe beyond your perception cognition and reason. Because “construct a system of values” can only mean a repetition of ‘means of orientation’. So I can only translate the phrase as “I need a mythology that bypasses reason, so that I can find a means of preferences, choices, goods, and decidability, so that I can have a means of preferences, choices, goods, and decidability.” I don’t begrudge the female for her lack of agency, because of her inability to exit the influence of her hormones. I don’t begrudge the young male for his lack of agency, because of his inability to exit the influence of his hormones. I don’t begrudge the poor for their lack of agency due to genetic, familial, class and class inferiorities – I seek to create institutions that assist them. I don’t begrudge the inferior because of their cultural, economic, and political limitations – I seek to help them form institutions that assist them. I don’t begrudge the socially inadequate because they are undesirable friends, undesirable mates, undesirable employees, and unprofitable members of the polity – I seek to prevent them from doing harm – and pursue satisfaction despite their inadequacies. However, I begrudge the genetically, personally, socially, economically, and politically inadequate from any pretense of superiority in false criticism of me, my achievements, or my work in progress as a means of generating pretense of criticism, pretense of superiority – when the very argument they use to do so is because they are by definition demonstrating inferiority by their demands. It is not a criticism to claim that Transcendence is insufficient for the inadequate. Itis an aristocratic value system, precisely because it needs no comforting lies. Weak, unaccomplished, undesirable males are not interesting if they, like women and children need fairy stories. Men act to transform the world by their will, for no other reason than reward for themselves, for their kin, and for their allies in doing so. And storytelling is the organizational model for liars, frauds, and priests. Business is organized by knowledge and wealth. Man is organized by law and power. Everyone else, is just sheep. (Or in this case LARPERS). (The right is full of losers.)

  • POSTMODERN CRITICISM FROM THE LOSERS ON THE HARD RIGHT –“Existential aesthetics

    POSTMODERN CRITICISM FROM THE LOSERS ON THE HARD RIGHT

    –“Existential aesthetics provide us with a means of orientation from which we may construct a system of values.”– A Young Male

    Can you explain that?

    Because “existential aesthetics” sounds like a pretense.

    You can say that producing high arts the combine craftsmanship, design(aesthetic representation of ‘bounty’), and reference (history or myth), can assist in the constant reinforcement of the means of decision making contained in the mythos.

    You can say that creating myths and fictions allow the immature mind to fantasize rather than achieve. And the fool to participate in the throng. Sure.

    But ‘existential aesthetics’ needs to refer to SOMETHING existential in order to exist as ‘existential’.

    Because “means of orientation” sounds like a pretense. I think you mean, “means of preferring, choosing, deciding” in a kaleidic universe beyond your perception cognition and reason.

    Because “construct a system of values” can only mean a repetition of ‘means of orientation’.

    So I can only translate the phrase as “I need a mythology that bypasses reason, so that I can find a means of preferences, choices, goods, and decidability, so that I can have a means of preferences, choices, goods, and decidability.”

    I don’t begrudge the female for her lack of agency, because of her inability to exit the influence of her hormones.

    I don’t begrudge the young male for his lack of agency, because of his inability to exit the influence of his hormones.

    I don’t begrudge the poor for their lack of agency due to genetic, familial, class and class inferiorities – I seek to create institutions that assist them.

    I don’t begrudge the inferior because of their cultural, economic, and political limitations – I seek to help them form institutions that assist them.

    I don’t begrudge the socially inadequate because they are undesirable friends, undesirable mates, undesirable employees, and unprofitable members of the polity – I seek to prevent them from doing harm – and pursue satisfaction despite their inadequacies.

    However, I begrudge the genetically, personally, socially, economically, and politically inadequate from any pretense of superiority in false criticism of me, my achievements, or my work in progress as a means of generating pretense of criticism, pretense of superiority – when the very argument they use to do so is because they are by definition demonstrating inferiority by their demands.

    It is not a criticism to claim that Transcendence is insufficient for the inadequate. Itis an aristocratic value system, precisely because it needs no comforting lies.

    Weak, unaccomplished, undesirable males are not interesting if they, like women and children need fairy stories.

    Men act to transform the world by their will, for no other reason than reward for themselves, for their kin, and for their allies in doing so. And storytelling is the organizational model for liars, frauds, and priests.

    Business is organized by knowledge and wealth.

    Man is organized by law and power.

    Everyone else, is just sheep. (Or in this case LARPERS).

    (The right is full of losers.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-01 18:41:00 UTC