Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • I dunno. I’m grateful to Springer for showing the world what the room temperatur

    I dunno. I’m grateful to Springer for showing the world what the room temperature IQ crowd does with their privilege of exiting poverty, freedom of expression, and their ability to vote.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:11:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976174331872063488

    Reply addressees: @adamcbest

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976121979043532800

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976121979043532800

  • “Suicide By Virtue Signal”

    “SUICIDE BY VIRTUE SIGNAL” Reading Pinker’s Enlightenment Now. And all it’s doing is making me angry. Once you understand (((their))) use of Pilpul it’s like listening to Jim Jones discussing the heaven that awaits those that drink the Cool Aide. They create moral hazard by the use of appeals to reasonableness. I have to fund a study that will demonstrate how vulnerable we are to suicide by signal. Women do not know of what they speak, and (((those))) authors do not know of what they speak, because they do not speak from evolution, but from devolution, so that the unfit genes can prosper. I started taking notes, but it’s …. it’s pointless. I’d have to refute nearly every paragraph.

  • “SUICIDE BY VIRTUE SIGNAL” Reading Pinker’s Enlightenment Now. And all it’s doin

    “SUICIDE BY VIRTUE SIGNAL”

    Reading Pinker’s Enlightenment Now. And all it’s doing is making me angry.

    Once you understand (((their))) use of Pilpul it’s like listening to Jim Jones discussing the heaven that awaits those that drink the Cool Aide.

    They create moral hazard by the use of appeals to reasonableness. I have to fund a study that will demonstrate how vulnerable we are to suicide by signal.

    Women do not know of what they speak, and (((those))) authors do not know of what they speak, because they do not speak from evolution, but from devolution, so that the unfit genes can prosper.

    I started taking notes, but it’s …. it’s pointless. I’d have to refute nearly every paragraph.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 11:42:00 UTC

  • “Suicide By Virtue Signal”

    “SUICIDE BY VIRTUE SIGNAL” Reading Pinker’s Enlightenment Now. And all it’s doing is making me angry. Once you understand (((their))) use of Pilpul it’s like listening to Jim Jones discussing the heaven that awaits those that drink the Cool Aide. They create moral hazard by the use of appeals to reasonableness. I have to fund a study that will demonstrate how vulnerable we are to suicide by signal. Women do not know of what they speak, and (((those))) authors do not know of what they speak, because they do not speak from evolution, but from devolution, so that the unfit genes can prosper. I started taking notes, but it’s …. it’s pointless. I’d have to refute nearly every paragraph.

  • LIBERTARIAN PRETENSE OF PAYING THE HIGH COST OF ORDER —“libertarians aren’t ag

    LIBERTARIAN PRETENSE OF PAYING THE HIGH COST OF ORDER

    —“libertarians aren’t against violence…”—

    Empty words, because they are untestable words. Which is why libertarian words are, like religion, a comforting deception.

    1. The question is not whether one is against aggression, but which cases of aggression.

    2. The question is not whether one is against violence buth which cases of violence.

    3. The question is not whether one will use violence, but under what cases they will use violence.

    Libertarians have not and cannot answer these questions because if they do the answer becomes obvious: “I want other people to pay the cost of the commons I benefit from.”

    Libertarianism is simply marxism for the commons instead of marxism for private property.

    There is only one method by which we create the class conditions of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy, and that is the continuous organized application of violence to deny one and all the alternatives, by the universal militia of able men, and the costly production of the normative, economic, judicial, political, military and traditional commons necessary for preservation of their power to do so against all opposition.

    That is what libertarian means. Rothbardians did not favor liberty (ownership) but separatist anarchy (parasitism upon others commons).

    Period. End of Argument.

    I ended libertarianism forever like others ended marxism before it, and we ware currently in the process of ending neo-conservatism. When that is done, and we return to rule of law, the pseudoscientific century will have ended.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 08:26:00 UTC

  • Libertarian Pretense Of Paying The High Cost Of Order

    —“libertarians aren’t against violence…”— Empty words, because they are untestable words. Which is why libertarian words are, like religion, a comforting deception. 1. The question is not whether one is against aggression, but which cases of aggression. 2. The question is not whether one is against violence buth which cases of violence. 3. The question is not whether one will use violence, but under what cases they will use violence. Libertarians have not and cannot answer these questions because if they do the answer becomes obvious: “I want other people to pay the cost of the commons I benefit from.” Libertarianism is simply marxism for the commons instead of marxism for private property. There is only one method by which we create the class conditions of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy, and that is the continuous organized application of violence to deny one and all the alternatives, by the universal militia of able men, and the costly production of the normative, economic, judicial, political, military and traditional commons necessary for preservation of their power to do so against all opposition. That is what libertarian means. Rothbardians did not favor liberty (ownership) but separatist anarchy (parasitism upon others commons). Period. End of Argument. I ended libertarianism forever like others ended marxism before it, and we ware currently in the process of ending neo-conservatism. When that is done, and we return to rule of law, the pseudoscientific century will have ended.

  • Libertarian Pretense Of Paying The High Cost Of Order

    —“libertarians aren’t against violence…”— Empty words, because they are untestable words. Which is why libertarian words are, like religion, a comforting deception. 1. The question is not whether one is against aggression, but which cases of aggression. 2. The question is not whether one is against violence buth which cases of violence. 3. The question is not whether one will use violence, but under what cases they will use violence. Libertarians have not and cannot answer these questions because if they do the answer becomes obvious: “I want other people to pay the cost of the commons I benefit from.” Libertarianism is simply marxism for the commons instead of marxism for private property. There is only one method by which we create the class conditions of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy, and that is the continuous organized application of violence to deny one and all the alternatives, by the universal militia of able men, and the costly production of the normative, economic, judicial, political, military and traditional commons necessary for preservation of their power to do so against all opposition. That is what libertarian means. Rothbardians did not favor liberty (ownership) but separatist anarchy (parasitism upon others commons). Period. End of Argument. I ended libertarianism forever like others ended marxism before it, and we ware currently in the process of ending neo-conservatism. When that is done, and we return to rule of law, the pseudoscientific century will have ended.

  • So you mean, you don’t understand semantics, grammar, consistency, correspondenc

    So you mean, you don’t understand semantics, grammar, consistency, correspondence, coherence, parsimony and falsifiability?The only requirement for a libertarian identity is sovereignty, and therefore reciprocity, and therefore reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:37:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975033290183839744

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197

  • 4 – Every thinker is only partly right. My beef with rothbard is that he conflat

    4 – Every thinker is only partly right. My beef with rothbard is that he conflated low trust ethics with high trust ethics, and conducted an pseudoscientific war on the commons as marx did on private property. The only one who was right was Hayek: it’s all just reducible to law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:50:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975021495566159873

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049

  • MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LIBERTARIAN IDENTITY —“And you call yourself libertar

    MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LIBERTARIAN IDENTITY

    —“And you call yourself libertarian. Lol”—

    So you mean, you don’t understand semantics, grammar, consistency, correspondence, coherence, parsimony and falsifiability?

    The only requirement for a libertarian identity is sovereignty, and therefore reciprocity, and therefore reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity.

    Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate reciprocity and therefore sovereignty, and therefore insurance of reciprocity and sovereignty.

    Either you can warranty your words our you are externalizing costs of doing so onto others.

    Truthful – meaning warrantied – speech doesn’t violate reciprocity. Un-warrantied speech does.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 11:40:00 UTC