Form: Critique

  • RYAN??? Um. Conservatives despise the guy as a Traitor. So you mean NEOCONSERVAT

    RYAN???

    Um. Conservatives despise the guy as a Traitor.

    So you mean NEOCONSERVATIVE decline, (Labor class Marxism, Middle class Libertarianism, Martial Class Neoconservatism) it’s the same nonsense in three different class languages. Marxist common property monopoly, libertarian private property monopoly, Neocon Normative Property Monopoly.

    What we are seeing is the end to the counter-revolution that we call the enlightenment, against the scientific revolution(s), in this era, just as we saw them in the ancient world.

    Conservatism = agrarian aristocracy. It’s eugenic that’s why conservatives can’t be honest about it.

    Libertarianism – ascendant male. It’s equilibrial. That’s why we can talk abou tit, but no one can construct power with it.

    Liberalism = Pastoralist dependency. Its dysgenic and that’s why it’s both profitable and appealing.

    We just don’t dare talk about these things any longer. Science is not kind to us. THankfully we have a century of data now to override the wishful thinking of prior eras.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-12 19:29:00 UTC

  • The Science of Christianity (really)

      —-“What is the overall message of the bible?”— (“Salvation”) It is: “If you submit (abandon) your reason, and surrender (abandon) your will to the commands of an evil omnipotent and omniscient fictional character, and imitate the life of another very benevolent and charitable fictional character, that you will find salvation (be saved) in a non existent afterlife, after you die.” Scientifically: Now scientifically speaking, christianity is reducible to:1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, imprisonment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. And this turns out to be the optimum strategy for producing persistent high trust cooperation. It’s just counter intuitive since we evolved very aggressive altruistic punishment. And functionally: More than 1/3 if not 1/2 of people are lack the agency both internal and environmental, and or the intelligence, and or the resources to contrive a means of successfully competing in market civilization, when ones self worth and status are determined by by that success. As such providing an alternative method by which people of limited agency, ability, and resources can develop virtuous behavior, and personal mindfulness, and therefore happiness with their self image, through merely extension of kinship love, forgiveness, and charity is a successful strategy. Moreover, the externalities produced in a market civilization by large numbers of these people constructs the trust necessary for prosperity in a market civilization. And Politically: Despite lacking agency, ability, knowledge, education, and resources, people are able to use ‘faith’ and the ‘christian strategy’ to defend against threats to their strategy, their self image, and the good they do to society, are impervious to corruption, to persuasion, to coercion, and to abandonment of that strategy (hence why intelligence agencies love to hire christians). The problem is that there is an ever declining percentage of the population willing to use this strategy by faith, even if there is an ever expanding population willing to use this strategy if stated as scientifically as I have here. So while a demand for ‘church’ remains, a demand for the primitivism of semitic underclasses, has been replaced by a demand for the advance reason of european middle classes. The already devoted are irrelevant. It’s those who are not open to devotion that don’t need a religion of faith, but a religion of reason, that need mindfulness.

  • The Science of Christianity (really)

      —-“What is the overall message of the bible?”— (“Salvation”) It is: “If you submit (abandon) your reason, and surrender (abandon) your will to the commands of an evil omnipotent and omniscient fictional character, and imitate the life of another very benevolent and charitable fictional character, that you will find salvation (be saved) in a non existent afterlife, after you die.” Scientifically: Now scientifically speaking, christianity is reducible to:1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, imprisonment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. And this turns out to be the optimum strategy for producing persistent high trust cooperation. It’s just counter intuitive since we evolved very aggressive altruistic punishment. And functionally: More than 1/3 if not 1/2 of people are lack the agency both internal and environmental, and or the intelligence, and or the resources to contrive a means of successfully competing in market civilization, when ones self worth and status are determined by by that success. As such providing an alternative method by which people of limited agency, ability, and resources can develop virtuous behavior, and personal mindfulness, and therefore happiness with their self image, through merely extension of kinship love, forgiveness, and charity is a successful strategy. Moreover, the externalities produced in a market civilization by large numbers of these people constructs the trust necessary for prosperity in a market civilization. And Politically: Despite lacking agency, ability, knowledge, education, and resources, people are able to use ‘faith’ and the ‘christian strategy’ to defend against threats to their strategy, their self image, and the good they do to society, are impervious to corruption, to persuasion, to coercion, and to abandonment of that strategy (hence why intelligence agencies love to hire christians). The problem is that there is an ever declining percentage of the population willing to use this strategy by faith, even if there is an ever expanding population willing to use this strategy if stated as scientifically as I have here. So while a demand for ‘church’ remains, a demand for the primitivism of semitic underclasses, has been replaced by a demand for the advance reason of european middle classes. The already devoted are irrelevant. It’s those who are not open to devotion that don’t need a religion of faith, but a religion of reason, that need mindfulness.

  • Stop blaming other people, and blame the one in the mirror.

