Form: Argument

  • If We Train One Another in Stoicism We Can Implement Redistribution.

    Every forced transfer is a loss at the expense of an opportunity for a productive reciprocal exchange. The exchange the wealthy desire is respect for property of all kinds, leading to stoicism in the individual, since it is only stoicism that both requires action and prevents all imposition of costs upon *everything*: display (sound, sight, appearance, movement), word, and deed. The underclass wants redistribution AND discounts on consumption without paying the cost of respect for the property that makes it possible: physical, behavioral, informational, institutional, territorial, environmental. The underclass lacks agency which is the reason for their low GMV (genetic market value: reproductive, social, economic, informational, political, and military). If we train one another in stoicism we can implement redistribution.

  • Doolittle’s Law of Education

    1) Children’s potential is 80% genetics, and 20% early physical development, and nearly zero anything else. 2) You cannot improve on genetics – and all temporary gains measured will dissipate within one forgetting cycle (3 years). 3) You can harm children’s development through trauma and exposure to malincentives and bad behavior, but you cannot improve it beyond their genetic potential. 4) People are wealthier or poorer because they are more or less sexually, socially, economically, politically, and militarily valuable to others (“Genetic Market Value” – GMV ). 5) Peoples GMV is determined by physical appearance, personality traits (particularly industriousness and agreeableness), and intelligence. In general, all positive traits increase and decrease together, and intelligence is the proxy. People perform worse not because they are poor, they are poor because they perform worse, and they perform worse because of their genes. All else is just statistical outlier. 6) Human groups differ by rates and depths of sexual maturity, with slower developmental and depth rates yielding better results, and faster and deeper rates worse behavioral results. We are domesticated animals like all other domesticated animals, and human groups have varied in our degree of self-domestication (limiting depth and rate of sexual maturity). 7) When the USA was founded there was 1000 years of middle class genetics trapped by the dead capital in the church. Those middle class genetics existed because northern europeans practiced manorialism, aggressive hanging, suffered the plagues, and frequent wars. This caused the downward distribution of middle class genetics into the lower economic classes. By the time we reached 1900 that genetic capital had been redistributed, and the dead capital of the church redistributed. Beginning in 1964 the prohibition on underclass immigration was lifted, and we immigrated vast numbers of underclasses that were not static human capital. Instead, we have been spending increasing amounts of money trying to compensate for an increasingly poor stock of human capital. 8 ) A teacher is born not taught. Teaching is an art (talent) not a skill. All the evidence we have to date is that a teacher succeeds in the first six months or not, and no further improvement is made. Teaching is simple for the talented and beneficial to the taught. For the untalented each student is effectively punished by the experience. The truth is that teachers are largely from the bottom of the intellectual pool and this is the primary difference. Not pay: lack of intelligence, and lack of life experience outside the classroom. Tenure merely institutionalizes incompetence. 9) All we can do is help teachers perform better is teaching them project planning (curriculum development), like all other industries teach project planning. Project planning is a basic, necessary, human life skill. This is not a complicated skill. The problem for managing the project of education is the ‘art’ of teaching individual minds in a group, and a constantly rotating curriculum and the materials teachers need to teach it. The fact that budgets are not in the hands of teachers, and curricula are not marketed on the academic equivalent of amazon is the problem. 10) The fact that teachers do not ‘own’ the schools themselves is the origin of the problem, since there is absolutely zero evidence that the entire hierarchy of the school system provides any value. Education evolved as colleges (collections of professors) and that is the optimum model. The voucher system would redistribute purchasing power. Political control of education as a means of indoctrination would be eliminated. Market forces not ideology would provide the competitive education children need given their genetics and family circumstances. (or lack of family as is mostly the case of underperforming children). 11) Other than reading, writing, history, geography, basic sciences, mathematics, almost every other course is a waste of time with no results. The competitive advantage of western civilization is our law and our economics that favor entrepreneurship and innovation at all costs, and we do not teach money, checkbooks, financing, micro, macro economics basic statistics, and basic contracts when these are the skills most valuable to citizens. Worse we teach falsehoods about our government which was never designed and never should be converted to, a democracy. Democracies always fail. This educational content should be corrected. 12) After grade six it appears we would invest better in our children by reducing their school hours and putting them into the workplace and then bringing them into apprenticeship programs (as is common in Germany). The central problem is making use of labor so that labor produces sufficient multiples, that labor creates wealth rather than costs it. 13) Professors are often bad because the university is organized to market it’s top professors, but deliver its bottom professors and its graduate students. 14) Teaching professors are not rewarded, since publications are required. Yet there is no correlation between the quality of teaching and the quality of publication. 15) Universities stack large first and second year classes knowing that the students will fail out, or that the class material is worthless. This money is used to fund the bureaucracy. If we do the basic math, it should cost about 15K + Room and Board for a college education at the outside. Anything above this is extraction. 16) Worse, we have many fake degrees. If a field does not require calculation (math, logic, programming) then it is a craft, not a profession. Calculation determines the difference between a craft and a profession. The reason being that one can sense a craft directly, but cannot sense a profession directly – and must rely upon calculation. 17) …. (more later….) May 15, 2018 10:03am

