You see, all other civilizations failed to discover, obey, and apply truth: God’s logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Only the European aristocracy survived god’s test. So he sent Jesus to tell the rest how to tolerate the European ‘Way’: Love.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 00:42:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387930239150563335
The reason that a war against western civilization is possible is that we didn’t have the equivalent of sharia–torah. And our law is insufficient to defend us against warfare by female means. And we can’t build or tolerate a Chinese fascism.
Problem solved. We have our Law.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 23:53:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387917897939529732
You want a government office that makes a difference? Legislate a 12 Year Office to repatriate every aspect of strategic industry, at zero interest, over 20 years, from the treasury, regardless of cost, and staff it by over 40’s from the top biz consulting firms.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 22:15:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386443729322627076
Imagine you have nearly infinite resources and produce a digital currency and prosecute anyone and everyone who uses any other currency until only criminals use that currency.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-24 01:01:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385760811029864453
Reply addressees: @fubuloubu
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385739731233816584
Group differences in IQ DO have a genetic component – because group differences consist of increases in domestication syndrome (neoteny) in groups, determining the scal of the right of the curve. Although the group mean is determined by the agrarian underclass size reduction.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 02:32:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384334034973642752
Reply addressees: @gmukunda @sullydish @rasmansa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383982378121449481
“Have you read” as a question to create a common context for subsequent discussion, is different from whether one is evading an argument. Either you can make an authors argument or you cannot claim your premises depend on understanding it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 00:07:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384297526665256968
Reply addressees: @james__jenko
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384288055800995847
the “Have you read…. ” argument. My response is always the same. “Either you can make the author’s argument or you can’t. If you can’t make it you can’t claim it. You’re just engaged in evasion and deceit.”
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-19 04:21:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383999152011419655
8) All of these (six) factors produce a problem for members of every race other than the upper-middle class of that race. This is because humans value status and self-image more than anything other than life.
9) so while the upper-middle class can travel the world successfully, the upper and lower classes organize in defense of one another, as elites gain status prestige and wealth seeking political-economic and demographic advantage for the lower and middle classes that can’t compete with other races – within the same polity.
10) so the painful truth is that globalization and race-mixing favors the upper-middle class, at the cost of the middle, working, laboring, and dependent classes.
11) and that America has a foreign, hostile, upper-middle-class that is conducting war on the anglo and germanic and scots Irish middle, working, and laboring classes as well as the anglo upper classes.
12) we know that this was done on purpose and it’s well documented – this is an act of war just like the bolshevik revolution in Russia and the Marxist revolution in Germany were acts of war against the host people – offering false and impossible promises to the underclasses by claiming they were oppressed rather than uncompetitive in the new industrial and technological world that made their relative prosperity possible.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 00:41:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066560230179862
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066558909416161
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
5) And the genetic distribution (size of the underclass) in each race varies by the latitude of its history, and this genetic distribution causes demand for behavior, norms, culture, institutions, and most importantly status. These factors combine to create demand for different norms, traditions, values, institutions. This is the underlying issue. People who would be compatible in separate states because they could cooperate by trade are not compatible in polities, social orders, neighborhoods because their biological interests require different socio-economic-political conditions. Mostly, this is due to the fact that some groups can afford high investment parenting (East Asians), other high investment parenting in the commons (Europeans), and others pay high costs of parenting in the first place due to the rate of maturity of their offspring (islam, africa). So PROXIMITY CAUSES FRICTION AND ENVY which creates HOSTILITY. 6) there are at least four to six generations of mankind, that we call races, that progressively isolated, adapted, and as they moved north produced neoteny so that the East Asians are the most neotenic, the Europeans next, the south Eurasians (north Africa to India) next, and the various Africans least. So the Africans have the most rapid maturity and aggression, followed by the middle east, followed by various others, followed by Europeans, with east Asians far out ahead in neoteny such that they live longer too. Let’s note that there is a limit to the return on neotenic development. 7) the most taboo topic is the difference in IQ between the races that’s due to neotenic evolution and increased cranial volume because of longer development cycles. This does not mean that races determine intelligence. It means that the size of the underclass determines the racial average of intelligence, so a lower racial intelligence only means that they were unsuccessful at reducing the size of the underclass in warmer climates – and people in cold climates, and cold climates under agrarianism more so. The primary difference in IQ between the races has to do with male-spatial, female-verbal biases, and the number of outliers they produce over 140 because of a slightly wider standard deviation. (Ashkenazim). … more …
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066558909416161
5) And the genetic distribution (size of the underclass) in each race varies by the latitude of its history, and this genetic distribution causes demand for behavior, norms, culture, institutions, and most importantly status. These factors combine to create demand for different norms, traditions, values, institutions. This is the underlying issue. People who would be compatible in separate states because they could cooperate by trade are not compatible in polities, social orders, neighborhoods because their biological interests require different socio-economic-political conditions. Mostly, this is due to the fact that some groups can afford high investment parenting (East Asians), other high investment parenting in the commons (Europeans), and others pay high costs of parenting in the first place due to the rate of maturity of their offspring (islam, africa). So PROXIMITY CAUSES FRICTION AND ENVY which creates HOSTILITY.
6) there are at least four to six generations of mankind, that we call races, that progressively isolated, adapted, and as they moved north produced neoteny so that the East Asians are the most neotenic, the Europeans next, the south Eurasians (north Africa to India) next, and the various Africans least. So the Africans have the most rapid maturity and aggression, followed by the middle east, followed by various others, followed by Europeans, with east Asians far out ahead in neoteny such that they live longer too. Let’s note that there is a limit to the return on neotenic development.
7) the most taboo topic is the difference in IQ between the races that’s due to neotenic evolution and increased cranial volume because of longer development cycles. This does not mean that races determine intelligence. It means that the size of the underclass determines the racial average of intelligence, so a lower racial intelligence only means that they were unsuccessful at reducing the size of the underclass in warmer climates – and people in cold climates, and cold climates under agrarianism more so. The primary difference in IQ between the races has to do with male-spatial, female-verbal biases, and the number of outliers they produce over 140 because of a slightly wider standard deviation. (Ashkenazim).
… more …
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 00:40:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066558909416161
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066556523739154
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
You cannot judge a person by the properties of his class (race, religion, culture, class ), but you can judge a class (race, religion, culture, class) by the properties of its people. In other words. there are good people in every race, and bad people in every race. That said, 1) all people are biased toward their race, with that bias increasing with stress, and decreasing with lack of social, economic, political stress, and increasing with the ability to virtue signal at other race member’s expense. 2) All but a small percentage of people marry, reproduce, work with, live in neighborhoods with, and associate with members of their race, class, religion etc. 3) Human Sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by not only symmetry and health but the degree of neotenic evolution. 4) Differences in neotenic evolution cause races to mature at different rates, and reach different depts of maturity. This manifests as higher aggression and lower executive function and lower accomplishment, to just the opposite. And these behavioral differences that only mediate in relatively old age. …more…
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066556523739154
1) Asian men will tolerate worse living conditions in exchange for the income (cultural)
2) Black and Hispanics don’t produce enough outliers per capita to move the statistical needle (Asians do).
3) Programming is second only to mathematics.
Don’t get mad at me for the truth.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-14 23:40:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382479017060806658
Reply addressees: @pewresearch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382471996152365056