Form: Argument

  • PHILOSOPHY IS A WASTE OF TIME: STUDY HISTORY, LAW, PROGRAMMING, ENGINEERING, SCI

    PHILOSOPHY IS A WASTE OF TIME: STUDY HISTORY, LAW, PROGRAMMING, ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, ECONOMICS

    —Q: “Name a philosopher that will blow my mind”—

    There aren’t any.

    Philosophy is largely a history of fantasy literature – an attempt to replace the false authority of pseudo-mythology with the false authority of pseudo-rationalism with History, Common Law, and Science as the record of intellectual achievements.

    The 19th and 20th century consist largely of increased emphasis on pseudo-rationalism, and the invention of pseudosciences dependent on statistical justifications of abstract goods reducible to hyper consumption.

    And it has only been since approximately 1999 with the fist book by Pinker, but the flood that followed, that we have begun to fight back against the pseudosciences (freud, boaz, marx, cantor, mises, the frankfurt school) and the new pseudo-rationalism (the french postmodernists and anglo pragmatists).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, UKraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 14:12:00 UTC

  • MEN ARE RATIONAL – PERIOD. 1 – Men are rational. Period. 2 – Men can rationally

    MEN ARE RATIONAL – PERIOD.

    1 – Men are rational. Period.

    2 – Men can rationally choose morality or immorality or evil. Period.

    3 – Morality consist of reciprocity. Period.

    4 – Reciprocity consists of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality – period.

    5 – The test of reciprocity is changes in property in toto (demonstrated property) Period.

    6 – The purpose of reciprocity is the demand for restitution as a means of preventing retaliation cycles.

    7 – The Purpose of preventing retaliation cycles, is to preserve the value of cooperation.

    8 – The incremental suppression of retaliation cycles produces lower risk and higher experimental velocity, (that we call ‘trust’), thereby increasing the rate of returns on cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 10:23:00 UTC

  • ARE MEN NOT MORAL? —“If men are not moral, why do they have any conception of

    ARE MEN NOT MORAL?

    —“If men are not moral, why do they have any conception of good, let alone try to achieve it?”—Keith Smith

    Men are merely rational. We are capable of moral (cooperative) and immoral (parasitic), and evil (predatory) behaviors. We demonstrate that we are capable of moral, immoral, and evil behaviors.

    We choose good most often because it is rational. A few of us choose not good because it is rational – fairly often. A few of us choose evil, because it is rational given their emotional condition. We always manage our physical, emotional, and intellectual(frustration) budgets, and we

    We educate our young and each other in order to preserve the utility of cooperation for them, for ourselves, and the group, and to prevent retaliation for them, ourselves, and the group.

    The fact of the matter is that if you are strong, in the short term predation is most rewarding, at the cost of future retaliation. if you are not weak, In the medium term cooperation is most rewarding. In the long term, if you are weak, parasitism is most rewarding.

    And this is what we see: a predatory upper class, a productive middle class, and a parasitic underclass.

    There are no possible perpetual motion machines, including those of a polity, economy, and kin group.

    We must always defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity, despite that some of us are strong and competent, some of us not weak but competent, and some of us weak and incompetent.

    We are, like all nature, bound by the basic laws of the universe, and in particular, the laws of thermodynamics. All civilization is merely an attempt to cooperate at larger and larger scales, by trading off near pleasures, for future returns.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 10:06:00 UTC

  • Why Is The U.s Thought Of So Negatively By Many?

    Why should people in the USA care about being considered negatively by some, when so many people demonstrably want to move here, and stay here, demonstrated preference is a superior scientific test than expressed opinion.

    The weak always criticize the strong. Those with less criticise those with more. The unimportant always criticize the unimportant.

    You probably can’t imagine how little americans think about you or care what you think.

    Because you are irrelevant to them. Becaus your opinion is irrelevant to them. And because they would largely attribute your opinion to weakness, relative poverty, or relative ignorance and unimportance.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-U-S-thought-of-so-negatively-by-many

  • Why Are Women Less Distracted By Attractive Men Than Men Being Distracted By A Beautiful Woman?