    —“CURT: WHY ISN’T WINSTON CHURCHILL DEMONIZED FOR STARVING INDIANS TO FEED EUROPEANS DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR”— A Hindu (Indian) A REPRIMAND FOR ASKING THE QUESTION (Part of my ongoing effort to make people look in the mirror rather than blame others) **The following is what I tell every ethnic group on earth. You aren’t special.** Your question is typical of a failed people wishing to blame others for their condition … 1 – Who grant themselves a social, economic, political, military and intellectual equality that does not exist. The very idea that all humans are equal is anti-empirical, and merely a means by which to encourage economic cooperation and competition rather than violent conflict. It is an ambition in cooperation not an existential property of humans, or human groups. Quite the opposite. 2 – Who assume that we grant each other equal standing for anything other than utilitarian reasons – in order to increase trade and reduce opportunity for conflict. 3 – Who assume that the utility of cooperation is endless, when it is merely whenever it is more rewarding than not cooperating. Or in the case of the primitive civilizations, when it is more profitable to “Mature them out of superstition(india), destructive traditions and customs (india), ignorance(india), illiteracy(india), poverty (india), overbreeding(india), child mortality, early death, systemic filthiness (india), disregard for maintenance of the commons (india), resistance to truth telling (india), pervasive self-justificationary excuse making (india), pervasive familial corruption(india), inability to develop a middle class (india), vast asymmetry between the size of the classes (india), who cannot defend themselves (muslim gunpowder empires), – than it is to rule them, profit from ruling them, and like a good parent, try to raise them out of that current state. 4 – Why should we pay any cost of parenting a primitive people unless it is profitable? History demonstrates quite clearly that extermination is more profitable than cooperation. 5 – When we are at war, why would we not favor family, kin, and civilization over primitive peoples? Isn’t that the reason for pervasive indian corruption? Favoring family over commons? 6 – And why should we treat undomesticated human animals any differently than any other undomesticated animal? The answer is, we don’t until we can trade with them. So the problem is, parenting a people until we can trade with them. LOOK IN THE MIRROR Whenever you want to blame someone else, exhaust your opportunity to blame the person, the family, the tribe, the nation, the civilization **in the mirror**. Despite having one of the three early great civilizations, and despite amassing capital (not wealth, but capital), why did India and indians consistently fail? Why could she not resist Whites? Why couldn’t she resist the mongols? Why couldn’t she resist the muslims? Why couldn’t she resist the british? And conversely, why did east asia and the west europe succeed? Why do indians always fail? West Europe probably exceeded china for the simple reasons of geography and culture. Had china not had to resist barbarians at her walls, she might have continued her expansion into the new world. On the other hand, once China explored the rest of the world, they saw nothing worth bringing home. Once the west saw the rest of the world, they saw opportunity for expansion. And so the west dragged primitive peoples out of primitivism (ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, infant mortality, early death, disease, corruption, tyranny, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to human life. **We are not family, we are not kin, we are not friends, we are at best trading partners of convenience,** that fight by population, religion, means of government, and economic productivity, rather than fight by violence. And if you think otherwise you are simply fooled by your ability to absorb 3000 years of western civilization, and profit from doing so, while the british empire establishes the world trade destroyed by the muslims, and the americans pay the high cost of policing that system of world trade against primitive peoples of all civilizations, not the least of which were the russians, the chinese, the communists, and now the muslims. ANd no doubt, had india been powerful enough to mount a resistance, her also. We are all compatible at the feast. When in famine, it’s self, family, and kin we defend. No man is a hero to his debtors. Yet you are our debtors. Do not assume any equality whatsoever. All equality is merely a useful means of maturing you so that you’re profitable rather than a risk or cost. TRUTH: EVEN DARWIN AND MALTHUS WERE TOO KIND Territory is what you hold because you can. You can hold territory because you produce a people who can fight, and an economy to arm them against competitors. The purpose of ‘human rights’ – which are nothing but property rights – is not to produce human rights per se, but to demand states produce wealth by internal reformation rather than achieve wealth through conquest. In other words, it is a means of self defense. A form of cost reduction. The purpose of directing states to produce internal reformation and wealth so that they join the world economy, is to prevent another world war, and in no small part to convert from war by violence to war by commerce. For the simple reason that war by commerce tends to produce the opposite effect: continuous self improvement. This is the paradox of economic competition. If you do not understand this then you are still of a religious rather than scientific disposition, and believe in comforting falsehoods. **So stop blaming other people, and look in the mirror.**

  • Stop blaming other people, and blame the one in the mirror.

    —“CURT: WHY ISN’T WINSTON CHURCHILL DEMONIZED FOR STARVING INDIANS TO FEED EUROPEANS DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR”— A Hindu (Indian) A REPRIMAND FOR ASKING THE QUESTION (Part of my ongoing effort to make people look in the mirror rather than blame others) **The following is what I tell every ethnic group on earth. You aren’t special.** Your question is typical of a failed people wishing to blame others for their condition … 1 – Who grant themselves a social, economic, political, military and intellectual equality that does not exist. The very idea that all humans are equal is anti-empirical, and merely a means by which to encourage economic cooperation and competition rather than violent conflict. It is an ambition in cooperation not an existential property of humans, or human groups. Quite the opposite. 2 – Who assume that we grant each other equal standing for anything other than utilitarian reasons – in order to increase trade and reduce opportunity for conflict. 3 – Who assume that the utility of cooperation is endless, when it is merely whenever it is more rewarding than not cooperating. Or in the case of the primitive civilizations, when it is more profitable to “Mature them out of superstition(india), destructive traditions and customs (india), ignorance(india), illiteracy(india), poverty (india), overbreeding(india), child mortality, early death, systemic filthiness (india), disregard for maintenance of the commons (india), resistance to truth telling (india), pervasive self-justificationary excuse making (india), pervasive familial corruption(india), inability to develop a middle class (india), vast asymmetry between the size of the classes (india), who cannot defend themselves (muslim gunpowder empires), – than it is to rule them, profit from ruling them, and like a good parent, try to raise them out of that current state. 4 – Why should we pay any cost of parenting a primitive people unless it is profitable? History demonstrates quite clearly that extermination is more profitable than cooperation. 5 – When we are at war, why would we not favor family, kin, and civilization over primitive peoples? Isn’t that the reason for pervasive indian corruption? Favoring family over commons? 6 – And why should we treat undomesticated human animals any differently than any other undomesticated animal? The answer is, we don’t until we can trade with them. So the problem is, parenting a people until we can trade with them. LOOK IN THE MIRROR Whenever you want to blame someone else, exhaust your opportunity to blame the person, the family, the tribe, the nation, the civilization **in the mirror**. Despite having one of the three early great civilizations, and despite amassing capital (not wealth, but capital), why did India and indians consistently fail? Why could she not resist Whites? Why couldn’t she resist the mongols? Why couldn’t she resist the muslims? Why couldn’t she resist the british? And conversely, why did east asia and the west europe succeed? Why do indians always fail? West Europe probably exceeded china for the simple reasons of geography and culture. Had china not had to resist barbarians at her walls, she might have continued her expansion into the new world. On the other hand, once China explored the rest of the world, they saw nothing worth bringing home. Once the west saw the rest of the world, they saw opportunity for expansion. And so the west dragged primitive peoples out of primitivism (ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, infant mortality, early death, disease, corruption, tyranny, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to human life. **We are not family, we are not kin, we are not friends, we are at best trading partners of convenience,** that fight by population, religion, means of government, and economic productivity, rather than fight by violence. And if you think otherwise you are simply fooled by your ability to absorb 3000 years of western civilization, and profit from doing so, while the british empire establishes the world trade destroyed by the muslims, and the americans pay the high cost of policing that system of world trade against primitive peoples of all civilizations, not the least of which were the russians, the chinese, the communists, and now the muslims. ANd no doubt, had india been powerful enough to mount a resistance, her also. We are all compatible at the feast. When in famine, it’s self, family, and kin we defend. No man is a hero to his debtors. Yet you are our debtors. Do not assume any equality whatsoever. All equality is merely a useful means of maturing you so that you’re profitable rather than a risk or cost. TRUTH: EVEN DARWIN AND MALTHUS WERE TOO KIND Territory is what you hold because you can. You can hold territory because you produce a people who can fight, and an economy to arm them against competitors. The purpose of ‘human rights’ – which are nothing but property rights – is not to produce human rights per se, but to demand states produce wealth by internal reformation rather than achieve wealth through conquest. In other words, it is a means of self defense. A form of cost reduction. The purpose of directing states to produce internal reformation and wealth so that they join the world economy, is to prevent another world war, and in no small part to convert from war by violence to war by commerce. For the simple reason that war by commerce tends to produce the opposite effect: continuous self improvement. This is the paradox of economic competition. If you do not understand this then you are still of a religious rather than scientific disposition, and believe in comforting falsehoods. **So stop blaming other people, and look in the mirror.**

