Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • CRITICISM OF P 1. Lack of Vital Components: This is the correct criticism. My pl

    CRITICISM OF P

    1. Lack of Vital Components: This is the correct criticism. My plan has been consistent: A moral license, a set of demands, a plan of transition and a means of insurrection. So far you can only see through the set of demands (constitution). It does not pay to release more information. The window has to move further.

    2. Lack of Reach: We have a plan. It is not useful to release it. The window has to move further.

    The window keeps moving. Unfortunately it’s started moving faster than I can…

    3. I’ll give you a warning: your conservatism (“show me, i need to understand”) is effective in resisting change only if you are in control. And it’s been a failure in resisting when you are not in control. And we lost control when women and underclasses entered the franchise. And you (we) let them into the franchise out of christian optimism during a period of windfall profits at civilizational scale – one that will never repeat again given the seizure of low hanging scientific fruits. So, I”m going to be blunt and say ‘if you need to understand to act, then you are the reason you fail.” The left just seizes a series of opportunities for incremental advancement. Your need for ‘understanding’ and ‘certainty’ is why you (conservatives) have failed. And the hand-wringing (cowards) on the right are the majority. I have studied many things not the least of which is the history of revolutions and evolutions in governance both inside the anglo european and outside it. The last time we had a political solution available to us was 1992. We have not had that solution available to us yet. it is only under extreme duress, and the inability to deny being ‘conservative and politically lazy’ that the overton window moves to the blatantly obvious. So the problem is the man in your mirror that even asks these questions rather than running to every rally, every demonstration,m every opportunity, and yes, every fight, to defend what you depend upon but really want others to solve for you so you can continue being lazy ‘conservatives’. There is no condition under which we can gain control after this next election and that is simply it. The only solution is to eliminate the optimism of the ‘white middle’ civic nationalists by evidence that they cannot contradict: the exposure of differences in groups under duress.

    4. My strategy has been to create a discussion on a proposition that serves the interest of our people regardless of disposition at the expense of the elites. It is not a ‘conservative’ strategy so much as it is a strategy neither side can envision because of their ignorance of the law, economics, and the sciences that describe the world beyond what is emotionally available to our intuitions. So, my strategy is to make a solution available and the promise of civil war so certain that it is unnecessary. But that if necessary there is the least possible resistance. This is not something new, it is the same strategy I have expressed for over a decade. And as far as I know there is no solution for engineering the operation of a government under which we can separate (and continue to speciate) yet hold this continental territory and its unique advantage in food production from competitors.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 11:51:00 UTC

  • LIBER-TARDIANS … USEFUL IDIOTS OF THE ENEMY —“I’ll bet I used [Propertariani

    LIBER-TARDIANS … USEFUL IDIOTS OF THE ENEMY

    —“I’ll bet I used [Propertarianism] before you ever did. It is amusing that you think”–

    Well if you’ll bet, then how much, and what evidence can you present to back your case?

    —“2. You would suppress the imposition of costs by inventing counterfeit property, such as a property in things like social trust, average IQ, and feelings of safety.”—

    1. Demonstrated interest is existential: “demonstrated” – a truth. It’s not a choice, opinion, or preference. Any OTHER definition is a choice, preference or opinion. In other words any other choice is arbitrary.

    2. You have to arbitrarily choose something other than demonstrated interest. (This is how Abrahamic Pilpul is used to create an internally consistent set of justificationary lies – and of course you fell for it.)

    3. Humans can’t know scarcity, only demonstrated interest. Look up the origin of the concept of scarcity.

    4. Humans only know objective demonstration of interest and subjective value. Humans could only have evolved identification of value, demonstrated interest, and subjective value. We can’t know scarcity only ignorance.

    5. Any attempt to refute my position is an attempt to refute subjective value, and you would have a very hard time doing that. 😉

    6. Humans can’t avoid conflict by simply being ignorant of the resources necessary to demonstrate an interest something, we can only avoid conflict by knoweldge that others have used resources to demonstrate an interest, and continue to demonstrate that interest.

    7. What you are missing is (a) scarcity of a good is a circular reasoning. (b) that demonstrated interest is the scarcity, (b) that cooperation is the ultimate scarcity, (c) that reciprocity (non imposition against demonstrated interest) is the only means of preserving that cooperation. (d) that those who impose costs upon demonstrated intersets are the only source of conflict over the POTENTIAL to obtain returns on one’s demonstrated interests.

