Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • 1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 9:12 PMNeither of the iss

    1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 9:12 PMNeither of the issues Stiglitz mentions will make any difference because the problem we face is (a) human capital is no longer in reserve in europe, but underperforming from the third world, (b) we have concentrated all growth in a few immigrant cities that are all on the edge of bankruptcy, and these are so expensive they have become ovary graveyards; and (c) proximity creates hostility because of signaling competition and cannot be fixed. There is no reason that what failed in levantine/semitic civilization will not fail here in western civilization. (d) the reason that we are in decline is reproductive redistribution downward and a continuous drop in human capital because of it, and this is caused by (e) the consumption of all income produced the the addition of women into the workforce by taxation and redistribution to said underclasses, and (f) the financialization of the economy wherein trillions are extracted from working families but not under and upper classes, thereby creating the reproductive redistribution. On top of that (g) unions caused the industrial, technological, and job flight. GM alone is priced out of the market by intergenerational rents that cannot possibly be paid, and should never have been tolerated as a legal obligation.

    I can’t even believe he’s dishonest and incompetent enough to even make those two nonsense arguments.

    Hence why I write so much about economic pseudoscience, particularly via Krugman, Stiglitz, and DeLong.

    I am fairly sure they know what evil they do, and they do it precisely because it is evil.Updated Oct 7, 2019, 11:24 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 11:24:00 UTC

  • That the swiss model is optimum especially with Rifles, RPGs, Mines, and Nuclear

    That the swiss model is optimum especially with Rifles, RPGs, Mines, and Nuclear Weapons – all territorial denial weapons but impossible to use for aggression – is true, but the mountains serve like england’s seas. But where are you going to get a switzerland without a war?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 22:11:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180968857864933381

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180967942953017344

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LLaddon The caliphate (Spain), Iceland (Denmark), The free Cities (Holy Roman Empire) and the Pale (Poland, Lithuania, then Russia), America (England), and the 20th (America, Israel), were all borderlands permitted some autonomy by the empire in exchange for taxation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180967942953017344

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LLaddon The caliphate (Spain), Iceland (Denmark), The free Cities (Holy Roman Empire) and the Pale (Poland, Lithuania, then Russia), America (England), and the 20th (America, Israel), were all borderlands permitted some autonomy by the empire in exchange for taxation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180967942953017344

  • I don’t ‘believe’ much, but in general, it appears capital punishment is certain

    I don’t ‘believe’ much, but in general, it appears capital punishment is certainly preferable than its absence. Our ancient ancestors didn’t practice it until the romans except for adultery and cowardice in battle – they called it sacrifice instead, and put criminals to good use.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 21:38:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180960608470159360

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180896965661474817

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180896965661474817

  • I would consider a unified revolt impossible and foolish. However, neither the g

    I would consider a unified revolt impossible and foolish. However, neither the government nor the world thought leadership considers that a threat. Instead a distributed, cyclically self reinforcing conflict – like the one we are seeing evolve every single day. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 21:34:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180959642152837126

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180928256884854787

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180928256884854787

  • And this is why services business can survive in cities and production cannot, a

    And this is why services business can survive in cities and production cannot, and why production must eventually move offshore. Density is not the advantage people think it is. Every doubling of population produces 20% more – of both goods and bads.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 22:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180609395568369664

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423 @RobertJamesHurd

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180608967292133376

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ClownBa73413423 @RobertJamesHurd They can say no all they want, but there is even an economic law named for the effect. And so I would love to see examples. The Baumol effect is universal, and every city demonstrates this. All urban centers are in competition between advantages of density, and employee payroll.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180608967292133376

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ClownBa73413423 @RobertJamesHurd They can say no all they want, but there is even an economic law named for the effect. And so I would love to see examples. The Baumol effect is universal, and every city demonstrates this. All urban centers are in competition between advantages of density, and employee payroll.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180608967292133376

  • I don’t think you get it. I’m not undermining just postmodernism, or feminism, o

    I don’t think you get it. I’m not undermining just postmodernism, or feminism, or neoconservatism, or libertarianism, or christianity, or judaism, or islam. I’m undermining the means of LYING used by each of them and restoring Western Civilization:TRUTH,SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 19:57:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180572843584737280

  • Restitution is easy. The Prevention will be brutal. Because we must create a pun

    Restitution is easy. The Prevention will be brutal. Because we must create a punishment that provides sufficient incentive, that the repetition of the female strategy of undermining civilization, evolution, and our transcendence into the gods we imagine is ever again attempted.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:58:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180512655745994753

    Reply addressees: @nytopinion

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @nytopinion So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples? Our law requires Restitution and Prevention.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @nytopinion So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples? Our law requires Restitution and Prevention.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637

  • TRUST IN IGNORANCE VS UNDERSTANDING IN KNOWLEDGE —“I just don’t trust him [Doo

    TRUST IN IGNORANCE VS UNDERSTANDING IN KNOWLEDGE

    —“I just don’t trust him [Doolittle]”—

    You should never trust a thinker. You should only determine the truth or falsehood of his theories.