  • Doolittle’s Law of Education

    1) Children’s potential is 80% genetics, and 20% early physical development, and nearly zero anything else. 2) You cannot improve on genetics – and all temporary gains measured will dissipate within one forgetting cycle (3 years). 3) You can harm children’s development through trauma and exposure to malincentives and bad behavior, but you cannot improve it beyond their genetic potential. 4) People are wealthier or poorer because they are more or less sexually, socially, economically, politically, and militarily valuable to others (“Genetic Market Value” – GMV ). 5) Peoples GMV is determined by physical appearance, personality traits (particularly industriousness and agreeableness), and intelligence. In general, all positive traits increase and decrease together, and intelligence is the proxy. People perform worse not because they are poor, they are poor because they perform worse, and they perform worse because of their genes. All else is just statistical outlier. 6) Human groups differ by rates and depths of sexual maturity, with slower developmental and depth rates yielding better results, and faster and deeper rates worse behavioral results. We are domesticated animals like all other domesticated animals, and human groups have varied in our degree of self-domestication (limiting depth and rate of sexual maturity). 7) When the USA was founded there was 1000 years of middle class genetics trapped by the dead capital in the church. Those middle class genetics existed because northern europeans practiced manorialism, aggressive hanging, suffered the plagues, and frequent wars. This caused the downward distribution of middle class genetics into the lower economic classes. By the time we reached 1900 that genetic capital had been redistributed, and the dead capital of the church redistributed. Beginning in 1964 the prohibition on underclass immigration was lifted, and we immigrated vast numbers of underclasses that were not static human capital. Instead, we have been spending increasing amounts of money trying to compensate for an increasingly poor stock of human capital. 8 ) A teacher is born not taught. Teaching is an art (talent) not a skill. All the evidence we have to date is that a teacher succeeds in the first six months or not, and no further improvement is made. Teaching is simple for the talented and beneficial to the taught. For the untalented each student is effectively punished by the experience. The truth is that teachers are largely from the bottom of the intellectual pool and this is the primary difference. Not pay: lack of intelligence, and lack of life experience outside the classroom. Tenure merely institutionalizes incompetence. 9) All we can do is help teachers perform better is teaching them project planning (curriculum development), like all other industries teach project planning. Project planning is a basic, necessary, human life skill. This is not a complicated skill. The problem for managing the project of education is the ‘art’ of teaching individual minds in a group, and a constantly rotating curriculum and the materials teachers need to teach it. The fact that budgets are not in the hands of teachers, and curricula are not marketed on the academic equivalent of amazon is the problem. 10) The fact that teachers do not ‘own’ the schools themselves is the origin of the problem, since there is absolutely zero evidence that the entire hierarchy of the school system provides any value. Education evolved as colleges (collections of professors) and that is the optimum model. The voucher system would redistribute purchasing power. Political control of education as a means of indoctrination would be eliminated. Market forces not ideology would provide the competitive education children need given their genetics and family circumstances. (or lack of family as is mostly the case of underperforming children). 11) Other than reading, writing, history, geography, basic sciences, mathematics, almost every other course is a waste of time with no results. The competitive advantage of western civilization is our law and our economics that favor entrepreneurship and innovation at all costs, and we do not teach money, checkbooks, financing, micro, macro economics basic statistics, and basic contracts when these are the skills most valuable to citizens. Worse we teach falsehoods about our government which was never designed and never should be converted to, a democracy. Democracies always fail. This educational content should be corrected. 12) After grade six it appears we would invest better in our children by reducing their school hours and putting them into the workplace and then bringing them into apprenticeship programs (as is common in Germany). The central problem is making use of labor so that labor produces sufficient multiples, that labor creates wealth rather than costs it. 13) Professors are often bad because the university is organized to market it’s top professors, but deliver its bottom professors and its graduate students. 14) Teaching professors are not rewarded, since publications are required. Yet there is no correlation between the quality of teaching and the quality of publication. 15) Universities stack large first and second year classes knowing that the students will fail out, or that the class material is worthless. This money is used to fund the bureaucracy. If we do the basic math, it should cost about 15K + Room and Board for a college education at the outside. Anything above this is extraction. 16) Worse, we have many fake degrees. If a field does not require calculation (math, logic, programming) then it is a craft, not a profession. Calculation determines the difference between a craft and a profession. The reason being that one can sense a craft directly, but cannot sense a profession directly – and must rely upon calculation. 17) …. (more later….) May 15, 2018 10:03am

