Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • YOU WANT ME TO SAY SOMETHING BOTH OFFENSIVE AND TRUE? You want me to say somethi

    YOU WANT ME TO SAY SOMETHING BOTH OFFENSIVE AND TRUE?

    You want me to say something offensive? Ok. How’s this: what’s a greater crime? The holocaust (the forcible deportation to of a gypsies, jews, and other non-conformists) or the inventions of the infantilizing lies of the Abrahamic religions and Cosmopolitan pseudoscience? (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno+Co, Rothbard/Rand, Straussian Neo-Conservatism, Feminism, Postmodernism, and “Political Correctness”?)

    What has caused more harm to mankind? It’s not even worth discussing. And after the west rescues the disenfranchised, what do they do? They struggle to destroy it by turning our high trust homogenous polity into another failed Levantine catastrophe.

    THE UTOPIA CANNOT EXIST

    We either create small prosperous redistributive hgh trust homogenous states, or we create a large corrupt low trust poor caste system.

    There is no alternative.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 09:38:00 UTC

  • It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But scienc

    It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But science is a moral discipline.So if it’s immoral is it scientific?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 02:59:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797272551756103680

  • NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARR

    NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARRANT THE TRUTHFULNESS OF OUR STATEMENTS.

    The languges of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.

    The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances.

    That’s what science is:

    A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech.

    Period. End of story.

    I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology.

    Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Ethelebert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups.

    Ok. We’re done here.

    “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.”

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:39:00 UTC

  • So Natural Law provides decidability, and it is both moral and true. But moral a

    So Natural Law provides decidability, and it is both moral and true. But moral arguments alone provide no decidability alone.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:09:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797124015957667842

    Reply addressees: @carson_gross

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769

  • So technically speaking, moral rules provide no method of decidability, but we c

    So technically speaking, moral rules provide no method of decidability, but we can state that natural law is decid. and moral.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:08:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797123781399547905

    Reply addressees: @carson_gross

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769

  • FREE TRADE FRAUD Ok, so if the retail price of a car is $300 cheaper for the con

    FREE TRADE FRAUD

    Ok, so if the retail price of a car is $300 cheaper for the consumer if its assembled in mexico, and the tradeoff is that our black unemployment is increased, is that really a net gain? You see? Consumption is not a net good. ONLY FULL ACCOUNTING tells you.

    (finally some black men are waking up to the fact that the democrats fucked their whole race over. destroyed their families. and that at least trump will try to get their jobs back.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 11:46:00 UTC

  • THE MARKET FOR LIES ARGUMENT HAS EXPLANATORY POWER —“The ‘market for lies’ arg

    THE MARKET FOR LIES ARGUMENT HAS EXPLANATORY POWER

    —“The ‘market for lies’ argument is novel inasmuch as it postulates a meritocratic, incentive-based theory for the organization of the production of lies (misinformation-industrial-complex). I think the model can survive criticism because it isn’t dependent on the assumption of conspiracy or historical context, though those criteria can be considered in seeking its limits and particularities.”— James Augustus Berens.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:52:00 UTC

  • People vote as racial blocks. Ergo, race matters in politics, business, social s

    People vote as racial blocks. Ergo, race matters in politics, business, social status, mating, friends.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 23:06:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796489104238280708

    Reply addressees: @NomadAIt @lindamachi @shannessian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796487655848546304

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796487655848546304

  • Maybe you should work at having a great family so you can have rich kids. Why sh

    Maybe you should work at having a great family so you can have rich kids. Why shouldn’t we favor good families instead of bad?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:08:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796459592339378178

    Reply addressees: @shannessian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796452735746981888

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796452735746981888

  • Disrespecting parasites and respecting producers is somehow incorrect judgment?

    Disrespecting parasites and respecting producers is somehow incorrect judgment? We don’t want your respect. Want your defeat.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:07:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796459154730864641

    Reply addressees: @macarloni

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796457504565661696

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796457504565661696