Form: Argument

  • Why Do We Own A Rifle?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic. 2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights: a) reciprocity without exception, b) universal standing, and c) universal applicability. 3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral. 4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked. 5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political. Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization. Period. Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west. And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny. There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry. If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear. I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.
  • WHY DO WE OWN A RIFLE? 1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by

    WHY DO WE OWN A RIFLE?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic.

    2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights:

    a) reciprocity without exception,

    b) universal standing, and

    c) universal applicability.

    3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral.

    4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked.

    5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political.

    Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization.

    Period.

    Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west.

    And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny.

    There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry.

    If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear.

    I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS

    INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-08 20:38:00 UTC

  • Why Do We Own A Rifle?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic. 2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights: a) reciprocity without exception, b) universal standing, and c) universal applicability. 3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral. 4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked. 5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political. Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization. Period. Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west. And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny. There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry. If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear. I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.
  • There is zero difficulty ‘squaring’ human existence with physics. It’s not absur

    There is zero difficulty ‘squaring’ human existence with physics. It’s not absurd at all. Its tediously simple. Art and Beauty are also trivial to explain. To say that knowing alone denies us the emotional rewards of loading and framing is certain. But not inexplicable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 20:59:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971128059075219457

    Reply addressees: @No2Sovereignty @HeritageNLegacy @LueYee @JWilliamXIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971125295339134976


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971125295339134976

  • We should organize such that governments cannot be used to commit slow genocide,

    We should organize such that governments cannot be used to commit slow genocide, and therefore organize by kin group. Clan>Tribe>Nation. I think ‘race’ is too broad for a government, although it is not too broad for citizenship.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 18:28:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971090191380344832

    Reply addressees: @NachoGarona

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971082643377934338


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971082643377934338

  • Do You Think Community Activism Serves A Realistic Purpose?

    The purpose of community activism – was intentionaly developed to undermine western civilization. it has served the realistic purpose of destroying the homogenous, familial, hard working culture that was america prior to 1960 and the postmodernist invasion via the university system from France.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-community-activism-serves-a-realistic-purpose

  • Do You Think Community Activism Serves A Realistic Purpose?

    The purpose of community activism – was intentionaly developed to undermine western civilization. it has served the realistic purpose of destroying the homogenous, familial, hard working culture that was america prior to 1960 and the postmodernist invasion via the university system from France.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-community-activism-serves-a-realistic-purpose

  • In general, I make painfully accurate sense. It’s my job. Now, we have rights of

    In general, I make painfully accurate sense. It’s my job. Now, we have rights of reciprocity – sure. Just as we have the right to boycott, sue,and prosecute people who commit fraud in the distribution of goods,services, and information. And that was my argument: reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 14:00:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968848421191933953

    Reply addressees: @Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846718707163141


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846718707163141

  • Um … the west evolved truth telling regardless of impact on the dominance hier

    Um … the west evolved truth telling regardless of impact on the dominance hierarchy. The east developed lying to circumvent impact on the dominance hierarchy. China’s’ first philosopher is sun-tzu, “delay, deceive, and seek opportunity to act when the opponent is in weak condition”. The west’s first philosopher is unstated: we are small in number, so use techology, and expertise, to solve future problems immediately – regardless of the impact ont he dominnce hierarchy. This philosophy results in mathematics, plato, aristotle, and zeno. Lying is systemic in china. It’s expected. They cannot create and hold commons. They have zero respect for human life. They care nothing for liberty. China is a bureaucracy. Russia is a church, and the West is (or was) a militia.
  • Is Conflict Costly?

    —“Conflict is too costly to be anything but an absolutely last resort.”— A friend Thats not true. (It’s a common libertarian trope.) We have MADE conflict increasingly costly. However, predation is incredibly rewarding and every expansionary empire in history is evidence of it. Hell, american ascendence, and american quality of life is perhaps the best example in history. I can’t think of any condition in history where expansionary conquest wasn’t the most profitable endeavor possible. I think we can say that SYMMETRIC conflict is costly, but ASYMMETRIC conflict is extraordinarily rewarding – hence the eternal arms race from the dawn of time. Conquest and Rule are THE MOST PROFITABLE INDUSTRIES ever invented by man. And we invented it.