  • Social interactions must be ‘calculable’ and the greater the variation in predic

    Social interactions must be ‘calculable’ and the greater the variation in predicability the higher the cost of discovering a protocol (shared sentiments) and the higher the cost of seeking subtlety (innovation).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 16:45:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996431460084191232

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996410686271115264


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @charlesmurray Charles: While we have increased interpersonal tolerance, we have decreased interpersonal interaction. In other words, heterogeneity and tolerance decrease sociability, and homogeneity increases sociability. The fact that this is a necessary consequence of cognition is lost.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/996410686271115264


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @charlesmurray Charles: While we have increased interpersonal tolerance, we have decreased interpersonal interaction. In other words, heterogeneity and tolerance decrease sociability, and homogeneity increases sociability. The fact that this is a necessary consequence of cognition is lost.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/996410686271115264

  • DOOLITTLE’S LAW OF EDUCATION 1) Children’s potential is 80% genetics, and 20% ea

    DOOLITTLE’S LAW OF EDUCATION

    1) Children’s potential is 80% genetics, and 20% early physical development, and nearly zero anything else.

    2) You cannot improve on genetics – and all temporary gains measured will dissipate within one forgetting cycle (3 years).

    3) You can harm children’s development through trauma and exposure to malincentives and bad behavior, but you cannot improve it beyond their genetic potential.

    4) People are wealthier or poorer because they are more or less sexually, socially, economically, politically, and militarily valuable to others (“Genetic Market Value” – GMV ).

    5) Peoples GMV is determined by physical appearance, personality traits (particularly industriousness and agreeableness), and intelligence. In general, all positive traits increase and decrease together, and intelligence is the proxy. People perform worse not because they are poor, they are poor because they perform worse, and they perform worse because of their genes. All else is just statistical outlier.

    6) Human groups differ by rates and depths of sexual maturity, with slower developmental and depth rates yielding better results, and faster and deeper rates worse behavioral results. We are domesticated animals like all other domesticated animals, and human groups have varied in our degree of self-domestication (limiting depth and rate of sexual maturity).

