—“Being ‘Nice’ is just using the herd to hide”—Nick Heywood
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-05 16:47:00 UTC
—“Being ‘Nice’ is just using the herd to hide”—Nick Heywood
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-05 16:47:00 UTC
Being ‘nice’ is the whole problem. It’s like postmodern parenting: responsibility avoidance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-05 10:14:00 UTC
War isn’t. Peace is.
Poverty isn’t, Wealth is.
Self Interest isn’t. Cooperation is.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-05 08:18:00 UTC
There are many useful means of free association (conflation) but only one means of falsification (deflation). Justificationism is false.
The question is not what is true such that we can make an excuse, so that we can claim justification for preference, but whether we engage in falsehood, deception, reciprocity, and externality. Wisdom lit is full of falsehood, deception, suggestion, obscurantism reciprocity and externality.
So solving for a truth claim in wisdom lit is simply an act of fraud. What you mean is ‘it works to satisfy a need’. Whether or not it ‘s true reciprocal, and free of externality is still open to question regardless of opinion.
The question then is wheher something is preferable yet not false, irreciprocal and plagued with externatlities
That is the only wisdom we need understand.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 22:21:00 UTC
The reason we have cognitive science is because psychology was pure nonsense and so a group branched off to create a science where previously there was none.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 21:17:00 UTC
As far as I know the ‘Collapse’ model is correct: civilizations expand – like all human opportunities – until the underclasses, now enabled, conquer them. This is true for 3500 bc, 1200bc, 400ad, and 1900ad.
As far as I know the ‘Collapse’ model is correct: civilizations expand – like all human opportunities – until the underclasses, now enabled, conquer them. This is true for 3500 bc, 1200bc, 400ad, and 1900ad.
If I could reduce the question of our age to a simple comparison, the academy is still trying to produce wisdom lit of low offense, while i produce natural law, and the hard sciences produce physical law, regardless of offense. The reason the academy could replace the church was that they produced wisdom lit in every possible fictionalism, and did not produce natural law – and did so because there was a market for falsehood (wisdom lit) an no law prohibiting its sale.
If I could reduce the question of our age to a simple comparison, the academy is still trying to produce wisdom lit of low offense, while i produce natural law, and the hard sciences produce physical law, regardless of offense. The reason the academy could replace the church was that they produced wisdom lit in every possible fictionalism, and did not produce natural law – and did so because there was a market for falsehood (wisdom lit) an no law prohibiting its sale.