Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Why do you blame white people when your people are a fraction of the population,

    Why do you blame white people when your people are a fraction of the population, are the least self regulating of the races, commit an absurdly disproportionate amount of crime, and kill an equally disproportionate number of white people? Fix your people. You and yours are the problem. Fix your families. Fix your discipline. Fix your culture. If necessary get back into religion. And don’t blame whites for economic disparities given the standard deviation of difference in intelligence – something that is only going to get worse as increasing percentages of your population are unable to self regulate, behave, and learn behaviors that are necessary for survival in a modern economies. The problem for black people is the person you see when you look in the mirror. Fix yourselves.

    Reply addressees: @JamaalBowmanNY

    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 00:33:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866642331711197184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866552100995428779

  • I have no ego involved. I am in the business of ending ignorance, error, bias an

    I have no ego involved. I am in the business of ending ignorance, error, bias and deceit. And I have a moral obligation as one with ability and knowledge to prevent harms to the informational commons by the lies of people like you who wish to spread ignorance and falsehoods.
    My emotions have nothing to do with it.
    You would need to put forth an argument that states how consciousness is produced other than that which I have stated. That won’t be possible (I know it isn’t’). But I have mastered nearly every field of human inquiry, so I have an advantage in such things.

    Reply addressees: @iEslam @DaveShapi

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-28 17:09:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862181970924691456

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862180342150402450

  • I made an argument. It is the most reductive argument possible. It is the outcom

    I made an argument. It is the most reductive argument possible. It is the outcome of the science. I may have been earlier than most in this understanding, but multiple books will be published in the next year on the subject by primary researchers in the field.

    As LLMs are presently illustrating, and advancements in the queue demonstrating, it’s just memory of memory of memory all the way down, in a continuous stream.

    If you had an argument instead of an assertion you would make it. But (a) there is no phenomena that cannot be explained by basic neuroscience, (b) you have put forth no argument to counter with neuroscience.

    In general my people tell me not to wste my time with silly people, but it helps those in the process of learning to observe the spectrum of errors, biases, and deceits made use of by those of you who assert what you cannot testify to – and therefore lie.

    Reply addressees: @iEslam @DaveShapi

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-28 17:03:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862180582593372163

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862178783618314548

  • Sam, you’re wrong. Consciousness is a deterministic consequence of a sufficient

    Sam, you’re wrong. Consciousness is a deterministic consequence of a sufficient quantity of neurons in sufficiently recursive hierarchy. Sorry. In retrospect it’s not even complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-28 15:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862150515922223430

    Reply addressees: @iEslam @DaveShapi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861628891598615029

  • Theology and philosophy vs Science and law. EMJ is correct but you have to agree

    Theology and philosophy vs Science and law. EMJ is correct but you have to agree with it and can’t engineer it. Our work is correct and it’s not possible to disagree with and you can engineer it. The problem is only some version of religion will teach the positive behavior. We…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-26 19:19:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861489995481260296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861488203317838092

  • NO EUROPEANS AREN’T POLITICALLY VIRTUOUS –“Health Care? Denmark does not have t

    NO EUROPEANS AREN’T POLITICALLY VIRTUOUS
    –“Health Care? Denmark does not have to pay for its own defence, the US pays and guarantees protection. Imagine if the US didn’t have a military budget, and an almost equally large debt service to finance it, because another country had sworn to protect it. Yes, the USA could afford Medicare for All (which is all they need) if Americans weren’t carrying the weight of world defense, finance, distribution and trade, granting nearly unfettered access to our vast market and capital, and exporting the potential income of our working and laboring classes to encourage developing countries to join this costly international order Americans pay for. Which is precisely why Americans are returning to isolationism. And the fact that Europeans and Canadians insult Americans over this matter only encouraged Americans to return to Isolation: false virtue signaling at others’ expense, and lack of gratitude are enough to anger anyone.”–

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-23 19:27:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860404725075836928

  • RUSSIAN USE OF NUKES? (Not gonna happen) Russia cannot win a war against little

    RUSSIAN USE OF NUKES? (Not gonna happen)
    Russia cannot win a war against little Ukraine. It’s not going to win a war against NATO. It wouldn’t win a war against just France or the UK. The only thing it can do is commit suicide. They know we will never use nukes first. We don’t have to. We can just use conventional weapons to decapitate the leadership (which we know how to do) and to destroy what remains of the army, navy, and air force.
    The only reason the USA isn’t keen on using conventional weapons is that we used the peace dividend to shrink our forces, draw down the supply of ammunition and missiles and archive the supply chain. Trump will fix that. But it will take two or three years.
    People always act rationally. And people in power do not make silly petty moralizing decisions like common people do.

    CD

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-23 19:14:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860401473642987520

  • RUSSIA-UKRAINE DEAL? Russia (RU) perceives a need for the two eastern provinces

    RUSSIA-UKRAINE DEAL?
    Russia (RU) perceives a need for the two eastern provinces of Luhansk and Donetsk where they have control – and they don’t need what they limited control over in the southern of Zaporizhia and Kherson which are Ukraine’s (UA) coastal ports and some of their best growing regions. And of course RU will fight hard for Crimea because it’s their only warm water port, and it gives them access to the oil regions in the black sea, preventing Ukraine from accessing them. Strategically UA can’t give up the southern provinces and allow RU to seize a future opportunity to take the Odessa region, and attempt to seize moldova – making Ukraine geologically bound and prohibited from shipping lanes.
    I would offer Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea and return Zaporizhia and Kherson. This would maintain RU dependence on the bridge to Crimea, but it would maintain UA access to the seas which it needs to export it’s agricultural and manufacturing products (the food that feeds a lot of people).
    IMO Trump is just trying to get Europe to pay their way. And in particular, to force germany to follow France and England, and now Poland into full armament including nuclear armament and nuclear power.
    I have a vague idea of what Trump will offer to RU, and it could include very different and more expansive strategy than is not stated in the media. He might even offer them full integration, which is what they require for their survival.

    CD

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-23 19:04:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860399043450667011

  • Islam is successful in the 80 IQ range. Islamic civ averages 84. We presume that

    Islam is successful in the 80 IQ range. Islamic civ averages 84. We presume that both christianity (90s) and aristotelianism (modern western thought, 100s) is sufficient for populations of (a) lower neotenic evolution (b) lower impulse regulation, and (c) lower IQ that can compensate for lower impulse regulation. But it’s not.
    Islam’s excessive use of ritual and repetition in a public forum substitutes for self regulation, and obedience substitutes for learning. It’s also a religion of irresponsibility, which is quite the opposite of christianity, and utterly opposed to the western tradition both pre-and-post-christian. The western tradition is reducible to the institutionalization of the maximization of individual responsibility.
    That’s why other people’s can’t do it (other than the japanese and koreans). It requires neoteny, iq, and continous institutional reinforcement.

    Reply addressees: @_GallusGallus_ @DanielB02277937 @GeneralVeritass @VDHanson

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 22:17:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859722740909080576

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859676033538269240

  • Robert is wrong. Power law over capital is not only optimum but necessary. Paret

    Robert is wrong. Power law over capital is not only optimum but necessary. Pareto must rule. The question isn’t capital it’s income and assets sufficient for risk moderation. As such our people are under insured, under paid, overburdened with consumer interest, and over taxed.…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 19:43:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859684010928329055

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859318335256584473