Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • RELIGION: PSYCHOLOGICAL DRUG USERS JUSTIFYING THEIR ADDICTION —-“Heidegger pos

    RELIGION: PSYCHOLOGICAL DRUG USERS JUSTIFYING THEIR ADDICTION

    —-“Heidegger posits that modern man is cut off from the sacred via the methods (scientific rationality) which you use to form the basis of your argument.”— Sean Kinney

    He is cut off from appealing, harmful, deceptions yes, when he could be otherwise provided with mindfulness by non-harmful means.

    —“The overarching externalized context or that which is beyond our understanding is the primary variable.”—

    That by which we are self manipulated, and manipulated by others, into submission or denial, rather than enabled into action, creates demand for non-harmful means of producing agency rather than sedation.

    —“There is no fundamental cohesive endpoint upon which to deduce your primary assertions: no universal self evident axioms can be identified upon which the initial premises of truth can be established.”—

    We never know the Truth (most parsimonious testimony possible) because our knowledge is incomplete. As such we only know that which is false with certainty. Between Omniscience (Truth: most parsimonious possible) and Falsehood (certainty), we merely satisfy demand for decidability necessary for making a choice. For ancestral reasons we conflate this demand for decidability sufficient for choice in the given context, with ‘truth’ proper (decidabiilty), as ‘true enough for me’ (sufficiently decidable for the context).

    —“A fundamental Nietzschean and Heideggerian premise.”–German Authors sought to preserve the german grammar developed by kant (Rationalism), as a formal expression of Rousseau’s counter-reaction against empiricism (Literary Moralism), thereby creating a more formal Rational expression of christianity in the absence of war against the aristocracy, where french had created a literary and moral war restatement of christianity as a war against the aristocracy.

    —“The beforementioned authors here point us towards the sacred and mythical characteristics of being which are antithetical to the french pomos.”–

    German authors repeatedly try to preserve a secular restatement of germanicized christianity, that is antithetical to anglo rationalism, and antithetical to french anti-aristocracy.

    —“Mathematical equations of reality based upon markets are unlikely to summon the masses to action either way.”—

    The evidence is that the population pursues self interest at all times and seeks a narrative to rally with in pursuit of it.

    —“From a Heideggerian point of view, this appeal to contextual truths simply conceal the Aesthetic wonders of Dasein and conceal the inherrent referentiality and mythos which transcend the age in which one is producing intellectual content.”—

    Use various techniques will allow us to produce some degree of mindfulness, and this includes ritual and dance, delusion, drug and alcohol use, hallucinogens, and other forms of physical and mental abuse, such as body, and sexual identity illusions. Individuals who succeed in habituating demand for the delusion demonstrate an addiction response and are undesirable We can change behavior dramatically by changing psychochemistry, both by ritualistic and supplemental means. A docile, sedated population lacking agency is preferable in many cases to a population that competes by greater agency than others. The problem being that demographic distribution and wealth limit the choices of means of providing such sedation vs agency.

    —(Being cannot be enclosed in a conceptual structure). This is Heidegger: Be that as it may: I assume based upon his later writings that he would appeal to ancestral veneration (blood and soil) as the primary source of inspiration for the masses. Reducing such concepts to the playthings of children or products of the occult however would seem to be destructive from this perspective. )—-

    Drug users report the same effects, Religious zealots, those who practice meditation, even the ‘high’ runners experience can produce it. However we can also produce it through self authoring (cognitive behavioral therapy) or what we call ‘stoicism’ producing individual agency and action instead of individual sedation and detachment.

    WE do not need perfect replication of experience to communicate it, we need only sufficient replication of experience, and of experience we need replication we need only those that produce agency not delusion and sedation.

    So yes, (and we can produce very solid metrics on this) the infant, child, youth, adolescent, young adult, establishing adult, established adult, and reproductive-cycle-complete adult demonstrate very different demands for methods of mindfulness.

    So yes, it’s not an opinion, that demand for mythos fulfills the needs of the weak, unaccomplished, lacking agency, and of low sexual, social, economic, and political value, and we find that the method of producing mindfulness changes as we increase our network of relationships and command over our destiny (agency). In that we increase our tools (paradigms) as we increase our agency.