    8. Your opinion on what imposition of costs upon their demonstrated interests does not matter to others or the headman, counsel, court that must resolve conflicts when demonstrated interest is always and everywhere the means of decidability. In other words, you can try to advocate for leaving open the possibility of parasitism upon and harm against others, but it doesn’t mean anything to others, it’s just a lie you and yours tell yourselves to try to justify parasitism upon others and harm against others intersets. Morality is what other people won’t harm or kill you for, and the only reason not to harm or kill you is the value of your cooperation versus non-cooperation, uncooperative-competition, free riding, parasitism, predation upon anything that the use whatsoever to create and preserve their returns on cooperation. In other words, it doesn’t matter what you think – it matters what others do and you can negotiate for survival with them. (This is why I use science not justificationary pilpul like jewish rothbard and jewish-trained Hoppe.

    Hoppe is trying to restore free cities but to do so by free riding on on other’s states. Rothbard is trying to restore jewish separatism by free riding on the same states. They’re both trying to justify free riding. There is only one source of determining your rights: the use of organized violence at personal risk to deny others the alternative. The problem is that the only way to hold territory and population is with economic production hence the universal creation of increasingly suppressive laws against parasitism in every empire so that economic velocity is highest, and returns highest, and therefore military capacity highest. )

    9. I do science. Y’all do pilpul (sophistry). Jewish sophistry (pilpul and critique, GSRRM, false promise, baiting into hazard) is the most sophisticated form of deception yet invented by man, just as science is the most sophisticated form of truthful testimony invented by man. There are many means of lying by sophistry, including numerology, astrology, pseudoscience, theology, but the means of lying without appeal to anything external to language is Sophism. The reason it’s effective – weaving internal consistently out of self referentiality – is because it does not, like science, appeal to reality for closure (decidability). Instead the technique seeks to overwhelm (overload) reason (modeling) causing an appeal to moral intuition. Once you understand it’s just a technique of deception that like any other technique that can be mastered, it’s relatively easy to identify. The problem is untangling the self-referentiality rather than modeling the consequences in reality – which is what it seeks to undermine.

    Anyway. I don’t err. We all make mistakes. I very rarely err. And since this is my primary line of research I certainly don’t err in this case. I can’t. The science says so.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 16:11:00 UTC

  • Um. Let me help you. “Fashion” is an lower middle class business, usurped by und

    Um. Let me help you. “Fashion” is an lower middle class business, usurped by underclass undermining, just as art was usurped by underclass undermining. It’s politics. Nonsense gets attention because its novel, while Lauren, Ford, Gucci, get sales.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 20:13:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218989951003635712

  • It’s logically impossible to steel man a theory you do not understand. You demon

    It’s logically impossible to steel man a theory you do not understand. You demonstrate you don’t understand it. SO you can’t be steel manning it. Instead, you are just throwing bullshit and wasting our time.

    Everything is online: https://t.co/4Z8sbLXhEk

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 16:11:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218928893781999617

    Reply addressees: @scprsp @textortexxel @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218925557498302464

    IN REPLY TO:

    @scprsp

    @curtdoolittle @textortexxel @WorMartiN Call it what you want, I call it steelmanning whatever it is you’re on about.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218925557498302464

  • NITWITS FROM THE CRITIQUE GALLERY —“Yet, you believe the pseudoscientific cher

    NITWITS FROM THE CRITIQUE GALLERY

    —“Yet, you believe the pseudoscientific cherry picking by “experts” like Judith curry, Tim ball, Richard lindzen etc on the topic of climate change, so much for argument from authority. Just because you dont comprehend the math behind probablistic models used in quantum models, doesn’t mean they are invalid”—Rash Ak

    (a) Curry is the best most neutral skeptic (I don’t recognize ball or linden) and I was directly involved with the movement deeply enough to criticize the people, their malincentives and the failure of its predictions. It’s this behavior and the failure of the predictions I criticize. My position has been, and remains: overpopulation by the underclass is the problem not energy use or consumption. I don’t know yet how much affect we’re having or if that effect is meaningful, and if it’s meaningful the I’m not confident it’s bad. And I”m not confident it’s bad, because this warm interglacial is preferable to the norm: glacial. And even if we determine it’s meaningful and bad then I don’t see any solution to the problem other than vast reduction in human population.