  • Quora

    Curt Doolittle’s answer to Why is the black race judged by of its least successful members?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at http://quora.com/contact with a link to your content.

    Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    It isn’t. It’s judged by the dominance of it’s race in failures of education, crime, civic behavior, business achievement, intellectual achievement, and artistic and literary achievement. The east asians and western europeans have aggressively killed off their lower classes through winters, starvation, enslavment, hanging, beheading, war, and a very severe justice system for thousands of years. The rest of the world has not. So the size of the underclasses in the black, arabic, turkic, hispanic, and southeast asian worlds is far higher a percentage than in the more northern climes. West and east were eugenic civilizations. Rice is a brutal system requiring disciplined work 360 days a year. Western winters are unforgiving.

    Humans think by stereotypes just as we think in all other categories. We have to. We cannot afford to interrogate every person we meet. We cannot pay the high cost of risk of trusting people from high risk groups. Instead, how can people from high risk groups signal (demonstrate) that they are good risks? Research has consistently shown, that contrary to popular myth, stereotypes are the most ACCURATE feature in social science. So people must rely on stereotypes, stereotypes are true, and it is the responsibility of people who are members of negatively stereotyped groups to change their behavior and signals so that they are visibly not a risk.

    When we say ‘we can’t judge this middle class black man’ or some other “Not All X Are Like That”, we are either committing a rhetorical fallacy or simply lying. Why? because the fact that we say most people of group X are a high risk, we are not saying that an outlier is. Yet conversely, we are saying (almost always correctly) that most people from group X are in fact a higher risk that we perceive our own group to be.

    We know the reasons for black underclass achievement: (a) the disproportionate size of the black underclass below 85 IQ, and the comparatively small sizes of its middle and upper middle classes, and total absence of an upper class, (b) earlier and more rapid maturity accompanied by the same level of hormones, leading to impulsivity and aggression, (c) lower verbal intelligence, (d) lower aggregate intelligence, (e) destruction of the black family by the progressive programs of the Johnson administration’s Great Society programs of the 1960’s – his attempt to mimc soviet resettlement programs from villages to urban areas without grasping the vast differences in Russian and black human capital. (f) the attempt to educate different races that mature more or less, more quickly or more slowly, at the same age under the same conditions. Educate black and hispanic men in what equates to military training and you will get good men out of it. You cannot ask humans in their youth to fight hormones that intense. Educating pliable asians and less pliable and more physical whites at the same rates is equally destructive. We can start asians and east asians one to two years earlier than whites, and it’s arguable that we should provide two more years for hispanics and three for blacks. It prevents schools from tailoring programs to the genetic needs of the children.

    We get nowhere by lying that we’re equally distributed. It’s liberal lies of equality that prevent us from developing institutions that support the needs of different genetic organisms, with different rates of maturity, different degrees of maturity, and different sizes of underclass.

    Curt DoolittleThe Propertarian Institute

    My job is to prevent lies in public discourse that prevent us from coming to compromises on policies.

     Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Sep 6, 2016
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to Is liberalism idealistic as opposed to being realistic?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle
    Curt Doolittle, Philosopher of political economy and founder of the Propertarian Institute.

    It’s Utopian, dysgenic, devolutionary, and entirely false, which is why it sells.

    You don’t think religions sell because they’re realistic or true? Neither do political ideologies.

    Here is some humbling and painful truth:

    1) Those civilizations that were most successful in preventing from access to food, delaying reproduction, preventing access to reproduction, enslaving, starving, killing, sending to war, or abandoning to the elements, the largest number of their lower classes, consistently produce the highest standards of living.

    Why? It’s pretty simple math: productive people are only so productive. The very best only a bit more productive, and they are small in number. The person at the bottom is six times more damaging than the person at the top is beneficial. SIX TIMES. (Or at least, like Pareto’s rule, that it’s the inverse of, it’s a very good rule of thumb.)

    2) Western Civilization, from the corded ware (Kurgan) people onward, (the european branch of the Aryan Invasions) out of Ukraine and what is now southern Russia, adopted these eugenic practices and redistributed resources upward increasing the rates of the middle class reproduction. Beginnig with the church’s ban on intermarriage, and the adoption of Bipartite Manorialism in Frisia, and the aggressive hanging of 1/2 to 1% of the population per year, until by the late middle ages – almost everyone living in Europe was a descendent of the genetic if not economic and social middle class.

    3) american puritans recruited people of ‘character’ and the original at least puritan colonies were intended to be a eugenic experiment. This only ended with the marxist, socialist, bolshevik, and soviet cooption of the university and media as an overwhelming counter-enlightenment to that provided by Darwin and Spencer. The pseudosciences of Boaz, Marx, Freud, and even Cantor were propagated to restore the underclass to some level of political control now that they had the economic means available that were provided by the industrial revolution, and the somewhat foolish enfranchisement of non-property owners and women. Meritocracy after all, is a eugenic strategy.

    4) Western civilization, beginning with the separation of western empirical, common, judge discovered law (law), from celebrations, festivals, and education (religion), has always been empirical. Our greek reason and british empiricism that we call ‘science’ today evolved from this legal tradition. To attack this empiricism, particularly after Darwin and Maxwell’s revelations, and Nietzche’s attempt to resurrect greek religion just as bacon, lock, smith, and hume had resurrected greek reason – the left invented multiple layers of progressive falsehoods:

    The myth of oppression of the equal underclasses rather than the necessity of domestication of the inferior underclasses.

