October 11th, 2018 3:31 PM COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 ) So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted? THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice). Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity. Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’.â¨â¨This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature. The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors. So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.) Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.) Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency. [Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality [Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty [Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.â¨â¨ Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort. Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories. We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them. “Thus endeth the lesson.” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Form: Critique
-
COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: ) So you didn’t
COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM
( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 )
So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted?
THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT
Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice).
Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity.
Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’. This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature.
The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors.
So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.)
Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.)
Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency.
[Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality
[Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty
[Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.
Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort.
Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories.
We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them.
“Thus endeth the lesson.”
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 15:31:00 UTC
-
The False Promise of Universalism vs … Eugenics
October 10th, 2018 9:50 AM
—“Could we come up with a better term than ‘tribalism’ please?”— Marginal Revolution
OMG….. How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience? The world doesn’t need more sophisms. |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction. –versus– |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION. Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS. I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia. Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle. And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction. Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd. Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.
-
The False Promise of Universalism vs … Eugenics
October 10th, 2018 9:50 AM
—“Could we come up with a better term than ‘tribalism’ please?”— Marginal Revolution
OMG….. How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience? The world doesn’t need more sophisms. |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction. –versus– |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION. Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS. I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia. Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle. And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction. Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd. Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.
-
Sorry But I Understand Religion Completely.
October 10th, 2018 11:21 AM
—“None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions: …”Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly. THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD. -CD…”—
1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to. 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria. 3) We can train physical abilities, intuition-emotion, reason, and skills of transformation. We have developed ritual, religion, stoicism, and philosophy to train intuition & emotion and intuition, and developed calculation for reason, and techne for skills 4) Semitic argument consists of the sophisms of pilpul, critique, false promise, moral hazard, monopoly control of information, using threats of ostracization, disapproval, shaming, gossip, rallying and reputation destruction to impose a monopoly by suggestion and intimidation. 5) We call this combination of sophism (psuedo-rationalism), supernaturalism (occult), false history (pseudoscience) ritual indoctrination, false promise (fraud) to create a monopoly of conformity to falsehoods a “Religion” even though doing so is unique to the Semitic Religions. 6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other technology, is traceable throughout history as the incremental evolution of a technique of deception. It is used to produce natural neurochemical (opiate) responses and functions as an addiction. 7) So just as the Romans invented empirical law with the help of aristotle and zeno, the Greeks invented idealism and ideal argument, the semites invented the sophistries of pilpul and critique and threats of ostracization thus weaponizing the female group strategy in argument. 8) meanwhile the west produced hero-worship, civic ritual, the cult of the empirical law of tort, reason, rationalism, empiricism, science as an evolution of their criteria of decidability: individual sovereignty, with disputes resolved by law of tort, and a MARKET for ideas. 9) It’s not that I don’t understand religion. It’s that I understand it completely; how to replace its falsehoods completely; and that abrahamic religions were responsible for the dark ages, and the destruction of all the great civilizations in the ancient world – and modern. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
“Could we come up with a better term than “tribalism” please?”— Marginal Revol
—“Could we come up with a better term than “tribalism” please?”— Marginal Revolution
<Critical Rant=ON>
OMG…..
How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience?
The world doesn’t need more sophisms.
|PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction.
–versus–
|HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION.
Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS.
I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia.
Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle.
And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction.
Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd.
Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.
<Critical Rant=Off/>
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:50:00 UTC
-
UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY As far as I know the Shroud of Turi
UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY
As far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 14:08:00 UTC
-
Um. Shroud of Turin Is a Nice Forgery. Sorry
October 9th, 2018 2:08 PM UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY [A]s far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.
-
WE KNOW QUITE WELL WHAT POSTMODERNISM, COMMUNISM, AND ABRAHAMISM “ARE” (“Consist
WE KNOW QUITE WELL WHAT POSTMODERNISM, COMMUNISM, AND ABRAHAMISM “ARE” (“Consist Of”):
In response to a criticism of Hicks’ Postmodernism:
—“When you don’t know what communism or postmodernism is.”— Anon,
Which I’ll counter with “When you know what Abrahamism, Communism and Postmodernism consist of: Counter-Revolutions Against Truth and Reason.”
GRAMMARS OF COERCION:
There are only three means of coercion:
1 – Violence,
2 – Remuneration, and;
3 – Ostracization (Shaming/Endearing (Gossip)).