    7) When the USA was founded there was 1000 years of middle class genetics trapped by the dead capital in the church. Those middle class genetics existed because northern europeans practiced manorialism, aggressive hanging, suffered the plagues, and frequent wars. This caused the downward distribution of middle class genetics into the lower economic classes. By the time we reached 1900 that genetic capital had been redistributed, and the dead capital of the church redistributed. Beginning in 1964 the prohibition on underclass immigration was lifted, and we immigrated vast numbers of underclasses that were not static human capital. Instead, we have been spending increasing amounts of money trying to compensate for an increasingly poor stock of human capital.

    8 ) A teacher is born not taught. Teaching is an art (talent) not a skill. All the evidence we have to date is that a teacher succeeds in the first six months or not, and no further improvement is made. Teaching is simple for the talented and beneficial to the taught. For the untalented each student is effectively punished by the experience. The truth is that teachers are largely from the bottom of the intellectual pool and this is the primary difference. Not pay: lack of intelligence, and lack of life experience outside the classroom. Tenure merely institutionalizes incompetence.

    9) All we can do is help teachers perform better is teaching them project planning (curriculum development), like all other industries teach project planning. Project planning is a basic, necessary, human life skill. This is not a complicated skill. The problem for managing the project of education is the ‘art’ of teaching individual minds in a group, and a constantly rotating curriculum and the materials teachers need to teach it. The fact that budgets are not in the hands of teachers, and curricula are not marketed on the academic equivalent of amazon is the problem.

    10) The fact that teachers do not ‘own’ the schools themselves is the origin of the problem, since there is absolutely zero evidence that the entire hierarchy of the school system provides any value. Education evolved as colleges (collections of professors) and that is the optimum model. The voucher system would redistribute purchasing power. Political control of education as a means of indoctrination would be eliminated. Market forces not ideology would provide the competitive education children need given their genetics and family circumstances. (or lack of family as is mostly the case of underperforming children).

    11) Other than reading, writing, history, geography, basic sciences, mathematics, almost every other course is a waste of time with no results. The competitive advantage of western civilization is our law and our economics that favor entrepreneurship and innovation at all costs, and we do not teach money, checkbooks, financing, micro, macro economics basic statistics, and basic contracts when these are the skills most valuable to citizens. Worse we teach falsehoods about our government which was never designed and never should be converted to, a democracy. Democracies always fail. This educational content should be corrected.

    12) After grade six it appears we would invest better in our children by reducing their school hours and putting them into the workplace and then bringing them into apprenticeship programs (as is common in Germany). The central problem is making use of labor so that labor produces sufficient multiples, that labor creates wealth rather than costs it.

    13) Professors are often bad because the university is organized to market it’s top professors, but deliver its bottom professors and its graduate students.

    14) Teaching professors are not rewarded, since publications are required. Yet there is no correlation between the quality of teaching and the quality of publication.

    15) Universities stack large first and second year classes knowing that the students will fail out, or that the class material is worthless. This money is used to fund the bureaucracy. If we do the basic math, it should cost about 15K + Room and Board for a college education at the outside. Anything above this is extraction.

    16) Worse, we have many fake degrees. If a field does not require calculation (math, logic, programming) then it is a craft, not a profession. Calculation determines the difference between a craft and a profession. The reason being that one can sense a craft directly, but cannot sense a profession directly – and must rely upon calculation.

    17) ….

    (more later….)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 10:03:00 UTC

  • Lets get this labor thing straight. Labor has no value other than under capitali

    Lets get this labor thing straight. Labor has no value other than under capitalism we can create a consumer out of the laborer which organizes the very fractional contribution of labor into large groups producing many complex parts, and the complex part provides the value.

    The profit on the price is required to organize others in this network.

    That’s the whole thing. If you’re ‘labor’ you aren’t ‘value’ to others, since none of us is productive enough to matter. What matters is multipliers, and labor isn’t one.

    Labor’s primary value lies in (a) you are at least self supporting because (b) as a slave you’re even less productive, and (c) as a barbarian you’re a parasite.

    The value is in organizing using incentives using prices and profits.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 08:39:00 UTC

  • SCHOOLING SOPHISTS ON THE MEANING OF EXISTENCE (worth reading) —“Ivar Diederik

    SCHOOLING SOPHISTS ON THE MEANING OF EXISTENCE

    (worth reading)

    —“Ivar Diederik “Math does not appear in what we study.”