    (b) I comprehend the math just fine, which is why I clearly articulate the cause and consequence of ‘mathiness’ as use of probabilism because the underlying causal relations are still unknown. And the reason I do so is the parallel between the problems of physics, economics, and mathematics, because of the late 19th and early 20th reversion to pre-descartian math just as hilbert complained.

    (c) the quantum and the relativistic models are in conflict for the reasons I’ve described – we have no geometric (classical model) that explains the distribution of probability across the wave form.

    (d) Nit: validity is an unscientific term left over from justificationary philosophy., and imported from mathematics (test of internal consistency). Instead: Repeatable, demonstrable, explanatory, consistent, coherent.

    You will be very hard pressed to find other than one of the best professors of physics or mathematics who can or will debate me on this subject.

    You aren’t capable of this conversation or you would have made a different criticism. And you are clearly pulling sh-t out of your a– from a troll (fake) account to engage in female-jewish critique because you can’t construct an argument on equally articulate terms.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 08:30:00 UTC

  • You’re wrong of course: a useful idiot for purveyors of the Alinsky method of pe

    You’re wrong of course: a useful idiot for purveyors of the Alinsky method of personalizing political movements.
    Trump is just a representative of half the population. Half the population that is getting very close to “cleansing” the country of the other half of the population.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 13:55:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218170056812716032

    Reply addressees: @KralcTrebor @ARossP @tedcruz @RandPaul @MittRomney @SenatorCollins @lisamurkowski @SenMcSallyAZ @SenMikeLee @johnthune @SenatorWicker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218155976064479232

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218155976064479232

  • A Detailed Explanation of Rothbard’s Sophistry

    –“I define anarchist society as one where there is no legal possibility for coercive aggression against the person or property of any individual.” —  Murray N. Rothbard

    —“There needs to be a detailed explanation as to how this statement is sophistry Curt Doolittle.”— Χρόνος @HliosX, Murray Rothbard @MurraySuggests [E]asily done. The Jewish method of deceit by sophism (pilpul), and Rothbard’s application of the Jewish method of deceit by suggestion: “I define a perfect object as one that has four dimensions” The fact that it’s possible to imagine but impossible to construct any object in four dimensions isn’t stated. Mathematical axioms are declarative (we make them up), literary consistencies (pseudo-axioms) are declarative (they are only analogies), and physical laws are existential (we merely discover them, and can’t make them up). It doesn’t matter what you define (axioms) it matters only what exists and can be constructed by actions (laws). Once we know the Jewish method of deceit by pilpul (sophism) the technique is obvious: false promise, baiting into hazard, advocated by pilpul (sophism, overloading, suggestion), defended by critique(undermining), via pretense of plausible deniability, and absent warranty. We then compare this to the Western test of Operational Construction: How can a thing be brought into being by a sequence of actions, and persist if it is? An example of idealism (sophism) vs realism (operationalism). The Greeks innovated in truth and the jews in lying. So, false promise of possibility or survival by suggestion (freedom from conformity, integration, paying costs of normative, institutional, territorial commons), false promise of ethics by non-coercion (psychological and personally controlled), rather than non-imposition (empirical, and controlled by those affected by your actions, and whether they retaliate). False promise (insinuation) of the nature of man, false promise of the function of state(assets), rule(conflict), government(cooperation in the production of commons). Real purpose? Undermining western civilization’s competition, cooperation, cohesion, by militarization, duty, and production of commons for high returns on those commons. Create the oppression myth in order to obscure free riding on the