    So yes, children (ignorant, lacking relationships, lacking ability, lacking capital, and lacking power) seek success in their dreams to satisfy their low status, and yes people who have high status do the opposite.

    Humans are very simple creatures. The strong law (command), the wealthy reciprocity ( trade), the weak storytelling (gossip, rallying).

    And no amount of postmodern prose will alter those facts.

    We pursue the narrative (paradigm) that suits our power in order to fulfill our will to power.

    If you had power able to influence, leaders worth leading, something to exchange, then you would not need a fantasy with which to escape reality. But the weak do not. They tell stories to themselves and others to ‘make it through the day’ given the hard reality of their low status (sexual, social, economic, political market value).

    hence why I say there is nothing in christianity that cannot be taught as a stoic virtue – without the lies. And nothining good in the search for ‘experience’ (delusion and sedation) that cannot be better provided by agency (truth and training). It is just (a) more expensive to train people in stoic virtues, (b) easier and cheaper to deceive them with sophisms instead, (c) those cheap and easy narratives are methods of deception that prevent the individual from learning how to falsify the OTHER nonsense thrown at him.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 11:05:00 UTC

  • (a) since when has any one ‘calmed down’, (b) since when has the libertarian pro

    (a) since when has any one ‘calmed down’, (b) since when has the libertarian program had any successes, (c) since when has it had any intellectuals, (d) since when has it had any formal works? (e) Libertarianism = Marxism of the Commons instead of Marxism of Private Property.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 23:17:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057411173866524672

    Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057385685018202112

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GonzoGeorgism

    @curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen Nah, dude. Liberty does just fine when everyone calms the fuck down- in fact, much better I would argue than when violence is introduced into the equation, as it‘s an incredibly risk bet that liberty would come of such a development.

    Just relax. I’m a smooth talker; I got this.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057385685018202112

  • Idiot Report

    October 30th, 2018 9:42 AM TUESDAY MORNING IDIOT REPORT

    —“When you put it in all caps.. .it is much more convincing.”—Brandon Zicha

    Don’t be an ass. The Formatting of Posts https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/23/the-formatting-of-posts/ (Link To “Formatting Posts”:how I format posts for readability)

    —“How could anyone think this was a cult?”–Brandon Zicha

    [I] dunno how formatting posts in lieu of font size, bold, and italic has anything to do with a cult rather than increasing readability. How could anyone be stupid enough to make that accusation? How could anyone be stupid enough refer to formatting over content? How could anyone be stupid enough to come to my page and demonstrate he’s that overwhelmingly stupid?

  • Idiot Report

    October 30th, 2018 9:42 AM TUESDAY MORNING IDIOT REPORT

    —“When you put it in all caps.. .it is much more convincing.”—Brandon Zicha

    Don’t be an ass. The Formatting of Posts https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/23/the-formatting-of-posts/ (Link To “Formatting Posts”:how I format posts for readability)

    —“How could anyone think this was a cult?”–Brandon Zicha

    [I] dunno how formatting posts in lieu of font size, bold, and italic has anything to do with a cult rather than increasing readability. How could anyone be stupid enough to make that accusation? How could anyone be stupid enough refer to formatting over content? How could anyone be stupid enough to come to my page and demonstrate he’s that overwhelmingly stupid?

  • MORNING IDIOT REPORT —“When you put it in all caps.. .it is much more convinci

    https://propertarianism.com/…/23/the-formatting-of-posts/TUESDAY MORNING IDIOT REPORT

    —“When you put it in all caps.. .it is much more convincing.”—Brandon Zicha

    don’t be an ass.

    The Formatting of Posts

    https://propertarianism.com/…/23/the-formatting-of-posts/

    (Link To “Formatting Posts”:how I format posts for readability)

    —“How could anyone think this was a cult?”–Brandon Zicha

    I dunno how formatting posts in lieu of font size, bold, and italic has anything to do with a cult rather than increasing readability.

    How could anyone be stupid enough to make that accusation?

    How could anyone be stupid enough refer to formatting over content?