    Actually it does. There are several theorems that were first developed theoretically, and only years later were discovered or proven to exist in nature. James Clerk Maxwell predicted things about electro-magnetism which physicist Heinrich Hertz later proved to be true. Quantum electrodynamics (QED) and Riemann’s new geometries were only later revealed to be practically useful. The inner (and eternal) logic of mathematics, rather than the measurement of phenomena, suggested these theorems were true and useful. And as it later turned out, existence does indeed make use of the dynamics of these theorems.”—-

    No, what EXISTS is the universe in different states of excitement, and the universe is deterministic, meaning regular, and if we (humans) break it into some set of categories (forces, particles, elements, entities) we observe that those categories demonstrate constant relations (determinism). Positions (cardinality and ordinality) also consist of constant relations. We then created a hierarchy of grammars of constant relations beginning with counting, and at present through field-symmetries (god only knows what’s after that if anything, other than a hierarchy of self same). This hierarchy of grammars of constant relations we categorize as ‘mathematics’. The grammars ( rules of continuous disambiguation) of mathematics consists of very limited vocabulary (semantics), and syntax,

    Man creates referrers when he observes referents, and his referents are determined by the limits of the the human body (senses, memory, cognition).

    Mathematics is just one of the hierarchy of grammars possible under the human language capacity (the universal grammar) and is a very narrow grammar of very narrow semantics (positional names) and a very limited set of operations. This simplicity (positions) makes it very difficult to produce malformed statements.

    So again, constant relations exist in the universe. man recognizes those constant relations. man describes those constant relations in language.

    The error you are making is called ‘platonism’ which is confusing the existence of a man made referrer with a category we identify in existence and describe the grammar constrained enough for the purpose of disambiguation suiting the use of the statement.

    —“Math is just another language made by man” There you go again, bringing man into it. Do you seriously believe the Pythagorean Theorem was untrue prior to it being defined by man? When I talk of ontological mathematics, I talk about the totality of mathematical principles that are eternally true and cannot be otherwise. This complete, ontological mathematics is what everything comes from, the only “nothing” that can create something.”—-

    Well I think I’ve answered this about as thoroughly as possible, but for sake of repetitive training I’ll reiterate that man makes descriptions using a grammar limited by human ability, of categories of constant relations. So when we say a tree exists we are speaking parsimoniously (conveniently), when matter exists, we have identified a set of constant relations in time at human scale’s of time perception, and we name that set of constant relations (category) a tree, and therefore reality exists, the set of constant relations we call the tree exists, we have identified a category of similar constant relations, we have CREATED a name for those constant relations at human scales of perception, and referred to it.

    So we often conflate existence (universe), referent (constant relations), referrer (named category). We do not necessarily have a name for the referrer other than ‘knowledge’ or ‘knowledge of’. Even such, we use the term ‘knowledge of’ for both awareness of, hypothesis, theory, settled theory, and law.

    Worse, knowledge consist of some record (memory, or physical translation to symbols that will activate memories), that when recalled, observed, contemplated, or calculated, is reconstructed as experience. As such knowledge of necessity requires a host to experience it.

    So knowledge is potential for experience, and the act of knowing is the point at which knowledge is brought into existence during experience.

    Ergo, existence = persistence, and knowledge = potential for knowing, and Knowing = experience. And so knowing does not persist except when active in thought. And it consists of some subset of symbols or references that combined with memory reconstruct the state of knowing that we call knowledge.

