Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • Paul doesn’t try to make sense. He tries to pursue his western-hatred agenda. An

    Paul doesn’t try to make sense. He tries to pursue his western-hatred agenda. And he does it as has every other generation of Fictionalists (Theologians, Rationalist Philosophers, Pseudoscientists), by half truths forcing suggestion using overloading to invoke moral sentiments.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 13:51:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846077846806528

    Reply addressees: @Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968840221151330305

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968840221151330305

  • Hoppe’s Work

    (from elsewhere) TOCAS is Hoppe’s best work. It is before he is overly affected by Rothbard. Like all Hoppe’s work, he is at his best in the study, description, and articulation of general rules of human incentives, and reduction of all of ethics to statements of property – even though he fails to make the connection between via positiva property, with via-negativa Reciprocity. He solves social science making the same mistake as Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Mises – verbalisms, rather than empiricisms. Unfortunately as a German (Rationalist), educated by Marxists (Justificationists), and overly influenced by Rothbard (Fictionalist), he favors his rational insights (which are false) instead of following his original, purely operational, insights into the application of economics to politics. Mises discovered operationalism in the only field in which it mattered (math does not need it, and physics has already adopted it), and turned his (and his generation’s) intuition into a rationalist pseudoscience. Rothbard again ran with the justificationary rationalism of Jewish Law, and finally, hoppe improved upon rothbard with more rigorousness rather than appeals to optimistic moral intuition. We stand on the shoulders of Giants. But these giants are often more flawed than perfect.

  • HOPPE’S WORK (from elsewhere) TOCAS is Hoppe’s best work. It is before he is ove

    HOPPE’S WORK

    (from elsewhere)

    TOCAS is Hoppe’s best work. It is before he is overly affected by Rothbard. Like all Hoppe’s work, he is at his best in the study, description, and articulation of general rules of human incentives, and reduction of all of ethics to statements of property – even though he fails to make the connection between via positiva property, with via-negativa Reciprocity. He solves social science making the same mistake as Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Mises – verbalisms, rather than empiricisms. Unfortunately as a German (Rationalist), educated by Marxists (Justificationists), and overly influenced by Rothbard (Fictionalist), he favors his rational insights (which are false) instead of following his original, purely operational, insights into the application of economics to politics. Mises discovered operationalism in the only field in which it mattered (math does not need it, and physics has already adopted it), and turned his (and his generation’s) intuition into a rationalist pseudoscience. Rothbard again ran with the justificationary rationalism of Jewish Law, and finally, hoppe improved upon rothbard with more rigorousness rather than appeals to optimistic moral intuition. We stand on the shoulders of Giants. But these giants are often more flawed than perfect.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 10:56:00 UTC

  • Hoppe’s Work

    (from elsewhere) TOCAS is Hoppe’s best work. It is before he is overly affected by Rothbard. Like all Hoppe’s work, he is at his best in the study, description, and articulation of general rules of human incentives, and reduction of all of ethics to statements of property – even though he fails to make the connection between via positiva property, with via-negativa Reciprocity. He solves social science making the same mistake as Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Mises – verbalisms, rather than empiricisms. Unfortunately as a German (Rationalist), educated by Marxists (Justificationists), and overly influenced by Rothbard (Fictionalist), he favors his rational insights (which are false) instead of following his original, purely operational, insights into the application of economics to politics. Mises discovered operationalism in the only field in which it mattered (math does not need it, and physics has already adopted it), and turned his (and his generation’s) intuition into a rationalist pseudoscience. Rothbard again ran with the justificationary rationalism of Jewish Law, and finally, hoppe improved upon rothbard with more rigorousness rather than appeals to optimistic moral intuition. We stand on the shoulders of Giants. But these giants are often more flawed than perfect.