production of commons by others. Marx to undermine tripartism (cost of cooperation between the classes using markets under rule of law of tort), Rothbard to undermine the production of commons (cost). Friedan to undermine the family as an institution(cost) between men and women. Derrida undermine truth itself. Cultural Marxists (Frankfurt School) to undermine heroism, duty, honor, excellence, beauty, all of which are methods of paying costs of contribution to the commons. They work to create the myth (false promise) that physical law and natural law are oppressions by man. (In effect they’re calling our people ‘gods’.) And that western aristocracy oppresses man, rather than that western man has discovered optimums: work in concert with physical and natural law. Their strategy is to hide under myth of persecution and oppression rather than being prohibited from free riding, baiting into hazard, and undermining, while they profit from undermining societies by sowing discord. And while there is little shame in it, because this technique of deceit is very advanced, you my friend are just as much a useful idiot of the enemy of our people and our civilization as are the useful idiots of the marxists. So my unsolicited advice is that you learn their technique of lying, and my techniques of how to articulate, expose, and defeat their lies, and how to produce a constitution and body of law, that creates rule of law of tort preventing imposition on our demonstrated intersets. So that we can prevent not only the misuse of rule of law, state, court, and government to produced imposition of costs on us by well intentioned and unaccountable fools, and malicious groups whose sole group strategy for survival is the undermining more advanced peoples. And repeating a dark age in the modern world with Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism by combining the Jewish method of deceit by sophism with pseudoscience as they did in the dark age of judaism, christianity and islam in the ancient with theology. We look at history and see the great achievements of western and eastern civilizations, vs the destruction of every other civlization that arose under agrarianism – without cognizance that technology of both Truth (western, eastern) and Deceit (middle eastern) evolved apace. And that the battle for the future is between another semitic dark age under another era of lies, poverty, and destruction, or another european renaissance and enlightenment under another era of truth, prosperity, and innovation. The enemy (purveyors of abrahamism), is just as sophisticated in deceit, undermining, ignorance, and dysgenia, as we are in truth, cooperation, innovation, and eugenia. So stop being a useful idiot, undermining the miracle of western civilization’s heroism, excellence, beauty, truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law, jury, and markets in all aspects of life – that dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, and disease. And instead, work to produce western, empirical, evidentiary, operational, logical, rational, and cooperative optimum and the commons that result, from the direction of dominance to the production of commons including truth, trust, property, and sovereignty. And be upfront and honest that eugenics has been our strategy, and that markets are softly and empirically eugenic, if we limit reproduction to those who can afford their reproduction by participation in those markets. But that we do not abandon those who by accident of birth or circumstance require extra-market organization – not possible to organize in the production of commons under the pricing systems incentives. We merely limit their reproduction to one child – and time cures all. Peoples who never developed agrarian norms, traditions, institutions and genetics,and remained migratory thieves(gypsies) or shepherds(arabs) on one end, or traders(jews) on the other, never developed the bias for commons and the returns on commons, and hence despotic empires. We did develop those traditions (Market Hierarchy), Hindustanis did(Caste hierarchy) less so, and the Chinese(Monopoly hierarchy) did. The persians were ruined by three waves of muslim raiders. The arabs, jews, gypsies never did. And the pacific and africans were behind. The world has only one enemy: the lies of the abrahamic peoples. The world has only one hero: the truth of natural law (aristotelian) peoples. Between is a spectrum.

