Form: Argument

“Regarding there are no races” Stop lying. Debate is over. Even David Reich, the best in the industry, has come out publicly. People like you are preventing the development of policy that will compensate for vast differences in developmental biology. There are five generations of humans … 1 – Old African and the African coastal disaspora @ 62 … 2 – New African (East African rift valley urheimat) @67 … 3 – South Eurasian (dry Persian gulf urheimat) @85 … 4 – Siberian American @85. (Polar @90) … 5 – West Eurasian (European European and Ancestral North Eurasian Urheimats) @100 … 6 – East Asian (Tibetan Plateau Urheimat) @105 With each caused by isolation and partial speciation by neotenic evolution. There are significant genetic and biological differences between the races, most importantly being: … 1 – neotenic evolution, … 2 – rate of development and maturity, … 3 – selection for gracile form, … 4 – selection for self-regulation. That resulted in significant increases in: … 1 – cerebral volume … 2 – intelligence, … 3 – sociability, and … 4 – conscientiousness (lower aggression) Caucasian is no longer a meaningful term since the genetics are clearly: … 1 – African (in at least three main groups) … 2 – South Eurasian from north Africa to India. … 3 – And western hunter-gatherer from Spain to the Urals. … 4 – East Asian – with recent developments, we know the east Asians speciated on the plateau. East Asians were in a cold climate longer, with less admixture because of the impenetrability of the mountains, plateaus, and desert and were able to evolve the greatest degree of neoteny. Europeans are the youngest race as the hybridization of western hunter-gatherers, Anatolian farmers (south Europe), with ancestral North Eurasians (the most recent isolate and the most recent sub-speciation), and the European steppe herders, forming a cline from south to north. Northern Europeans have been practicing aggressive selection for thousands of years, especially by manorialism after 700 above the Hajnal line (Germanics) and then after 1200 with the aggressive hanging of as much as 1% of the population per decade. This Soft Eugenics  (“Genetic Pacification” by others) resulted in the downward distribution of the genetic middle class, enabling the Germanic immigration to America without harm. This eugenic process was reversed after 1968 by design with intent, because of the useful idiots that were indoctrinated into the pseudoscientific religion to deny it. WHY? With intent of malice the postwar Marxists, neo-marxists, and postmodernists set out to ‘**destroy the institutions of cultural production’** in the west as they had done in Russia with communism, and had tried but failed to do in Germany. They stated it clearly, in public, in writing, with frequency: having failed at weaponizing the lower classes against the middle class because capitalism was in fact most beneficial to the laboring and working classes, they were moving to America to weaponize the African Americans against the middle class where the economy could never fix the divergence in income, status, or political utility. The scheme was possible because of the introduction of women into the voting pool, the introduction of women into ‘colleges’, the intuitions of women (predominantly to harm care, with disregard to loyalty, hierarchy, and sanctity) and the intentional replacement of academics with pseudoscientists, and the tendency of women to vote by emotional affiliation rather than national interest. To accomplish this act of war, they made four false promises: … 1) the end of scarcity, … 2) the nature of man. … 3) the malleability of man, and one lie … 4) the myth of oppression – when instead, man had self domesticated for at least 60K years, if not 2m years. And that we were no different from any other domesticated animal. But despite those false promises and that lie, … (a) scarcity is permanent and there is no possibility of unlimited growth, and we are past planetary sustainability if we are to continue with caloric manipulation necessary for continued evolution, … (b) man is amoral, reciprocal, proportional, and acts only as morally as he can get away with, … (c) nature-nurture is over, and it’s 80% nature and 20% idiosyncratic development. … (d) IQ and conscientiousness determine all outcomes in life, and IQ reverts to genetic distribution over time no matter what we do. The differences in races are due to differences in generations of neotenic evolution. The classes are different due to accumulated genetic load (defect). The sexes vary largely in lateral (female-quantity-empathy) vs longitudinal connectivity(male-speed-systematizing), and in hormonal variation producing stereotypical behaviors common to most domesticatable species. Personality, morality, political bias, and Intellectual differences are also stereotypical. With males and females diverging to prefer the satisfaction of instincts the more freedom they have to do so – rather than converging as pseudoscientists had expected. Intelligence and the size of the underclass are the most and exclusively influential factor in the organization of a polity by 1) a power distribution of regulation and administration, 2) a Pareto distribution of assets to produce incentives, and 3) a Nash distribution of rewards for the population. There is zero variation from this fact in every single measure in every single society in every single country. So the fundamental problem of races is a rather great disparity in intelligence, and therefore social-economic, and political status, and therefore PROXIMITY CREATES HOSTILITY  and  it does not lift less-biologically-advantaged people up but drags more-biologically-advantaged people to down in behavior (Something that every animal trainer in the world is painfully familiar with.) This is why the three great programs of the soviets failed in the united states among heterogeneous people where they succeeded in Russia among homogenous people: generating demand for authority by undermining institutions of cultural production: … 1) relocation of underclasses to urban areas to undermining social cohesion and pro-social behavior, … 2) forced integration that undermines trust, social cohesion and pro-social behavior … 3) educational indoctrination at the expense of educational quality and competitive results, that undermines knowledge, the economy, the polity, and the institutions of the cultural production of which education is of the most influence – at least in the absence of home indoctrination in religion. That’s the science, that’s the history, that’s the truth – so no more lies. No more pseudoscience. Solve the problem. Stop contributing to the suicide of civilization.  

