Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • NO THE CONSTITUTION AND ANGLO LAW RE NOT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT EMPIRICAL —“What is

    NO THE CONSTITUTION AND ANGLO LAW RE NOT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT EMPIRICAL

    —“What is the significance of a philosophical approach to the constitution?”—

    1 – Contrary to popular belief, the constitution is not a philosophical document.

    2 – Contrary to popular belief, the common law is not a philosophical discipline.

    3 – The natural law of tort (demonstrated interests) is purely empirical (scientific). It’s not philosophical. Philosophers only sought to explain it. We discovered it by adjudicating differences in order to end conflicts and to ‘keep the peace’ meaning ‘cooperation between members of the community’ – in particular to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). This is why the first laws do not state the law, they only standardize punishments – because the law existed, everyone knew the laws – they’re common sense. But the variation in punishments created retaliation cycles (feuds). A standard punishment demands the community enforce the punishment as ‘settlement of differences’ and ensure both parties against further feuds.

    4 – This law is predicated on self-determination, individual sovereignty to achieve it, reciprocity to maintain it, jury and court to decide it, and markets in all aspects of life as a consequence of it. (This is what other civs can’t do – get past familism or tribalism)

    5 – The constitution presumes the common law (not positive law), and articulates a market for the production of commons. It’s just another marketplace.

    6 – The constitution contains processes for transactional modification of that marketplace. The bill of rights shouldn’t be necessary (and many of the founders didn’t think so) but their failure was to define the common law sufficiently that rights weren’t necessary.

    7 – A constitution is a contract that produces a ledger for transactions under the rule of law of natural law of tort. it’s a recipe for running a legal accounting system, for the production of contracts under the natural law of tort. The ‘philosophical’ claims about the constitution are relatively recent attempts to undermine it and end rule of law.

    It’s the most boring empirical system known by man – which is why no other people in the world have constitutions – only ‘documents of nice words’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 12:51:00 UTC

  • THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY? —“Q: Which is the most developed country of the wo

    THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY?

    —“Q: Which is the most developed country of the world?”—

    GREATER GERMANIA

    (States of the Holy Roman Empire, plus the Nordics.)

    MEASUREMENT

    “Developed” requires measurement of the demographic, informational, normative, traditional, institutional, economic, technological question OFFSET by population decline, dysgenia (decline in human capital), immigration of declines in human capital.

    CAUSES

    A small homogenous population, with a long history of market and agrarian eugenics, in a reasonably large territory, with few local competitors, needing limited military expenditure, and because of a history of market and agrarian eugenics and therefore possessed of superior demographics, can produce sufficient surplus, to continuously improve human capital (cultural indoctrination, education, training, successful production, research, development), and to produce sufficient commons to maintain those people, and maintain economic competition.

    WHY GERMANIA?

    Norway has oil. Switzerland has banking. Even so, Greater Germania is most developed: Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland. Why? Emphasis on Quality (Excellence) at all levels of the society; Highest Trust(and justified) in the World; Cultural predisposition to Duty; Cultural predisposition to hierarchy.

    WHY NOT THE ANGLOSPHERE?

    Germania is Followed by the anglosphere (UK, CA, NZ, USA, with USA’s higher credit capacity, lower taxes, and higher consumption masking its lack of development. Empires always destroy the home population, and the Anglosphere (British Empire) is paying the cost of empires seeking profits at the expense of the natural population that birthed them.

    If not for a tiny number of companies Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft)) is rapidly becoming a 3rd world country because it is only now 1/2 European, and 40% black or Hispanic or ‘other’ third world peoples. USA will be a second if not third world country by 2050, even if it preserves a viable military – and Mexico and mexican-Hispanic peoples will be the dominant majority -effectively reconquering the south and southwest.

    Why? Women voters. The pill. No-fault divorce, Financialization to defeat the soviets, Jewish sponsorship of immigration, the academic undermining of European civilization to advance their one-world socialism, the export of research, technology and industry to China, import of Hispanic assembly and manual labor and export of assembly labor to Mexico.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 12:36:00 UTC

  • THE FACTORS OF CHINESE ECONOMIC GROWTH – AND CHINA ISN’T COMMUNIST – IT’S NAZI –

    THE FACTORS OF CHINESE ECONOMIC GROWTH – AND CHINA ISN’T COMMUNIST – IT’S NAZI

    —“CURT: What are the factors of economic growth in China as a communist country?”—

    1) They have a devoted, nationalistic, (chip on the shoulder) red army, convinced of ethnic and cultural superiority, and china’s destiny to return to its traditional position as ‘the center of the world’ that can force implementation of policy.