    How could anyone be stupid enough to come to my page and demonstrate he’s that overwhelmingly stupid?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 09:42:00 UTC

  • The Position of “Libertarian” Literature in Intellectual History

    October 29th, 2018 9:55 AM THE POSITION OF “LIBERTARIAN” LITERATURE IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY [A]s in most enlightenment literature, [Insert libertarian book name here] presumes an environmental condition that does not exist. The enlightenment has failed. The 20th century was the end of the experiment. Man was not oppressed. He was domesticated, until he could produce a sufficient pareto distribution that made a middle class possible given the technology available. we aren’t every going to ‘…. all just get along…”, only find the safest ways of evolutionary competition. [they are] good books. But [they are] just plagued by the usual problems of the postwar ‘end of history’ movement between the anglo, french, and jewish versions of a middle class utopia. My criticism of Rawls, Nozick, Barnett (et al), is that like many in the 20th, they too readily accepted the jewish libertine separatist literature – when that tradition never created liberty because the producers could never hold territory, because they were insufficiently martial – instead of the european tripartite (aristocratic) model of earning a condition of liberty through governance of animal man – by holding the territory and creating the institutions and capital necessary to domesticate him. So the Libertines “libertarians” produced works advocating Roving Preacher ‘liberty’ and the ‘Bazaar ethics of travelling merchants’ instead of the entics of the territorial military, independent jurist, the domestication from slavery to serfdom to freemen to citizen to peer, and the production of metal and capital rather than rent seeking and privatization of the commons.) Just as we fought hard to survive the french german, and russian counter-empirical revolutions (enlightenments), and their ‘centuries’, the “jewish century” is over (having done more than all previous counter-revolutions combined). Marxism, Socialism, “Libertinism”, Neo-conservatism, “Jewish Austrianism”, Freudian and Boazian Pseudoscience, Frankfurt “critique” (undermining), french-jewish postmodernism (outright lying by reality by chanting), Propaganda by Pilpul and Critique, Globalism, and all universalisms (monopolies) of authoritarians have failed, with the balance of powers, nationalism, truth, and science replacing the century of fraud. The question is whether we will regroup and defend ourselves against the restoration of the 1500 years of islamic conquest, as we have regrouped against the french, german, russian, and jewish revolts against modernity. It seems like the intellectual vanguard to undermine the west (the french and the jews), the political vanguard to undermine the west (the puritans and the french and the jews) and the islamic military and demographic masses to destroy, (restoration of the islamic conquest) is just repeating in the current world, the same process that occurred in the ancient – and gave us the Abrahamic Dark Ages of Ignorance. Without women voters we would never be here. Because like the ancient world, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were spread to the women and the underclasses who are most susceptible to false promise (‘salvation’), pilpul (sophism), and critique (straw manning). But despite women voters it appears that the world is revolting against the jewish century false promises, pilpul (sophisms), critique (straw manning), and the industrialization of undermining through media (gossip and reputation destruction. Anglo 1600’s, French 1700’s, German middle 1800 to early 1900’s, Russian – Jewish Late 1800-early-1900’s – jewish postwar to present – Islamic late 1900s to present. one empirica and one scientific enlightenment, offset by french, german, russian-jewish-chinese, western-jewish, and now Islamic counter-enlightenments. in retrospect it’s amazing that (a) we fell for it a second time, and (b) still survived it.