    —-“the universe, lacks intelligence and choice and as such is entirely deterministic” The universe is an expression of the most flawless logic, namely the totality of mathematics. Although that does indeed create a deterministic situation, because every “big bang” will invariably result in the kind of inhabited cosmos we experience now, this itself is a manifestation of the “intelligence” of the eternal whole. The way existence is “set up”, it can be enjoyed eternally. That’s a pretty good “design”, I’d say. If I had a choice, I would structure existence that way too. Of course, I do agree with you that we should not conceive of this intelligence and choice in a anthropocentric way. “—

    Well that can’t be true. The universe existed before man. The universe is deterministic. Becasue it is deterministic (can’t choose) we can identify constant relations and refer to them as categories, and we can identify constant relations between those relations, and so on in vast hierarchies. The fact that we can create a language within the limits of human perception that describe these categories and relations in terms of the limits of human perception (all language analogy to experience), we can then describe that universe in a grammar (subset of our language) limited to constant relations.

    —“and as such evidence of the absence of any ‘deity’.”I’m not arguing for the existence of a deity. In fact I reject it as unnecessary and impossible. Nothing can exist prior to creation except the eternal logic of mathematics. There can be no self-consciousness prior to the arrival of Homo sapiens sapiens, or similar creatures. All conceptions of a deity supposedly getting bored and then, thinking out loud, deciding to create the universe are entirely metaphorical.”—

    You mean, that the universe exists and we invented a grammar to describe its constant relations in human language at human scale.

    —“But I do disagree with your notion that we are an anomaly, just because the majority of space is filled with lifeless matter. To me that argument is as silly as stating that an apple tree is hostile to the creation of apples because there aren’t any apples growing on its trunk and roots, and most of the year not even on the tips of its branches. The majority of our DNA is “junk”, yet it would be foolish to suggest DNA is hostile to life, and the coding part is just an anomaly.”—

    Well you can debate the semantics of anomaly with me, but life does not appear anywhere that we are looking yet, and it is extremely difficult to keep humans (or any other form of life) alive anywhere that we know of other than this planet (and I doubt there ever will be).

    —“You talk about lies, yet you yourself embrace the blatant lie that the universe does not support life, even though evidently you and I are alive, and the goldilocks situation isn’t that unique in a universe that seems to be unlimited in size and “obeying” the same mathematical principles. Even the circumstances that favored the development of human species aren’t that special.”—

    Well that’s a lie right? Because I said only that (a) life is a deterministic solution to entropy, (b) is appears that (and is logically) rare – at least a human scales of perception and action, and (c) it is simply a fact that the universe is hostile to our life form, and (d) that even here on earth life has been all but exterminated on a regular basis.

    —-“That we can created math disproves a god.” That we can describe mathematics proves we are an aspect of this universe that can come to understand itself. Self-consciousness is possible in the human form (of which the introverted, intuitive thinking type is closest to enlightenment), and since the universe favors the evolution of the human form, as evidenced by our existence, it favors self-consciousness. You and I are the universe attaining its telos. The subjective aspect of mathematics “wants” to experience life (of course, it’s eternal so it never dies, but simply being is “boring”, whereas becoming is great fun). And there’s your free will, the engine of creativity. A deterministic universe, in which the eventual development of human life is guaranteed, grants the maximum experience of free will and excitement of discovery. It’s the best of all possible worlds.”—

    The universe, in order to be able to ‘understand itself’ would have to have a means of maintaining memory of prior states in order to identify categories, of changes in state of constant relations.

    So no. Self consciousness is available to humans because we have finally produced enough capacity to organize changes in state and contemplate alternatives and therefore choose them. As far as I know this is the result of our extraordinary brain to body ratio, extraordinary modeling ability, and the need to serialize language (storytell) in order to communicate in serial symbols of continuous disambiguation.

    There is a method by which matter within the universe can be organized to retain state, but there is no method by which the universe can retain a continuous stream of states, and if it could it would ahve the ability to choose, and if it had the ability to choose the universe would not be deterministic everywhere we look, and therefore we could not describe the universe in human scale language using the deflationary grammar of constant relations that we call mathematics.

    And let this be a lesson to you and others, that unless you can reduce your ideas to a sequence of operations in operational language that you can easily fool yourself.

    This was Aristotle’s lesson to Plato.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 10:15:00 UTC

  • “YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT GODS”– I’m not wrong about gods at all. The only question

    —“YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT GODS”–

    I’m not wrong about gods at all. The only question is whether it’s possible for not-quite-humans to function without an imaginary pack leader acting as a unit of measurement.