    The Utopian vision of a world run by the underclasses (marxism). Despite the evidence that the world universally sorts by iq and genetic class except for rotations in and out of the middle class due to mating and economic lottery effects.

    The great lies of social science: Marxian history, Boazian Anthropology, Freudian Psychology.

    WHEN THESE FAILED to produce a revolution the left turned to “Scientific Socialism”.

    The great lies of economic pseudoscience: managed economies, central planning, world socialism.

    The Great Lies of Political science: That democracy was a good, rather than a luxury. That democracy was possible for the resolution of disputes in heterogeneous polities rather than the prioritization of wants in homogenous polities. That majoritarian monopoly was desirable, or produced beneficial ends. That

    The Great Lies of Law: that rule of law was not determined by the natural properties of mankind that we could enumerate to allow each other to cooperate, but that these laws were arbitrary, discretionary commands that could be followed like the rules of a corporation.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to the Culture of Critique (attack on culture).

    The Frankfurt school’s false criticisms of art, of western civilization, of white men, of western history.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to it’s only remaining option:

    1) to immigrate underclasses in order to obtain power through invasion and displacement.

    2) to switch from criticism to political correctness and the enfranchisement not o productive labor and families but of every fringe group possible

    3) to switch from rational argument to simply repeating messages and lies. (alinsky etc).

    THE RESULT is what we live with today:

    1) the destruction of the family that was the condition of enfranchisement into the american eugenic order.

    2) the destruction of the rule of law so that the constitution is no longer a document of the science of cooperation but a justification for war against western civilization.

    3) the destruction of the Whig History of the continuous evolution of western civilization.

    4) the devolution of the parties into married whites, and unmarried white women and the underclasses.

    5) The big sort, where people are nationally relocating to be near people like them.

    6) We are on the brink of civil war (and frankly I’m working to start it)

     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at http://quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Sep 7, 2016
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to Why is the black race judged by of its least successful members?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    (THIS IS  A REPEAT OF THE PREVIOUS CRITICISM)
     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at http://quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Mar 2, 2017
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to What do white people need to understand about racism?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    That it’s natural.  That all human groups act in the interests of their kin.  That people vote racially.  They work in racial groups. They live in racial groups. They mate and marry in racial groups.  They speak in racial groups.

    All racial groups convey status because some groups are more desirable than others.  That all those capable of escaping the lower classes of their racial groups rationally want to join in white culture so that they can have a better life, and that as such they want to limit racial discrimination.  And that white middle and lower classes want to preserve their privileges by preserving the status of their elites from competition.

    That race, religion, culture, tribe, gender are a part of life because they are meaningful differences because people act to their advantage at all times, and race, religion, culture, tribe and gender convey different advantages.

    NO MORE LIES.

    The century of pseudoscience and lying is over.

    Kant, Boaz, Freud, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt School, Rothbard, and the Postmoderns are just liars and pseudoscientists creating mythology of secular christianity that is the literary equivalent of science fiction and fantasy that provide the myth of pagan aristocracy.

    It’s not complicated.  Silly people in the ancient world believed in holy books. Silly people in the modern world believe in pseudoscientific books.  But they’re both nonsense. Both lies.

    The difference is that pagans and aristocracy know that science fiction and fantasy are just literature. The secular christians thought that mysticism was real. They think pseudoscience is real. They love propaganda. They love political correctness. They police speech that exposes their lies.

    The fact that women are and the underclasses are vectors for mysticism and  pseudoscience, and men and the middle classes are vectors for commerce, technology, and warfare shouldn’t be surprising.

    Women and slaves spread the lies of mysticism in the ancient world. Women and the ‘slaves’  or underclasses spread the lies of pseudoscience in the modern world.

    There is nothing even the least bit difficult to understand.

    Wishful thinking is fertile ground for lies.

    Lies are lies no matter how well you wrap them in story.

    Stories are the perfect method for telling lies.

    Why?  Women invented gossip: stories. Men invented history.

     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Curt Doolittle
    Mar 4, 2017

    I am a professional, and one of the leading thinkers on group evolutionary strategies. I am asked frequently to answer these questions. As far as I know I give articulate and truthful answers to them.

    In my opinion you should ether eliminate ALL questions related to race, or accept all truthful responses. Otherwise by definition you are simply sponsoring hate speech against white people by permitting criticism, but not advocacy or explanation.

     
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Nov 7
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Your comment on Who are the actual Aryans – Europeans, Iranians or Indians?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.
    Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Full text of comment:Evidence is in.H1B Starts in afghanistan.Moves west to caspian-back sea.Black sea deluge causes shock‘whites’ develop (we even know eye color time change)Split into west-north european and south-east indo-iranianSpread back to afghanistan.Cross into india, separating indo and iranian.Fight, interbreed, outbreed, and disappear.Leaves Indo-iranian+Dravidian distribution.Small population of conquerors has profound demographic effects.Modern equivalent is south america spanish + amerindian.Consequence of such admixture is genetic castesIndia forms institutional caste system.Indian castes reflect racial origins with the brahmins equal to jews, and the remaining indians retaining sub-saharan IQs.Unlike china, which is ethnically homogenous, india cannot reduce size of underclass, so India carries a heavy burden as does south america.Bad, but not as bad as arab peoples. Not as bad as sub-saharan african peoples.General confusion is R1B genetic origin in afghanistan; advances in R1B due to pedomorphic selection in ukraine; cultural, and technological components all define ‘aryans’. In general, we use the term ‘caucasian’ for the race, european, iranian, and indian for the subraces, ’aryans’ for the cultural change to militaristic sky worshippers, and their use of technological innovation of Russo-ukrainian horse, european wheel, and anatolian/iranian bronze.Evidence is that europeans (more neotonically advanced) moved west into ukraine and poland, and indo-iranians defeated those that remained in the ukaine-russia region, then the europeans re-conquered the ukraine-russia region, and drove the iranians out, but the original cultures of the region had been destroyed.This left europeans to expand west, the iranians to branch into most of the caucasian peoples, and the indians outbred with the dravidians and largely gone through full integration.Let me close with the fact that the West, the Russians, the Chinese all consider India having a serious problem with pseudoscience in this matter. India and South America have demonstrated the consequences of collision between major racial groups with different levels of pedomorphic development.
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Dec 16
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to Why do some Caucasian men prefer Asian women?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology, Truth.