  • A Detailed Explanation of Rothbard’s Sophistry

    –“I define anarchist society as one where there is no legal possibility for coercive aggression against the person or property of any individual.” —  Murray N. Rothbard

    —“There needs to be a detailed explanation as to how this statement is sophistry Curt Doolittle.”— Χρόνος @HliosX, Murray Rothbard @MurraySuggests [E]asily done. The Jewish method of deceit by sophism (pilpul), and Rothbard’s application of the Jewish method of deceit by suggestion: “I define a perfect object as one that has four dimensions” The fact that it’s possible to imagine but impossible to construct any object in four dimensions isn’t stated. Mathematical axioms are declarative (we make them up), literary consistencies (pseudo-axioms) are declarative (they are only analogies), and physical laws are existential (we merely discover them, and can’t make them up). It doesn’t matter what you define (axioms) it matters only what exists and can be constructed by actions (laws). Once we know the Jewish method of deceit by pilpul (sophism) the technique is obvious: false promise, baiting into hazard, advocated by pilpul (sophism, overloading, suggestion), defended by critique(undermining), via pretense of plausible deniability, and absent warranty. We then compare this to the Western test of Operational Construction: How can a thing be brought into being by a sequence of actions, and persist if it is? An example of idealism (sophism) vs realism (operationalism). The Greeks innovated in truth and the jews in lying. So, false promise of possibility or survival by suggestion (freedom from conformity, integration, paying costs of normative, institutional, territorial commons), false promise of ethics by non-coercion (psychological and personally controlled), rather than non-imposition (empirical, and controlled by those affected by your actions, and whether they retaliate). False promise (insinuation) of the nature of man, false promise of the function of state(assets), rule(conflict), government(cooperation in the production of commons). Real purpose? Undermining western civilization’s competition, cooperation, cohesion, by militarization, duty, and production of commons for high returns on those commons. Create the oppression myth in order to obscure free riding on the production of commons by others. Marx to undermine tripartism (cost of cooperation between the classes using markets under rule of law of tort), Rothbard to undermine the production of commons (cost). Friedan to undermine the family as an institution(cost) between men and women. Derrida undermine truth itself. Cultural Marxists (Frankfurt School) to undermine heroism, duty, honor, excellence, beauty, all of which are methods of paying costs of contribution to the commons. They work to create the myth (false promise) that physical law and natural law are oppressions by man. (In effect they’re calling our people ‘gods’.) And that western aristocracy oppresses man, rather than that western man has discovered optimums: work in concert with physical and natural law. Their strategy is to hide under myth of persecution and oppression rather than being prohibited from free riding, baiting into hazard, and undermining, while they profit from undermining societies by sowing discord. And while there is little shame in it, because this technique of deceit is very advanced, you my friend are just as much a useful idiot of the enemy of our people and our civilization as are the useful idiots of the marxists. So my unsolicited advice is that you learn their technique of lying, and my techniques of how to articulate, expose, and defeat their lies, and how to produce a constitution and body of law, that creates rule of law of tort preventing imposition on our demonstrated intersets. So that we can prevent not only the misuse of rule of law, state, court, and government to produced imposition of costs on us by well intentioned and unaccountable fools, and malicious groups whose sole group strategy for survival is the undermining more advanced peoples. And repeating a dark age in the modern world with Marxism, Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, Feminism, and Postmodernism by combining the Jewish method of deceit by sophism with pseudoscience as they did in the dark age of judaism, christianity and islam in the ancient with theology. We look at history and see the great achievements of western and eastern civilizations, vs the destruction of every other civlization that arose under agrarianism – without cognizance that technology of both Truth (western, eastern) and Deceit (middle eastern) evolved apace. And that the battle for the future is between another semitic dark age under another era of lies, poverty, and destruction, or another european renaissance and enlightenment under another era of truth, prosperity, and innovation. The enemy (purveyors of abrahamism), is just as sophisticated in deceit, undermining, ignorance, and dysgenia, as we are in truth, cooperation, innovation, and eugenia. So stop being a useful idiot, undermining the miracle of western civilization’s heroism, excellence, beauty, truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law, jury, and markets in all aspects of life – that dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, and disease. And instead, work to produce western, empirical, evidentiary, operational, logical, rational, and cooperative optimum and the commons that result, from the direction of dominance to the production of commons including truth, trust, property, and sovereignty. And be upfront and honest that eugenics has been our strategy, and that markets are softly and empirically eugenic, if we limit reproduction to those who can afford their reproduction by participation in those markets. But that we do not abandon those who by accident of birth or circumstance require extra-market organization – not possible to organize in the production of commons under the pricing systems incentives. We merely limit their reproduction to one child – and time cures all. Peoples who never developed agrarian norms, traditions, institutions and genetics,and remained migratory thieves(gypsies) or shepherds(arabs) on one end, or traders(jews) on the other, never developed the bias for commons and the returns on commons, and hence despotic empires. We did develop those traditions (Market Hierarchy), Hindustanis did(Caste hierarchy) less so, and the Chinese(Monopoly hierarchy) did. The persians were ruined by three waves of muslim raiders. The arabs, jews, gypsies never did. And the pacific and africans were behind. The world has only one enemy: the lies of the abrahamic peoples. The world has only one hero: the truth of natural law (aristotelian) peoples. Between is a spectrum.

  • Complete: Simple: Justificationism > Sophism > Pilpul. Rothbard’s entire body of

    Complete: https://propertarianism.com/2016/09/15/the-anti-rothbardian-libertarian-canon/

    Simple: Justificationism > Sophism > Pilpul. Rothbard’s entire body of work is constructed by pilpul (sophistry), seeking justification of jewish parasitic ethics.

    Test: Blackmail. Then lack of warranty. Blackmail vs taxation? Contradiction.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 19:37:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217531145212047363

    Reply addressees: @HliosX

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217517718309670912

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217517718309670912

  • You got rid of them. They still conquered you. And you still act like them. Dish

    You got rid of them. They still conquered you. And you still act like them. Dishonesty is endemic.
    That’s why you have a low trust culture,
    That’s why you have endemic corruption,
    That’s why most of your people are still poor.
    Liars.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 23:28:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216864646231154690

    Reply addressees: @galt_the @JohnNune1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216864283545559041

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216864283545559041