Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • There is a vast difference between freedom to ridicule, shame, gossip, obscure,

    There is a vast difference between freedom to ridicule, shame, gossip, obscure, load, frame, overload, suggest, fictionalize, deceive, lie, and defraud, promote free riding, parasitism, predation – and speaking with reciprocity (morally), and truthfully.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:51:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765246765240320

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970420628388855808

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970420628388855808

  • You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.

    I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.

  • DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veVONaeTBVMYOU DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT YOU MUST.

    I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.Updated Mar 16, 2018, 12:48 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:48:00 UTC

  • You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.

    I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.

  • one determines a christian by comparing him to observers of other religions. If

    one determines a christian by comparing him to observers of other religions. If we produce christian actions (exhaustive extension of kinship love to non-kin)then we are de-facto christians. It’s not adherence to dogma (falsehoods) to pay the price of admission. It’s how we live.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:12:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974075717196615681

    Reply addressees: @michaelsw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969699229298913280

    IN REPLY TO:

    @michaelsw

    Asking whether or not #JordanPeterson is a Christian might be a bad question. We don’t dismiss someone and what they have to say based on whether or not they are a believer. Better question(s). Is he speaking the truth? Is he challenging faulty philosophical presuppositions?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969699229298913280

  • The principle teaching of Sun Tzu is delay, deceive, and wait for opportunity, b

    The principle teaching of Sun Tzu is delay, deceive, and wait for opportunity, by incrementally depriving the opponent of opportunity. The principle teaching of the west is to confront and solve problems immediately internally and externally. Why? we have always been a minority.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:43:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973992921535000591

    Reply addressees: @sonshi_com

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973977851165847563

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973977851165847563

  • As far as I know, intuition, observation, and stereotypes are the most accurate

    As far as I know, intuition, observation, and stereotypes are the most accurate measures in the social sciences precisely because they are DEMONSTRATED but not REPORTED.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 15:10:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973576951125495808

    Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973396185942601728

    IN REPLY TO:

    @jordanbpeterson

    Companies: Stop using IAT research to buttress claims about unconscious bias… Here’s why (in part) https://t.co/I8oCE6iKvw

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973396185942601728

  • We have evolved an incredibly precise ability to intuit the personalities (tende

    We have evolved an incredibly precise ability to intuit the personalities (tendencies) of individuals from facial expressions, body language, diction, language, grooming, and dress. And these assessments are profoundly accurate. Why? We cooperate best with least differences.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 15:09:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973576723836145664

    Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973398841268486144

    IN REPLY TO:

    @jordanbpeterson

    “Based on the evidence that is currently available,” Forscher said, “I’d say that we cannot claim that implicit bias is a useful target of intervention.” https://t.co/rA4Bo7ji5p

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973398841268486144

  • From Elsewhere

    On Killing Defectors… (a) Killing defectors is defensive measure against further defection (b) Not killing imprisoned defectors is merely preserving an asset for future exchange. (c) Trading defectors you will later kill is simply buying the exchange for free. (d) Letting people have false hope and live in fear is more valuable than rapidly executing them. I detest conspiracy theories. People act according to rational incentives. However, Seth Rich and Skripal hold a remote possibility of implicating Russian involvement at a time when we are sensitive to (endemic) russian, chinese, jewish, manipulation of our polity. The jewish are most successful at political interference. The chinese most successful at technological theft. The Russian most successful at undermining power in general. Russian, Jewish, Chinese, and American involvement in intelligence gathering and shaming by publication of undesirable information is endemic, and has been since the advent of the soviets.The soviets mastered propaganda from the French, then competed with the fascists for supremacy. Americans being anglo were late to develop the technique since we have a high trust society and these kinds of actions were resisted. As far as I know – and I am fairly certain of this – the collusion story is just that – an excuse to cover the failings of the democratic party in putting forward such an undesirable candidate in a time of divisiveness. Intelligence work on the american side is tediously boring really. The russians on the other hand use disaffected intellectuals (particularly on the left) to do their work for them at pennies on our dollar. And they always have done so. Americans are rather overt about our interference. Wikileaks has done us a profound favor and I only wish them a future even brighter.

  • FROM ELSEWHERE On Killing Defectors… (a) Killing defectors is defensive measur

    FROM ELSEWHERE

    On Killing Defectors…

    (a) Killing defectors is defensive measure against further defection

    (b) Not killing imprisoned defectors is merely preserving an asset for future exchange.

    (c) Trading defectors you will later kill is simply buying the exchange for free.

    (d) Letting people have false hope and live in fear is more valuable than rapidly executing them.

    I detest conspiracy theories. People act according to rational incentives.

    However, Seth Rich and Skripal hold a remote possibility of implicating Russian involvement at a time when we are sensitive to (endemic) russian, chinese, jewish, manipulation of our polity. The jewish are most successful at political interference. The chinese most successful at technological theft. The Russian most successful at undermining power in general.

    Russian, Jewish, Chinese, and American involvement in intelligence gathering and shaming by publication of undesirable information is endemic, and has been since the advent of the soviets.The soviets mastered propaganda from the French, then competed with the fascists for supremacy. Americans being anglo were late to develop the technique since we have a high trust society and these kinds of actions were resisted.

    As far as I know – and I am fairly certain of this – the collusion story is just that – an excuse to cover the failings of the democratic party in putting forward such an undesirable candidate in a time of divisiveness.

    Intelligence work on the american side is tediously boring really. The russians on the other hand use disaffected intellectuals (particularly on the left) to do their work for them at pennies on our dollar. And they always have done so. Americans are rather overt about our interference.

    Wikileaks has done us a profound favor and I only wish them a future even brighter.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 12:53:00 UTC