    2) They have an authoritarian government, running the empire as a business, that’s backed by that army that can force policy

    3) They have a very long tradition of professional bureaucracy and ‘grow’ leadership by the gradual promotion of those who are successful at local levels to increasing degrees of responsibility.

    4) They have a vast labor pool – the only cheap labor pool with a +100 IQ – meaning the most industrializable pool of poor remaining in the world.

    5) They use intelligence (Spies), their international students and citizens as spies and thieves, and conduct outright thefts, by every means possible to obtain technology and use their cheap labor and technology to slowly take over world industrial production (just as the USA did to Europe in the (1800’s), and how Americans and Russians stole and took advantage of german technology postwar.

    6) They use the invention of Regan era American financial credit system (digital money) to make all these investments so that they didn’t have to use the communist model of forced labor in order to afford it – and therefore avoided the communist-socialist problem of ‘incentives and impossibility of economic calculation’.

    HOWEVER

    China is a Fascist, not a communist country. We can’t face this painful truth yet, but the Chinese didn’t copy the communists – they aren’t a communist government. Instead, they copied the Nazis – they are a Fascist Government.

    Fascism: Nationalist, Racist, Autarkic, Mixed Economy, Opposition to Jewish Cosmopolitanism (one-world government principles, subjugating all, depriving people of sovereignty, and self-determination). And opposition to American Meritocracy, Democracy – the failed project to spread democracy beyond northern European peoples who are uniquely able to practice it because of genetics and culture and institutions.

    And what the Chinese have done, as the Germans did, is prove that Fascism, not democracy, not social democracy, not communism, won the war of political models of the 19th and 20th Centuries.

    Why? Because (a) intolerance for political competition, (good), (b) ethnocentrism (racism), (c) desperate attempt to maintain legitimacy by keeping the people happy, (good), (d) using debt (state capitalism) instead of forced labor (state socialism), (good), (e) creating an economy rather than a military (good), (f) using that economy to build the world’s dominant military (good). (g) so that they can replace the USA’s dollar as a reserve currency (good), and become the dominant power in the world (i dunno if that’s good).

    China isn’t communist. It’s Nazi.

    And just as the Nazis would have without the entirety of the developed world going to war with them – they are going to win.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 12:05:00 UTC

  • THE MILITIA IS FIRST BEFORE ARMS —“I admire Poland for many things they are do

    THE MILITIA IS FIRST BEFORE ARMS

    —“I admire Poland for many things they are doing now.”—Stewart Colley

    —“Let’s hope they repeal their gun laws”—Josh Burda

    Ooh.. gotta answer that one.

    Lesson from Russia: you don’t convert to consumer capitalism without first establishing rule of law.

    Lesson for the world: you don’t convert to an armed populace without first establishing military service and a militial tradition.

    If anything, the past month has made me understand that the cognitive class-tribes of men can only be united by military training where words do not matter, only empirical evidence, truthful testimony, and duty to one another before all else.

    Men > Military Service (at last boot camp and two years of continuous operations – even just training – ‘in the field’, three years is optimum because that’s the length of the human forgetting curve necessary to truly transform. > Quarterly militia practice for military, disaster, medical, or riot control.

    This is our most profound secret to success.

    Military > Empiricism+Testimony > duty > invsetment in the commons > Status regardless of rank > ‘insurance’ regardless of rank.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 11:29:00 UTC