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization. Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization. Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage.

    That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.)

    That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively).

    This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics.

    Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage.

    cheers

    Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Jan 16
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Your comment on Which political party has done the most good for the US, Democrat or Republican?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle, Philosopher: Truth, Natural Law, Economics, Politics, War

    That’s the wrong question. The question is, which has done the least damage?

    It’s pretty hard to argue that democrats have not done the most catastrophic and unrecoverable damage. And if I went into the list, I could write pages on it.

     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora ModerationFull text of comment:
    Debate me then. Make an argument. As far as I know, I’ll eat you like a pringle with beer. Why? Politics is a pseudoscience for the purpose of justifying priors, and Economics provides all required explanatory power. And at present the handful of people who can debate me with any degree of intellectual honesty does not include you.
  • Quora

    Curt Doolittle’s answer to Why is the black race judged by of its least successful members?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at http://quora.com/contact with a link to your content.

    Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    It isn’t. It’s judged by the dominance of it’s race in failures of education, crime, civic behavior, business achievement, intellectual achievement, and artistic and literary achievement. The east asians and western europeans have aggressively killed off their lower classes through winters, starvation, enslavment, hanging, beheading, war, and a very severe justice system for thousands of years. The rest of the world has not. So the size of the underclasses in the black, arabic, turkic, hispanic, and southeast asian worlds is far higher a percentage than in the more northern climes. West and east were eugenic civilizations. Rice is a brutal system requiring disciplined work 360 days a year. Western winters are unforgiving.

    Humans think by stereotypes just as we think in all other categories. We have to. We cannot afford to interrogate every person we meet. We cannot pay the high cost of risk of trusting people from high risk groups. Instead, how can people from high risk groups signal (demonstrate) that they are good risks? Research has consistently shown, that contrary to popular myth, stereotypes are the most ACCURATE feature in social science. So people must rely on stereotypes, stereotypes are true, and it is the responsibility of people who are members of negatively stereotyped groups to change their behavior and signals so that they are visibly not a risk.

    When we say ‘we can’t judge this middle class black man’ or some other “Not All X Are Like That”, we are either committing a rhetorical fallacy or simply lying. Why? because the fact that we say most people of group X are a high risk, we are not saying that an outlier is. Yet conversely, we are saying (almost always correctly) that most people from group X are in fact a higher risk that we perceive our own group to be.

    We know the reasons for black underclass achievement: (a) the disproportionate size of the black underclass below 85 IQ, and the comparatively small sizes of its middle and upper middle classes, and total absence of an upper class, (b) earlier and more rapid maturity accompanied by the same level of hormones, leading to impulsivity and aggression, (c) lower verbal intelligence, (d) lower aggregate intelligence, (e) destruction of the black family by the progressive programs of the Johnson administration’s Great Society programs of the 1960’s – his attempt to mimc soviet resettlement programs from villages to urban areas without grasping the vast differences in Russian and black human capital. (f) the attempt to educate different races that mature more or less, more quickly or more slowly, at the same age under the same conditions. Educate black and hispanic men in what equates to military training and you will get good men out of it. You cannot ask humans in their youth to fight hormones that intense. Educating pliable asians and less pliable and more physical whites at the same rates is equally destructive. We can start asians and east asians one to two years earlier than whites, and it’s arguable that we should provide two more years for hispanics and three for blacks. It prevents schools from tailoring programs to the genetic needs of the children.

    We get nowhere by lying that we’re equally distributed. It’s liberal lies of equality that prevent us from developing institutions that support the needs of different genetic organisms, with different rates of maturity, different degrees of maturity, and different sizes of underclass.

    Curt DoolittleThe Propertarian Institute

    My job is to prevent lies in public discourse that prevent us from coming to compromises on policies.

     Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Sep 6, 2016
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to Is liberalism idealistic as opposed to being realistic?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle
    Curt Doolittle, Philosopher of political economy and founder of the Propertarian Institute.

    It’s Utopian, dysgenic, devolutionary, and entirely false, which is why it sells.

    You don’t think religions sell because they’re realistic or true? Neither do political ideologies.

    Here is some humbling and painful truth:

    1) Those civilizations that were most successful in preventing from access to food, delaying reproduction, preventing access to reproduction, enslaving, starving, killing, sending to war, or abandoning to the elements, the largest number of their lower classes, consistently produce the highest standards of living.

    Why? It’s pretty simple math: productive people are only so productive. The very best only a bit more productive, and they are small in number. The person at the bottom is six times more damaging than the person at the top is beneficial. SIX TIMES. (Or at least, like Pareto’s rule, that it’s the inverse of, it’s a very good rule of thumb.)

    2) Western Civilization, from the corded ware (Kurgan) people onward, (the european branch of the Aryan Invasions) out of Ukraine and what is now southern Russia, adopted these eugenic practices and redistributed resources upward increasing the rates of the middle class reproduction. Beginnig with the church’s ban on intermarriage, and the adoption of Bipartite Manorialism in Frisia, and the aggressive hanging of 1/2 to 1% of the population per year, until by the late middle ages – almost everyone living in Europe was a descendent of the genetic if not economic and social middle class.

    3) american puritans recruited people of ‘character’ and the original at least puritan colonies were intended to be a eugenic experiment. This only ended with the marxist, socialist, bolshevik, and soviet cooption of the university and media as an overwhelming counter-enlightenment to that provided by Darwin and Spencer. The pseudosciences of Boaz, Marx, Freud, and even Cantor were propagated to restore the underclass to some level of political control now that they had the economic means available that were provided by the industrial revolution, and the somewhat foolish enfranchisement of non-property owners and women. Meritocracy after all, is a eugenic strategy.

    4) Western civilization, beginning with the separation of western empirical, common, judge discovered law (law), from celebrations, festivals, and education (religion), has always been empirical. Our greek reason and british empiricism that we call ‘science’ today evolved from this legal tradition. To attack this empiricism, particularly after Darwin and Maxwell’s revelations, and Nietzche’s attempt to resurrect greek religion just as bacon, lock, smith, and hume had resurrected greek reason – the left invented multiple layers of progressive falsehoods:

    The myth of oppression of the equal underclasses rather than the necessity of domestication of the inferior underclasses.

