Form: Critique

  • WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR A SUBSTANTIVE CRITICISM OF PROPERTARIANISM AND … WE N

    WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR A SUBSTANTIVE CRITICISM OF PROPERTARIANISM AND … WE NEVER GET ONE.

    Here is another straw man (or what I call ’empty hat’).

    —“I am not sure what you want them to criticize. What has propertarianism accomplished? Where has it been applied in a meaningful way that can be measured? Which governments have based their foundational documents and legal systems on P? Of those, how many have gathered meaningful statistical data on P itself in practice? So far, all I have ever seen is a shit load of thought experiments. Some ideas based on statistical data sure, but no statistical data of a deployment of P in a real world government and/or legal system.

    Until such a time as this can be done people are left in a situation not unlike the pre Bolshevik era in which many people can speculate but have no real evidence.

    Propertarianism until such time is unsubstantiated speculation. I do think it’s interesting that anybody who disagrees just doesn’t “understand.” Now that is a Marxist echo if I ever heard one.”— Clifton Knox

    I can criticize Marx on his first premises, and so can anyone else, we all know that the premises are false. Try to criticize P on any such premise. Go ahead.

    —“Where has it been applied in a meaningful way that can be measured? Which governments have based their foundational documents and legal systems on P?”—

    Same thing I can say for hoppe and rothbard, right? So how is that a defense of their work vs mine?

    P is a continuation of the anglo rule of law by creating the long-sought-after means of strict construction free of interpetation of the law. Pretty much the entire anglo world runs upon it (although with weak constitutions everywhere).

    You can’t claim rule of law isn’t practiced, only that P-law applied to speech isn’t practiced. And even there that’s questionable because we do it all the time in commercial cases.

    —“Where has it been applied in a meaningful way that can be measured? Which governments have based their foundational documents and legal systems on P?”—

    How long did it take Smith/Hume, Marx, Aristotle to be applied? Darwin is still struggling against the entire abrahamic project? How is that a criticism? I haven’t even published yet. Although we ARE teaching it and our movement is growing.

    —“Which governments have based their foundational documents and legal systems on P? Of those, how many have gathered meaningful statistical data on P itself in practice? So far, all I have ever seen is a shit load of thought experiments.”—

    P consists of multiple works. The logic of cognitive science, logic of social science, the logic of language, and the logic of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, how to construct a range of constitutions under it, and an explanation of why it evolved in the west, but could be imitated by any group able to construct a sufficient demographic by use of soft eugenics.

    P is a continuation of the anglo tradition of rule of law by the common law, where the common law is reducible to tort. It is the most continuous form of government in europe, the tradition, at least in the northern realm, is somewhere near 5000 years old. So rule of law, particularly by monarchy, and houses of the classes, was discovered in northern europe during the middle ages, but it’s not like we havent practiced it in some form or other for millennia.

    P is most analogous to a programming language – operational logic, which is where I took the model from – You can construct ANY form of government with it as long as it consists of articulation as reciprocity and trades within reciprocity. I know this because I”ve tried. Aristotle, and the Founders wrote a constitution, why didn’t Hoppe or Rothbard?

    That’s the only argumentative ‘test’ of a theory of politics, isn’t it? Even if survival of a polity under it is the only empirical test. If you can’t write a constitution you are just talking smack. Aristotle did, the founders did, and I am doing it.

    —“Propertarianism until such time is unsubstantiated speculation”—

    Well you know, how is that a criticism vs hoppe and rothbard?

    It’s very easy to test P-logic and P-law. so far it’s flawless.

    P is a formal OPERATIONAL logic, and the first formal operational logic of social science, that can be used to compose constitutions, amendments, legislation, regulation, and findings of the court. Mises didn’t understand (and neither does Hoppe) that all logics are falsificationary, and operational logic the most falsificationary possible by human beings because it requires we falsify every dimension of consistency (constant relations) perceivable by man.

    You can test P over and over again as many of us have now: try to state a falsehood in testimonial form, operational language.

    Do it and illustrate that you can. For example, both ordinary language logic and formal logic (symbolic) can be criticized, empiricism can be ….

    I’ve written an argument (“Ruling”) for every substantial question of political conflict I can find, in some degree of completeness. I know. I’ve done it. And people are always blown away by them. they just take time.

    What you have done so far is use a STRAW MAN.

    SO:

    (a) yes rule of law has been tried and is successful – its the holy grail of all peoples. We live under it.

    (b) every one of P’s operational logics is open to criticism by falsification. Go ahead and try. If it’s LAW it must be open to logical analysis. It’s not an empirical question.

    (c) all constitutions will produce conflict because we all seek advantages over others with different abilities and interests.