  • “Going After” all Right factions

    YES I GO AFTER EVERYONE – BECAUSE UNITY IS ONLY POSSIBLE ON WHAT WE AGREE ON: SELF DETERMINATION, SOVEREIGNTY AND RECIPROCITY. The law is the only neutral territory between factions. Just as science is the only neutral territory between factions. Because law and science are the same. I go after the left because I have solved the problem of the left, and everyone agrees on it. The left lies to steal. And they lie to steal because they are unfit to compete in an advanced economy. Or because they gain social status by virtue signaling for finding a place in it. It’s not complicated. They lie to steal or defraud. The left was easy – they put herd before self-confidence. (For obvious reasons of female seeking advantage by self-sacrifice to the herd.) The right isn’t easy – they put self-confidence before the pack. (For obvious male reasons of seeking advantage using whatever abilities they have.) I go after the NS because they are the impulsive ‘slow kids’ of the Europeans, that can’t imagine the difficulty of large complex organizations, and how large complex organizations must be run: by general rules we call legislation, regulation, and law. I go after WN because they are the correct, experienced, but unsophisticated kids of the Europeans, that can’t imagine that the conservative tendency to distill ideas to the reductive leads to failure – and that a more sophisticated strategy is necessary to win. I go after CN because they are willfully ignorant – and too comfortable to risk saving their civilization and are willing to ride the civilization to the bottom rather than save it. I go after our elites because they have abandoned our people – they have given up on trying to unite the self-absorbed egos of the right factions – they consider it a hopeless task. They don’t care any longer about our people or their future. I go after libertarians because they are the reasonably intelligent but self-absorbed naive boys that cannot imagine the minds of emotional people, and have no experience with large scale organizations, and therefore human nature. I go after Christians because they are indifferent from the left, they just promise life after death for belief in falsehood instead of prosperity before death for belief in falsehood. You don’t see pagans voting for democrats, teaching pseudoscience (creationism), sponsoring immigration, sponsoring tolerance, tolerating pedophiles, virtue signaling for belief (instead of actions), tolerating this nonsense. You see Christians doing it all day long. No respect for cowards hiding behind lies of fake virtue to excuse doing nothing but demanding better men solve their problems. Thats why christanity is femiine. “Men will do it” Because in history the male aristocracy DID do it. Edit

  • “Going After” all Right factions

    YES I GO AFTER EVERYONE – BECAUSE UNITY IS ONLY POSSIBLE ON WHAT WE AGREE ON: SELF DETERMINATION, SOVEREIGNTY AND RECIPROCITY. The law is the only neutral territory between factions. Just as science is the only neutral territory between factions. Because law and science are the same. I go after the left because I have solved the problem of the left, and everyone agrees on it. The left lies to steal. And they lie to steal because they are unfit to compete in an advanced economy. Or because they gain social status by virtue signaling for finding a place in it. It’s not complicated. They lie to steal or defraud. The left was easy – they put herd before self-confidence. (For obvious reasons of female seeking advantage by self-sacrifice to the herd.) The right isn’t easy – they put self-confidence before the pack. (For obvious male reasons of seeking advantage using whatever abilities they have.) I go after the NS because they are the impulsive ‘slow kids’ of the Europeans, that can’t imagine the difficulty of large complex organizations, and how large complex organizations must be run: by general rules we call legislation, regulation, and law. I go after WN because they are the correct, experienced, but unsophisticated kids of the Europeans, that can’t imagine that the conservative tendency to distill ideas to the reductive leads to failure – and that a more sophisticated strategy is necessary to win. I go after CN because they are willfully ignorant – and too comfortable to risk saving their civilization and are willing to ride the civilization to the bottom rather than save it. I go after our elites because they have abandoned our people – they have given up on trying to unite the self-absorbed egos of the right factions – they consider it a hopeless task. They don’t care any longer about our people or their future. I go after libertarians because they are the reasonably intelligent but self-absorbed naive boys that cannot imagine the minds of emotional people, and have no experience with large scale organizations, and therefore human nature. I go after Christians because they are indifferent from the left, they just promise life after death for belief in falsehood instead of prosperity before death for belief in falsehood. You don’t see pagans voting for democrats, teaching pseudoscience (creationism), sponsoring immigration, sponsoring tolerance, tolerating pedophiles, virtue signaling for belief (instead of actions), tolerating this nonsense. You see Christians doing it all day long. No respect for cowards hiding behind lies of fake virtue to excuse doing nothing but demanding better men solve their problems. Thats why christanity is femiine. “Men will do it” Because in history the male aristocracy DID do it. Edit

  • EUGENICS —“The only necessary policy: Forced sterilization of the dependent su

    EUGENICS

    —“The only necessary policy: Forced sterilization of the dependent sub-90’s would be the only policy necessary. Since 90 floats on the average, this policy would never have to change.”—

    That’s called ‘positive’ (or hard) eugenics’.

