Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • “BOOK” ENDING THE JEWISH AUSTRIAN (MISESIAN-ROTHBARDIAN) PSEUDOSCIENCE This ‘art

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/THE “BOOK” ENDING THE JEWISH AUSTRIAN (MISESIAN-ROTHBARDIAN) PSEUDOSCIENCE

    This ‘article’ is 21K words, or approximately an 80 page book, on ‘Correcting’ the Misesian (Jewish) wing, of the ‘Austrian'(Mengerian) school. It ‘corrects’ Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe – and indirectly explains Hayek.

    I’ve put it into book form but i can’t afford to edit it and release it because my other projects take precedence.

    There are a total of 200 pages or so in the book, which includes ideas from other posts on my site. However, for the truly interested party, the entire argument is in that shorter version.

    Um, in simple terms, Just as Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism (as well as the abrahamic religions) are elaborate sophisms, Misesian Economics consist of a single valuable insight (operationalism), made useless by a sea of sophisms.

    I’m aware that probably only Hoppe can debate me at this level, but someone with MA or PhD in the philosophy of science should be able to keep up. If you are deeply enough involved in libertarian theory it may help you quite a bit transition.

    But remember that the reason you are susceptible to rothbardianism is that you are suggestible. There are very few of us who are not suggestible (meaning we have very high agency.)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:42:00 UTC

  • “BOOK” ENDING THE JEWISH AUSTRIAN (MISESIAN-ROTHBARDIAN) PSEUDOSCIENCE This ‘art

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/THE “BOOK” ENDING THE JEWISH AUSTRIAN (MISESIAN-ROTHBARDIAN) PSEUDOSCIENCE

    This ‘article’ is 21K words, or approximately an 80 page book, on ‘Correcting’ the Misesian (Jewish) wing, of the ‘Austrian'(Mengerian) school. It ‘corrects’ Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe – and indirectly explains Hayek.

    I’ve put it into book form but i can’t afford to edit it and release it because my other projects take precedence.

    There are a total of 200 pages or so in the book, which includes ideas from other posts on my site. However, for the truly interested party, the entire argument is in that shorter version.

    Um, in simple terms, Just as Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism (as well as the abrahamic religions) are elaborate sophisms, Misesian Economics consist of a single valuable insight (operationalism), made useless by a sea of sophisms.

    I’m aware that probably only Hoppe can debate me at this level, but someone with MA or PhD in the philosophy of science should be able to keep up. If you are deeply enough involved in libertarian theory it may help you quite a bit transition.

    But remember that the reason you are susceptible to rothbardianism is that you are suggestible. There are very few of us who are not suggestible (meaning we have very high agency.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:42:00 UTC

  • Too many newbs that haven’t been following long enough nor read enough on proper

    Too many newbs that haven’t been following long enough nor read enough on propertarianism dot com, too many opinions rather than arguments, too much DK-Conflidence, and too many trolls. Good time to just write, and let the talent do the ‘educating’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 22:03:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001947122860732416

  • Too many newbs that haven’t been following long enough nor read enough on proper

    Too many newbs that haven’t been following long enough nor read enough on propertarianism dot com, too many opinions rather than arguments, too much DK-Conflidence, and too many trolls. Good time to just write, and let the talent do the ‘educating’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 18:02:00 UTC

  • Just read Kai Murros’ book on revolutions (it’s short) and it’s just maoist nons

    Just read Kai Murros’ book on revolutions (it’s short) and it’s just maoist nonsense revisited. There are a few rather obvious points in there (the middle class) but it’s nothing more than another monopoly attempt at the seizure of power so that the past errors can be repeated.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 17:49:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001883330537811969

  • Just read Kai Murros’ book on revolutions (it’s short) and it’s just maoist nons

    Just read Kai Murros’ book on revolutions (it’s short) and it’s just maoist nonsense revisited. There are a few rather obvious points in there (the middle class) but it’s nothing more than another monopoly attempt at the seizure of power so that the past errors can be repeated.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 13:49:00 UTC

  • Deism? Children Should Be Rarely Seen and Never Heard

    DON’T WASTE MY TIME WITH DEISM – IN COURT AS IN ALL ADULT CONVERSATION – CHILDREN SHOULD BE RARELY SEEN AND NEVER HEARD Don’t waste my time. I am not a friend of theists. I consider such people well intentioned children. Instead, we are a product of the Universe, and heroes, demigods, and gods are a product of man. We need a church (meeting place) and we need myths(strategy), an Oath(promise), Rituals (payment of costs), and Festivals (Rewards for rituals). We need these things like we need manners, ethics, morals and laws. But the words of the prophets are wisdom literature – parables – advice. It is true that this wisdom literature contains wisdom in some cases. But that is not the same as truth. And there is no reason that truth is not our wisdom literature : unless it is our strategy to lie, cheat, and steal. I specialize in truthful speech and in falsifying the fictionalisms (comforting lies). I do realize that given the limited abilities of the human mind, the members of the polity require The Magical(Supernatural), The theological, The ideal, The Pseudoscientific, because they lack the agency to tolerate the incompleteness(uncertainty) of The Operational(Scientific). It takes intellectual, emotional, and physical courage to say ‘i don’t know, YET’. And to simply accept that the universe is quite simple, and cognitively sterile. If you need these things you merely say you lack the agency to participate in judgement and rule. You are not yet fully human. It may in fact be impossible for you to be fully human. That is ok. Because we do not need everyone to be a judge and to rule. We simply need enough judges and rulers that we can create truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets in everything, and as a consequence sufficiently competitive society that we continue our evolution rather than become the victim once again of the natural devolution of the underclasses.
    May 24, 2018 7:50am