    However, rule of law (and the constitution I’m writing) prohibit the use of via-positiva coercion and force people using via-negativa-law into the markets for cooperation rather than tolerating imposition of costs upon others.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 09:35:00 UTC

  • There are no arguments for hoppeian defense without the credit capacity of a sta

    There are no arguments for hoppeian defense without the credit capacity of a state to maintain an economy sufficient to produce competitive defense. This has always been the libertarian (rothbardian libertarian at least, and german free city of hoppe) fantasy. Pale vs Free Cities


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 22:03:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180966752349544448

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180965762955132930


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180965762955132930

  • So if you want thought leadership, to change our circumstances, rather than self

    So if you want thought leadership, to change our circumstances, rather than self help and sedation to tolerate your victimization, you don’t waste your time with Moly-Petersons. Start with John Mark.Then come to Propertarianism. Sedatives don’t help. Action Does.
    @StefanMolyneux


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 15:01:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180860654586085376

  • EXPOSING THE TRUTH BEHIND THE TABOO Yglesias like Krugman and Stiglitz is in the

    EXPOSING THE TRUTH BEHIND THE TABOO
    Yglesias like Krugman and Stiglitz is in the business of profiting from undermining his host, western civilization – and nothing more. And here is how:

    http://propertarianism.com/2019/10/06/matt-yglesias-as-example-of-jewish-lefts-use-of-undermining/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 14:58:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180859794023993344

  • I guess the verdict of the jury of one’s subjective preference, personal incenti

    I guess the verdict of the jury of one’s subjective preference, personal incentives, and market demand is in, and that Stefan Molyneux was always a therapist w/o responsibility to the polity just like Jordan Peterson – not a leader evolving with the polity. @StefanMolyneux


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 14:56:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180859260521111554

  • Matt Yglesias As Example of Jewish Left’s Use of Undermining.

    —“I’m not sure what it will take to get people to believe this. But we have in the congressional GOP a group of several hundred adult human beings with a lot of economic security who keep saying they think Donald Trump is a good President possibly because it’s what they think.”— Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias —“The thing about being a US Senator is that a six-year term is deliberately designed to insulate members from the short-term repercussions of any single vote, no matter how significant the blow back may be.”—Michael Barbaro @mikiebarb

    The thing about six year terms, appointment by the states, is to limit the fashions of the house (commoners) from incremental folly, just as the electoral college to limit the fashionability of the states. The USA was designed to continue of European Meritocracy: Soft Eugenics.


      [T]he alliance between the Jewish left, Single Women, and Underclasses, advances dysgenia by underclass expansion reversing european soft eugenics that we have practiced for 5000 years -that combined with truthful speech, reciprocity, sovereignty, caused the velocity of the West over The Rest. The Jewish left, a supermajority of the group, advances the dysgenic female reproductive strategy by using the female conflict strategy of Undermining by Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, using Pilpul (Sophism), Critique(Straw Manning), and Heaping of Undo Praise to obscure the Truth. You will not find a single post or article by Matt Yglesias (or his peers) that is not in service of dysgenia, undermining, by use of the female conflict strategy, of creating conflict through moral outrage and envy. That is his profession. Every single day. Selling Outrage and Envy to dysgenia. They rebel against reality. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, in the old world and Marxism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism, are simply theological vs pseudoscientific versions of the female strategy of undermining the eugenic dominance hierarchy but instilling conflict and envy between gender, class, race. The Western Group Strategy is to produce markets in every aspect of life while using incremental evolution of the law of Tort to suppress every and all means of parasitism, including the parasitism of dysgenic reproduction, and opening the leadership to any family who succeeds. The Jewish group strategy is to profit from false promise, baiting into moral hazard, selling envy and conflcit into dysgenia, using Sophism, Supernaturalism, and Pseudoscience, reversing the evolutionary successes of Aristocratic (land owning,hierarchical,meritocratic) peoples. This is why the specialization in gambling, drug dealing, prostitution, finance, legal narrative, signal goods, entertainment, media, and political propaganda especially the inversion and subversion of rule of law by tort we call today’s economics. All of these industries profit from Undermining the host civilization’s cooperation between classes by markets and rule of law despite our genetic differences in ability and want. If you follow Yglesias, Krugman, and Stiglitz alone and deduce the undermining, you can’t unsee it. I don’t make errors. I specialize in Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Evolution and the means by which civilizations, states, priests, politicians, intellectuals, classes and individuals engage in their opposites: Lying, Collectivism, and Parasitism, and Dysgenia. Revolution Comes.

  • Matt Yglesias As Example of Jewish Left’s Use of Undermining.