“Regarding there are no races” Stop lying. Debate is over. Even David Reich, the best in the industry, has come out publicly. People like you are preventing the development of policy that will compensate for vast differences in developmental biology. There are five generations of humans … 1 – Old African and the African coastal disaspora @ 62 … 2 – New African (East African rift valley urheimat) @67 … 3 – South Eurasian (dry Persian gulf urheimat) @85 … 4 – Siberian American @85. (Polar @90) … 5 – West Eurasian (European European and Ancestral North Eurasian Urheimats) @100 … 6 – East Asian (Tibetan Plateau Urheimat) @105 With each caused by isolation and partial speciation by neotenic evolution. There are significant genetic and biological differences between the races, most importantly being: … 1 – neotenic evolution, … 2 – rate of development and maturity, … 3 – selection for gracile form, … 4 – selection for self-regulation. That resulted in significant increases in: … 1 – cerebral volume … 2 – intelligence, … 3 – sociability, and … 4 – conscientiousness (lower aggression) Caucasian is no longer a meaningful term since the genetics are clearly: … 1 – African (in at least three main groups) … 2 – South Eurasian from north Africa to India. … 3 – And western hunter-gatherer from Spain to the Urals. … 4 – East Asian – with recent developments, we know the east Asians speciated on the plateau. East Asians were in a cold climate longer, with less admixture because of the impenetrability of the mountains, plateaus, and desert and were able to evolve the greatest degree of neoteny. Europeans are the youngest race as the hybridization of western hunter-gatherers, Anatolian farmers (south Europe), with ancestral North Eurasians (the most recent isolate and the most recent sub-speciation), and the European steppe herders, forming a cline from south to north. Northern Europeans have been practicing aggressive selection for thousands of years, especially by manorialism after 700 above the Hajnal line (Germanics) and then after 1200 with the aggressive hanging of as much as 1% of the population per decade. This Soft Eugenics  (“Genetic Pacification” by others) resulted in the downward distribution of the genetic middle class, enabling the Germanic immigration to America without harm. This eugenic process was reversed after 1968 by design with intent, because of the useful idiots that were indoctrinated into the pseudoscientific religion to deny it. WHY? With intent of malice the postwar Marxists, neo-marxists, and postmodernists set out to ‘**destroy the institutions of cultural production’** in the west as they had done in Russia with communism, and had tried but failed to do in Germany. They stated it clearly, in public, in writing, with frequency: having failed at weaponizing the lower classes against the middle class because capitalism was in fact most beneficial to the laboring and working classes, they were moving to America to weaponize the African Americans against the middle class where the economy could never fix the divergence in income, status, or political utility. The scheme was possible because of the introduction of women into the voting pool, the introduction of women into ‘colleges’, the intuitions of women (predominantly to harm care, with disregard to loyalty, hierarchy, and sanctity) and the intentional replacement of academics with pseudoscientists, and the tendency of women to vote by emotional affiliation rather than national interest. To accomplish this act of war, they made four false promises: … 1) the end of scarcity, … 2) the nature of man. … 3) the malleability of man, and one lie … 4) the myth of oppression – when instead, man had self domesticated for at least 60K years, if not 2m years. And that we were no different from any other domesticated animal. But despite those false promises and that lie, … (a) scarcity is permanent and there is no possibility of unlimited growth, and we are past planetary sustainability if we are to continue with caloric manipulation necessary for continued evolution, … (b) man is amoral, reciprocal, proportional, and acts only as morally as he can get away with, … (c) nature-nurture is over, and it’s 80% nature and 20% idiosyncratic development. … (d) IQ and conscientiousness determine all outcomes in life, and IQ reverts to genetic distribution over time no matter what we do. The differences in races are due to differences in generations of neotenic evolution. The classes are different due to accumulated genetic load (defect). The sexes vary largely in lateral (female-quantity-empathy) vs longitudinal connectivity(male-speed-systematizing), and in hormonal variation producing stereotypical behaviors common to most domesticatable species. Personality, morality, political bias, and Intellectual differences are also stereotypical. With males and females diverging to prefer the satisfaction of instincts the more freedom they have to do so – rather than converging as pseudoscientists had expected. Intelligence and the size of the underclass are the most and exclusively influential factor in the organization of a polity by 1) a power distribution of regulation and administration, 2) a Pareto distribution of assets to produce incentives, and 3) a Nash distribution of rewards for the population. There is zero variation from this fact in every single measure in every single society in every single country. So the fundamental problem of races is a rather great disparity in intelligence, and therefore social-economic, and political status, and therefore PROXIMITY CREATES HOSTILITY  and  it does not lift less-biologically-advantaged people up but drags more-biologically-advantaged people to down in behavior (Something that every animal trainer in the world is painfully familiar with.) This is why the three great programs of the soviets failed in the united states among heterogeneous people where they succeeded in Russia among homogenous people: generating demand for authority by undermining institutions of cultural production: … 1) relocation of underclasses to urban areas to undermining social cohesion and pro-social behavior, … 2) forced integration that undermines trust, social cohesion and pro-social behavior … 3) educational indoctrination at the expense of educational quality and competitive results, that undermines knowledge, the economy, the polity, and the institutions of the cultural production of which education is of the most influence – at least in the absence of home indoctrination in religion. That’s the science, that’s the history, that’s the truth – so no more lies. No more pseudoscience. Solve the problem. Stop contributing to the suicide of civilization.