  • Deism? Children Should Be Rarely Seen and Never Heard

    DON’T WASTE MY TIME WITH DEISM – IN COURT AS IN ALL ADULT CONVERSATION – CHILDREN SHOULD BE RARELY SEEN AND NEVER HEARD Don’t waste my time. I am not a friend of theists. I consider such people well intentioned children. Instead, we are a product of the Universe, and heroes, demigods, and gods are a product of man. We need a church (meeting place) and we need myths(strategy), an Oath(promise), Rituals (payment of costs), and Festivals (Rewards for rituals). We need these things like we need manners, ethics, morals and laws. But the words of the prophets are wisdom literature – parables – advice. It is true that this wisdom literature contains wisdom in some cases. But that is not the same as truth. And there is no reason that truth is not our wisdom literature : unless it is our strategy to lie, cheat, and steal. I specialize in truthful speech and in falsifying the fictionalisms (comforting lies). I do realize that given the limited abilities of the human mind, the members of the polity require The Magical(Supernatural), The theological, The ideal, The Pseudoscientific, because they lack the agency to tolerate the incompleteness(uncertainty) of The Operational(Scientific). It takes intellectual, emotional, and physical courage to say ‘i don’t know, YET’. And to simply accept that the universe is quite simple, and cognitively sterile. If you need these things you merely say you lack the agency to participate in judgement and rule. You are not yet fully human. It may in fact be impossible for you to be fully human. That is ok. Because we do not need everyone to be a judge and to rule. We simply need enough judges and rulers that we can create truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets in everything, and as a consequence sufficiently competitive society that we continue our evolution rather than become the victim once again of the natural devolution of the underclasses.
    May 24, 2018 7:50am

  • DON’T WASTE MY TIME WITH DEISM – IN COURT AS IN ALL ADULT CONVERSATION – CHILDRE

    DON’T WASTE MY TIME WITH DEISM – IN COURT AS IN ALL ADULT CONVERSATION – CHILDREN SHOULD BE RARELY SEEN AND NEVER HEARD

    Don’t waste my time. I am not a friend of theists. I consider such people well intentioned children. Instead, we are a product of the Universe, and heroes, demigods, and gods are a product of man. We need a church (meeting place) and we need myths(strategy), an Oath(promise), Rituals (payment of costs), and Festivals (Rewards for rituals). We need these things like we need manners, ethics, morals and laws. But the words of the prophets are wisdom literature – parables – advice. It is true that this wisdom literature contains wisdom in some cases. But that is not the same as truth. And there is no reason that truth is not our wisdom literature : unless it is our strategy to lie, cheat, and steal.

    I specialize in truthful speech and in falsifying the fictionalisms (comforting lies). I do realize that given the limited abilities of the human mind, the members of the polity require The Magical(Supernatural), The theological, The ideal, The Pseudoscientific, because they lack the agency to tolerate the incompleteness(uncertainty) of The Operational(Scientific). It takes intellectual, emotional, and physical courage to say ‘i don’t know, YET’. And to simply accept that the universe is quite simple, and cognitively sterile.

    If you need these things you merely say you lack the agency to participate in judgement and rule. You are not yet fully human. It may in fact be impossible for you to be fully human.

    That is ok. Because we do not need everyone to be a judge and to rule. We simply need enough judges and rulers that we can create truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets in everything, and as a consequence sufficiently competitive society that we continue our evolution rather than become the victim once again of the natural devolution of the underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-24 07:50:00 UTC

  • Pilpul Is as Easily Identifiable as Its Negative: Critique

    —“I am somewhat curious as to why you blocked me from your timeline. …… You do come across as an intellectual, being an educated philosopher, I am just very surprised that an intellectual would have such a disdain for a fluid free flow of dialogue even if it does come from a position that might make some of your followers feel moderately uncomfortable. The greatest ideas of the intellectual heros throughout history were allowed to flourish due to at least somewhat of a tolerance towards dissenting views and novel ideas.”— Banned Pilpul Practitioner. It’s because (a) sarcasm, (b) pilpul. Specialize in truth, within truth in grammars, with grammars of the art of lying. Now you were raised in the culture that (a) invented poly moralism, (b) never succeeded at developing agrarian ethics, and (c) practiced pillpul to employ those polymoral ethics. But your method of argument (pilpul) is just as recognizable to me (and my followers) as is christian or muslim argument. So it’s simply that as a practitioner and teacher of truthful speech, I practiced what I teach, and that is, the punishment and suppression of ‘lying’, by the use of pilpul. It’s not complicated. You may not even be aware that you’re lying you just equate that form of lying with ‘reasonableness’. But I know (and we know) better: it’s an attempt to advertise ingroup morality while practicing ougroup immorality. I don’t support ‘free speech’ at all. I only support free ‘truthful speech’. And I expose and ostracize the rest.