    —“I’m not sure what it will take to get people to believe this. But we have in the congressional GOP a group of several hundred adult human beings with a lot of economic security who keep saying they think Donald Trump is a good President possibly because it’s what they think.”— Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias —“The thing about being a US Senator is that a six-year term is deliberately designed to insulate members from the short-term repercussions of any single vote, no matter how significant the blow back may be.”—Michael Barbaro @mikiebarb

    The thing about six year terms, appointment by the states, is to limit the fashions of the house (commoners) from incremental folly, just as the electoral college to limit the fashionability of the states. The USA was designed to continue of European Meritocracy: Soft Eugenics.


      [T]he alliance between the Jewish left, Single Women, and Underclasses, advances dysgenia by underclass expansion reversing european soft eugenics that we have practiced for 5000 years -that combined with truthful speech, reciprocity, sovereignty, caused the velocity of the West over The Rest. The Jewish left, a supermajority of the group, advances the dysgenic female reproductive strategy by using the female conflict strategy of Undermining by Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, using Pilpul (Sophism), Critique(Straw Manning), and Heaping of Undo Praise to obscure the Truth. You will not find a single post or article by Matt Yglesias (or his peers) that is not in service of dysgenia, undermining, by use of the female conflict strategy, of creating conflict through moral outrage and envy. That is his profession. Every single day. Selling Outrage and Envy to dysgenia. They rebel against reality. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, in the old world and Marxism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism, are simply theological vs pseudoscientific versions of the female strategy of undermining the eugenic dominance hierarchy but instilling conflict and envy between gender, class, race. The Western Group Strategy is to produce markets in every aspect of life while using incremental evolution of the law of Tort to suppress every and all means of parasitism, including the parasitism of dysgenic reproduction, and opening the leadership to any family who succeeds. The Jewish group strategy is to profit from false promise, baiting into moral hazard, selling envy and conflcit into dysgenia, using Sophism, Supernaturalism, and Pseudoscience, reversing the evolutionary successes of Aristocratic (land owning,hierarchical,meritocratic) peoples. This is why the specialization in gambling, drug dealing, prostitution, finance, legal narrative, signal goods, entertainment, media, and political propaganda especially the inversion and subversion of rule of law by tort we call today’s economics. All of these industries profit from Undermining the host civilization’s cooperation between classes by markets and rule of law despite our genetic differences in ability and want. If you follow Yglesias, Krugman, and Stiglitz alone and deduce the undermining, you can’t unsee it. I don’t make errors. I specialize in Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Evolution and the means by which civilizations, states, priests, politicians, intellectuals, classes and individuals engage in their opposites: Lying, Collectivism, and Parasitism, and Dysgenia. Revolution Comes.

  • You will not find a single post or article by Matt Yglesias that is not in servi

    You will not find a single post or article by Matt Yglesias that is not in service of dysgenia, undermining, by use of the female conflict strategy, of creating conflict through moral outrage and envy. That is his profession.Every single day. Selling Outrage and Envy to dysgenia.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 14:33:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180853593399857152

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180853296124370957


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mattyglesias The Jewish left advances the dysgenic female reproductive strategy by using the female conflict strategy of Undermining by Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, using Pilpul (Sophism), Critique(Straw Manning), and Heaping of Undo Praise to obscure the Truth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180853296124370957


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @mattyglesias The Jewish left advances the dysgenic female reproductive strategy by using the female conflict strategy of Undermining by Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, using Pilpul (Sophism), Critique(Straw Manning), and Heaping of Undo Praise to obscure the Truth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180853296124370957

  • PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFU

    PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFUL IDIOT”

    —“For me the last part best manifests itself within the ideas of libertarianism.”—psionin @psionin

    Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including *commons*, or what we call ‘government’.

    Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism.

    So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not.

    If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.

    Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.

    So please stop being a useful idiot. I use Sovereigntarian, or rule of law of reciprocity, or rule of law monarchy, or classical liberal. Libertarian in the hayekian sense means Classical Liberalism. Libertarianism in the Rothbardian sense just means “useful idiot”.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 08:07:00 UTC

  • May Your Gods Have Mercy on You. Because We Will Not.