    The Utopian vision of a world run by the underclasses (marxism). Despite the evidence that the world universally sorts by iq and genetic class except for rotations in and out of the middle class due to mating and economic lottery effects.

    The great lies of social science: Marxian history, Boazian Anthropology, Freudian Psychology.

    WHEN THESE FAILED to produce a revolution the left turned to “Scientific Socialism”.

    The great lies of economic pseudoscience: managed economies, central planning, world socialism.

    The Great Lies of Political science: That democracy was a good, rather than a luxury. That democracy was possible for the resolution of disputes in heterogeneous polities rather than the prioritization of wants in homogenous polities. That majoritarian monopoly was desirable, or produced beneficial ends. That

    The Great Lies of Law: that rule of law was not determined by the natural properties of mankind that we could enumerate to allow each other to cooperate, but that these laws were arbitrary, discretionary commands that could be followed like the rules of a corporation.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to the Culture of Critique (attack on culture).

    The Frankfurt school’s false criticisms of art, of western civilization, of white men, of western history.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to it’s only remaining option:

    1) to immigrate underclasses in order to obtain power through invasion and displacement.

    2) to switch from criticism to political correctness and the enfranchisement not o productive labor and families but of every fringe group possible

    3) to switch from rational argument to simply repeating messages and lies. (alinsky etc).

    THE RESULT is what we live with today:

    1) the destruction of the family that was the condition of enfranchisement into the american eugenic order.

    2) the destruction of the rule of law so that the constitution is no longer a document of the science of cooperation but a justification for war against western civilization.

    3) the destruction of the Whig History of the continuous evolution of western civilization.

    4) the devolution of the parties into married whites, and unmarried white women and the underclasses.

    5) The big sort, where people are nationally relocating to be near people like them.

    6) We are on the brink of civil war (and frankly I’m working to start it)

     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at http://quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Sep 7, 2016
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to Why is the black race judged by of its least successful members?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    (THIS IS  A REPEAT OF THE PREVIOUS CRITICISM)
     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at http://quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Mar 2, 2017
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to What do white people need to understand about racism?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    That it’s natural.  That all human groups act in the interests of their kin.  That people vote racially.  They work in racial groups. They live in racial groups. They mate and marry in racial groups.  They speak in racial groups.

    All racial groups convey status because some groups are more desirable than others.  That all those capable of escaping the lower classes of their racial groups rationally want to join in white culture so that they can have a better life, and that as such they want to limit racial discrimination.  And that white middle and lower classes want to preserve their privileges by preserving the status of their elites from competition.

    That race, religion, culture, tribe, gender are a part of life because they are meaningful differences because people act to their advantage at all times, and race, religion, culture, tribe and gender convey different advantages.

    NO MORE LIES.

    The century of pseudoscience and lying is over.

    Kant, Boaz, Freud, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt School, Rothbard, and the Postmoderns are just liars and pseudoscientists creating mythology of secular christianity that is the literary equivalent of science fiction and fantasy that provide the myth of pagan aristocracy.

    It’s not complicated.  Silly people in the ancient world believed in holy books. Silly people in the modern world believe in pseudoscientific books.  But they’re both nonsense. Both lies.

    The difference is that pagans and aristocracy know that science fiction and fantasy are just literature. The secular christians thought that mysticism was real. They think pseudoscience is real. They love propaganda. They love political correctness. They police speech that exposes their lies.

    The fact that women are and the underclasses are vectors for mysticism and  pseudoscience, and men and the middle classes are vectors for commerce, technology, and warfare shouldn’t be surprising.

    Women and slaves spread the lies of mysticism in the ancient world. Women and the ‘slaves’  or underclasses spread the lies of pseudoscience in the modern world.

    There is nothing even the least bit difficult to understand.

    Wishful thinking is fertile ground for lies.

    Lies are lies no matter how well you wrap them in story.

    Stories are the perfect method for telling lies.

    Why?  Women invented gossip: stories. Men invented history.

     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Curt Doolittle
    Mar 4, 2017

    I am a professional, and one of the leading thinkers on group evolutionary strategies. I am asked frequently to answer these questions. As far as I know I give articulate and truthful answers to them.

    In my opinion you should ether eliminate ALL questions related to race, or accept all truthful responses. Otherwise by definition you are simply sponsoring hate speech against white people by permitting criticism, but not advocacy or explanation.

     
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Nov 7
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Your comment on Who are the actual Aryans – Europeans, Iranians or Indians?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.
    Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Full text of comment:Evidence is in.H1B Starts in afghanistan.Moves west to caspian-back sea.Black sea deluge causes shock‘whites’ develop (we even know eye color time change)Split into west-north european and south-east indo-iranianSpread back to afghanistan.Cross into india, separating indo and iranian.Fight, interbreed, outbreed, and disappear.Leaves Indo-iranian+Dravidian distribution.Small population of conquerors has profound demographic effects.Modern equivalent is south america spanish + amerindian.Consequence of such admixture is genetic castesIndia forms institutional caste system.Indian castes reflect racial origins with the brahmins equal to jews, and the remaining indians retaining sub-saharan IQs.Unlike china, which is ethnically homogenous, india cannot reduce size of underclass, so India carries a heavy burden as does south america.Bad, but not as bad as arab peoples. Not as bad as sub-saharan african peoples.General confusion is R1B genetic origin in afghanistan; advances in R1B due to pedomorphic selection in ukraine; cultural, and technological components all define ‘aryans’. In general, we use the term ‘caucasian’ for the race, european, iranian, and indian for the subraces, ’aryans’ for the cultural change to militaristic sky worshippers, and their use of technological innovation of Russo-ukrainian horse, european wheel, and anatolian/iranian bronze.Evidence is that europeans (more neotonically advanced) moved west into ukraine and poland, and indo-iranians defeated those that remained in the ukaine-russia region, then the europeans re-conquered the ukraine-russia region, and drove the iranians out, but the original cultures of the region had been destroyed.This left europeans to expand west, the iranians to branch into most of the caucasian peoples, and the indians outbred with the dravidians and largely gone through full integration.Let me close with the fact that the West, the Russians, the Chinese all consider India having a serious problem with pseudoscience in this matter. India and South America have demonstrated the consequences of collision between major racial groups with different levels of pedomorphic development.
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Dec 16
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Curt Doolittle’s answer to Why do some Caucasian men prefer Asian women?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology, Truth.

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization. Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization. Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage.

    That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.)

    That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively).