  • The Position of “Libertarian” Literature in Intellectual History

    October 29th, 2018 9:55 AM THE POSITION OF “LIBERTARIAN” LITERATURE IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY [A]s in most enlightenment literature, [Insert libertarian book name here] presumes an environmental condition that does not exist. The enlightenment has failed. The 20th century was the end of the experiment. Man was not oppressed. He was domesticated, until he could produce a sufficient pareto distribution that made a middle class possible given the technology available. we aren’t every going to ‘…. all just get along…”, only find the safest ways of evolutionary competition. [they are] good books. But [they are] just plagued by the usual problems of the postwar ‘end of history’ movement between the anglo, french, and jewish versions of a middle class utopia. My criticism of Rawls, Nozick, Barnett (et al), is that like many in the 20th, they too readily accepted the jewish libertine separatist literature – when that tradition never created liberty because the producers could never hold territory, because they were insufficiently martial – instead of the european tripartite (aristocratic) model of earning a condition of liberty through governance of animal man – by holding the territory and creating the institutions and capital necessary to domesticate him. So the Libertines “libertarians” produced works advocating Roving Preacher ‘liberty’ and the ‘Bazaar ethics of travelling merchants’ instead of the entics of the territorial military, independent jurist, the domestication from slavery to serfdom to freemen to citizen to peer, and the production of metal and capital rather than rent seeking and privatization of the commons.) Just as we fought hard to survive the french german, and russian counter-empirical revolutions (enlightenments), and their ‘centuries’, the “jewish century” is over (having done more than all previous counter-revolutions combined). Marxism, Socialism, “Libertinism”, Neo-conservatism, “Jewish Austrianism”, Freudian and Boazian Pseudoscience, Frankfurt “critique” (undermining), french-jewish postmodernism (outright lying by reality by chanting), Propaganda by Pilpul and Critique, Globalism, and all universalisms (monopolies) of authoritarians have failed, with the balance of powers, nationalism, truth, and science replacing the century of fraud. The question is whether we will regroup and defend ourselves against the restoration of the 1500 years of islamic conquest, as we have regrouped against the french, german, russian, and jewish revolts against modernity. It seems like the intellectual vanguard to undermine the west (the french and the jews), the political vanguard to undermine the west (the puritans and the french and the jews) and the islamic military and demographic masses to destroy, (restoration of the islamic conquest) is just repeating in the current world, the same process that occurred in the ancient – and gave us the Abrahamic Dark Ages of Ignorance. Without women voters we would never be here. Because like the ancient world, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were spread to the women and the underclasses who are most susceptible to false promise (‘salvation’), pilpul (sophism), and critique (straw manning). But despite women voters it appears that the world is revolting against the jewish century false promises, pilpul (sophisms), critique (straw manning), and the industrialization of undermining through media (gossip and reputation destruction. Anglo 1600’s, French 1700’s, German middle 1800 to early 1900’s, Russian – Jewish Late 1800-early-1900’s – jewish postwar to present – Islamic late 1900s to present. one empirica and one scientific enlightenment, offset by french, german, russian-jewish-chinese, western-jewish, and now Islamic counter-enlightenments. in retrospect it’s amazing that (a) we fell for it a second time, and (b) still survived it.

  • THE POSITION OF “LIBERTARIAN” LITERATURE IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY As in most enli

    THE POSITION OF “LIBERTARIAN” LITERATURE IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY

    As in most enlightenment literature, [Insert libertarian book name here] presumes an environmental condition that does not exist. The enlightenment has failed. The 20th century was the end of the experiment. Man was not oppressed. He was domesticated, until he could produce a sufficient pareto distribution that made a middle class possible given the technology available. we aren’t every going to ‘…. all just get along…”, only find the safest ways of evolutionary competition.

    [they are] good books. But [they are] just plagued by the usual problems of the postwar ‘end of history’ movement between the anglo, french, and jewish versions of a middle class utopia.

    My criticism of Rawls, Nozick, Barnett (et al), is that like many in the 20th, they too readily accepted the jewish libertine separatist literature – when that tradition never created liberty because the producers could never hold territory, because they were insufficiently martial – instead of the european tripartite (aristocratic) model of earning a condition of liberty through governance of animal man – by holding the territory and creating the institutions and capital necessary to domesticate him. So the Libertines “libertarians” produced works advocating Roving Preacher ‘liberty’ and the ‘Bazaar ethics of travelling merchants’ instead of the entics of the territorial military, independent jurist, the domestication from slavery to serfdom to freemen to citizen to peer, and the production of metal and capital rather than rent seeking and privatization of the commons.)

    Just as we fought hard to survive the french german, and russian counter-empirical revolutions (enlightenments), and their ‘centuries’, the “jewish century” is over (having done more than all previous counter-revolutions combined). Marxism, Socialism, “Libertinism”, Neo-conservatism, “Jewish Austrianism”, Freudian and Boazian Pseudoscience, Frankfurt “critique” (undermining), french-jewish postmodernism (outright lying by reality by chanting), Propaganda by Pilpul and Critique, Globalism, and all universalisms (monopolies) of authoritarians have failed, with the balance of powers, nationalism, truth, and science replacing the century of fraud.