  • THE NYT has done more to destroy western civilization than any other publication

    THE NYT has done more to destroy western civilization than any other publication.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-27 17:46:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968542964141215750

    Reply addressees: @nytimes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968157996189560833

    IN REPLY TO:

    @nytimes

    This is a chance to hold power to account. https://t.co/PGBV0M34gn

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968157996189560833

  • When Someone Uses The Term “Reductionism” They”re Admitting They Have No Argument.

    WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT. —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “— You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history. Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies? Truth was invented precisely once. Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once. Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty). Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it. The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide) That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it. Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it. Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it. Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.

  • WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMEN

    WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT.

    —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “—

    You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history.

    Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies?

    Truth was invented precisely once.

    Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once.

    Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty).

    Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it.

    The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide)

    That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it.

    Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it.

    Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it.

    Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-22 09:56:00 UTC

  • When Someone Uses The Term “Reductionism” They”re Admitting They Have No Argument.

    WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT. —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “— You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history. Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies? Truth was invented precisely once. Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once. Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty). Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it. The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide) That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it. Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it. Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it. Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.

  • Yeah, We All Knew.

    (a) seth rich was the wikileaks source. (b) he was murdered for it. (by whom?) (c) there was no meddling. KIM DOT COM Kim Dotcom has once again chimed in on the DNC hack, following a Sunday morning tweet from President Trump clarifying his previous comments on Russian meddling in the 2016 election. In response, Dotcom tweeted “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why,” adding “Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. 360 pounds!” alluding of course to Trump’s “400 pound genius” comment. “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why. Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. ” Dotcom’s assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick. The local transfer theory of course blows the Russian hacking narrative out of the water, lending credibility to the theory that the DNC “hack” was in fact an inside job, potentially implicating late DNC IT staffer, Seth Rich. John Podesta’s email was allegedly successfully “hacked” (he fell victim to a phishing scam) in March 2016, while the DNC reported suspicious activity (the suspected Seth Rich file transfer) in late April, 2016 according to the Washington Post. On May 18, 2017, Dotcom proposed that if Congress includes the Seth Rich investigation in their Russia probe, he would provide written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was WikiLeaks’ source. “If Congress includes #SethRich case into their Russia probe I’ll give written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was @Wikileaks source.” “I knew Seth Rich. I know he was the @Wikileaks source. I was involved.” “I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process. “If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.” Kim Dotcom knew.

  • WE ALL KNEW. (a) seth rich was the wikileaks source. (b) he was murdered for it.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.smh.com.au/world/us-election/dnchack-did-kim-dotcom-warn-the-world-about-the-democratic-party-hacking-20160622-gpp15a.htmlYEAH, WE ALL KNEW.

    (a) seth rich was the wikileaks source.

    (b) he was murdered for it. (by whom?)

    (c) there was no meddling.

    KIM DOT COM

    Kim Dotcom has once again chimed in on the DNC hack, following a Sunday morning tweet from President Trump clarifying his previous comments on Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

    In response, Dotcom tweeted “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why,” adding “Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. 360 pounds!” alluding of course to Trump’s “400 pound genius” comment.

    “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why. Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. “

    Dotcom’s assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick.

    The local transfer theory of course blows the Russian hacking narrative out of the water, lending credibility to the theory that the DNC “hack” was in fact an inside job, potentially implicating late DNC IT staffer, Seth Rich.

    John Podesta’s email was allegedly successfully “hacked” (he fell victim to a phishing scam) in March 2016, while the DNC reported suspicious activity (the suspected Seth Rich file transfer) in late April, 2016 according to the Washington Post.

    On May 18, 2017, Dotcom proposed that if Congress includes the Seth Rich investigation in their Russia probe, he would provide written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was WikiLeaks’ source.

    “If Congress includes #SethRich case into their Russia probe I’ll give written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was @Wikileaks source.”

    “I knew Seth Rich. I know he was the @Wikileaks source. I was involved.”

    “I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

    “If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.”

    Kim Dotcom knew.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-19 19:12:00 UTC