Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • NO, AD HOM IN PROSECUTION IS NOT A DOUBLE STANDARD. —“How can [we] complain ab

    NO, AD HOM IN PROSECUTION IS NOT A DOUBLE STANDARD.

    —“How can [we] complain about ridicule, but then habitually use terms like “white knight” and “shieldmaiden””—

    1 – Reciprocity. Always (a) return the insult, (b) return to the central argument, (c) stay with the argument until the opponent is defeated or retreats.

    2 – Prosecution vs Coercion: Ad hom used in prosecuting attempted theft by coercion – the moral, vs ad hom as means of coercion in perpetuation of a theft – the immoral.

    3 – Usually (I run into this a lot) accusations of contradiction are only attempted frauds of false equality. Either one is trying to commit a theft or not. Ad hom for theft is simply true. Ad claiming equality when one is a prosecutor of attempted theft and another is an attempted thief, is just another attempted theft by fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-25 10:18:00 UTC

  • WHY IS CHRISTIANITY GOOD? Exhaustive Extension kinship love to near kin is the o

    WHY IS CHRISTIANITY GOOD?
    Exhaustive Extension kinship love to near kin is the optimum cooperative strategy.
    Exhaustive investment in personal acts of charity demonstrates that optimum cooperative strategy.
    The church outlawed cousin marriage
    The church revived natural law

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-24 14:12:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999654345716174848

  • WHY IS CHRISTIANITY GOOD? Exhaustive Extension kinship love to near kin is the o

    WHY IS CHRISTIANITY GOOD?

    Exhaustive Extension kinship love to near kin is the optimum cooperative strategy.

    Exhaustive investment in personal acts of charity demonstrates that optimum cooperative strategy.

    The church continued the stoic tradition of extirpation of hatred from the human heart.

    The church outlawed cousin marriage

    The church revived natural law under the scholastics.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-24 10:12:00 UTC

  • Why Is (was) Psychology a Pseudoscience?

    —“You said Psychology is not a science. Can you explain this argument as you have done with Marxism? Thanks”—Jamie Watson PSEUDOSCIENCE (AND RELIGION – THE FEMININE) (a) based entirely upon projection – with no empirical content (meaning ‘no system of measurement’), (b) framed as authoritarian (monopoly) demand for homogeneity as its system of measurement (c) framed as deviation from a non-existent but feminine norm: (d) framed as guilt for deviation from the authoritarian, feminine, norm. (e) The scary one: Freud (using oppression into baseline) was trying to reverse Nietzsche (using freedom to exit baseline). Freud was just creating a pseudoscientific counter-revolution for the female mind(collectivism) against the restoration of the male mind(individualism) by Nietzsche. (Just as Marx and Boaz were creating a counter-revolution against Darwin. Just as Rousseau and Kant a counter-revolution against Locke/Smith/Hume/Newton.) SCIENCE (AND LAW – THE MASCULINE ) (a) all behavior is in pursuit of acquisitions (“man is acquisitive”) of every possible utility – “discounts on risk and calories”. (b) all emotions are reactions to changes in state of past, present, and future acquisitions – nothing more. Rewards for training a brain that can learn to acquire. (c) all emotions, personality traits, all cognition, and therefore all behavior are biased by the different reproductive strategies of males and females. (wolves(M-eugenic) vs deer(F-dysgenic)) (d) all acquisition-seeking is biased by class (familial, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value) to others – in other words, the classes demonstrate biases that reflect the needs of their classes in competition-and-cooperation with the other classes. (e) We have a limited number of biological reward systems, and those reward systems appear to map to stages of the prey drive (our operational lifecycle) intersecting with our reproductive drives. We describe these variations in reward systems as personality factors and traits. (f) ….. (more in an hour…. need to play chauffeur for my niece – my favorite munchkin.)….

  • Why Is (was) Psychology a Pseudoscience?

    —“You said Psychology is not a science. Can you explain this argument as you have done with Marxism? Thanks”—Jamie Watson PSEUDOSCIENCE (AND RELIGION – THE FEMININE) (a) based entirely upon projection – with no empirical content (meaning ‘no system of measurement’), (b) framed as authoritarian (monopoly) demand for homogeneity as its system of measurement (c) framed as deviation from a non-existent but feminine norm: (d) framed as guilt for deviation from the authoritarian, feminine, norm. (e) The scary one: Freud (using oppression into baseline) was trying to reverse Nietzsche (using freedom to exit baseline). Freud was just creating a pseudoscientific counter-revolution for the female mind(collectivism) against the restoration of the male mind(individualism) by Nietzsche. (Just as Marx and Boaz were creating a counter-revolution against Darwin. Just as Rousseau and Kant a counter-revolution against Locke/Smith/Hume/Newton.) SCIENCE (AND LAW – THE MASCULINE ) (a) all behavior is in pursuit of acquisitions (“man is acquisitive”) of every possible utility – “discounts on risk and calories”. (b) all emotions are reactions to changes in state of past, present, and future acquisitions – nothing more. Rewards for training a brain that can learn to acquire. (c) all emotions, personality traits, all cognition, and therefore all behavior are biased by the different reproductive strategies of males and females. (wolves(M-eugenic) vs deer(F-dysgenic)) (d) all acquisition-seeking is biased by class (familial, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value) to others – in other words, the classes demonstrate biases that reflect the needs of their classes in competition-and-cooperation with the other classes. (e) We have a limited number of biological reward systems, and those reward systems appear to map to stages of the prey drive (our operational lifecycle) intersecting with our reproductive drives. We describe these variations in reward systems as personality factors and traits. (f) ….. (more in an hour…. need to play chauffeur for my niece – my favorite munchkin.)….

