If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speech, then the NYT and Academy, would be organized crime orgs.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 12:14:00 UTC
Form: Argument
-
RELIGION IS EXPLICABLE BY SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS ALSO. SORRY. JUST IS. NO MAGIC NEC
RELIGION IS EXPLICABLE BY SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS ALSO. SORRY. JUST IS. NO MAGIC NECESSARY. NO SUPERSTITION NECESSARY. NO LIES NECESSARY.
1) myth=history/heroes,
2) ritual=plays/stoicism
3) festivals=sports/holidays/feasts
That the ancients used primitive concepts in all walks of life where we no longer do is simply an artifact of the process of accumulating particular rather than analogistic knowledge.
What makes people feel spiritual is literally the combination of:
0) a narrative that provides common decidability on tie breakers that support our group evolutionary strategy
1) what we think of meditation or prayer in which we are free to be honest with ourselves,
2) the chant/fire/group prayer where we feel the pack response in safety,
3) the play/church/school/temple where we feel the pack response in narrative,
4) the feast/festival/sport where we feel the pack response in ‘celebration’.
5) war/competition where we draw upon all of the above.
Spirituality (elation,safety) is produced by the pack response.
Spiritual euporia (in all it’s names) is produced by the intellectual equivalent of abandonment of all ‘concerns’.
But these ‘effects’ are achievable by multiple means, both shinto/stoic/buddhist personal ritual, group prayer or storytelling ritual, team sport and festival ritual, and martial and funeral ritual.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 10:09:00 UTC
-
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider.
The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend.
This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 09:18:00 UTC
-
You Want Me To Say Something Both Offensive And True?
You want me to say something offensive? Ok. How’s this: what’s a greater crime? The holocaust (the forcible deportation to of a gypsies, jews, and other non-conformists) or the inventions of the infantilizing lies of the Abrahamic religions and Cosmopolitan pseudoscience? (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno+Co, Rothbard/Rand, Straussian Neo-Conservatism, Feminism, Postmodernism, and “Political Correctness”?) What has caused more harm to mankind? It’s not even worth discussing. And after the west rescues the disenfranchised, what do they do? They struggle to destroy it by turning our high trust homogenous polity into another failed Levantine catastrophe.
THE UTOPIA CANNOT EXIST We either create small prosperous redistributive high trust homogenous states, or we create a large corrupt low trust poor caste system. There is no alternative. -
You Want Me To Say Something Both Offensive And True?
You want me to say something offensive? Ok. How’s this: what’s a greater crime? The holocaust (the forcible deportation to of a gypsies, jews, and other non-conformists) or the inventions of the infantilizing lies of the Abrahamic religions and Cosmopolitan pseudoscience? (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno+Co, Rothbard/Rand, Straussian Neo-Conservatism, Feminism, Postmodernism, and “Political Correctness”?) What has caused more harm to mankind? It’s not even worth discussing. And after the west rescues the disenfranchised, what do they do? They struggle to destroy it by turning our high trust homogenous polity into another failed Levantine catastrophe.
THE UTOPIA CANNOT EXIST We either create small prosperous redistributive high trust homogenous states, or we create a large corrupt low trust poor caste system. There is no alternative. -
If houses were restored to requirements for membership classes could conduct exc
If houses were restored to requirements for membership classes could conduct exchanges truthfully rather than propagandize with falsehoods.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:58:00 UTC
-
We end monopoly democracy and restore the market for commons by trade between th
We end monopoly democracy and restore the market for commons by trade between the houses of the classes. The city-suburb warfare ends.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:53:00 UTC
-
NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARR
NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARRANT THE TRUTHFULNESS OF OUR STATEMENTS.
(Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing)
The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.
The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances.
That’s what science is:
A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech.
Period. End of story.
I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology.
Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.
Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups.
Ok. We’re done here.
“Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.”
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:33:00 UTC
-
Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry
Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry of power and information. Courts are the only means of preserving asymmetry of warranty of performance.
I don’t think markets are subordinate to hierarchy in any sense other than I think that they themselves prohibit hierarchy by permitting the meritocratic rise and fall of the classes by means of DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS.
I don’t think a market for commons divided by the classes of production is a hierarchy, it is just a means of recognizing the forms of production that the meritocratic families have managed to produce and hold onto: families, business, enterprises, territories, and monarchy.
The fact that there is greater SCALE OF MERIT in each class is simply a fact of the market operating to ensure that we demonstrate the greatest rotation and maintain the families businesses, enterprises, and institutions, with the greatest merit.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:32:00 UTC
-
DECREASING THE ERROR, BIAS, AND DECEIT, TO IDENTIFY CHEAPLY OPPORTUNITIES TO SEI
DECREASING THE ERROR, BIAS, AND DECEIT, TO IDENTIFY CHEAPLY OPPORTUNITIES TO SEIZE
The political questions we face are very different if we seek to eliminate error, bias, and deceit, rather than if we seek to identify optimums by which to obtain discounts. People will sieze the discounts no matter what. the problem is in decreasing the error, bias, and deciet, so that those opportunities are more readily visible. It’s not that we should ignore error bias and deceit so we must constantly thrash through them to find the opportunities amidst the clutter.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:31:00 UTC