    The question is whether we will regroup and defend ourselves against the restoration of the 1500 years of islamic conquest, as we have regrouped against the french, german, russian, and jewish revolts against modernity. It seems like the intellectual vanguard to undermine the west (the french and the jews), the political vanguard to undermine the west (the puritans and the french and the jews) and the islamic military and demographic masses to destroy, (restoration of the islamic conquest) is just repeating in the current world, the same process that occurred in the ancient – and gave us the Abrahamic Dark Ages of Ignorance.

    Without women voters we would never be here. Because like the ancient world, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were spread to the women and the underclasses who are most susceptible to false promise (‘salvation’), pilpul (sophism), and critique (straw manning).

    But despite women voters it appears that the world is revolting against the jewish century false promises, pilpul (sophisms), critique (straw manning), and the industrialization of undermining through media (gossip and reputation destruction.

    Anglo 1600’s, French 1700’s, German middle 1800 to early 1900’s, Russian – Jewish Late 1800-early-1900’s – jewish postwar to present – Islamic late 1900s to present.

    one empirica and one scientific enlightenment, offset by french, german, russian-jewish-chinese, western-jewish, and now Islamic counter-enlightenments.

    in retrospect it’s amazing that (a) we fell for it a second time, and (b) still survived it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 09:55:00 UTC

  • Why and How Pilpul Functions as A Means of Deception.

    October 28th, 2018 2:27 PM WHY AND HOW PILPUL FUNCTIONS AS A MEANS OF DECEPTION.

    —“(((They))) win by creating false dichotomies; the use of language is very important.”—Mirjana Bilić

    [T]heir technique of Pilpul: They use an element of truth to create a false dichotomy and therefore frame the question by suggestion, and obscure the solution due to anchoring. We are always vulnerable to anchoring. Because we are vulnerable to anchoring we are vulnerable to framing. Because we are vulnerable to framing we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism. Because we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism we are vulnerable to influence. If we are provided for incentive to justify that influence we can be controlled – by BLOCKING our OPPORTUNITY and MOTIVATION for seeking truth. The three abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) all produce recursive ignorance cue to BLOCKING our search for truth. This is how PILPUL is used to deceive, and why math, logic, science, economics, law and testimonial truth are such an important defense. A lie (incentive), a half truth, a False dichotomy (choice). Low trust people simply dont’ go beyond the tangible. High trust people do. Our asset of high trust in constructing the commons which produce such outsized returns compared to other peoples. But our trust( suspension of disbelief), and vulnerability to anchoring, suggestion, and obscurantism make our ordinary folk easily deceived, manipulated, controlled, and preyed upon.

  • NO. HERE IS THE FUTURE OF BTC (No more lies, means no more btc lies too) This is

    NO. HERE IS THE FUTURE OF BTC

    (No more lies, means no more btc lies too)

    This is of course an interesting thought experiment, but of course the difference is that such a metal does not exist, the precious metals are in demand for un-replicable reasons, and they are insufficient in volume, so their function of a monetary substitute (holding place of value) is actually oil.

    Fiat money consists of shares in the state, and is in demand because the state demands it for taxes, and demands it’s monopoly. Bitcoin consists of shares in the bitcoin network. There is trivial difference between electronic distribution of any existing currency, and the distribution of bitcoin OTHER than the FEES that can be extracted for use of those other currencies, in exchange for state insurance of those transactions, and that the INDIVIDUAL COIN HOLDER provides the function of clearances between different currencies (locales), at lower FEES (transaction costs) at slower rates (transaction rates), in the absence of insurance by the currency issuer (the state or the btc network). There is no known method of insuring the BTC network and it remains slow expensive and fragile.

    As I’ve written consistently since I think 2012, all we are doing with these currencies is performing research and development for the state, which will NOT use a distributed but CENTRALIZED transaction processor, on top of existing financial networks, using the encryption technology, and the state will destroy private networks because the state can INSURE those transactions as well as police the input and output of money into and out of such networks.

    There is absolutely zero chance of any other outcome. As far as I know the legacy of BTC and similar products will be as registries of title, thereby eliminating title companies. Registries of stocks and interests. And if someone is smart enough, to eliminate the check-cashing businesses which will then be able to provide cash distribution services in lieu of risk, for flat fees rather than interest.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 13:31:00 UTC