    Well, we did it successfully prewar. But the postwar (a)propaganda (b) prohibition on research (c) pseudointellectual movements of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism are all predicated on suppressing this one continuation of natural selection. The industrial revolution ended it. And that means eugenics is a great filter, and that the end result is extinction.

    —“Not only will no one agree to this, but it has to be one of the darkest and most horrific approaches to dealing with ‘double-digiters’. A better way imo would be a 1 or no child policy for welfare.”—

    That’s called ‘negative’ (or soft) eugneics.

    Of course – that’s the right policy. 😉

    And it’s what’s in our Constitutional recommendations.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 14:18:00 UTC

  • YES I GO AFTER EVERYONE – BECAUSE UNITY IS ONLY POSSIBLE ON WHAT WE AGREE ON: SE

    YES I GO AFTER EVERYONE – BECAUSE UNITY IS ONLY POSSIBLE ON WHAT WE AGREE ON: SELF DETERMINATION, SOVEREIGNTY AND RECIPROCITY.

    The law is the only neutral territory between factions. Just as science is the only neutral territory between factions. Because law and science are the same.

    I go after the left because I have solved the problem of the left, and everyone agrees on it. The left lies to steal. And they lie to steal because they are unfit to compete in an advanced economy. Or because they gain social status by virtue signaling for finding a place in it. It’s not complicated. They lie to steal or defraud.

    The left was easy – they put herd before self-confidence. (For obvious reasons of female seeking advantage by self-sacrifice to the herd.)

    The right isn’t easy – they put self-confidence before the pack. (For obvious male reasons of seeking advantage using whatever abilities they have.)

    I go after the NS because they are the impulsive ‘slow kids’ of the Europeans, that can’t imagine the difficulty of large complex organizations, and how large complex organizations must be run: by general rules we call legislation, regulation, and law.

    I go after WN because they are the correct, experienced, but unsophisticated kids of the Europeans, that can’t imagine that the conservative tendency to distill ideas to the reductive leads to failure – and that a more sophisticated strategy is necessary to win.

    I go after CN because they are willfully ignorant – and too comfortable to risk saving their civilization and are willing to ride the civilization to the bottom rather than save it.

    I go after our elites because they have abandoned our people – they have given up on trying to unite the self-absorbed egos of the right factions – they consider it a hopeless task. They don’t care any longer about our people or their future.

    I go after libertarians because they are the reasonably intelligent but self-absorbed naive boys that cannot imagine the minds of emotional people, and have no experience with large scale organizations, and therefore human nature.

    I go after Christians because they are indifferent from the left, they just promise life after death for belief in falsehood instead of prosperity before death for belief in falsehood.

    You don’t see pagans voting for democrats, teaching pseudoscience (creationism), sponsoring immigration, sponsoring tolerance, tolerating pedophiles, virtue signaling for belief (instead of actions), tolerating this nonsense.

    You see Christians doing it all day long.

    No respect for cowards hiding behind lies of fake virtue to excuse doing nothing but demanding better men solve their problems.

    Thats why christanity is femiine.

    “Men will do it”

    Because in history the male aristocracy DID do it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 11:22:00 UTC

  • You aren’t thinking this thru. (a) Shame the behavior you want to be suppressed

    You aren’t thinking this thru. (a) Shame the behavior you want to be suppressed (b) Don’t shame the people suppressing the behavior.

    I get this all the time: People can’t disambiguate shaming the deceitful, criminal, unethical, and immoral, versus shaming to disapprove.

    Reply addressees: @erikhk47

  • We don’t do protests. We don’t have to pay for people to attend. We don’t have t

    We don’t do protests. We don’t have to pay for people to attend. We don’t have to pay people by looting. We don’t have to excite people by burning businesses. We don’t have to topple statures or burn cathedrals.

    We just have to war.
    Coming soon to a neighborhood near you. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-18 18:21:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284553984691273730

    Reply addressees: @SocialIntellig5 @TheAzureAqua @davidhogg111 @SocialistRA @AMarch4OurLives

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284533496678055936