    Men: Search for biological fitness in a woman.
    Women: Search for status fitness in a man.

    It’s not complicated. She’s a hot body, and you’re a hot wallet.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-women-less-distracted-by-attractive-men-than-men-being-distracted-by-a-beautiful-woman

  • Why Is The U.s Thought Of So Negatively By Many?

    Why should people in the USA care about being considered negatively by some, when so many people demonstrably want to move here, and stay here, demonstrated preference is a superior scientific test than expressed opinion.

    The weak always criticize the strong. Those with less criticise those with more. The unimportant always criticize the unimportant.

    You probably can’t imagine how little americans think about you or care what you think.

    Because you are irrelevant to them. Becaus your opinion is irrelevant to them. And because they would largely attribute your opinion to weakness, relative poverty, or relative ignorance and unimportance.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-U-S-thought-of-so-negatively-by-many

  • Why Are Women Less Distracted By Attractive Men Than Men Being Distracted By A Beautiful Woman?

    Men: Search for biological fitness in a woman.
    Women: Search for status fitness in a man.

    It’s not complicated. She’s a hot body, and you’re a hot wallet.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-women-less-distracted-by-attractive-men-than-men-being-distracted-by-a-beautiful-woman

  • Because of the asymmetric abilities of men and women, and the asymmetric distrib

    Because of the asymmetric abilities of men and women, and the asymmetric distribution of intelligence in men and women, any society led by women will rapidly be defeated by any society led by men. Period. End of Story. Deal with it. Women in power is a temporary luxury good.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-20 16:56:00 UTC

  • When you start from the presumption that cooperation is mandatory rather than co

    When you start from the presumption that cooperation is mandatory rather than cooperation is merely one choice among three: predation, cooperation, boycott – you can justify pragmatism, social construction, and religions of all stripes.

    When you start from the truth: that we have the option for violence at all times, and that at all times violence might be preferable, you cannot justify pragmatism, social construction, and religions of all stripes.

    This is why the philosophical lies and the abrahamic lies are so successful: by the mere fact that we are attempting to cooperate we have already forgone violence, and it is ‘rude’ to refer to that extra-discourse option. But to the man for whom cooperation is no longer preferable, he makes not presupposition, and has not forgone violence, but seeks to negotiate terms under which cooperating ‘might’ still be preferable to conflict, conquest, and predation.

    Natural Law: no presumptions whatsoever.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-13 05:53:00 UTC

  • ON POLYGAMY I’ve answered this question repeatedly. So here we go again: (a) the

    ON POLYGAMY

    I’ve answered this question repeatedly. So here we go again:

    (a) the community will not insure it.

    (b) the community might ostracize it.

    (c) the ostracization is rational since it is not in their kin’s interests, and poses a normative risk to their kin.

    (d) there is nothing stopping you from creating a corporation with the identical properties of a marriage EXCEPT for the community insurance of the relationship.

    (e) so effectively you trade a decrease in normative social status in exchange for polygamy. And I have no reason to think this is not exactly the optimum condition.

    (f) i might argue that such a private contract might have higher value than the marriage contract since it is unregulated.

    In other words, IMO, marriage is an ancient natural law contract between a man and a woman for the formation of a corporation of community property that produces offspring who later care for the parents in old age.

    Every other relationship is not marriage but a contract that grants:

    (a) reciprocal exclusivity of resources of all kinds

    (b) reciprocal power of attorney over the community assets including one another.

    (c) reciprocal insurance against the vicissitudes of life.

    (d) reciprocal insurance of offspring.

    The difference being that the community will warranty non interference in the relationship and therefore the contract of marriage, and the community will not warranty the same of the alternative contract, since it is not in the interests of the community to foster these relationships. (no it’s not. sorry).


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-10 20:04:00 UTC