Form: Critique

  • SO NO MORE LIES. Journalists invented the industrialization of lying by panderin

    SO NO MORE LIES. Journalists invented the industrialization of lying by pandering to the 150 year old movement to deny Darwin. And actively suppressing the incompatibility of peoples with marginally indifferent rates of neoteny, ability, culture, and development.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-31 19:52:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1156653815862616064

    Reply addressees: @brianstelter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1156652913743319040


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @brianstelter If you think you don’t feel safe now, what do you think will happen when this warm civil war flips hot at over an unpredictable triggering event? Who do you think is the public face of institutional decline? Who has advocated equality of outcome? Equality of ability? You.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1156652913743319040


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @brianstelter If you think you don’t feel safe now, what do you think will happen when this warm civil war flips hot at over an unpredictable triggering event? Who do you think is the public face of institutional decline? Who has advocated equality of outcome? Equality of ability? You.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1156652913743319040

  • PROPAGANDA The propaganda is using this particular crime as exemplary rather tha

    PROPAGANDA
    The propaganda is using this particular crime as exemplary rather than standard fare in Italy, particularly Rome where crime drugs, and filth are rampant, and worse in the south, where in Naples there is shooting in the streets, and organized crime a state substitute.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 15:48:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155867635411800064

    Reply addressees: @nytimesworld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154953821208096768


    IN REPLY TO:

    @nytimesworld

    A 19-year-old American student has confessed to killing a policeman in central Rome, in a crime that has shaken Italy, the national news agency ANSA reported on Friday. https://t.co/EJ7vErbc7y

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154953821208096768

  • The propaganda is using this particular crime as exemplary rather than standard

    The propaganda is using this particular crime as exemplary rather than standard fare in Italy, particularly Rome where crime drugs, and filth are rampant, and worse in the south, where in Naples there is shooting in the streets, and organized crime a state substitute.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 15:45:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155867059991040000

    Reply addressees: @LennyPes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155865275897667585


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LennyPes

    @curtdoolittle There is no “propaganda”. Just simple facts. You kill a man, you go to jail.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155865275897667585

  • ack. These people are clowns. They aren’t practicing math but exploiting innumer

    ack. These people are clowns. They aren’t practicing math but exploiting innumeracy. watched it until it became absurd. given properties of carbon alone, life will emerge and did rapidly. The calculation of a field of probabilities of molecular composition at every … its lots.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-28 03:22:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155317568401543168

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155252867453739008


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoseidonAwoke

    Also be sure to watch this one, which talks about the theoretical mathematical problems to abiogenesis presented by new scientific understandings.
    https://t.co/9K4fNZfRNx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155252867453739008

  • IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT. (rant) —“I found him online b

    IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT.
    (rant)

    —“I found him online by listening to a John Mark video. I’ve recently started to notice he seems more into himself and his own status as “super genius “ than helping his fellow wypipo.”— Tiffany Tiffany

    Well someone actually hit a nerve. 😉
    I have them. lol
    That hurt.

    I am doing the best I know how to do. Mostly it works. And I’m pretty good at what it is I do – not what you want me to do – which is be a priest with secular christian message of hopefulness that panders to your frame of reference and expectations

    I play king of the hill games. It is how to teach men by dominance play. It is the best way to teach men, because you do not waste your time on the failures – meanwhile those who have potential can watch and learn until they are able to try. And even when they fail they come back after a year or two once they learn enough to play the game. and that frame is male Meritocracy: Heroism, Excellence. Superiority.

    And the problem is that this technique is definitely an issue for
    – Women (equality, terror at losing face)
    – Christians (equality, pacifism , terror at falsification)
    – Working, Laboring, Underclass, Undesirable Men who feel left behind. (desperation for peer leadership,on their terms,)

    1. And that is because we want collective victory on the terms of our FRAMES.

    2. And that is because we all discover and use the FRAMES that reflect our gender, sexual, social, economic, and political, market values.