    If you cannot determine that truth or falsehood of his statements two things are occurring: either you lack the knowledge and ability, or the thinker is uninterested in bearing the expense of teaching you sufficient knowledge that you, with your ability, are able to determine the truth or falsehood of the statement.

    You must trust a person who has made you a promise, but you falsify an argument. There is no trust involved except in yourself, and your ability to comprehend that argument.

    What you mean is that a person does not share your emotional reactions to statements, or agree with your frame of reference. But at every standard deviation of ability we are incompatible, and at every two standard deviations we are incomprehensible to one another. To make matters worse we can speak in operational, pseudoscientific, historical, ideal(logical), sophomoric(philosophical) and occult (religious) terms at these same levels of complexity, which is why we have always had elites selling competing narratives and theories all of them.

    I don’t pander, which is what you want: someone you feel comfortable controlling you. Instead, I practice the aristocratic strategy of seeking for men who can rise above needing control.

    So, I don’t want your trust. I want you to have sufficient agency so that you don’t need to. Because if you need to trust, then you lack the agency to determine the truth or falsehood yourself.

    My goal is only to give you that agency. I will only ‘lead’ as a last resort, for having to fail to manufacture by my work, leaders better than I at leading.

    That’s the goal of western civilization: men who develop agency sufficient to insure one another and police the private and common. We created the only civilization that industrialized the development of agency regardless of rank. Every other did not – although the Chinese did try at least for the bureaucratic class.

    So understand my arguments or don’t. But don’t trust me. It means you have failed – and so have I.

    And if you must trust, you deserve the fate those you trust deliver unto you – which so far, it appears, you have chosen poorly.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 10:00:00 UTC

  • Because you MUST obey a law under threat of violence, but it is not possible any

    Because you MUST obey a law under threat of violence, but it is not possible any longer to get even a majority to ‘believe’ in a fantasy parable for the purpose of obtaining mindfulness given their lack of status ad agency in the existential world -which is the reason for it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 18:45:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180192213936087040

    Reply addressees: @EvolaJesus @PoseidonAwoke @JohnMarkSays @Algernon_Sydney @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180191602784002054

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EvolaJesus @PoseidonAwoke @JohnMarkSays @Algernon_Sydney @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite You can argue we need binding narrative. You can argue it needs legal, rational-moral,and occult-emotional contents, because many people do need the sedating effect of the illusion of control provided by a common values and strategy. But not pilpul,critique,false promise,hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180191602784002054

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EvolaJesus @PoseidonAwoke @JohnMarkSays @Algernon_Sydney @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite You can argue we need binding narrative. You can argue it needs legal, rational-moral,and occult-emotional contents, because many people do need the sedating effect of the illusion of control provided by a common values and strategy. But not pilpul,critique,false promise,hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180191602784002054

  • So you can clutch at straws but the only ACTIONABLE means of defeating the enemy

    So you can clutch at straws but the only ACTIONABLE means of defeating the enemy is through a market for suppression of their means of undermining and parasitism by means of the law in all walks of life.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 18:44:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180191928689795073

    Reply addressees: @EvolaJesus @PoseidonAwoke @JohnMarkSays @Algernon_Sydney @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180191602784002054

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EvolaJesus @PoseidonAwoke @JohnMarkSays @Algernon_Sydney @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite You can argue we need binding narrative. You can argue it needs legal, rational-moral,and occult-emotional contents, because many people do need the sedating effect of the illusion of control provided by a common values and strategy. But not pilpul,critique,false promise,hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180191602784002054

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EvolaJesus @PoseidonAwoke @JohnMarkSays @Algernon_Sydney @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite You can argue we need binding narrative. You can argue it needs legal, rational-moral,and occult-emotional contents, because many people do need the sedating effect of the illusion of control provided by a common values and strategy. But not pilpul,critique,false promise,hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180191602784002054