    This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics.

    Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage.

    cheers

    Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora Moderation
    Quora
    Quora Moderation
    Jan 16
    Hello,We recently found some of your content (Your comment on Which political party has done the most good for the US, Democrat or Republican?) that violates Quora’s Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (See What is Quora’s “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy?).
    Curt Doolittle, Philosopher: Truth, Natural Law, Economics, Politics, War

    That’s the wrong question. The question is, which has done the least damage?

    It’s pretty hard to argue that democrats have not done the most catastrophic and unrecoverable damage. And if I went into the list, I could write pages on it.

     Please keep this policy in mind when interacting with other people on Quora. If you continue posting content that violates this policy, you may be banned from using Quora. For more information, see: How do I appeal a Quora Moderation decision?.If you think this is an error on our part, please submit a moderation appeal at https://www.quora.com/contact with a link to your content.Thank you,Quora ModerationFull text of comment:
    Debate me then. Make an argument. As far as I know, I’ll eat you like a pringle with beer. Why? Politics is a pseudoscience for the purpose of justifying priors, and Economics provides all required explanatory power. And at present the handful of people who can debate me with any degree of intellectual honesty does not include you.
  • answers. Here is the correct one.** **Belief and Faith**, because of our theolog

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-an-ideology-and-a-belief/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=0e8d0fca&srid=u4Qv**Terrible answers. Here is the correct one.**

    **Belief and Faith**, because of our theological heritage have been conflated quite intentionally. So we have to deconflate (disambiguate) them before we can answer the question.

    A **belief** or **reported preference** refers to that which you report (state) that you understand to be True, and honestly think you will or do, act as if is True. (whether or not you actually act as such is something different.)

    A **demonstrated preference ** refers to what we do regardless of what we believe, say we believe. This is why social sciences and psychology were pseudosciences and economics was necessary to stop them from spreading pseudoscience: people demonstrate preferences when they vote or purchase things, and they report, and say they believe very differently from how they vote or purchase. Hence we use only indirectly produced information to test people’s demonstrated preferences, and nearly all surveys are to large part meaningless on anything that someone would virtue signal (Google “Virtue Signaling”).

    An article of **Faith** requires we preserve belief (act as if true) something that is contrary to the evidence in order to preserve the value of acting in accordance with Wisdom Literature in order to achieve desirable ends, even when we don’t understand the relationship between cause and effect. In economic terms faith allows us to buy cheap options on achieving a personal or collective good, and renders one’s plans and actions invulnerable to rational and scientific persuasion. That is their value. It turns out that faith in others is the optimum strategy for producing high trust cooperation. That was just a theory until we proved it in the past century.

    An **ideology** functions, like literature, to inspire individuals to action under democracy. Ideologies need not be rational or consistent, and are less vulnerable to criticism if they are not. Ideology is the result of our change to (limited) democracy.

    A **philosophy** provides methods of decidability in order to achieve a desired state of affairs. The domain of philosophy is individual preferences, and interpersonal good.

    A **logic** provides a grammar (rules of continuous disambiguation) for the testing

    (criticism) of sets of constant relations for internal consistency between two or more states (falsification by competition).

    All disciplinary languages (grammars) from math to logic, to programming, to contract language, to common language, to fiction (and even ficitonalisms – meaning pseudoscience, and theology) consist of variations in the rules of grammar (rules of continuous disambiguation), including variations in permissible vocabulary (paradigms).

    A **science** provides a formal process and makes use of instrumentation for the use of measurements for the elimination of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, by the falsification (passage of testing) of *categorical consistency, internal consistency, external correspondence, existential possibility, scope completeness, limits, and parsimony.* If the science is a social science it must also include *tests of rational choice given available knowledge and incentives (rationality),* and if a matter of law*, tests of voluntary reciprocity (morality)*

    As far as I know this is the ‘state of the art’ set of definitions.

    Curt Doolittle,

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    READING

    Andrew Heywood : Political Ideologies : An Introduction. (http://www.amazon.com/Political-Ideologies-Introduction-Andrew-Heywood/dp/0230367259)

    Emmanuel Todd: The Explanation of Ideology

    Thomas Sowell: A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political StrugglesUpdated Mar 21, 2018, 9:55 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 21:55:00 UTC

  • ON FRAUDULENT HISTORICISM (READ THIS) One Of The Most Important Bits You Can Eve

    ON FRAUDULENT HISTORICISM (READ THIS)

    One Of The Most Important Bits You Can Ever Read:

    (from elsewhere- similarities between christianity and mithraism)

    The author’s argument uses a methodology called Pilpul (from theology) one technique of which is to construct differences from distinctions – and does not use the methodology used by technological and economic historians, following current scientific method, which is that information spreads exhaustively and is applied to opportunities by all groups that have identified an opportunity to make use of it.

    The fact of the matter is that at the axis of african-eurasian trade routes the pastoralist underclasses and their teachers sought wisdom literature (normative rules) using information from every available religion in a time of rapid change, when the predominance of the homeric epic (the trial of Achilles) filled all the libraries of the Greco-Roman world. The old world’s obsession with Homer equals the Islamic obsession with Muhammed, and medieval with Jesus. Hence why christians closed the stoic schools, then Christians first and Muslims second destroyed everything that addressed those narratives.

    The spreading wealth that disrupted social orders but enabled the underclasses sent them searching for justificationary narratives just as our labor force did under Marx/Freud/Boaz (pseudoscience) in the 19th century and our literary and female classes have under Postmodernism(pseudo-rationalism) in the 20th, just as islamists are doubling down on fundamentalism in the late 20th to early 21st: to preserve local status hierarchies and political rent seeking in the face of change.

    The texts were produced the way scripts are today, and marxism was in the previous century, like a game of telephone where a storyteller with the best story gets status and attention for it. History without exposition of underlying incentives produced by the expansion of social, economic, political, and military markets for status is not historicism, but Mythology.

    There is absurdly obvious similarity between these religions (fantasy moral literature), because all peoples of the high competition, low trust, and high population density in the levant made use of all available technology to create a replacement for the aristocratic mythos’ (Roman, Persian, and Egyptian – the levantine-north-african is lost to us.