We have invented:
1 – Law and War for Violence.
2 – Markets and Corruption for Remuneration,
3 – and a host of grammars of persuasion for inclusion (insurance) versus ostracization (risk).
ABRAHAMISM, COMMUNISM, POSTMODERNISM VS TECHNOLOGY, MARKETS, AND TRUTH.
We see the evolution of law of western peoples:
1 – Sovereignty, (individualism is incorrect).
2 – Tort, and thang, court, senate,
3 – Martial Truth (MIlitary ‘Reporting’), and the demand for speaking martial truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competency) hierarchy.
4 – Reason, rationalism, empiricism, and science as a consequence.
5 – Markets and competing intellectual disciplines rather than authority and mono-disciplines (ie: religion).
These choices are the consequences of mixed, metalworking, agrarian, cattle herders, requiring large well defended territories, that must self finance their military capability, because they lack any means of concentrating capital and taxation cheaply as did the irrigationist in the flood river valleys. They developed ‘Contractual Civilization’.
But we also see:
1 – Abrahamic fiction and supernaturalism of the pastoralists against the reason and realism of the agrarians and metallurgists;
2 – Pseudoscientific Communism as a restatement of Jewish separatism using class warfare; and;
3 – Postmodernism as a pseudo-rational restatement of marxism-communism using ethnic warfare.
WHERE
1 – Superstition (Judaism, Christianity, Islamism)
evolved into ==>
2 – pseudoscience (w Jewish Critique)
evolved into ==>
3 – pseudo rationalism (w Jewish Pilpul) (French > German > Jewish),
USING
Each time increasing in rhetorical complexity but using the same techniques in each of the sophisms:
1 – Justification (Pilpul) and Poisoning the Straw Man (Critique) then adding incremental techniques of:
a) Fictionalism (Fictional History > Mythology),
b) Supernaturalism,
c) Pseudoscience, and;
d) Pseudo Rationalism, and at present
e) Simple Denialism. (Race, IQ, Homogeneity, Markets)
LYING BY SUGGESTION
It took me less than a year of relatively hard work to disassemble the techniques into grammars and enumerate and articulate all of them. But no matter the depth of analysis, lying by art of suggestion by overloading is still lying by abuse of the human process of continuous recursion in streams of memory producing what we call Meaning, and our suggestibility and suspension of disbelief in that state.
DEFENSE AGAINST FALSEHOOD
Realism, Reason, Calculation and Computation in all their forms, are defenses against this suggestion, loading, overloading by the use of correspondence and operational possibility, but take disciplined training and a minimum intellectual ability. Because we have a host of cognitive and moral (reproductive) biases that influence our choices without the discipline and training to prevent them from doing so.
RULES OF ORDER
The Ancient World civilizations each produced means of producing sufficient meaning (rules) for local preservation of cooperation:
Rome (Realism), Athens (Idealism(abstract)), Anatolian (lost), Babylon (Ideal Monotheism(supernatural)), Jerusalem (Authoritarian Reactionary Monotheism), Beka Valley (Authoritarian Expansionary Monotheism), Memphis (Pragmatic Ritual Polytheism), Indus (Pragmatic Narrative Polytheism), and Yellow River (Confucian Rationalism, hierarchy and harmony), Lao Tsu’s “balance and reasonableness”, and the utility of Buddhism in Ritual. With only the Japanese
THE GREAT CONFLICT OF HUMAN HISTORY
The homogeneous masculine eugenic pack of hunters and farmers were able to produce high trust commons, versus the heterogeneous feminine dysgenic universalist herd and herders were unable to produce high trust commons. (Cain and Able is the literary example of the Pastoralists hatred of the wealthier and urbanized Agrarians and Metalworkers).
But the question is not Athens vs Jerusalem, since both ideal democracy and supernatural universalism have been the greatest failures of all of the world civilizations, causing the destruction of every great ancient civilization and bringing about the Abrahamic Dark Age and it’s 750M dead; as well as the current 150 Year attempt at recreating another Abrahamic Dark Age — this time by Rousseau, Kant, Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno and co., and their 100M dead. Followed by the inventiveness of the French and their conspirators: Derrida, Foucault, Rorty et al. And the feminists that followed from them: each trying to produce a monopoly as a means of avoiding markets for cooperation, because they are unable to compete in those markets for pareto optimums, only nash equilibriums
In the ancient world, overextension of the empires to eliminate local frictions (taxes, rents) on trade, and profit from those efficiencies, produced travel, communication, trade, and infrastructure that made possible the jewish and christian invasion of the western empire; intentional fomenting of underclass resistance against the aristocratic civilization; and then Byzantine forcible conversion of the entirety of the population in order to end Reason, Law, and Aristocratic Rule.