    I mean, women demonstrate NAXALT, and men demonstrate INTENTIONALITY, and by both demonstrations we can identify the not-yet-human, not yet possessing agency, and therefore not yet capable of sovereignty.

    Now, I know why the weak mind needs such lies. But the question is, can we train the weak mind to possess sufficient agency that it does not need these lies.

    It should be possible for many.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 09:44:00 UTC

  • Is Objective Morality Possible? how Do We Know?

    It’s actually pretty easy: 1) Empirically, (in-group) law evolved everywhere using a test of reciprocity. Even norms demand reciprocity. All that differs is the local organization of rights and obligations that produce various forms of reciprocity under various group evolutionary strategies. 2) Empirically, (out-group) international law, that is insulated by differences as a compromise between differences is reducible to reciprocity. 3) Logically, (internal consistency) all questions of conflict are in fact decidable by the test of reciprocity, and it is the only decidability that exists that I know of. 4) Scientifically (Axelrod) (operationally), no organism can both cooperate (produce outsized returns), and not (a) preserve defection (cheating), and (b) require reciprocity (prevent parasitism), and (c) buy options on cooperation (invest) to incentivize cooperation, and (d) practice altruistic punishment (costly punishment) in order to preserve the incentive to cooperate without going extinct. So: 0 – Parties must be able to negotiate a contract for cooperation and remember success or failure for cooperation to exist. (We cannot cooperate with animals. They aren’t conscious enough to do so, or to hold to commitments.) 1 – Objective morality (reciprocity) is in fact ‘reciprocity’. 2 – Moral norms (networks of reciprocity) 3 – Moral intuitions ( individual intuition of reciprocity given one’s reproductive/survival needs) 4 – Moral actions are limited to fully informed, warrantied, productive, voluntary exchange free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality. And 1 – Restoration of reciprocity by forgiveness (investment in future forgiveness) 2 – restoration of reciprocity by restitution 3 – restoration of reciprocity by restitution and punishment 4 – restoration of incentive for reciprocity by restitution and death. Ergo 1 – one may take no action one may not perform restitution for. All of which pretty much are reflected in the common law of tort.

  • Is Objective Morality Possible? how Do We Know?

    It’s actually pretty easy: 1) Empirically, (in-group) law evolved everywhere using a test of reciprocity. Even norms demand reciprocity. All that differs is the local organization of rights and obligations that produce various forms of reciprocity under various group evolutionary strategies. 2) Empirically, (out-group) international law, that is insulated by differences as a compromise between differences is reducible to reciprocity. 3) Logically, (internal consistency) all questions of conflict are in fact decidable by the test of reciprocity, and it is the only decidability that exists that I know of. 4) Scientifically (Axelrod) (operationally), no organism can both cooperate (produce outsized returns), and not (a) preserve defection (cheating), and (b) require reciprocity (prevent parasitism), and (c) buy options on cooperation (invest) to incentivize cooperation, and (d) practice altruistic punishment (costly punishment) in order to preserve the incentive to cooperate without going extinct. So: 0 – Parties must be able to negotiate a contract for cooperation and remember success or failure for cooperation to exist. (We cannot cooperate with animals. They aren’t conscious enough to do so, or to hold to commitments.) 1 – Objective morality (reciprocity) is in fact ‘reciprocity’. 2 – Moral norms (networks of reciprocity) 3 – Moral intuitions ( individual intuition of reciprocity given one’s reproductive/survival needs) 4 – Moral actions are limited to fully informed, warrantied, productive, voluntary exchange free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality. And 1 – Restoration of reciprocity by forgiveness (investment in future forgiveness) 2 – restoration of reciprocity by restitution 3 – restoration of reciprocity by restitution and punishment 4 – restoration of incentive for reciprocity by restitution and death. Ergo 1 – one may take no action one may not perform restitution for. All of which pretty much are reflected in the common law of tort.