  • UM, UNDERCLASS REPRODUCTION IS OPPRESSION OF THE ENTIRE POLITY. —“The classes

    UM, UNDERCLASS REPRODUCTION IS OPPRESSION OF THE ENTIRE POLITY.

    —“The classes were not oppressed, but domesticated through the use of organized violence, manorialism, and religion to cull sufficient numbers from the population that only those not a drag on the rest of humanity remained.”—Curt Doolittle

    —“Um since when does this so-called “domestication” not count as oppression?”—Ian Heckman, PhD student in philosophy.

    I think most of us call it ‘the minimum eugenics necessary to insure the median agency of the population exceeds the median demands of competitive survival’.

    I mean, evidence is evidence: The single best investment people can make in developing a high trust polity with a standard of living above the malthusian limit is to cull the underclasses as aggressively as possible.

    So by any and every measure, underclass reproduction oppresses the entirety of the polity and keeps them in violence, low trust, poverty, and disease.

    It’s my job to state the truth. It’s up to other people what they do with it.

    —NOTE TO CLARIFY—

    —“the mean value the third generation of children are regressing to is the mean of their respective families”—Jayman

    You don’t regress to the mean of the population but to the mean of your respective families. Due to sortition, populations (which are collections of families) tend to regress to the mean of the collection of families.

    https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/regression-to-the-mean/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-23 11:45:00 UTC

  • NON ARGUMENT. Russia can INVENT technology but it must SELL it. They are too poo

    NON ARGUMENT. Russia can INVENT technology but it must SELL it. They are too poor to accumulate/use it. They have an economy equal to Texas and Italy. Putin restored Order.Then he restored Pride. Now he will restore the Economy. And he is still the most spectacular leader living.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 15:48:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998591255373320195

    Reply addressees: @ForeignPolicy @jensstoltenberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998590501480747010

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ForeignPolicy

    “We don’t want a new Cold War. We don’t want a new arms race.”

    In an interview with Foreign Policy, @jensstoltenberg cautioned against a new arms race with Russia:

    https://t.co/R4p8nZVErB

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998590501480747010

  • ???? Fascism was a rational, successful, and necessary counter-reaction to Bolsh

    ???? Fascism was a rational, successful, and necessary counter-reaction to Bolshevism and Marxism. National Socialism vs World Communism. The degree to which people manufacture pseudoscientific justifications of priors is what causes chaos. Truth is mercilessly orderly.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 14:15:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998568087782912003

    Reply addressees: @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998566933665669120

    IN REPLY TO:

    @sapinker

    Why we need more science in the humanities: Madeleine Albright argues that chaos causes Fascism. Proof? Germany, Italy etc. were chaotic then Fascist. Um, what about the countries that were chaotic but didn’t become Fascist? https://t.co/GVYKaZB7Gp

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998566933665669120

  • Nielsen data during the product tampering era taught us that “Any Opportunity To

    Nielsen data during the product tampering era taught us that “Any Opportunity To Exert Power Via Media Will Be Copied”, and all we are doing with reporting is increasing incentives. They stopped reporting and tampering went down.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 14:10:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998566814127882240

    Reply addressees: @nytdavidbrooks @mises

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998238271439278082

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DavidBrooks224

    On Meet The Press I mentioned that school shooting rates have been plummeting since the 1990s, causing some outrage and shock on Twitter. Here’s a write up of the data. 4X as many kids were killed per year back then. https://t.co/4DrZ0wyFSt

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998238271439278082

  • The folly of that argument is that there exists a continuous stream of people (g

    The folly of that argument is that there exists a continuous stream of people (generations) approaching that point in their development of understanding, seeking anchors of decidability, and all future decisions will be weighted by those anchors. We keep ideas alive.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 12:51:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998546734845517825

    Reply addressees: @OldBookClub @KalishJantzen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998517673825718273

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998517673825718273