(core) [S]cience absolutely positively can tell you about ethics and morality. And it has. Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species. There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances. So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information. So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality. And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive. Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good Quod erat demonstrandum Thus endeth the lesson. fin.
Form: Argument
-
YES ETHICS (INTERPERSONAL) MORALITY (EXTRAPERSONAL) IS A SCIENTIFIC LAW (core) S
YES ETHICS (INTERPERSONAL) MORALITY (EXTRAPERSONAL) IS A SCIENTIFIC LAW
(core)
Science absolutely positively can tell you about ethics and morality.
Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species.
There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances.
So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information.
So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality.
And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive.
Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good
Quod erat demonstrandum
Thus endeth the lesson.
fin.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 13:47:00 UTC
-
YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO. —“No he’s not, he’s
YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.
—“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b
Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement.
(a) Eugenics would work.
(b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition.
We don’t do it.
SO STOP LYING.
We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs.
So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry.
What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom?
Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means.
People like you are a cancer for mankind.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 12:28:00 UTC
-
NO. TOLL ROADS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNDER P-CONSTITUTION —-“How would P-Law handl
NO. TOLL ROADS ARE NOT PERMITTED UNDER P-CONSTITUTION
—-“How would P-Law handle toll roads. More specifically, our current highway into Houston is a regular tax funded highway, with an oversized median between the two directional lanes… however they’re in the process of building a new toll road in the median & converting the current highway into a feeder road with all the hassles of stop lights. At present, it’s a 45 minute non stop trip on a publically paid for highway. How would P-law handle the govt changing our current highway into a toll road?”—Clinton McLaggan
It’s a debatable and technical point, however, P-Constitution prohibits toll roads. While at first blush it would appear possible under natural law, its a violation of two criteria: first, the only necessary right of a commons – of movement in two dimensional space, and secondly: it’s open to rent seeking – a fee without contributing to production. In other words if you want a road you can build one, but you can’t create such a commons and extract tolls for it. Same for bridges. Not for ferries.
NOTE:
One of P’s prohibitions is non-exclusory use of property. Meaning you can’t wall someone out of access to territory. This is a very old common law tradition. If you want to wall something off you have to provide passage along the borders.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 21:10:00 UTC
-
“it’s Hard to Get on Board with Monarchy”
Feb 12, 2020, 9:53 AM “IT’S HARD TO GET ON BOARD WITH MONARCHY” [I] wasn’t on board with it either. It’s just eventually I couldn’t deny it any longer. Constitutional monarchy with power of veto, termination of ministers, dissolution of parliament. That’s all. Monarchy = Kinship government, and Intergenerational Incentives, and capitalization rather than tragedy of the commons, and compensates for fashion, political, and procedural failure. The enemy wanted to end our monarchy to replace it with an organized crime family.
-
“it’s Hard to Get on Board with Monarchy”
Feb 12, 2020, 9:53 AM “IT’S HARD TO GET ON BOARD WITH MONARCHY” [I] wasn’t on board with it either. It’s just eventually I couldn’t deny it any longer. Constitutional monarchy with power of veto, termination of ministers, dissolution of parliament. That’s all. Monarchy = Kinship government, and Intergenerational Incentives, and capitalization rather than tragedy of the commons, and compensates for fashion, political, and procedural failure. The enemy wanted to end our monarchy to replace it with an organized crime family.
-
Greatest Mistakes
Feb 12, 2020, 11:12 AM [T]he greatest mistakes our country made were not letting the south secede, expanding the franchise to those unproductive and lacking responsibility, and the Hart-Celler Act to open the gates to the underclasses – destroying the American experiment in a third way: middle-class civ. These are followed closely by tolerating the postwar suppression of the American eugenics movement, and not brutally crushing the communist movement, Marxist-postmodernist movements. We were tolerant in Greek, Roman, Germanic, and British civilizations. Tolerance is a weakness, not a virtue.
-
Greatest Mistakes
Feb 12, 2020, 11:12 AM [T]he greatest mistakes our country made were not letting the south secede, expanding the franchise to those unproductive and lacking responsibility, and the Hart-Celler Act to open the gates to the underclasses – destroying the American experiment in a third way: middle-class civ. These are followed closely by tolerating the postwar suppression of the American eugenics movement, and not brutally crushing the communist movement, Marxist-postmodernist movements. We were tolerant in Greek, Roman, Germanic, and British civilizations. Tolerance is a weakness, not a virtue.
-
Educate, Don’t Compromise
Feb 12, 2020, 11:43 AM [D]o not compromise because of people’s ignorance. Educate. We have to reverse the entire Marxist, Cultural Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, Multiculturalist, Denialist era of false promise, baiting into hazard, as a means of destroying the market between the classes, the rule of law of reciprocity, and the myths, history, traditions, that made our civilization possible. Yes. Heroism, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Monarchy, Cabinet, Senate, Industry, Commons, and Dependents (Church), and markets in everything where we suppress the reproduction of the unproductive and divert the proceeds to the production of intergenerational continuously capitalizing commons. If you want socialism, then leave. you have a whole world willing to take you. If you want western civilization and the proceeds of it, then there is only one country left to have it. And we are going to keep it, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you.
-
Educate, Don’t Compromise
Feb 12, 2020, 11:43 AM [D]o not compromise because of people’s ignorance. Educate. We have to reverse the entire Marxist, Cultural Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, Multiculturalist, Denialist era of false promise, baiting into hazard, as a means of destroying the market between the classes, the rule of law of reciprocity, and the myths, history, traditions, that made our civilization possible. Yes. Heroism, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Monarchy, Cabinet, Senate, Industry, Commons, and Dependents (Church), and markets in everything where we suppress the reproduction of the unproductive and divert the proceeds to the production of intergenerational continuously capitalizing commons. If you want socialism, then leave. you have a whole world willing to take you. If you want western civilization and the proceeds of it, then there is only one country left to have it. And we are going to keep it, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you.