    *Among low trust pastoralists unable to develop high-cost, high-trust martial and agrarian ethics of homogenous peoples, expensive rituals that often require recitation of falsehoods (belief) and attendant mythology function as do States and Borders that resist invasion and resist defection.*

    If you understand these simple principles you will understand the levantine origins of authoritarian religion and consequently why far east, india, and far west developed rapidly in isolation and the levant stagnated and declined after the arab conquest and the abrahamic dark age that followed, and th 500M deaths that resulted in the old world and the 100M deaths from communism in the modern world was the greatest crime in history.

    The Abrahamic dark age was the worst catastrophe in human history, second only to the great plagues and diseases, and ever-present malaria. And we are still dragging humanity kicking and screaming one civilization at a time, out of that dark age – at tragic cost to western civilization.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 17:29:00 UTC

  • I considered taking up harris on his bet, but couldn’t afford the time at the ti

    I considered taking up harris on his bet, but couldn’t afford the time at the time. I’ve made one video I think on the Harris/peterson debate discussing how they’re both wrong.

    I understood as did Durant (or any serious student of mankind) that philosophy no matter where and by whom, is a middle class attempt at justifying alteration of the status quo. The strong rule by law (force), the weak and poor rule by religion(exclusion) and the middle class by persuasion(exchange). And they must since there exist only three means of coercion of others: force, remuneration, gossip(exclusion). Some of us master symphonies of those combinations, and some repeat one note of violence or gossip.

    So as Durant said “The only knowledge of man is obtained through history”. And the evidence of history is that what is moral in any group is encoded in the history of their decisions in matters of conflict over that morality.

    The reason being that preference and goods are always and everywhere conditionally subjective, while criminal(physical), unethical (verbal-direct), and immoral (indirect) are something we know, that which is preferable, good, decidable, and true, is that which is decidedly not false, immoral, unethical, and criminal. In other words, anything that is not bad is good. So definition of the criminal, unethical, and immoral (and evil for that matter) is trivial: the violation of reciprocity. The definition of preferable is limited to the individual. The definition of the good is known only by consent. The problem is in the manufacturing of consent by truthful means (rare if ever), by suggestive and obscurant means, by fictionalist (see SEP for “Fictionalism”) means, or by deceitful means.

    When people claim something is moral or not they are simply trying to coerce people to spend opportunities, thought, time, effort, and resources on one preference or possible good (or possible bad) versus the ones that they spend them on at present under the promise that an alternative investment will provide higher returns than the current investment.

    At any given time, given the geography demographics, means of production distribution and trade, institutions, current knowledge, and limits of current language, those opportunities that we might seize by the transfer of investments from current returns to new possible returns, different such that while moral actions are universal, choosing moral actions with high return is extremely difficult.

    (a) First, to avoid sophilsms due to grammatical imprecision let’s separate actions vs consequences vs externalities, vs unintended externalities. We have the ability to make judgements at any point on that spectrum. And it is quite difficult to find answers that satisfy the entire spectrum.

    (b) second, propositions can be measured by decidability, possibility, cost, rationality of choice, consequence, externality, and unintended externality.

    (c) third, propositions are decidable, cardinal(measurable), and ordinal by triangulation. It takes quite a bit of skill to decide by ordinality in high causal density.

    (d) fourth, let’s look at how we already measure morality. *in every civilization, state, polity, tribe, clan, and even family, we resolve conflicts by tests of reciprocity.* If we look at every moral code, every legal code, the test is reciprocity. The difference between orders is (i)

    (e) The science is pretty clear in all disciplines that “stress- without-breaking” (competition) produces the optimum in all life including humans, and that caretaking by the continuous reduction of stress does the opposite. But this is not intuitive. It is counter intuitive.

    (f) the science is pretty clear that of the three means of persuasion, each reflects the reproductive strategy: i) established male force, ii) ascendent male trade, iii) female rejection, disapproval, ridicule, shaming, gossiping and rallying. And each attempts to create a monopoly for himself/herself and his/her allies. But it is the competition between these groups that allows them to calculate possibilities and compete against external forces. Yet the secret of the western VELOCITY in the ancient and modern worlds was that the necessary sovereignty of individuals participating in a militia defense, leaves only reciprocity, the law of tort, and markets in all aspects of life as the means by which to cooperate. Even more so, each of our classes produced a separate literature, separate forms of argument, and separate narratives. The west evolved not first, not best, but fastest, for the simple reason that it *calculates adaptation to change* faster, and as such *gives very little room for the accumulation of rents* that produce the calcification that prevent a civilization, nation, tribe, or family, from adapting to shocks.

    in the current era, democratic socialist humanism appears to be spending down all accumulated capital by reversing 4000 years of upward redistribution of reproduction. And the data shows this reversal continues.

    So whether something is in fact preferable or good by your measure has largely to do with your intuitive response which is very little more than you reproductive strategy.

    We had a perfect government: king as the judge of last resort (via negativa), regional nobility (demonstrated intergenerational families), business owners (largely farmers and merchants) with demonstrated success. And the women, the poor, and matters of the family and norm represented by the church. This created a market for cooperation between the classes for the production of commons, and kept the state out of matters of family and norm. Unfortunately, (a) the enlightenment was in no small part a result of the mobilization of the 50% of dead capital controlled by the church, and the church could not adapt to the darwinian/maxwellian revolution,. So the academy tried to adopt their role by selling unwarranted diplomas rather than unwarranted indulgences,

    Philosophy is more of the record of the failure of literary minds, where hstory, the common law, and economics provide empirical evidence rather than flights of fancy – moral fictionalism.

    I solved the problems of philosophy that I did, becasue I came through physics > computer science(mathematics) > economics > Law, then worked backwards through intellectual history to trace the errors of each thinker.

    The causal chain is rather obvious in retrospect, as the invention of lying (to the self as well as others) using a particular technique given the frailty of colloquial languages.

    So no, morality is objective and universally decidable which is why international law is reducible to the single test of reciprocity.

    The problem means of testing the morality of a proposition (whether it is reciprocal or not) requires only that we do rather tedious calculations by triangulation. If anyone is subject to reciprocity then it is not in fact moral.

    All moral propositions are open to such testing, just as are all other logics.

    If we end the means of deceit we end the mans of self deciet. The problem is as always, that we love our deceits. Heliocentrism, Evolution, Markets, and the necessity of falsifying signals, self image, and status to produce the results of those markets are all unpleasant realities upon which our freedom from superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, tyranny and the vicissitudes of nature depend.

    Unfortunately, we are more defensive of our status, no matter how false, than we are often of our lives.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 10:35:00 UTC