Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy

    Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, and political market values, determined by those traits, we are socially(normatively), economically(competitively), and politically (demands for commons), incompatible.

    Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer

  • Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy

    Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, and political market values, determined by those traits, we are socially(normatively), economically(competitively), and politically (demands for commons), incompatible.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 19:39:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267178822698520576

    Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267178489897201665

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, resulting trait distributions, particularly conscientiousness and intelligence produce different ‘challenges’ in normalizing behavior between groups.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1267178489897201665

  • Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice.

      And suppressing justice is conspiracy to commit a crime. We don’t hate. We do, I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the Abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: lying. No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit; Whether: – Supernatural: Jewish/Christian/Muslim, or – Pseudoscientific: Marxist/Boasian/Freudian/Cantorian, or – Innumerate: Statistical/Economic/Financial/Consumer Credit. – Sophistry: Postmodern/Feminist/Identitarian, – Denial: Politically-Correct, With false promises of: – Individual, Gender, Class, Nation, Race, Species Equality of: – ability, potential, outcome, value to others; To Circumvent – Power-Law, Pareto-Capital, and Nash-Reward distributions; – The Necessity of market eugenics, and prevention of non-market dysgenics. With The False Promise of – Universalism, Globalism, Monotheism; Are Over. – The Century of Lies is Over. – Welcome to The World’s Renaissance. No More Lies Truth or False = Truth/falsehood, (meaningful) Innocence or Crime = Reciprocity/Harm-Theft-Fraud (meaningful) Love or Hate = Approval/Disapproval (meaningless) Any Argument to: – Approval or Disapproval, – Love or Hate, When the question is: – True or False, or – Innocence or Crime; Constitutes: – Conspiracy to commit: – Deceit or Crime: And Can Only Be Judged: – A Crime. Demanding; – Restitution; – Punishment;

    [fin]

    Edit

  • Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice.

      And suppressing justice is conspiracy to commit a crime. We don’t hate. We do, I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the Abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: lying. No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit; Whether: – Supernatural: Jewish/Christian/Muslim, or – Pseudoscientific: Marxist/Boasian/Freudian/Cantorian, or – Innumerate: Statistical/Economic/Financial/Consumer Credit. – Sophistry: Postmodern/Feminist/Identitarian, – Denial: Politically-Correct, With false promises of: – Individual, Gender, Class, Nation, Race, Species Equality of: – ability, potential, outcome, value to others; To Circumvent – Power-Law, Pareto-Capital, and Nash-Reward distributions; – The Necessity of market eugenics, and prevention of non-market dysgenics. With The False Promise of – Universalism, Globalism, Monotheism; Are Over. – The Century of Lies is Over. – Welcome to The World’s Renaissance. No More Lies Truth or False = Truth/falsehood, (meaningful) Innocence or Crime = Reciprocity/Harm-Theft-Fraud (meaningful) Love or Hate = Approval/Disapproval (meaningless) Any Argument to: – Approval or Disapproval, – Love or Hate, When the question is: – True or False, or – Innocence or Crime; Constitutes: – Conspiracy to commit: – Deceit or Crime: And Can Only Be Judged: – A Crime. Demanding; – Restitution; – Punishment;

    [fin]

    Edit

  • Sorry but I Am Not Wrong on Monarchy.

    Sorry but I am not wrong on Monarchy. I don’t make errors. Read Hoppe Monarchy is the last line of defense against the failure of institutions to protect the people from usurpation by incremental or direct means. Monarchy has the optimum incentive for the production of arts and aesthetic commons that persist traditions. Monarchy has the optimum incentives to persist the nation, the people, people their genes as a family. Monarchy prevents the displacement of human heads of the national family with supernatural, or ideological heads of the national family. Washington’s only mistake was not taking the position of king and thereby preventing the civil war and the undermining of our people in the postwar period by eastern european jewish intellectuals intent on creating the same ‘license’ that they had in the Pale. If elizabeth was not fearful OF speaking out she would. She is merely waiting out the ‘democratic experiment’ which is rapidly coming to an end. We restore europe by restoring monarchies, and thereby restoring nation states, with ‘free cities’ for those who are less conforming, but want the benefits of our superior social political legal economic, and intellectual order. Cheers

  • Sorry but I Am Not Wrong on Monarchy.

    Sorry but I am not wrong on Monarchy. I don’t make errors. Read Hoppe Monarchy is the last line of defense against the failure of institutions to protect the people from usurpation by incremental or direct means. Monarchy has the optimum incentive for the production of arts and aesthetic commons that persist traditions. Monarchy has the optimum incentives to persist the nation, the people, people their genes as a family. Monarchy prevents the displacement of human heads of the national family with supernatural, or ideological heads of the national family. Washington’s only mistake was not taking the position of king and thereby preventing the civil war and the undermining of our people in the postwar period by eastern european jewish intellectuals intent on creating the same ‘license’ that they had in the Pale. If elizabeth was not fearful OF speaking out she would. She is merely waiting out the ‘democratic experiment’ which is rapidly coming to an end. We restore europe by restoring monarchies, and thereby restoring nation states, with ‘free cities’ for those who are less conforming, but want the benefits of our superior social political legal economic, and intellectual order. Cheers

  • A Monarch=judge of Last Resort (not Monarchy = Government),

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:50 PM

    A monarch=judge of last resort (not monarchy = government), is the last line of defense against the fashions of the people. I’m sorry. Data is data. Evidence is evidence. If elizabeth could survive pulling the plug and restoring british sovereignty, (and she should be able to) then the political ambitions of the evil people in the world could easily be overcome.

  • A Monarch=judge of Last Resort (not Monarchy = Government),

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:50 PM

    A monarch=judge of last resort (not monarchy = government), is the last line of defense against the fashions of the people. I’m sorry. Data is data. Evidence is evidence. If elizabeth could survive pulling the plug and restoring british sovereignty, (and she should be able to) then the political ambitions of the evil people in the world could easily be overcome.

  • I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments.

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:53 PM I think this is the dumbest thing to argue with me about. I mean, our presidency has failed compared to both monarchy and parliaments. Our supreme court has failed more so than the house of lords. The whole purpose of rule of law and a monarch is to DENY PEOPLE POWER OVER OUR PEOPLE. What did democracy do? It created a means by which to obtain political power, and it created means of circumventing the market in the service of one another to do so. I … I just don’t understand some people. It’s fking obvious. Who is it that’s always harping on me about Schmidt and Authority needed for Exceptions? Or the utility of the Roman senate handing dictatorship to a general in time of war? I mean, wtf is wrong with people. We have a problem because hostile elite could undermine us and sieze power through a system that was WEAK.

  • I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments.

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:53 PM I think this is the dumbest thing to argue with me about. I mean, our presidency has failed compared to both monarchy and parliaments. Our supreme court has failed more so than the house of lords. The whole purpose of rule of law and a monarch is to DENY PEOPLE POWER OVER OUR PEOPLE. What did democracy do? It created a means by which to obtain political power, and it created means of circumventing the market in the service of one another to do so. I … I just don’t understand some people. It’s fking obvious. Who is it that’s always harping on me about Schmidt and Authority needed for Exceptions? Or the utility of the Roman senate handing dictatorship to a general in time of war? I mean, wtf is wrong with people. We have a problem because hostile elite could undermine us and sieze power through a system that was WEAK.