    CHOOSING BETWEEN FEMININE LEFTIST LIES AND MASCULINE RIGHTIST TRUTH (In Response to the NYT) [T]he foundations of western civilization rely upon traditions we developed during the great age of transformation where we first came into being as western indo europeans.  Those traditions are still with us.  They are Truth before Face regardless of cost as contribution to the commons; Duty before Self and Family as contribution to the Commons, Heroism and Excellence as Contribution to the Commons; Sovereignty and Reciprocity in Law as contribution to the commons; Observance of  The jury and their Verdict as contribution to the commons; Observance of, and Oath To these traditions for membership, and fighting others and defending our own,  leaving only voluntary cooperation in markets in allways of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods and services, production of justice we call law, production of commons we call governing, and production of war – which to our ancestors was an entrepreneurial process, indifferent from the current economic which institutionalize that tradition in commerce. The differentiation between west and the rest is in this combination of Testimonial Truth, Grant of Reciprocity, and Sovereignty, as reciprocal insurance between each member of the polity having demonstrated by oath and payment in risk, his purchase of the franchise. ALthough in most simple terms, truthful speech is merely reciprocity warrantied, to be free of loading and framing. The NYT, The Monotheists, Marxists, Postmoderns and Neoliberal Left, want us to choose between contra-evidentiary Lying about anything and everything that obscures evidentiary truth of Gender, Race, Subrace, Culture, Class, Personality, Intelligence, and physical differences, and our use of markets to cooperate on means despite our differences in ability, preference and desired ends while advancing all of us together – presuming we limit the reproduction of the bottom quintile. That’s Choice is the question of the 20th Century playing out as a cold civil war on the verge of turning hot in the 21st: Restoring female genetic,  and semitic civilizational strategy’s demand for equality that produces dysgenia and dark ages, or restoring Male and Western ( “Greek, Roman, Prussian” ) civilization’s demand for Meritocracy that produces eugenics and rapid innovation, dragging the rest of  mankind and our women out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, hard labor, early death, infanticide, child labor, disease, and transforming ourselves into the gods the envious opposition imagine. There is only one solution to the civil war that the Feminine genetic and Semitic strategic left have created by attempt to restore dysgenic, stagnating, supernatural theology, with it’s updated versions using pseudoscience and sophism: Marx, Boax, Freud, Adorno, Derrida: Separation, Specialization, and Speciation along lines the European shrinking of the world, and the pressure of agrarian age’s compromise reversed. Europeans may have made a world of mankind from race, fist in the presumption of domestication under rule, then by enforcement of commercial self rule. But the effort has failed, and with it the world order we sought to build to organize, cooperate, and operate it. For while the female method of conflict of undermining dominant males by gossiping, rallying, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, psychologizing, and denial in order to suppress truth, and instill conflict, works while men tolerate it – in the end, men’s method of conflict resolution decides, because as always might determines whatever right exists whether or not it is reciprocal and naturally hierarchical as the masculine and eugenic world desires, or proportional as the feminine, equalitarian, and dysgenic world desires. So we can peacefully separate into your feminine egalitarian, deceitful, undermining, equalitarian, dysgenic, redistributive polity, and our masculine hierarchical, meritocratic, truth telling, market, eugenic polity – and we can leave you to the resulting squalor you seek to create – or we can war – in a war you cannot ever win. Because while the feminine means of undermining by selling supernatural false promise to females and slaves (immigrants, minorities, underclasses)  in the ancient world was successful in destroying every great civilization that they could reach – all five of them- and worse than the bronze collapse of the sea peoples –  enough of us are aware that you have fooled us once and caused a thousand year dark age from which the north sea people rescued mankind – kicking and screaming all the while – that we will not let this systemic undermining of civilization by imposing lies, sophisms, supernaturalism, pseudosciences of ignorance and dysgenia cause another dark age. So arm yourselves for war. Because recent events have been the last straw in our hope that you too could join the Aristocracy of Everyone the Greco Romans and the Modern Europeans invested their efforts into. And just as the left caused one hundred million deaths with your communist class warfare; you will have caused one hundred million deaths or more with your second attempt by creating gender and race warfare. The new Jewish heretics we call Christians destroyed the arts, literature, architecture, schools, of the ancient world, killed the philosophers who taught in them, prevented the restoration of roman aristocracy, and drowned our civilization in the superstition and ignorance that european truth and reason had rescued them from, and the monopoly of thought and governance that the hittites,  then greeks, then romans, then all of europe rebelled against after centuries of piracy, slaving, and raiding our world, culminating in the destruction of old southeastern europe – which we cannot seem to reverse. So we learned from your destruction of knowledge, tradition, arts, literature, teachers, propagandists, intellectuals, customers, architecture, how civilizational warfare is conducted by means counter to western accommodation, inclusion, education, and the rewards of doing so. We domesticated warfare in the ancient world. We domesticated it further in the middle ages. We domesticated it elegantly by the Westphalian Peace. And we domesticated it since the world wars. And we tried in vain to domesticate you. And we learned from our mistakes – and you have not. So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples?  You. So having learned that warfare must be conducted on the enemy’s terms, not our own domesticated terms, and that we must defeat you on your terms. Our law requires Restitution and Prevention, both by the individual actor, and by those who might imitate that actor. Restitution is easy. But Prevention will be brutal. Because we must create a punishment that provides sufficient incentives, that the repetition of the female strategy of undermining civilization, evolution, and our transcendence into the gods we imagine is never again attempted. We must carve a law into history that will last ten thousand years or more. So may your gods have mercy on you. Because we will not. 😉