Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • RE: THE NEUROSCIENCE OF INTELLIGENCE @charlesmurray 0. Correct but the opposite,

    RE: THE NEUROSCIENCE OF INTELLIGENCE

    @charlesmurray

    0. Correct but the opposite, via-negativa: The neuroscience is trivial. The causes of defect in intelligence are almost limitless. It’s not so much that we need to understand intelligence (g), it’s that we need to understand why defects in intelligence are so common.

    1. AFAIK, (g) is the most accurate measure in psychology, and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social sciences. The problem with testing is casting (g) separately from personality traits (which it is), and therefore not ALSO testing for trait-conscientiousness.

    2 If we test intelligence, and the Big5 traits we see that success is determined MORE by trait conscientiousness than by intelligence, and that intelligence increases income only because it grants access to problems of greater complexity. Intelligence REDUCES ERROR in complexity.

    3. As such ADAPTABILITY (success) consists of applying trait conscientiousness and trait intelligence to exploit opportunities at one’s optimum of complexity. This means ‘the bell curve’ of overlapping bell curves from low IQ/conscientiousness to high IQ/conscientiousness.

    4. There are plenty of people who are high in both intelligence,high in conscientiousness, and high in agreeableness and therefore low in competitiveness. So once we stack the priority of these traits in the context of a given economy and rule of law, sortition is obvious.

    5. Furthermore, once we combine all 5/6 traits we see that personalities cluster around three archetypes: female mother(teach),ascendant male(experiment), and established or dominant male(defend).

    The world is simple – if and only if you use enough dimensions of measurement.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-12 15:47:00 UTC

  • Please stop your sophomoric moralizing. This was the most elegant political danc

    Please stop your sophomoric moralizing. This was the most elegant political dance in decades and both sides played their parts with artistry.

    It was brilliant.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 19:25:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215716300556771330

    Reply addressees: @catoletters @AlexEmmons

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215716062492270598

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @catoletters @AlexEmmons The attack on the embassy was organized by Soleimani as a precursor to a coup against the Iraqi regime putting him in political power seizing control. The Soliemani assassination was leaked by Iranians to prevent it. Since then hundreds of his allies in Iran have been arrested.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215716062492270598

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @catoletters @AlexEmmons The attack on the embassy was organized by Soleimani as a precursor to a coup against the Iraqi regime putting him in political power seizing control. The Soliemani assassination was leaked by Iranians to prevent it. Since then hundreds of his allies in Iran have been arrested.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215716062492270598

  • FALSE. The congressional delegation was ‘insulted’ because the administration to

    FALSE. The congressional delegation was ‘insulted’ because the administration told them to be good little statesmen and not engage in rallying, moralizing and shaming for airtime that would embolden Iran to seize political opportunity. WHY: Solieman was organizing a coup in Iraq.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 19:20:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215715147211329536

    Reply addressees: @catoletters @AlexEmmons

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215352421615931392

    IN REPLY TO:

    @catoletters

    In classified briefings, Trump administration failed to convince members of Congress that assassination of Qassim Suleimani was justified https://t.co/RsTRFlczqa by @AlexEmmons

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215352421615931392

  • Bohr (Copenhagen interpretation) brought sophistry (like Cantor before him) into

    Bohr (Copenhagen interpretation) brought sophistry (like Cantor before him) into mathematics – something that Descartes to Hilbert had worked to remove. Physics is lost in silly mathiness. AFAIK (and Gerard ‘t Hooft agrees) the universe is classical (geometric).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 22:24:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215398978596102150

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215396717409062913

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215396717409062913

  • Look at the people who created the Jewish century of Undermining:Cantor-Bohr (Ps

    Look at the people who created the Jewish century of Undermining:Cantor-Bohr (Pseudomathematics), Boas, Freud, Marx(pseudoscience), Adorno-From et all (Fictionalism), Derrida (sophistry), Friedan (Denial). The female strategy of warfare against the group by instigating conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 20:25:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215369082297626626

    Reply addressees: @EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC If you industrialize lying, foment conflict,by false promise of freedom from natural laws (differences) with pseudoscience,sophism and denial then eventually, even a high trust population will be forced to adopt your tactics for no other reason than the low cost of lies vs truth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC If you industrialize lying, foment conflict,by false promise of freedom from natural laws (differences) with pseudoscience,sophism and denial then eventually, even a high trust population will be forced to adopt your tactics for no other reason than the low cost of lies vs truth.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819

  • There was academic consensus on Freud, Boas, Marx and still is on Derrida and Fr

    There was academic consensus on Freud, Boas, Marx and still is on Derrida and Friedan. Consensus means nothing.
    We falsified IQ indifference by 2000
    We falsified gender indifference by 2012
    We falsified race indifference last year (2019)
    We’re falsifying the Jewish Century now.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 14:44:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215283167571124224

    Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215121675013906433

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Steve_Sailer

    Which A.S. knows more about biological science:

    Adam Serwer, Angela Saini, or Andrew Sullivan? https://t.co/5L5DnQfatD

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215121675013906433

  • OMG:CNN criticizing anyone for flagrant disregard for the Truth is not just iron

    OMG:CNN criticizing anyone for flagrant disregard for the Truth is not just ironic, not just intellectually dishonest, not just immoral, but a criminal harm to the informational commons, and the good name of Reciprocity upon which western tolerance for free speech is predicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 02:42:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215101516907937794

    Reply addressees: @CNN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215100906372501504

    IN REPLY TO:

    @CNN

    Even if you put aside the long history of presidential deception about matters of war, President Trump’s consistent and flagrant disregard for truth has made trusting him quite difficult | Analysis by Daniel Dale https://t.co/VSTH2YgIHj

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215100906372501504

  • Another Baumeister-ism bites the dust. I mean, seriously. Learn Propertarianism.

    Another Baumeister-ism bites the dust. I mean, seriously.
    Learn Propertarianism. It will be work and take six months to get your arms around using it. If you do then paradigms (metaphysics, language, forms of narrative), psychology, sociology, economics, politics will be obvious. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1213115845087502338

  • Paul is intellectually Dishonest. The Central Command’s strategy for Iran is a s

    Paul is intellectually Dishonest. The Central Command’s strategy for Iran is a siege: continuous destruction of military, power, infrastructure, production, shipping without a single boot on the ground. The impact on the world economy would be negative but USA’s economy positive.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 20:04:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214639085874233347

    Reply addressees: @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214619536944594944

    IN REPLY TO:

    @paulkrugman

    Any who believes this is an idiot. Iran has 80 million people — more than twice Iraq — who are strongly nationalistic. What are we going to do — reinstate the draft and send a million soldiers to occupy the country in perpetuity? https://t.co/Wq5ciV8EJK

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214619536944594944

  • DON’T COME TO A JURIDICAL SCIENTIST AND TRY TO JUSTIFY ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS – YOU

    DON’T COME TO A JURIDICAL SCIENTIST AND TRY TO JUSTIFY ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS – YOU CAN’T. THEY’RE FRAUDS.

    —“Wrong.”—Oussama Dib II

    That’s not an argument. And I pretty much never get it wrong.

    —“What historical facts prove that? And refering Arabs for Dictatorship Wisdom Lit of predation? Did you know well Arabs and their history? The good and bad..?”—Oussama Dib II

    WHAT HISTORICAL FACTS? TRY THESE:

    1) What is the source of decidability in islam?

    (A Supernatural Authoritarian Deity.)

    2) Did islam spread by the sword, justifying conquest by the sword, and tax coercion?

    (Sword, conquest and tax).

    3) What was the consequence for north african, egyptian, levantine, greek, byzantine, anatolian, persian, and NW indian cvilizations? What happend to islam after 1200? What are genetic demographics under islam? Literacy? medicine? Science? Engineering? Technology? Why did mesopotamia start first and end last? Why did the levant begin first and was it passed by every other civilization other than africa?

    (Dysgenia, ignorance, hyperconsumption of all accumulated cultural, institutional, and civilizational capital)

    …. IS THIS TRUE OR FALSE?

    CIVILIZATIONAL WISDOM LITERATURES:

    Author—–Metaphysics——–Grammar—————–

    Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability) Law

    Plato:………Ideal/Natural:………….Sophistry (Justification) Philo

    Confucian: Real/Myth-Natural:….~Reason(Harmony) Reason

    Hindu:……..Unreal/Supernatural..Wisdom (Harmony) Mytho.

    Persian……Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (?) Mytho/Philo.

    Egyptian….Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (Order) Mytho.

    Semitic:…..Unreal/Supernatural:..Fraud(Authority) Theo.

    (Grammar: paradigms, vocabulary, logic, grammar)

    We are forever bound by the grammars of our wisdom literatures.

    …. IS THIS TRUE OR FALSE?

    WE INVENTED TRUTH AND THEY INVENTED LYING IN RESPONSE

    ……Female and Semitic vs Male and European

    …………………Dysgenics vs Eugenics

    …………….Consumption vs Capitalization

    ….Private Consumption vs Commons Production

    ……………..Undermining vs Order

    …Approval/Disapproval vs True/False

    ………….Incrementalism vs zero tolerance

    …..Plausible Deniability vs Warranty

    ……………………..GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost

    ……………………..Critique vs Falsification

    …………………………Pilpul vs Justification

    …………….False Promise vs Promise

    ……..Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity

    ……………………One Herd vs Many Packs

    Why was lying (fraud) using supernatural authoritarianism developed in only one place, by one people, and why was it spread by undermining (judaism), deception (christianity), and violence (islam)?

    Over time, Technology, Economics and Genetics tell the truth where men universally lie.

    I don’t make errors.

    Ever.

    It’s my job.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 16:42:00 UTC