The same technique is being used in this current era: invade, rebel, rally underclasses, import underclasses, and then seek power by numbers, using fairy tales desirable by those underclasses using the sophisms those underclasses are defenseless against, and which the Aristocracy tolerates or finds useful until the society has been destroyed by it.
ORIGINS
Gobekli Tepe is the oldest Temple complex we find to date, and predates all other monolithic works by thousands of years. It is also just south of one of the world’s greatest hunting gardens teeming with life at the origin of the Euphrates – an Eden if there ever was one.
As far as we know, from there, at the nexus of the continents, near the center of trade between them, on the highways of the main rivers, the idea spread from the monoliths of the Atlantic peoples to the advanced stone of the egyptians.
It was an early and effective tool of social order. Most likely because it predicted seasons. Once those skills existed, the construction revolution bloomed.
THE WEST THAT THE REST REBELS AGAINST:
While Myth, Ritual, and Oath are necessary components of demand for neural economy (computational efficiency) in the production of rules of social order, how we communicate those rules, the group evolutionary strategies in those rules, and the outcomes that are produced as externality by those rules, are not only means of internal persistence, but external competition. Only one set of those rules produces reciprocally beneficial outcomes:
Western Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, Sovereignty, Reason, Science, Rule of Law, and Competitive Markets in Everything gave the world nearly everything that raised man out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the dangers of nature.
Western Civilization consists of The Continuous Calculation by Competitive Trial and Error, of our Ascent into the Gods we imagine. Western civilization was and until recently, was organized to continuously produce Agency at the cost of eugenia, whereas the middle civilizations were organized to limit agency in exchange for dysgenia.
Without Manorialism and Markets (East Asia, Europe) the dysgenia defeats all attempts at preservation of gains. It is not malthus’ numbers that cause dark ages. It is the end of eugenic limitations, let loose by unregulated innovations, that feed regression to the mean, and brought about the Bronze age, Iron Age, and the present Steel Age collapses.
That is why the enlightenment project failed to create either an aristocracy of everyone (british), a middle class of everyone (french and german), or an underclass of everyone (jewish and russian). In europe and east asia, after more than a thousand years of manorialism, war, disease, and extremely aggressive criminal prosecution, the consequential upward redistribution of reproduction led to distributions that allowed pareto organization of populations where the ratio of the middle and upper was sufficient to produce surpluses necessary to concentrate capital in multipliers (commons).
But both hindus (which have yet failed in their project), east asians (who succeeded under our pressures), and westerners (who succeeded because of our tradition of empirical law), had an advantage. The chinese conquered and colonized all border people. The Western Indo Europeans conquered (exterminated) and colonized all border people, and both europe and east asia produced homogenous eugenic, agrarian, metalsmithing societies.
Either one is eugenic or dysgenic. The red queen cannot be defeated by any other means. It takes 95 to follow simple instructions, 105 to repair a machine, 115 to learn on one’s own by reading, 120 to design a machine, 130+ to synthesize and communicate ideas, 140+ to invent new ideas. Everyone below that who cannot be put into labor that does not require continuous learning and adaptation.
This is social science. Everything else is religion.
BIOLOGICAL ORIGINS: HOW MUCH AGENCY DO WE HAVE?
The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias?
Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed.
Violence and Threats VERSUS Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies.
HERD <—————> PACK
Utility <—————> Truth
Proportionality <——> Reciprocity
Equality <————-> Meritocracy
Dysgenia <———–> Eugenia
r <——————–> K
F<——————–> M
There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.
Male and female reproductive strategies are at odds. And we have little agency in the choice of those strategies, at the individual, group, civilizational levels. Everything else is a consequence.
We are just another self-domesticating animal.
Some of us more successful at it than others.
Nothing more complex is at work.
Curt Doolittle
The Evolutionary Strategy of Europeans
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 10:08:00 UTC
-
Neither of the issues Stiglitz mentions will make any difference because the pro
Neither of the issues Stiglitz mentions will make any difference because the problem we face is (a) human capital is no longer reserve in but underperforming from the third world, (b) we have… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=301670553763175&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 01:12:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049105307056656384