    3. And because (importantly) western civilization provides a market for frames, so we have frames to choose from – despite everyone wanting their frame to take priority.

    4. And that is because we all want leaders in our frame – except those FRAMES HAVE ALL FAILED.

    5. The West has (Europeans) generally succeeded when rallying all markets for FRAMES against a common enemy, or in pursuit of a common opportunity (indo european expansion, resistance to persia and , greco roman expansion, resistance to islam, arabs, and turks, colonial expansion, world wars, industrial technological market expansion.)

    Because it is the only time we create a monopoly instead of a market – and this vacillation between monopoly in war, and market in all else is what makes is different, more adaptive, and faster evolving than the rest of mankind.

    You WANT and all mankind wants MONOPOLY which is only achievable in supernatural or sophomoric or pseudoscientific ignorance, poverty, and equality in ignorance and poverty. This is the muslim religion’ strategy. To drag everyone to the bottom where they are equal in ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. Whereas the CHinese and Indian are merely stagnation, our is continuous competition, adaptation, innovation – and that is why our law is ‘scientific’ and why , as a consequence, we developed reason and science: because markets cannot function by any other means – particularly markets between frames that reflect a hierarchy of abilities.

    ( … )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:00:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842

  • So far the Right has been a train wreck of sentimental, sophomoric, cuckolded ch

    So far the Right has been a train wreck of sentimental, sophomoric, cuckolded christian wishful thinking and cowardly pacifism, in the dead language of medieval moralism, like a bunch of old women at the spinning wheel.

    GROW THE F*K UP.
    SHOW THE F*K UP.
    FIGHT
    WE WIN.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:56:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508096309968259

  • This data does not match the church data, or the church financial data. It’s the

    This data does not match the church data, or the church financial data. It’s the same reason Danes always poll as happier when they aren’t. It’s expected. It’s why polls that can be affected by virtue signals are off so far (political).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 01:11:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154559941748781058

    Reply addressees: @mariachong @TakillaMocking @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154495423278542848


    IN REPLY TO:

    @mariachong

    @TakillaMocking @EPoe187 America is very religious. Even non-church goers in America are religious: https://t.co/xe2YsRGqgx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154495423278542848

  • @TomKawczynski Purchased Kindle edition. Scanned. Long on sympathizing, empathiz

    @TomKawczynski Purchased Kindle edition. Scanned. Long on sympathizing, empathizing, and moralizing – limited in policy themes and missing implementation details. Those Themes you put forward are those already widely discussed. Most significant candidates get to the point where they offer a set of distinct policy recommendations. Certainly conservatives and libertarians do. Do I need to go thru the book and bullet point them? Do you have that somewhere?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-16 19:42:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102452830803223216

  • LIBERTARD ANCAPITARD FOOLS FOR (((FALSE))) DICHOTOMY —“Govt helping business i

    LIBERTARD ANCAPITARD FOOLS FOR (((FALSE))) DICHOTOMY

    —“Govt helping business isn’t #capitalism Know this. Grasp this. Learn this.”—

    You mean like providing limited liability? Or providing rule of law, courts, generating trust, risk tolerance, and the market and monetary velocity the results from it? You mean like providing commons despite the problem of free riders, parasites, those who privatize public goods and socialize private losses? You mean that every major country’s competitive advantage WASN’T a product of private-state partnership?

    Democratic Governments sell rents. Bureaucratic employees seek rents. Solve the problem of selling rents.

    The problem isn’t state (defense) or government (production of commons) but corruption and rent seeking.

    The problem is democracy, and deprivation of standing in matters of the commons before the courts.
    Otherwise we would have this country cleaned up by Tuesday.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:33:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442652470992882

  • CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed cri

    CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS

    I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy.

    In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of
    (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism.

    I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology.

    So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting.

    Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.)

    The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india).

    Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract.

    (continued…)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:09:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540